Überclok Reactor: “Überperformance” Gaming?
- Page 1:Introduction
- Page 2:Überclok, Under the Skin
- Page 3:Internal Components, Continued
- Page 4:Test System Configuration
- Page 5:Comparison System & Benchmark Settings
- Page 6:Benchmark Results - 3D Games
- Page 7:Benchmarks - 3D Games, Continued
- Page 8:Benchmarks - Audio, Video and Applications
- Page 9:Benchmarks - Synthetics
- Page 10:Benchmarks - Synthetics, Continued
- Page 11:Benchmarks - Synthetics, Continued
- Page 12:Conclusion
Benchmarks - Synthetics, Continued
PC Mark 2005’s system test gives the Überclok Reactor a 31% lead, which seems a little small considering its superior hardware and clock speeds.
The Überclok Reactor takes a much larger 57% lead in PC Mark’s CPU test.
A higher FSB has as much of an effect on memory access as higher memory speed, and the Überclok Reactor’s 445MHz FSB clock has certainly contributed to its 43% memory performance lead in PC Mark 2005.
The 8800GTX is only moderately faster than the 8800GT, but we still expected a bit more than the 17% PC Mark 2005 graphics test lead from Überclok’s overclocked cards.
A 31% hard drive performance lead by the Überclok Reactor in PC Mark 2005 is far more than we expected from its 1TB Hitachi drive.
Summary
- Introduction
- Überclok, Under the Skin
- Internal Components, Continued
- Test System Configuration
- Comparison System & Benchmark Settings
- Benchmark Results - 3D Games
- Benchmarks - 3D Games, Continued
- Benchmarks - Audio, Video and Applications
- Benchmarks - Synthetics
- Benchmarks - Synthetics, Continued
- Benchmarks - Synthetics, Continued
- Conclusion
