Samsung usually kicks off what I refer to as 'Smartwatch Launch Season Palooza', in late July, with the competition — including favorites from our best smartwatch list — following suit in the weeks following.

If 2026 is anything like the past several years, you can probably expect the new Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 — and possibly the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 — to make a mid-summer appearance, likely followed by the debut of a Google Pixel Watch 5 in late August and an Apple Watch Series 12 in mid-September.

So, what can we expect from Samsung's 2026 Galaxy Watch class? I've been following all the Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 and Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 leaks since the last generation debuted. Here's everything we think we know.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 9: Price and release date predictions

While no official Samsung launch event has been announced for summer 2026, one will almost certainly take place in July or early August. I expect the Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 and maybe the Ultra 2 to debut alongside the new Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Galaxy Z Flip 8 handhelds.

Samsung upped the starting price of last year's model, the Galaxy Watch 8, to $349, for an increase of $50 versus the Galaxy Watch 7. This puts it in line with the starting cost of the Google Pixel Watch 4. However, it's still $50 cheaper than the lowest-cost Apple Watch Series 11.

For 2026, I don't anticipate any further price increases for the Galaxy Watch 9 series. The Galaxy Watch Ultra 2, however, might end up costing a bit more than 2024's model, which debuted at $649. Keep in mind, the Apple Watch Ultra 3, its nearest competitor, starts at $799.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 9: Possible tech upgrades

While Google is rumored to be ditching Qualcomm chips for the next-gen Pixel Watch 5 in favor of an in-house designed Google Tensor chip, Samsung is allegedly doing the exact opposite.

The Galaxy Watch 8 series uses Samsung's Exynos W1000 chipset. However, an insider report, first covered by SamMobile, claims that the Galaxy Watch 9 and/or Ultra 2 might instead sport a Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear Elite chipset, which, in theory, might support headier on-device AI tasks — rather than handing them off to a paired phone — with better power efficiency than the prior generation of Galaxy Watches.

There are also reports that the Galaxy Watch 9 and/or Ultra 2 might support 5G connectivity. Apple surprised last year by bringing 5G to the entire lineup of watches, including the entry-level Apple Watch SE 3, so it seems plausible that Samsung will follow suit.

Another insider report, this time from Smartprix, suggests that the onboard 3-in-1 BioActive health sensor array will see some sort of update, which could result in better accuracy for metrics like heart rate, tracking sleep stages, and detecting chronic conditions like sleep apnea and AFib.

There have also been murmurs of non-invasive blood glucose monitoring — a smartwatch holy grail feature — launching on the next-gen Galaxy Watch series, but with little concrete evidence to go by, I suspect that the tech is not quite ready for prime time.

Speaking of wellness, expect AI to play an even bigger role in interpreting your holistic data and making recommendations.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 9: Design, display and battery rumors

Samsung shifted the core Galaxy Watch series over to its circle-ish-square case design format, first introduced on 2024's Galaxy Watch Ultra, and I don't expect the Galaxy Watch 9 or the Ultra 2 (if it exists) to look much different than their predecessors.

But what about a Galaxy Watch 9 Classic? I'm disappointed to report, dear reader, that as of writing, it doesn't appear that a clicky bezel-sporting variant of the Galaxy Watch 9 is in the cards, but, hey, I could be wrong!

Maximum screen brightness has been steadily increasing over the past several generations of Galaxy Watch, and while there's a chance we'll see the Galaxy Watch 9 top out at 4,000 nits — a 1,000-nit increase over the prior generation — I suspect that any brightness increases will be exclusive to the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2. For reference, the current-gen Galaxy Watch Ultra also boasts 3,000 nits of max brightness.

Insiders suggest that battery capacity, at least for the larger 44mm Galaxy Watch 9 model, will be about the same as the 44mm Galaxy Watch 8, 435 mAh. However, improved processing efficiency might make the newer model a little longer lasting than the previous-gen, which averages roughly 30 hours per charge (non Classic).

Samsung Galaxy Watch 9: Outlook

Ultimately, the Galaxy Watch 9 will likely look just like the Galaxy Watch 8, but an updated processor might unlock new AI-powered features and holistic tools. We also may see a slight battery life increase, along with improved onboard health-tracking tech.

No leaks or reports hint at a Galaxy Watch 9 Classic model, but a replacement to the tough-built, oversized Galaxy Watch Ultra is quite possible. Similar to the Galaxy Watch 9, an Ultra 2 will likely look similar to its predecessor, but potentially offer new, advanced wellness, fitness, and AI features.

What possible new features or specs are you hoping for most when the Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 and Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 debut? Let me know in the comments below.

More from Tom's Guide

• Your Samsung Galaxy Watch now supports blood pressure tracking — but it’s not the same as Apple’s Hypertension Alerts
• 5 reasons why I sometimes still wear a 'dumb' watch
• Garmin’s rumored screen-less wearable just might be the subscription-free Whoop rival I’ve been waiting for

Samsung first announced plans to bring blood pressure monitoring to the brand’s lineup of Galaxy smartwatches all the way back in 2019. Now, the feature is available for U.S. watch users with the Galaxy Watch 4 or newer.

This is a major milestone for Samsung, which is in an epic arms race with the competition, including not just Apple and Google but Oura, Ultrahuman, and Whoop, too, to see which brand can add real-time blood pressure monitoring to a wearable device first.

Here’s everything you need to know about blood pressure tracking on the best Samsung Galaxy Watches, including the one notable drawback of the feature.

Samsung brings blood pressure tracking to Galaxy Watch in the U.S.

It’s worth mentioning that blood pressure tracking has been available on Samsung Galaxy Watch models in markets outside of the U.S. for some time now. However, this is officially the first time that the feature has been approved for use in the U.S.

However, before you can turn your Galaxy Watch 4 or newer into an on-wrist blood pressure monitor, you’ll first need to calibrate it. This requires a traditional blood pressure cuff.

The calibration process, required every 28 days, is pretty straightforward, though. You take a reading with the old-school cuff while wearing your Galaxy Watch on the opposite wrist. The Samsung Health app provides a simple set of instructions to ensure you’re recording an accurate reading.

Once you’ve completed the steps in the app, your Galaxy Watch is ready to roll; you can now take blood pressure readings. The resulting data includes everything you’d get from a traditional blood pressure monitor, including Systolic blood pressure, Diastolic blood pressure, and pulse (heart rate).

How Samsung’s blood pressure tracking differs from Apple’s Hypertension Alerts

While Samsung’s blood pressure monitoring tech might sound similar to Apple’s Hypertension Alerts, the two function quite differently. The Apple Watch feature, for example, doesn’t require an additional device for calibration, though there is a 30-day calibration period where you’re expected to wear the device most of the time.

Hypertension Alerts on the Apple Watch also don’t result in an actual blood pressure reading; rather, an alert is only triggered if/when signs of possible hypertension are detected.

Ultimately, a combination of Apple and Samsung’s approaches to blood pressure tracking and alerts would be the best of both worlds. That said, I’m hopeful that in the near future, wearables will be able to provide accurate blood pressure readings right out of the box, without the need for calibration, along with automatic alerts if consistently high blood pressure is detected.

More from Tom's Guide

• I review smartwatches for a living, but these are 5 reasons why I sometimes still wear a 'dumb' watch
• Apple Watch Series 12 rumors — everything we know so far
• Garmin’s rumored screen-less wearable just might be the subscription-free Whoop rival I’ve been waiting for

Thanks to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, I recently rediscovered the benefits of smartwatches after a long break, allowing me to stay on top of my health. Though I tried to use the Samsung Galaxy Ring as a smartwatch replacement, it couldn’t compete with the Galaxy Watch 8’s more comprehensive feature set, cementing it as an essential part of my everyday tech. In other words, it’s a device I consider a permanent fixture in my life.

However, as I'm always switching phones for work, I ran into a real problem: I just couldn't get the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic to pair with the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL — I must have tried around 20 times without any luck.

As expected, connecting Google's own Pixel Watch 4 with the Pixel 10 Pro XL was a seamless experience, providing me with the ideal opportunity to directly compare the two smartwatches and decide which one best suited my needs.

Fitness first

On paper, the Pixel Watch 4 is the clear winner for fitness tracking — and rightly so when you consider Google’s exclusive Fitbit integration. If you’re training for a marathon, its heart rate accuracy is unmatched. Its “Cardio Load” feature (courtesy of Fitbit) is especially impressive for athletes chasing more granular fitness tracking, providing users with increased insight into how much physical strain their cardiovascular system is under during intense exercise.

But I’m not someone who runs very much or does frequent intense training — I’m simply trying to understand my overall health on a day-to-day basis. It’s the reason I appreciate the Galaxy Watch 8’s “Energy Score” feature, which essentially uses my passive data and AI to predict how much energy I’m going to have throughout the day when I wake up in the morning.

Sensor-ship

The Pixel Watch 4 is undeniably equipped with superior sensors, featuring what many consider the best multi-path heart rate tracking and continuous stress detection available in a smartwatch (as of late 2025). That accuracy is further enhanced by the integration of Fitbit’s advanced algorithms, which are widely respected, especially for their precision in tracking sleep stages.

Due to the aforementioned Fitbit integration, the Pixel Watch 4 features a cEDA (continuous ElectroDermal Activity) sensor that effectively estimates stress by monitoring subtle shifts in sweat gland activity, allowing it to measure the stress response of the wearer’s autonomic nervous system.

The cEDA sensor, while not new to Google's smartwatches (it's been around since Pixel Watch 2), has been significantly enhanced for Pixel Watch 4. A key improvement is the upgraded “Body Response” — a Fitbit algorithm that’s now much better at distinguishing between physical stress (from exercise) and mental stress. Its quicker Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 processor not only brings increased power efficiency but also contributes to more accurate tracking.

While the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 can track stress, it lacks the Pixel Watch 4's cEDA sensor, relying instead on Samsung’s “BioActive” sensor and its ability to measure Heart Rate Variability (HRV).

This means that while the Galaxy Watch 8 is effective for day-long stress monitoring, the Pixel Watch 4's cEDA sensor and Body Response algorithms offer a distinct advantage: the ability to provide proactive alerts upon detecting sudden physiological changes.

BioActivity

Of course, that’s not to take anything away from the Galaxy Watch 8’s BioActive sensor — it may not be quite as accurate when it comes to heart rate or stress monitoring, but it offers additional tracking capabilities that the Pixel Watch 4’s sensors aren’t capable of, thanks to its unique 3-in-1 stack of sensors.

That means access to Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) for estimating body composition, and blood pressure measurement via its Optical Heart Rate sensor (currently awaiting FDA approval in the US). The latter is achieved using a photoplethysmogram (PPG) sensor, which measures changes in blood volume which are then compared against baseline data established through monthly calibration using a traditional upper arm cuff.

Admittedly, the Galaxy Watch 8’s blood pressure monitoring provides an estimation rather than a medically accurate measurement, but I still find it quite helpful as someone someone who's trying to stick close to the 120/80 sweet spot.

Samsung's BioActive sensor employs multi-spectrum LEDs capable of detecting "autofluorescence" — light reflecting off proteins in the skin, which is key to measuring metabolic AGEs (indicators of biological aging and sugar consumption). Essentially, it offers insight into the chemical impact of diet and lifestyle by looking inside your cells.

Additionally, the Galaxy Watch 8 offers Sleep Apnea Detection, which is FDA-approved and is said to detect signs of moderate to severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Granted, I don’t have sleep apnea, but it’s nice to know that it’ll alert me should it develop.

Safety dance

Of course, the Pixel Watch 4’s “Loss of Pulse Detection” feature (first introduced with the Pixel Watch 3) seems like an invaluable safety feature — particularly for older users or those with heart or respiratory conditions.

If the watch detects that your heart has stopped beating and you fail to respond to its check-in alerts, this feature will automatically contact emergency services and share your current location.

While Samsung’s Galaxy Watch 8 does provide “Hard Fall Detection”, there’s no denying that Google’s Pixel Watch 4 takes this concept much further, potentially providing life-saving functionality. That said, as someone who doesn’t suffer from any severe health conditions, the Galaxy Watch 8’s emergency features are more than sufficient for me.

Time to choose

Obviously, both smartwatches have their own strengths and weaknesses, and it would be easy for me to recommend both of them depending on what kind of features you’re after. Hardcore fitness fanatics and those involved in intense training will undoubtedly be the ones who most appreciate the Pixel Watch 4's key features.

However, a normie like me isn’t looking for that kind of data. The wellness info I’m generally interested in is of the passive variety, with the ability to also monitor my vitals in real time.

Now that I’ve used both watches extensively, there’s one feature on my Galaxy Watch 8 Classic that the Pixel Watch 4 simply cannot beat: the price of its health data — while Google locks its deepest sleep insights and long-term trends behind the Fitbit Premium paywall, Samsung hands me everything — from my Energy Score to the aforementioned metabolic AGEs index — for free.

This is where, in my opinion, the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic quietly wins the war.

More from Tom's Guide

• Galaxy Watch 8 is the first Android smartwatch with Gemini AI built in
• The ‘Classic’ model is the real star of the Galaxy Watch 8 lineup
• Apple Watch Series 11 set to launch next week

There's no doubt about it. The Google Pixel Watch 4 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 — specifically the Classic edition — are the best smartwatches for Android users in 2025. But which is the more accurate fitness tracker?

With similar price tags, features (including Google's excellent Gemini AI voice assistant) and onboard tech, I'd happily recommend either model, as I reviewed both for Tom's Guide. However, in the spirit of competition, I wore the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and Google Pixel Watch 4 during an hour-long walk around Seattle, Washington, to compare their workout data.

As a control, I manually counted my steps — with some assistance from my trusty old school tally counter — and ran Strava on my iPhone 12 mini for distance, pace, and elevation data.

Ultimately, one smartwatch proved decisively more accurate than the other. Can you guess which? Read on to discover the winner in this showdown between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and Google Pixel Watch 4.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs Pixel Watch 4: Quick comparison

Both devices start at $349 and come in a variety of case sizes — 40mm and 44mm for the Samsung and 41mm and 45mm for the Pixel Watch — and with or without cellular connectivity. The Galaxy Watch 8 is additionally offered in a Classic edition with a larger battery capacity and rotating bezel (this is the model I tested), something you won’t find on the latest Pixel Watch range.

Seriously bright and responsive touchscreens adorn both the latest Pixel Watch and Galaxy Watch models. The displays are paired with physical buttons along the sides of the cases. While the Pixel Watch 4 lasted longer than the Galaxy Watch 8 in my testing, both easily surpassed 40 hours or more per charge.

Fitness, wellness and safety tools are equally impressive across the board for both watches. That said, only the Pixel Watch 4 offers a Loss of Pulse Detection feature. Plus, the LTE versions of the Pixel Watch 4 also support a new satellite messaging feature for off-the-grid emergency communications.

You can use either flagship smartwatch to track your sleep, though I find Samsung’s sleep reports slightly more detailed and with more actionable advice.

Google’s Gemini AI voice assistant comes standard on both watches, but it's easier to 'wake' using the Pixel Watch 4 thanks to an exclusive, new raise-the-wrist gesture control.

When it comes to monitoring outdoor workouts, the Pixel Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch 8 each boast dual-band GPS, onboard altimeters for monitoring elevation changes, and similarly advanced holistic sensor arrays. With no real technology advantage on either side, this walk test showdown is about as evenly matched as they get.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs Pixel Watch 4: Walk test results

With the Pixel Watch 4 on my left wrist and the Galaxy Watch 8 on my right, I embarked on my roughly 1-hour walk around autumn-kissed Seattle. To help keep a precise count of my paces, I noted every hundred step taken with a click of my tally counter before starting again at one. A pair of the best noise-canceling headphones also helped to eliminate distractions.

Across the board — with only a few exceptions — the fitness tracking data from these two flagship smartwatch models impresses. After an hour of walking, the fact that both devices produced step count totals within 30 steps of my actual tally blows me away.

The watches measured slightly less distance covered compared to Strava, but the discrepancy is minor and no cause for concern. On the other hand, the Pixel Watch 4's elevation data is a little funky. While the Galaxy Watch was within 8 feet of the control data (well within a reasonable margin of error), the Google wearable seemingly overcounted by 49 feet.

Samsung's average pace data is a little slower than Strava's, and Google's is significantly more sluggish. What gives? My hunch is that Google's average pace metric reflects an elapsed pace versus a moving pace. While Samsung and Strava provide both moving and elapsed pace metrics, Google provides just one (and doesn't note which it is).

Things get cheerier as we move on to heart rate data, with each wearable producing similar enough averages and maxes. For what it's worth, my maximum heart rate during this walk test occurred while I powered up the steepest hill in Seattle.

Lastly, the Pixel Watch noted more calories burned and also consumed a little more battery during the one-hour walk. The latter surprised me, given that the Pixel Watch 4 ultimately proved to be the longer-lasting device in my greater testing.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs Pixel Watch 4: And the winner is...

With a remarkably accurate step count total that's just three steps off from my actual total, along with more accurate elevation and pace data, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 beats the Google Pixel Watch 4 in today's head-to-head accuracy battle.

Still, the Pixel Watch 4 performed admirably across the board, except for seemingly inflated elevation data. That said, I plan to continue testing the Pixel Watch 4's fitness tracking chops to find out if the climb metric hiccup was an anomaly or something more chronic. Stay tuned for a Pixel Watch 4 vs. Apple Watch 11 comparison.

Until next time, get your steps in!

More from Tom's Guide

• I walked 5,000 steps with the Apple Watch 11 vs Garmin Venu 4 — and the winner is clear
• I just went hands-on with the Suunto Vertical 2 — and it beats my favorite Garmin in 5 big ways
• I test smartwatches for a living — and these are my 5 favorite models when I go hiking

I'm not the first person to say this, but getting old sucks. You have to start worrying about things like your blood pressure and stress levels, among other things, and for a mild hypochondriac like myself, monitoring vital signs can quickly become an all-consuming focus.

As I approach my 43rd birthday this month, I'm reminded of the need for increased vigilance regarding my health. The days of carelessly drifting into an uncertain future are over — I must now take an active role in prioritising and managing my well-being.

I've been easing myself into this mindset with the Samsung Galaxy Ring since late last year, and while I've found the wearable has had one clear health benefit, it isn't the smartwatch replacement I'd hoped for.

With the arrival of Samsung's Galaxy Watch 8 series, particularly the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, I've decided to revisit the category in an effort to get a more complete picture of my wellness — especially the stuff that matters to me the most.

Having not worn a smartwatch since Galaxy Watch 4, the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic has rekindled my interest in health tracking. I'm now more committed than ever to monitoring my vital signs, if the last week of use is anything to go by. Here are the top five ways the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is helping me stay on top of my health.

Blood pressure measuring

Around my 40th birthday, I became aware of my propensity for high blood pressure. Given my family's history of hypertension and my age, I'd begun to notice several instances where my own blood pressure would spike to higher than normal levels.

Since making a few lifestyle changes and consulting my doctor, my blood pressure is now under control, though it will require lifelong monitoring. An upper arm blood pressure monitor is ideal for home use, but impractical for when I'm out and about — this is where the Galaxy Watch 8 comes in handy.

The Galaxy Watch 8 offers a dedicated mode for monitoring my blood pressure, potentially providing an early warning about shifts in my blood pressure trends. While not medically precise, it serves as a useful monitoring tool, provided I calibrate it every 28 days using the aforementioned upper arm cuff.

Please be aware that this feature is currently unavailable for Galaxy Watch 8 users in the US, as it is still pending FDA approval. It is, however, available in the UK and Australia.

Real-time heart rate

Everything changed after pandemic — after a couple of years of working exclusively from home, I returned to the office and began to notice my heart rate spiking in public. Whether it be due my high blood pressure or just a more generalised (and possibly Covid-induced) anxiety, this was a definite concern.

For my peace of mind, a smartwatch with real-time heart rate monitoring, such as the Galaxy Watch 8, has become an indispensable part of my 'Everyday Carry'. With the real-time heart rate 'Complication' applied to my watch face, I can easily monitor my BPM at a glance.

Stress management

Stress is hard to avoid these days, but thankfully, I'm able to monitor my stress level and take steps to manage it on the Galaxy Watch 8.

Taking advantage of the device's real-time heart rate monitoring, the Watch 8 Classic's stress-tracking feature is able to rate my stress level from very low to very high, measuring on a coloured line that goes from blue to orange.

And to help me manage that stress, the device has a 'Mindfulness' section that let's me check in with my current mood, starting at 'Awesome' and working backwards to 'Terrible', and then letting me get more specific, with a list of emotions ranging from 'Calm' to 'Depressed'.

The Galaxy Watch 8 also offers various breathing exercises, each guiding you through five minutes of timed breathing with different patterns tailored to specific goals. For example, the 4-4-4-4 sequence (4-second inhale, 4-second hold, 4-second exhale, 4-second hold) is designed for relaxation, and has helped me bring my stress level and heart rate down on a few occasions. The watch also suggests breathing patterns to aid sleep and improve focus.

Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Because of the aforementioned worries about blood pressure and heart rate, I decided to get a full heart check-up a couple of years back, especially with all the Covid uncertainty. Thankfully, nothing serious was detected.

Still, I think it's a good idea to keep an eye on my heart rhythms, which is easily done via the Galaxy Watch 8's electrocardiogram (ECG) feature. Although not intended for medical diagnosis or heart attack detection, the device can identify unusual heart rhythm changes, such as palpitations and atrial fibrillation, which can then be reported to a medical professional.

Sleep monitoring

Having gotten used to monitoring my sleep quality with the Galaxy Ring, I'm now taking things a step further with the Watch 8 Classic, which is able to provide far more in-depth sleep data.

For starters, a sleep apnea risk-detection feature can now be enabled within the Samsung Health Monitor app on the Watch 8. Once enabled, the feature will monitor your sleep over a 10-day period, checking your blood oxygen (SpO2) level while also listening for any breathing disruptions.

Of course, the feature is designed for risk detection, and will not provide a medical diagnosis — it will simply alert you if it detects any signs of obstructive sleep apnea in your data, which you can then follow up with your doctor. Thankfully, no such signs have been detected in my case.

Additionally, I'm able to enable snore detection from within the Samsung Health app on my Galaxy S25 Ultra, which can be an early indicator of a sleep abnormality.

A healthier outlook

Having spent my first week with the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, I already feel a greater sense of ease concerning my health. I'm actively monitoring my heart rate, blood pressure and stress levels, and I'm also benefiting from its guidance on mindfulness and relaxation techniques through breathing exercises. I'm optimistic that if I continue this routine, I will soon experience positive changes in my overall well-being. Right now, I'm quite confident that I will be able to keep this up.

More from Tom's Guide

• Galaxy Watch 8 is the first Android smartwatch with Gemini AI built in
• The ‘Classic’ model is the real star of the Galaxy Watch 8 lineup
• Apple Watch Series 11 set to launch next week

Samsung makes some of the best smartwatch models available in 2025, including both the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and the newer Samsung Galaxy Watch 8.

I've already covered the differences between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs. the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 in terms of features, design, and battery life, but what about fitness-tracking accuracy?

To find out which Samsung smartwatch is the more precise workout companion, I sported one on either wrist and embarked on a 5,500-step walk — manually counted, of course — around my neighborhood in Seattle, Washington.

Scroll down the page to see how my post-workout stats compare, including steps, distance, climb, pace, heart rate, and calories burned.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs. Galaxy Watch 7: Quick comparison

But first, a quick comparison: The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and Galaxy Watch 8 feature the same onboard health sensor array, but the newer model has a couple of exclusive wellness features, including insights into a user's cardiovascular load and antioxidant levels.

The Galaxy Watch 8 also has a brighter screen and slightly better battery life. Design-wise, the older model sports a simple, circular case, while the Galaxy Watch 8 has a 'cushion case' similar to the Galaxy Watch Ultra.

Another major distinction: Only the Galaxy Watch 8 is available in Samsung's 'Classic' edition, which features a fan-favorite rotating bezel.

Those core differences aside, from a fitness-tracking perspective, these two devices are essentially an even match. So, which model, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 or Galaxy Watch 7, came out on top in my walk test? Read on to find out.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs. Galaxy Watch 7: Walk test results

For this walk test, I wore the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic on my left wrist and the Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) on my right wrist. As a control, I manually counted my steps, denoting every hundred taken with a click of my trusty tally counter. As a control for distance, elevation, and pace data, I ran Strava on my iPhone.

To avoid either device piggybacking on location data from my paired Samsung Galaxy S24, I left it behind.

This is as close as they come. Both the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and Galaxy Watch 7 recorded step count tallies that fall well within a reasonable margin for error. The former overcounted by just 31 steps and the latter undercounted by a mere 25 steps.

Strava, for what it's worth, measured a step count total of 5,524 steps.

Distance-wise, both smartwatches also proved accurate, with less than a tenth of a mile separating the totals from Strava's count.

The Galaxy Watch 8 seems to have undecounted my climb by a manageable 16 feet, while the Galaxy Watch 7 was off by a more notable 26 feet. Beyond that, pace, heart rate, and calorie data are all anear-match across the board.

Finally, the Galaxy Watch 7 burned more battery during my 50-minute walk, which was to be expected.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs. Galaxy Watch 7: And the winner is...

While the Galaxy Watch 7 was ever-so-slightly more accurate at counting my steps and measuring my distance, the Galaxy Watch 8 was noticeably more precise at measuring my climb.

So, which device wins this bout? I'm giving the championship belt to the Galaxy Watch 7, but I strongly suspect that these two titans of the wrist will be squaring up again sometime soon (perhaps for a bike ride). As noted above, this was an exceptional close comparison.

More importantly, you now know that the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 is just as competent at tracking workouts as the newer Galaxy Watch 8, and either is a great choice to keep tabs on your next walk, run, hike, or pickleball match.

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 vs Galaxy Watch 8 — these are the 5 biggest differences
• I walked 6,500 steps with the Fitbit Charge 6 vs Pixel Watch 3 — and I’m surprised by the winner
• I test smartwatches for a living — and these are my 5 favorite models when I go hiking

I just walked 4,000 steps with the Google Pixel Watch 3 on my right wrist and the new Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 on my left to determine which is the more competent fitness tracker.

To keep things fair, I manually counted my steps as the primary control for this showdown; I also ran Strava on a separate device (iPhone 12 mini) as a control for distance, elevation and pace data.

After 4,000 steps and roughly 2.3 miles, one smartwatch proved (slightly) more accurate in this match-up of the new Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs Google Pixel Watch 3. Read on to find out which.

Pixel Watch 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 comparison

But first, here's a quick look at how these two flagship models compare. Both run Google's Wear OS platform, and neither plays nicely with the iPhone. The Galaxy Watch 8 is Samsung's new release for 2025, while the Pixel Watch 3 represents Google's 2024 model; we'll likely get a Pixel Watch 4 model in August, if rumors prove true.

Design-wise, the Galaxy Watch 8 features a "cushion" case design, borrowed from 2024's Galaxy Watch Ultra, compared to a circular case for the Pixel Watch 3, though both feature circular displays.

The Pixel Watch 3 comes in two sizes, 41mm and 45mm; the latter is represented here. The Galaxy Watch 8 standard model similarly comes in a smaller, 41mm, and larger, 44mm option.

There's also a 46mm Galaxy Watch 8 Classic with a rotating bezel, used for this comparison. The standard Galaxy Watch 8 models start at $349 for the 40mm model, which is the same starting cost as the 41mm Pixel Watch 3 (though you can score one on sale right now, link below).

Both smartwatches feature handy safety tools and access to the same enormous app library. Each is also brimming with wellness and fitness features, including deep insights into sleep quality, helpful workout training recovery tools, and potentially life-saving health-monitoring apps.

The Pixel Watch 3, for instance, is the only smartwatch on the market with Loss of Pulse Detection. Similarly, Samsung's new cardiovascular load monitoring tool is only available on the latest Galaxy Watch 8 and Galaxy Watch Ultra models. Still, either can perform an ECG, check your heart rate, or monitor your blood oxygen saturation levels.

Nuances aside, these two devices are remarkably well matched.

So, which came out ahead in this walk test? In my previous article, where I walked 5,000 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs. the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, Cupertino took home the trophy. Can Samsung score some redemption? Find the results of my walk test with the Pixel Watch 3 vs Galaxy Watch 8 below.

Pixel Watch 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 results

Both the Pixel Watch 3 and Galaxy Watch 8 each produced step count totals within 50 steps of my actual total. This is a very impressive level of accuracy and well within a reasonable margin for error. Strava also measures step count, and was even more spot-on with a total of 3,990 steps.

All three devices also essentially measured the same distance covered and similar amounts of elevation gained; the 14 feet separating Strava's tally from Google's is equivalent to 1.5 flights of stairs, i.e., not enough for concern.

Average pace data additionally matches nicely; I was moving fairly quickly for the duration of this walk and made minimal stops, except for one or two traffic lights. Strava measured the fastest moving time, but also provides an averaged elapsed pace, which came out to 15 minutes and 17 seconds per mile.

Both Samsung and Google wearables have a well-earned reputation for accurate heart rate data — something I can attest to based on reviewing numerous devices from each — and the results from this walk test are in near-perfect agreement with not only each other, but also my expectations based on numerous prior tests.

Finally, Samsung calculated fewer calories burned during my roughly 35-minute walk, but coincidentally, also burned nearly twice the amount of battery tracking my trek as the Pixel Watch 3.

Pixel Watch 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 winner

And the winner of this challenge is... the Google Pixel Watch 3. That said, this is about as close as these walk tests come to being called a tie. Over the years, I've probably written 25-plus head-to-head comparisons of this type, and I can't think of another time where the winner was determined by just two steps.

Stay tuned for more testing on the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, including my full review where I'll share the inside scoop on the device's newest features, like Run Coach, bedtime reminders, antioxidant tracking and Vascular Load monitoring.

Which smartwatches or fitness trackers would you like to see me test head-to-head next? Let me know in the comments below. Until next time, happy walking!

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 vs Galaxy Watch 8 — these are the 5 biggest differences
• I walked 6,500 steps with the Fitbit Charge 6 vs Pixel Watch 3 — and I’m surprised by the winner
• I test smartwatches for a living — and these are my 5 favorite models when I go hiking

I just walked 5,000 steps with the new Galaxy Watch 8 Classic on my left wrist and the Apple Watch Series 10 on my right wrist to find out which flagship smartwatch is the more accurate fitness tracker.

In addition to manually counting my steps during the walk as a control, I ran Strava on my smartphone for distance, climb and pace data. So, which device was produced the cleanest, most precise data in this showdown of the Apple Watch Series 10 versus Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic? Read on.

Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 compared

But first, how do these two top-tier wearables compare? The Apple Watch Series 10 arrived in fall 2024, boasting an updated case design with a thinner and lighter profile, updated touchscreen, and faster charging.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic was just announced in early July 2025 as the higher-end option in the Galaxy Watch 8 lineup. Samsung's newest watch offerings also feature standard models, without the Classic's rotating bezel, for less cash.

The latest Galaxy Watches also got a case redesign, moving away from the familiar circular face that has long been associated with the line and instead embracing the "cushion" case introduced with the Galaxy Watch Ultra last summer 2024.

Like the Apple Watch Series 10, the Galaxy Watch 8 is jam-packed with smart features, safety tools, and holistic-focused applications. In fact, the new Samsung watch offers several promising wellness tools absent on the Series 10, including Vascular Load monitoring, Antioxidant Index testing, and a daily Energy Score out of 100 based on sleep quality and recent physical activity.

That said, when it comes to tracking basic outdoor workouts, like walks, runs, hikes, and bike rides, both devices provide similar sets of post-effort metrics. They each also offer built-in GPS for pinpoint location data, onboard altimeters for precise elevation, and optical pulse sensors for continuous heart rate monitoring.

The Series 10 has already proven to be a worthy competitor in prior walk tests and a reliable fitness wearable, both in head-to-head comparison and daily field testing, one of the main reasons it's our best smartwatch pick for 2025. So can the latest Galaxy Watch 8 Classic compete?

Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 8: Walk test

To test the tracking accuracy of the latest devices, one goes on either wrist, the fitness tracking modes get fired up — along with Strava on my iPhone — and I set out on my merry way, counting each step.

To make things a tad easier, I use an old-school tally counter to note every 100 steps taken. So, really, I'm just counting to one hundred 50 times over. By the seventh or eighth time you do it, the process becomes rather easy. Of course, a pair of the best noise-cancelling headphones helps.

Find the results of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic versus Apple Watch Series 10 walk test below.

Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 8: Results

The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic added 223 steps on to my 5,000 step total, compared to the Apple Watch Series 10 adding just 83 extra steps. Strava did even worse, with a total of 5,272 steps, or 272 more than my actual count.

Distance data, however, lines up much more nicely. The same goes for elevation data. Living in Seattle, Washington, a rather hilly city, I'm a stickler for accurate climb tallies — I care about it more than distance — so it pleases me to see similar totals from these high-end wearables (and Strava).

All three methods also record similar average paces for my walk, with Strava having me move just a bit faster than Samsung and Apple. That said, Strava provides two average pace metrics: average moving pace, shown above, and average "elapsed" or total pace, which is 17 minutes and 32 seconds.

The latest Samsung models are billed as offering improved heart rate accuracy thanks to the new Dynamic Lug System, which more firmly presses the sensors to your wrist. However, from these results, it's difficult to say whether the new strap system worked as advertised.

Both smartwatches calculated similar enough average heart rates, but the Apple Watch noted a higher max. Which is right? Based on my most recent walk tests along similar routes, I can't say for certain.

When I tested the Apple Watch 10 vs. Garmin Forerunner 570, my max heart rate was 163 bpm and 164 bpm, respectively, but when I pitted the Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Garmin Venu X1, I had a max heart rate of 158 bpm and 159 bpm. Finally, when I walked 6,500 steps with the Pixel Watch 3 vs. Fitbit Charge 6, both measured my max heart rate at 164 bpm.

Apple noted more calories burned than Samsung, though this is a metric I tend to ignore (and encourage others to as well), as results between devices vary tremendously based on my extensive testing. Finally, the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic burned a little more battery during my roughly 45-minute walk compared to the Apple Watch Series 10.

Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 8: Winner

And the winner is... the Apple Watch Series 10. While both devices produced step-count totals that are well within a reasonable margin for error, the Apple Watch's results were much closer to my actual total than Samsung's.

That said, across the board, the latest Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch performed admirably, churning out metrics that not only largely lineup with one another but also with Strava's data.

Which devices should I test head-to-head next? Let me know in the comments below.

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 review: The first foldable I'd actually buy
• I walked 6,500 steps with the Fitbit Charge 6 vs Pixel Watch 3 — and I’m surprised by the winner
• I test smartwatches for a living — and these are my 5 favorite models when I go hiking

Samsung’s new lineup of Galaxy smartwatches has officially been unveiled for 2025 as part of the Unpacked July 2025 event. While there’s no Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 — we did get a new 'Titanium Blue' color option — Samsung did announce not one, not two, but six Galaxy Watch 8 configurations.

The most petite Galaxy Watch 8 model is 40mm and comes with or without LTE connectivity. A larger 44mm also offers optional LTE for a little extra cash.

Then there’s the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, the largest of the series at 46mm (with or without LTE). Despite also being the priciest of the bunch, it’s easily the star of the new Galaxy Watch 8 lineup (which my colleague Kate Kozuch just went hands-on with).

Here are the five biggest reasons why the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is the standout smartwatch from Unpacked.

1. A functional (and fidget friendly) 'clicky' bezel

First and foremost, the most obvious reason the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is superior to the non-classic options is the bi-directional 'clicky' bezel around the screen. This physical feature, a blend of classic horology design and modern convenience, allows you to easily browse/navigate the device without using the touchscreen or buttons. It's also a lot of fun to play around with.

2. An extra user-customizable button

Speaking of buttons, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic sports three along the side of the case — just like the flagship Galaxy Watch Ultra — compared to two on the standard Watch 8 models.

The third button, located near the three o’clock position, can be customized to launch a small but useful selection of features in an instant, like workout tracking or the flashlight.

3. Double the storage capacity

Depending on your connectivity configuration, the starting price for the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic model is $150 more than the 40mm Galaxy Watch 8 and $120 more than the 44mm model. What does that extra cash spent get you outside of a fidget-friendly bezel and added button?

Extra storage, baby. The Classic boasts 64GB of storage, the same as all new Galaxy Watch Ultra models that you can buy going forward. (The Ultra initially launched with 32GB of storage, but that's changed as of today.) By comparison, the standard Watch 8 series offers 32GB.

Greater onboard capacity means more room for your favorite apps, music, conversations, memes — you name it.

4. A bigger battery

The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, as the largest model in the series, also boasts slightly greater battery capacity than its siblings. While the smaller Galaxy Watch 8 sports a 325mAh battery and the larger 44mm model has a 433mAh capacity battery, the Classic bests both with 445mAh of battery capacity.

Now, this doesn’t necessarily mean a longer-lasting smartwatch, but given the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic features the same 1.34-inch screen size as the smaller, 40mm Galaxy Watch 8 — the 44mm features a 1.47-inch display — there’s a good chance it will offer an advantage in the longevity department.

For what it’s worth, Samsung says that all versions of the Galaxy Watch 8 should last between 30 hours (with the always-on display) and 40 hours (in low power mode).

Then again, Google made similar claims about the Pixel Watch 3 last year. However, in my testing, the new larger 45mm Pixel Watch 3 model ended up lasting twice as long as its smaller 41mm sibling.

5. Better overall design

Finally, greater heft aside, I’d argue that the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic offers a superior design to the standard Galaxy Watch 8 models in two key areas. First, the Classic sports a comparably more durable stainless steel case design. The standard Watch 8 models, in contrast, are aluminum.

Second, the Galaxy Watch 8 makes far better use of the series’s updated cushion case — borrowed from the Ultra line — thanks to the inclusion of the aftformentioend bezel. Without it, the standard Watch 8 looks oddly chunky at the corners where the screen meets the case, giving the impression of wated space.

What are your thoughts on the new Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 series? Is the Classic the model to get? Is the standard cushion case, sans-bezel, actually gorgeous? Let me know in the comments below.

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung Galaxy Unpacked unveils Android 16’s big changes for Google Gemini — here’s what’s coming for the Z Flip 7, Z Fold 7, Samsung Watch 8 and more
• Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 announced — here's all the upgrades including a huge cover display
• Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 hands-on: The first foldable I'd actually want to buy
  

The new Samsung Galaxy Watch is the world's first smartwatch with Gemini AI built in, with no need for a paired phone to take advantage of it. All you need is a Wi-Fi or LTE connection.

The new watch comes in two styles: a standard edition and a "Classic” edition, which means, yes, everyone’s favorite smartwatch clicky bezel is back.

The Galaxy Watch 8 also represents a full-on embrace of the cushion case design, first introduced on the Galaxy Watch Ultra a year ago. Speaking of that model, there is no new Galaxy Watch Ultra update for 2025, but there is a new color option. More on that below.

The Watch 8 series ships with a plethora of new fitness and wellness tools built in, including a personalized digital running coach, Bedtime Reminders to help you optimize sleep, and improved heart health monitoring.

Now for the bad news: Samsung is raising the starting price for the Galaxy Watch 8 to $349, an increase of $50 over the Galaxy Watch 7. That makes it the same starting cost as the Google Pixel Watch 3, but still $50 less than the Apple Watch Series 10.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8: Price and availability

The new Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 starts at $349 for the 40mm Bluetooth version and $379 for the larger 44mm Bluetooth edition. Meanwhile, the 40mm Galaxy Watch 8 with LTE is $399, while the 44mm LTE model is $429.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic comes in a single 46mm size, and you’ll pay $499 for the Bluetooth version or $549 for the LTE edition.

All versions of the Galaxy Watch 8 will be available for preorder starting today (July 9), with units expected to ship out before July 25. Those who preorder the Galaxy Watch 8 are eligible for $50 in savings.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Titanium Blue: Price and availability

In addition to the new Galaxy Watch 8 models, Samsung also announced a new “Titanium Blue” edition of the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra with double the storage of the standard model (64GB instead of 32GB) for the same price: $649. It's also available for preorder today and expected to ship before July 25.

It also sounds like Samsung will be doubling the storage for all Galaxy Watch Ultra versions (Silver, Grey and White) going forward — again, at no added cost.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8: Design

The standard version of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 comes in your choice of Silver or Graphite, regardless of which size you choose, 40mm or 44mm. The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is only available in 46mm in either stealthy Black or flashy White.

Physical design changes

Samsung is kissing the circular watch face goodbye. Love it or hate it, the “cushion" case introduced with the original Galaxy Watch Ultra has now been fully absorbed into the main Galaxy Watch line. The purpose of this, according to Samsung, is to give the Galaxy line a “unique identity.”

The Galaxy Watch 8 is the thinnest Galaxy Watch ever at 8.6mm thick; that’s an 11% slimmer profile than the Galaxy Watch 7. However, my colleague Kate Kozuch reports that the new cushion case IRL gives the appearance of wasted space on the non-Classics versions.

In addition to a case redesign, Samsung reengineered the internal aluminum frame for better durability. While the standard Galaxy Watch 8 is made of aluminum, the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic features a more durable stainless steel case material. That said, all versions of the Galaxy Watch 8 boast scratch and shatter-resistant sapphire screens.

The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic has three physical buttons on the case, compared to two on the standard model. The “Quick Button” at the 3:00 position on the Classic can be customized to open a supported app of your choosing, similar to Apple's Action Button.

Improved screen brightness

All Galaxy Watch 8 models offer a maximum screen brightness of 3,000 nits, up from 2,000 nits on the Galaxy Watch 7 and the same brightness as the Galaxy Watch Ultra and Apple Watch Ultra 2. This will mean easy visibility even in the brightest of conditions.

This spec increase also gives the Galaxy Watch 8 lineup a notable advantage over its nearest competitor, the Google Pixel Watch 3, which maxes out at 2,000 nits.

New proprietary system for connecting straps

The days of Samsung Galaxy Watches working with standard watch straps are sadly over. The new “Dynamic Lug System” promises better comfort and a more streamlined look/smaller gap, but to me, it seems more like an Apple-esque cash grab than anything else.

The new strap apparently results in 11% more accurate heart rate tracking, though.

Samsung is also working with third-party strap makers, and additional options to those launched by Samsung with the Galaxy Watch 8 will be available shortly after the device’s release.

Updated user experience

The latest One UI 8 software should make the Galaxy Watch 8 a more helpful digital companion and capable multitasker.

Multi-Info Tiles allow users to access their six favorite apps from the homescreen, a function I eagerly welcome. You'll also be able to view pertinent app information at a glance, like upcoming events or flight delays, via the new "Now Bar," located at the bottom of the homescreen.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8: Gemini AI features

Samsung says the Galaxy Watch 8 is the first smartwatch with a Gemini AI voice assistant built in, but how useful is it?

The feature requires an internet connection, either Wi-Fi or LTE, but not through a paired smartphone. Gemini should be able to handle basic inquiries like, “What was my most recent running pace?” or "When's my next haircut?" as well as simple tasks like setting a timer, starting a playlist or dictating a message.

The AI voice assistant should even be able to execute multi-step tasks, like turning on fitness tracking and a specific pump-up playlist at the same time, Samsung says.

Of course, reliability and latency will play a huge factor in Gemini's success on board the Galaxy Watch. However, if the Gemini assistant works as intended, it could make Samsung the smartwatch brand to beat when it comes to AI.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8: New health features

The Galaxy Watch 8 sports the same holistic sensor array as its predecessor but introduces a bunch of new wellness and fitness features, some of which are inherited by the Galaxy Watch 7, while others are not (as noted below).

Bedtime reminders

Bedtime Reminders are based on two user factors: Cicadian rhythm and “Sleep Pressure,” your growing need for sleep throughout the day. Users will receive a Bedtime Reminder — which isn’t a specific time but a window — roughly two hours ahead of time.

The Galaxy Watch 7, 8 and Ultra all support this feature.

Running Coach

Designed to help you train for an upcoming running event, this free feature asks users to participate in a 12-minute trial run to analyze their ability on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being “marathon-ready.”

Depending on your goals and skill level, you’ll be presented with a custom four to six-week training program. Users get guidance, motivational messages, insights and real-time feedback.

Like Bedtime Reminders, Running Coach is supported on the Galaxy Watch 8, as well as the Watch 7 and Ultra via a firmware update.

Vascular Load monitoring

This new holistic feature keeps tabs on how much stress your cardio system is taking on. The watch measures this while you sleep over a three-night period. If your Carido Load is determined to be too high, you’ll receive a notification with suggestions for ways to bring it down.

This feature will only be available on the Galaxy Watch 8 and Ultra series, not the Galaxy Watch 7 or earlier.

Antioxidant Index Testing

This new holistic feature uses the existing photosynthetic light sensor to measure a user’s antioxidant levels through the skin. If those levels are low, users will receive recommendations on how to improve and start healthier habits.

Similar to Cardio Load, this feature is also for the Galaxy Watch Ultra and Galaxy Watch 8 series.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8: Battery life

The Galaxy Watch 8 sports a larger capacity battery than the Galaxy Watch 7; however, Samsung is keeping battery life expectations for the devices the same as the previous generation— 30 hours when the always-on display is active and 40 hours when it’s not.

The Galaxy Watch 8 in 40mm now sports a 325mAh battery compared to a 300mAh battery on the Watch 7 in 40mm. The larger Galaxy Watch 8 has a 435mAh battery versus a 430mAh battery on the 44mm Galaxy Watch 7.

Meanwhile, the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic has a 445mAh battery, the biggest of the bunch; however, battery life is rated the same as the other models.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8: Outlook

I’m not excited to see Samsung hiking the starting price of the Galaxy Watch 8 series by $50, making it a match with the Google Pixel Watch 3. However, if Google ends up similarly hiking its starting price later this year for the rumored Pixel Watch 4, Samsung will go back to being the more budget-friendly, full-featured, Android-compatible smartwatch brand.

I’m not sold on the cushion case. On the standard Galaxy Watch 8, it gives the illusion of wasted case space around the corners. Visually, I think the case design works a lot better with the bezel-sporting Classic model.

The new holistic and fitness features sound promising, specifically, Bedtime Reminders, Running Coach, and Cardio Load, if, of course, they work as advertised. I'm less impressed by what I've seen from the Antioxidant Index screening feature after my colleague Kate Kozuch tested it in a demo. The watch's advice? Eat a carrot.

Of the rumored Galaxy Watch 8 upgrades I was most excited for, the only one that didn't largely come to fruition is improved battery life. That said, last year's Pixel Watch 3 wasn't advertised as having vastly better battery than the Pixel Watch 2, but in testing, the larger model ended up humming along for a full 48 hours (double Google's estimates). Here's hoping the same is the case for the Galaxy Watch 8.

Stay tuned for my full review.

More from Tom's Guide:

• Forget the Apple Watch — 5 reasons I’ll be wearing the new Casio G-Shock this summer instead
• I just went hands-on with the Amazfit Balance 2 — this new multisport smartwatch boasts 21 days of battery life
• Google Exclusive: How the Pixel Watch 3 got a life-saving feature the Apple Watch can't match

The Summer 2025 Samsung Galaxy Unpacked event is right around the corner, which means new Samsung Galaxy Watches are almost certainly on the horizon (also, new Galaxy Z Fold and Z Flip models).

Rumors and leaks suggest a new Galaxy Watch 8 model is all but certain, while a Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 is possible but slightly less likely. For this story, I’m going to focus on the former.

I reviewed the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 shortly after its release last summer and was overall impressed with the adequately comfortable, minimalistic case design, slick user experience and ample offering of handy smart features and apps; but it’s the holistic and fitness-tracking tools I appreciate the most. This is why I chose it as one of the best smartwatch models in 2025.

Will the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 maintain its predecessor’s easy-wearing, smooth-operating disposition, while adding to the class-leading suite of AI-powered health tools? The latest rumors have me hopeful.

With no shortage of leaks and murmurs to pick from surrounding the forthcoming device, these are the five biggest Galaxy Watch 8 rumors so far.

1. Goodbye circular case, hello square-ish one

Samsung introduced the “cushion case” last year with the Galaxy Watch Ultra. Now, for better or worse, it seems that the Galaxy Watch 8 will also inherit this square-ish design. For Galaxy Watch diehards, this may be a tough pill to swallow. After all, a circular case has long been the design hallmark of the Galaxy Watch line.

Perhaps Samsung simply wants to better differentiate itself from the Google Pixel Watch 3, which is also a circle. Either way, recently shared renderings by known leaker Evan Blass strongly suggest that the cushion case is here to stay, for this generation of Galaxy Watch, at least.

2. A return of the Classic model (clicky bezel)

When the Galaxy Watch 7 debuted last year, something was missing. Unlike the Galaxy Watch 6, Samsung didn’t offer a Galaxy Watch 7 “Classic” model with a clicky bezel. As a lover of both traditional mechanical watches and smart ones, I’m genuinely thrilled when brands incorporate old-school design elements into their modern devices. So, yeah, I’m a huge fan of the Classic’s bezel.

Fortunately, an earlier set of leaked renderings strongly suggests the return of a Classic model with the Galaxy Watch 8. Like the standard Galaxy Watch 8 renderings, the Classic edition also appears to inherit the cushion case. Plus, it looks like to has a new third case-side button near the 3:00 position, similar to the Galaxy Watch Ultra.

3. Improved battery life

I tested the smaller 40mm Galaxy Watch 7 model and averaged roughly 24 hours of use per charge. That’s a little bit better than the Apple Watch Series 10, but still a far cry from the Galaxy Watch Ultra’s roughly four days of battery life (in low power mode).

Based on paperwork Samsung filed for battery certification — and first spotted by Xpertpick — both the (presumably) 40mm and 44mm Galaxy Watch 8 models will see modest battery capacity increases. We’re talking about a boost of about 5aMh. Still, that bump up, coupled with a possibly new, more efficient processor, could mean several more hours of use in between charges. Here’s hoping.

4. Better heart health monitoring

Samsung began rolling out the brand’s latest One UI 8 beta software for the Galaxy Watch a little over a week ago, and one of the new features I’m most excited to try is Cardiovascular Load.

While a user sleeps, the watch analyzes how much stress their daily routine is putting on their cardiovascular system. If deemed too high, the watch will warn you and presumably offer suggestions to improve your heart health.

It’s worth noting that as of right now, Cardiovascular Load is only promised for the Galaxy Watch Ultra (you also need the latest Galaxy S25 phone). Hmmm. That seems to suggest that the forthcoming Galaxy Watch 8 series devices will almost certainly offer the tool, too.

5. One-touch nutrition tracking

The other forthcoming holistic feature I’m eager to try — also announced as part of One UI 8 — is Samsung’s new Antioxidant Index screening tool.

Using the existing onboard sensors found in the Galaxy Watch Ultra — Samsung makes no promises of this feature being supported by the Watch 7despite the two having matching sensor arrays — it can detect the level of carotenoids (antioxidants found in fruits and vegetables) currently stored in your skin.

Think of it as a virtual parent or guardian, ever-present to remind you to eat healthy. Again, like Cardio Load, the new Antioxidant Index tool is all but certain to be a marquee health feature of the Galaxy Watch 8.

This is a first-of-its-kind function for a smartwatch (as far as I’m aware), and though the concept sounds a little bit like science fiction, if it works reliably, it could be a super useful way to encourage better eating habits on the daily (and one I’m sure other brands will be eager to rip off).

More from Tom's Guide

• I walked 6,000 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 — this one was more accurate
• I test smartwatches for a living — and these are my 5 favorite models when I go hiking
• Google Exclusive: How the Pixel Watch 3 got a life-saving feature the Apple Watch can't match

Samsung's annual Summer Galaxy Unpacked event is merely two weeks away, where we expect to see the company's updated smartwatches in the Galaxy Watch 8, Galaxy Watch 8 Classic and the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2.

But if you can't wait that long, regular leaker Evan Blass just shared new renders that show all three watches off from every angle.

About the only thing we don't know at this point is what other colorways and straps might be available.

We expect Samsung to launch three models this year. The base model will be the Galaxy Watch 8, seen above.

It looks like the Watch 8 will get a slight redesign to something more squircle-esque look comparable to the Watch Ultra from last year. Though it still seems fairly round.

Two is a coincidence, but three is a pattern, and with Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, it looks like Samsung is sticking to a two-year release pattern for the Classic variant, as the last versions were the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic and Watch 6 Classic.

This year's Classic combines the physical rotating bezel with an Ultra-esque looking design.

The strap looks to have a more leather texture, which indicates to me that it'll be the watch you want for a more refined look, versus the Ultra, which is geared for more of an active lifestyle.

We're calling it the Ultra 2, but in this leak and a previous one, it's been labeled as the Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025), so it's possible that might be the convention Samsung uses.

As in the last leaked image, the Ultra 2 looks the same as the 2024 version. The big difference is the new blue colorway, which was not available last year.

All three watches should feature the same BioActive sensor. The Classic and Ultra 2 share a two-button and digital crown design, while the Watch 8 sticks with the two side buttons.

We've yet to see pricing leaks for the new watches; however, if recent leaks regarding pricing for the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 are to be believed, we might be in for a price increase.

We'll know more on July 9 when Samsung unveils foldable phones, wearables and maybe more.

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 prices leaked — and it's worse than we expected
• Panasonic’s 2025 flagship OLED TV is a true stunner — and it might beat LG and Samsung
• Samsung launches Exynos 2500 just ahead of Unpacked — chip rumored to power Galaxy Z Flip 7

For the last year, I've been wearing the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra fairly regularly, as it's one of the best Samsung smartwatches and my first foray into the world of smartwatches. But I couldn't help but wonder if there'd be any follow-up to this particular model.

Prior to the Unpacked Galaxy event expected for July, where Samsung would typically reveals its next generation of wearables, we've heard plenty of rumors about the Galaxy Watch 8 and the return of the Galaxy Watch Classic. A Galaxy Watch Ultra

What I wasn't seeing was leaks or news about a new edition of the Galaxy Watch Ultra — and that had me worried. Maybe the Ultra would be one and done — or at least infrequently updated — raising questions about whether Samsung's high-end watch would fade from the scene.

Thankfully, my fears have been quashed a bit thanks to a trio of leaked images from regular tipster Evan Blass, who shared photos of the Galaxy Watch 8, 8 Classic and what he labeled as the Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) — which you can see at the top of this article. You'll find the report in Blass' Substack newsletter.

At first glance, the 2025 Ultra doesn't look much different from the watch introduced in 2024. There are some smaller color adjustments like the notches in the bezel being orange rather than the white. The "titanium gray" colorway features orange notches. Additionally, the dark blue band, which looks slick, isn't an available color.

Currently, Samsung only offers bands in white, orange and black. I would love to see some more hues.

Now, to be clear this is potentially just a render, but Samsung does have history of changing up colorways between generations of devices.

As for the other devices, the 8 image looks much like the Galaxy Watch 7 and it appears Samsung is sticking to a biannual release for the Classic models since the last two were the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic and Galaxy Watch 4 Classic.

What can we expect?

Unfortunately, beyond an image, no other information was provided in the leak. So we don't know if there will be any specific upgrades to the physical watch.

Most of the upgrades we expect to see are on the software side of things. The One UI 8 beta just arrived this week with three big upgrades for Galaxy Watches. These include run coaching, improved sleep tracking and antioxidant measurement.

The updated software should also provide new icons and deeper Google Gemini integration according to previous rumors.

We're hoping for blood glucose monitoring on board the new Galaxy Watches, which we thought would debut last year, but obviously did not. We're cautiously optimistic that it launches this year.

Samsung is expected to reveal its new smart watches alongside the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 during its annual summer Galaxy Unpacked event in July, though a formal date has yet to be announced.

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge durability test ends in a surprising result
• Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge review: It’s impressively thin, with some major compromises
• Samsung Galaxy S25 is suffering from an embarrassing design quality issue — what you need to know

Come July, Samsung should have a refreshed set of its Galaxy Watches, which may include the return of the Galaxy Watch Classic that Samsung omitted from last year's lineup.

Back in March, model numbers for unreleased Samsung smartwatches were revealed in leaked firmware tests. That leak hinted at either two sizes for the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 or the return of the Classic.

Now we have a bit of confirmation thanks to new renders from regular tipster OnLeaks who shared their images with Sammy Guru.

Based on previous rumors, the new Classic model could be available in one 47mm size, similar to the Galaxy Watch Ultra.

According to SammyGuru, the refreshed Classic could feature a 435 mAh battery and a rotating bezel. The battery is smaller than the one in the Ultra, which may be due to the moving bezel taking up internal space.

The images provided by OnLeaks make the new Classic look like a mix of the square-ish Ultra and the rounder, softer Samsung Galaxy Watch 7, otherwise known as the "squircle" shape.

The display on the Watch 8 Classic should be 1.5 inches which would be the same size as the Ultra and the larger 44mm Watch 7.

Allegedly, the Classic will be roughly 46 x 46.5 x 14.2mm.

It's unclear what this means for the Ultra watch as the model numbers hint at Bluetooth and LTE variants of the Classic unless the Classic is a successor to the Ultra model.

It's expected that Samsung will announce its new watches alongside the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy Z Flip 7 during its summer Galaxy Unpacked event. That launch is rumored to be taking place in early July.

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung reportedly pushing Nintendo to release Switch 2 OLED — what we know
• Galaxy Z Fold 7 real-life image leaks — here's how Samsung's next foldable could look
• Samsung OLED TVs are set to get even thinner — here’s how

Samsung is reportedly launching One UI 8 this summer for its smartphone devices, but wearables won't be left behind.

Earlier this week, leaker DevOfIpos revealed a number of One UI 8 features including an improved DeX. They also apparently found firmware for One UI 8 Watch and posted some their findings on X.

It looks to be a fairly substantial update for Samsung's Galaxy smartwatches.

For starters, Samsung appears to be skipping versions 6.5 and 7 and heading straight to version 8.

Part of the leap includes new icons with the rounder style that Samsung introduced in One UI 7 for its handsets.

They also posted that Google's Gemini AI bot is replacing Google Assistant in the One UI 8 Watch update. It's been expected that Gemini will make its way into Wear OS, and it looks like Wear OS 6 will be the first inkling of that. Reportedly, Gemini is functionally the same app as Assistant.

As part of the leak, APKs from the update were also put up by Ipos, which Android Authority went through. If you're interested in the code, they beak down APKs on a regular basis.

On a simpler level, the APKs reveal strings that hint at how Gemini will work, which seems a lot like how Assistant currently operates but with new AI tools.

The code has "Gemini Actions" listed, which include standard Gemini features like email summarization, managing calendar events or getting weather updates via queries.

Antioxidant Index

Beyond Gemini, the APKs also revealed a new "antioxidant index" in the Samsung Health app. This measurement would allegedly measure beta carotene levels in your skin.

You would need to press that pad of your thumb against the back of your watch to trigger the measurement.

This feature is supposed to help you tailor your nutrition based on its measurements.

Interestingly, one of the code strings reads, "”Keep in mind that antioxidant index measurement is for fitness and wellness only, not for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. If you’re concerned about your antioxidant level, be sure to see a medical professional.”"

The APKs apparently held some images showcasing how this feature will work.

Google's annual developers conference, Google I/O 2025 is coming up at the end of the month and we expect to hear more about Wear OS 6 then, which One UI 8 Watch will be based on.

From there, Samsung should launch its Galaxy Watch 8 series of smartwatches, likely in July alongside One UI 8 and its foldable phones the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy Z Flip 7.

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung Galaxy A36 review: this budget phone still has room for improvement
• Samsung Galaxy S25's best feature could be even better with One UI 8
• Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 thickness could mean reduced battery life — what we know

The Apple Watch Series 10 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 are easily two of the best full-featured smartwatches available today. As Tom's Guide's resident wearables expert, they are also two of the models I reccomend most.

In addition to onboard smarts — and access massive buffets of third-party apps — both flagships boast impressive health and workout tracking tech paired with tools to help you maintain an active lifestyle, stay on top of your fitness goals, monitor and improve sleep quality and more effectively recover post-workout.

The question is, which device is the more accurate fitness tracker? To find out, I wore one on either wrist and tracked a manually-counted 6,000-step walk.

You can find the results from the Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 in the chart below.

Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Specs and features

But first, how do these two popular wearables compare? Despite a $100 difference in the starting price — the Galaxy Watch is the more affordable option — they offer very similar features, specs and even designs once you set aside their different case shapes.

Of course, the Apple Watch Series 10 — the best Apple Watch you can buy today — runs watchOS and only works with the iPhone, while the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 — one of the best smartwatches for Android — runs on Wear OS and works best with one of the best Samsung phones.

You can use the Galaxy Watch 7 with other newer Androids, but you'll miss out on some of its best AI-backed wellness features.

Those key differences aside, you're getting optional cellular connectivity, a bright and responsive touchscreen, a pair of physical buttons, 24 hours of battery life and state-of-the-art smart, safety and holistic features in whichever model you choose.

Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Walk test

If you've tuned in for any of my previous walk tests, feel free to skip on down to the results, because nothing has changed with how I test. For the newbies, welcome! Here's how we conduct these real-world accuracy comparisons.

To start, one watch goes on either wrist; in this case, the Apple Watch was on my left wrist, and the Samsung Galaxy Watch was on my right. With tracking rolling on both, along with Strava on my iPhone 12 mini, I embark on my walk, manually counting every step I take until I hit 100 steps. At that point, I give my trusty old-school tally-counter a click and start over again at one. Rinse and repeat 60 times.

Once I close in on my intended step count, i.e., get close to a nice rounded-number-total, I end the test by concluding tracking on all three devices and recording the results. This data then gets filed into the chart you see below and analyzed before a winner is declared.

With that said, let's head to the results chart!

Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Walk test results

Both smartwatches reported step count totals less than 100 steps off from my actual total. That's well within a reasonable margin for error — 99% accurate is good enough in my book. These are overwhelmingly reassuring results, not just for step count data but across the board.

The Apple Watch 10 was off by just 45 steps compared to 57 steps for the Galaxy Watch 7. Strava, however, was even closer with a step count total of 5,964 steps. All three devices, meanwhile, reported similar distance data within a tenth of a mile of one another.

The Apple Watch 10 and the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 also calculated similar elevation metrics, with just 4 feet separating the tallies. However, Strava noted a slightly lesser total climb for the walk.

Pace data is less consistent. While Samsung and Strava posted similar numbers, Apple's pace is way slower. Why? Samsung and Strava calculate your average pace based on your moving time, while Apple calculates it based on the total time the workout takes. This means that pauses in motion, like waiting at a crosswalk for the light to change, are held against you in Appleland.

Strava also provides an average "elapsed" pace metric, which, like Apple, is calculated based on your total workout time. For this walk, Strava measured my average elapsed pace at 16 minutes, 50 seconds per mile.

Heart rate data between the Apple and Samsung also checks out, with the slight discrepancies likely attributable to the devices being worn on different wrists. Apple, meanwhile, calculated 54 more calories burned during my walk. However, of all the metrics above, I place the least emphasis on the accuracy of this one.

Finally, battery drain for the 53-minute workout was the same for both devices, 5%.

Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Winner

In this comparison of fitness-tracking accuracy between the Apple Watch 10 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 7, Apple comes out victorious, besting the competition by just 12 steps.

So, does this mean that Apple makes better fitness-tracking wearables than Samsung? Certainly not.

Ultimately, both of these flagship smartwatches proved accurate in this test, posting similar (and sensible) data. Moreover, based on this comparison and numerous others, I'd confidently recommend either for your fitness tracking needs/journey.

Which smartwatch models or fitness trackers would you like to see me enter the ring with in a future bout of fitness-tracking supremacy? Let me know in the comments below.

More from Tom's Guide

• I walked 6,500 steps with the Galaxy Watch 7 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6 — this was more accurate
• I tried waking up with Garmin’s new Smart Alarm for a week — 5 things I learned
• I walked 8,000 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6 — and there's a clear winner

I walked 6,500 steps with the Garmin Vivoactive 6 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 to find out which is the more accurate fitness tracker. With matching $299 price tags, each of these smartwatches boasts impressive onboard fitness and location tracking tech. But only one can win this showdown.

For this comparison, I judged each device by how closely the final step count matched my actual (manually tallied) count of 6,500 steps. Other datapoints — like distance, climb, pace and heart accuracy — were also considered.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 comes into this challenge with one win versus the Garmin Forerunner 165, a tie versus the Google Pixel Watch 3 and one loss versus the Apple Watch SE (2022).

The newer Garmin Vivoactive 6, meanwhile, enters the ring coming off its first career loss versus the Apple Watch Series 10.

So, which device will come out on top in this bout? Read on.

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Compared

But first, here's a brief rundown of how the Garmin Vivoactive 6 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 compare in terms of features, specs and design.

While both start at $299, only the Galaxy Watch 7 comes with (optional) cellular connectivity. Similarly, like the best Apple Watch models, the best Samsung smartwatches work with an enormous range of third-party apps and also boast loads of native smart features.

The Galaxy Watch 7 is Android-only, but to get the most out of Samsung's impressive AI-backed wellness insights, you'll also need one of the best Samsung phones. On the flip side, all the best Garmin watches play nicely with both Android and iOS.

Another downside of the Samsung is battery life. I averaged roughly 24 hours per charge when testing it. The Garmin Vivoactive 6, meanwhile, consistently lasts for an entire week per charge in my testing. (The full review coming soon.)

When it comes to fitness training and recovery tools, the Vivoactive 6 has the Galaxy Watch 7 beat, though the latter does have some comparable features, like a daily Energy Score (similar to Garmin's Body Battery) and a daily Sleep Score. Speaking of sleep, both devices provide detailed sleep reports, but only the Samsung has an onboard ECG and body temperature sensor.

You also get useful safety tools on either model, including fall/crash detection.

And for fans of circular watches with big AMOLED touchscreens, the Galaxy Watch 7 and Vivoactive 6 look strikingly similar. Of course, the Samsung comes in two sizes, 40mm and 44mm, while the Garmin splits the difference with just a 42mm option.

There are some differences in the build quality. The Galaxy Watch 7 boasts a metal case, while the case on the Vivoactive 6 is mostly plastic. The Samsung also has a brighter screen. Both have a 50-meter water resistance rating, but the Garmin's plastic case makes it lighter, and ultimately, a little comfier.

Finally, the Galaxy Watch 7 and Vivoactive 6 each track a huge variety of workout types. As of writing, the Garmin supports 80 and the Samsung supports 100-plus, including, of course, walking.

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Walk test

For this test (as always), I manually counted every step while wearing one device on either wrist. In this case, the Garmin was on my left wrist and the Samsung was on my right.

To ensure an accurate manual count, I've developed a simple yet reliable system: Only my left foot takes odd-numbered steps and only my right foot takes even-numbered ones. Also, every time my manual count hits 100 steps, I click my trusty old-school tally-counter and start over again at one.

As a control for distance, pace and elevation data, I also run Strava on my trusty iPhone 12 mini. Once I hit my intended number of steps — in this case, 6,500 — the test ends and I turn into a statue, careful not to move a single leg muscle until all of the data from either device is captured and logged.

Next, the fun begins. I head home and put all the deets into the chart you see below and figure out a winner. With this in mind, here's how things shook out in this comparison of the Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs. the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7.

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Walk test results

I love a close call. Both devices were within 100 steps of my actual total, which is quite impressive. However, the Vivoactive 6 was ultimately closer, overcounting by just 26 steps compared to the Galaxy Watch 7, which undercounted by more than double that (58 steps). Still, either result is well within an acceptable margin for error.

Strava, meanwhile, placed my total at 6,506 steps, besting both wearables. Distance data is a near-match between the Garmin and Samsung and just a little bit higher than Strava's measure.

Elevation data is less consistent. Compared to Strava (which tends to be accurate in this department), the Samsung overcounted by 15 feet. This is a bit more than I expected, but still in a reasonable realm of accuracy. The Garmin watch, however, is off by a more significant 34 feet.

It's worth noting that only the Galaxy Watch 7 has an onboard altimeter for tracking elevation changes, which clearly puts the Vivoactive 6 at a disadvantage for this metric.

Fortunately, pace data is remarkably similar across the board. Strava and Samsung both calculate average pace based on your moving time alone, while Garmin provides both an average overall pace and an average moving pace, the latter of which is above. Apple, for what it's worth, only gives you an overall average pace (not a moving one), which I find less useful than the alternative.

Heart rate data between the Garmin and Samsung is also reassuringly similar, which shouldn't come as a surprise, given that both brands have long proven accurate in this regard.

Finally, the Samsung watch calculated slightly more total calories burned than its Garmin counterpart, and also ate through nearly twice the battery during my one-hour walk.

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Winner

In this walk test showdown between two titans of the sub-$300 wearable market, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 comes out on top over the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7. Surprised? I know I am, at least, a little.

With a more advanced array of health-tracking sensors and a more premium design overall (brighter screen, metal case vs. plastic), I had my money on the Galaxy Watch 7 taking home the championship belt. But alas, I was wrong.

Ultimately, both the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 proved more than reliable enough in this comparison test, and though it's fun to split hairs over which is (slightly) more accurate, I'd recommend either device for your fitness-tracking needs, with the Samsung being the better option if you also care about smart features, and the Garmin being better for hardcore workout enthusiasts and battery life fiends.

Which smartwatches/fitness trackers do you want to see me test head-to-head next? Let me know in the comments below. Until then, enjoy those steps!

More from Tom's Guide

• I biked 13 miles with the Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra — here’s the winner
• Apple Watch 10 vs. Pixel Watch 3: Which smartwatch wins?
• Under $100 smartwatch test: I walked 5,000 steps with the Amazfit Bip 5 vs Armitron Matrix — here’s the winner

Global smartwatch shipments dipped 7% in 2024 compared to the year prior. This is the first time since the original Apple Watch model debuted in 2014 that the market has seen any decline.

Based on data from the market research firm Counterpoint, Apple was hit hard by sluggish sales numbers. Compared to 2023, the Cupertino King shipped customers 19% fewer Apple Watch units. That’s quite the drop.

Why are Apple Watch sales dropping?

Source: Counterpoint Research Global Smartwatch Shipments Tracker by Model, Q4 2024

Blame it on the highly-anticipated Apple Watch Ultra 3 failing to materialize or the fact that the tenth-anniversary Apple Watch — the only new release we did get in 2024 — isn’t all that different from the Series 9 that came before it, even if it is the best smartwatch you can buy today.

Apple’s patent dispute with Masimo — which Apple recently effectively won — over the brand’s blood oxygen sensor tech also hurt sales early in 2024. For a short time, sales of the Series 9 and Ultra 2 were banned in the U.S.

Finally, Apple has yet to meaningfully incorporate Apple Intelligence features into the Apple Watch (though AI-generated notification summaries are pretty sweet).

All this adds up to a lack of excitement surrounding the Apple Watch. And without something truly groundbreaking or eye-popping in the pipeline for this year, I suspect Apple will continue to see its sales numbers shrink.

That said, with rumors pointing to a forthcoming Apple Watch Ultra 3 that could sport a larger display, significant battery life improvements, and high blood pressure warnings, along with a potential Apple Watch SE 3 at a more wallet-friendly price point, don’t count Cook and Co. out just yet.

Some smartwatch brands saw growth

On the flip side, Samsung noted a slight uptick in smartwatch sales of 3%. Google, meanwhile, was absent from the report.

Smartwatch makers focused on budget-friendly models managed to fare even better. The Chinese manufacturer Huawei, for instance, shipped 35% more devices in 2024 than in 2023. Xiaomi, meanwhile, noted a massive 135% increase in smartwatch sales.

While both manufacturers have a modest presence in the U.S., they’re selling smartwatches like hotcakes in other markets, most notably in Asia.

According to Xiaomi, the wallet-friendly Xiaomi Redmi series — which starts at around $50 — and the higher-end Xiaomi S1 proved especially popular.

More from Tom's Guide

• Your Apple Watch has a flashlight feature — here’s how to turn it on
• Apple paying $20 million over Apple Watch lawsuit — see if you’re eligible
• I walked 10,000 steps with Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Amazfit T-Rex 3 —here's the winner

Non-invasive blood glucose monitoring on wearable technology has been in the works for years, with Apple said to have been looking at the technology for its smartwatches in 2017. Eight years later, it hasn’t been achieved, with diabetics still having to use expensive third-party hardware to keep on top of their blood sugar levels.

Apple isn’t the only company said to be looking into the technology, and now it looks like Samsung may beat Apple to the punch. Originally rumored for last year’s Galaxy Watch Ultra, the company has dropped its biggest hint that the long-awaited health-tracking breakthrough is just around the corner.

At the Samsung Health forum in San Jose, the company’s senior vice president Dr. Hon Pak, specifically namechecked the feature as something Samsung’s engineers have been working on, according to Android Authority.

“What I’m really excited about is our team, as you may have assumed, we are working on a noninvasive optically-based continuous glucose monitor,” he’s quoted as saying. “I can’t tell you the time [of the launch], but I’m very excited about the progress we are making, and this, if we do it right, will be a game-changer.”

It’s unusual for a company to be as explicit as this about its work. But it wasn’t an accidental slip of the tongue: just yesterday, Samsung published an editorial from Dr. Pak on its newsroom reiterating the research.

“By combining our long-standing sensor innovations with AI leadership, we aim to elevate our capabilities in preventing diseases, beyond sleep apnea and expanding to cardio-metabolic conditions,” he writes.

“In particular, blood glucose is a big area of focus for us, and Samsung has been working to develop a sensor algorithm that predicts early signs of diabetes — along with non-invasive blood glucose monitoring technology and continuous glucose monitoring-integrated nutrition coaching.”

A game-changer, but when can we expect it?

While Dr. Pak was careful not to raise expectations by mentioning any kind of release date, the fact that Samsung is happy to talk about non-invasive blood glucose monitoring suggests that the company is confident it’s going to work — and soon.

This isn’t something Samsung would discuss in such definitive terms if it was only possible, and that in turn suggests it could be something we see debut this year with the Galaxy Watch 8.

That said, it’s worth referring back to Dr. Pak’s exact words here: “If we do it right, [it] will be a game-changer.” I’ve italicized “do it right” because that’s all important: blood glucose measuring isn’t something to be messed around with, and a poorly implemented solution is actually worse than no solution at all. The last thing you want to do is to lull diabetics into a false sense of security with unreliable measurements.

For that reason, while it’s possible, we’ll see the feature introduced in some form in the Galaxy Watch 8 — perhaps the “sensor algorithm that predicts early signs of diabetes” that Dr. Pak mentioned in the blog post — it wouldn’t be surprising if the holy grail of continuous glucose monitoring slips to the Galaxy Watch 9 or later.

More from Tom's Guide

• 5 biggest Android upgrades for the Galaxy S25 — Now Bar, improved Circle to Search and more
• Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra hands-on: This AI beats the iPhone
• Forget Samsung S25 Edge — this leaked image allegedly shows the iPhone 17 Air

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7, and its beefier sibling the Galaxy Watch Ultra, are two of the best smartwatches for Android users money can buy. And if you just got one for the holidays, you may be asking yourself, ‘How do I set this thing up?’ or ‘How hard is the setup process?’

The good news is two-fold: The process is both easy and fully documented. Simply follow my detailed instructions and illustrations below, and you’ll have your new Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 or Galaxy Watch Ultra up and running in no time like the tech buff that you are.

How to set up your Samsung Galaxy Watch

1. Turn on the Galaxy Watch and start the pairing process with your phone
2. Confirm the pins match; accept Samsung’s legal stuff
3. Sign in to your Google account and accept the legal stuff
4. Choose your apps and preloaded preferences
5. Choose your wearing preferences
6. Create optional workout routines and set sleep-tracking preferences
7. Read through key features and finish the setup process

Read on for more detailed instructions and illustrations.

Congratulations, you’ve successfully set up your new Samsung Galaxy Watch 7. You can expect the whole process to take roughly 30 to 45 minutes. As noted, the same setup process also applies to the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra.

Now that your new smartwatch is ready to roll, it’s time to explore all its cool and useful features, including my favorite wellness tracking tools, loads of smart functions and so much more.

Once on the wrist, you’ll be further prompted to take a tour of the watch’s basic navigational functions, which I recommend if you’re new to the Galaxy Watch world.

More from Tom's Guide:

• I test smartwatches for a living — my favorite wearable of 2024 is a battery-life champ
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 — here's the 3 biggest rumored upgrades
• I walked 5,000 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs. Fitbit Charge 6 — this device was more accurate

When the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 was announced last summer, my immediate thought was, 'I wonder what happened to all those promised upgrades that didn't come to fruition?'

Well, dear reader, it's time to dust off the Galaxy Watch 7 rumors and reapply them to Samsung's next-gen smartwatch, the Galaxy Watch 8.

There are three particularly juicy bits of speculative insight surrounding the forthcoming Galaxy smartwatch — expected to launch summer 2025 — each more notable than the next. Read on for details on each, followed by my wish list for the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8.

Micro-LED screen

It seems like every forthcoming smartwatch model, including both the Apple Watch 11 and Ultra 3, has at least one leak or rumor hinting at a move away from OLED to MicroLED. And the Galaxy Watch 8 is no exception.

I've written numerous times about the benefits of MicroLED compared to OLED, the most notable being much better energy efficiency, but improved resolution, brightness and saturation are also potentially on tap.

New square (ish) case design

The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra is the brand's first wearable in many years to sport a square (ish) case. Is Samsung trending too deeply into Apple's territory? Galaxy Watch 8 rumors suggest that the Ultra may not be the only Samsung smartwatch to feature an angular (ish) design.

I have mixed feelings about this move. As someone who reviews smartwatches for a living, I have no strong preference for square or round cases. I find both similarly comfy.

Of course, a square case makes it more obvious you're rocking a tiny computer on your wrist than a rounded one if that kind of thing matters to you.

Blood glucose monitoring

Similar to MicroLED upgrades, it feels like every single smart wearables manufacturer is working to figure out non-invasive blood glucose monitoring via the wrist, a breakthrough that would make managing diabetes much easier.

And there's reason to believe that Samsung may beat its rivals, namely Apple to the punch with blood glucose tracking in a smartwatch.

I initially predicted that we'd get the ground-breaking feature in the device which ended up being the Galaxy Watch Ultra. Now I'm cautiously optimistic that it will debut on the Galaxy Watch 8.

My Galaxy Watch 8 wish list

With the most notable Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 rumors (so far) out of the way, it's time to dream big and talk about my hopes and dreams for the Galaxy Watch 8.

Having reviewed both the Galaxy Watch 7 and Google Pixel Watch 3, one area Google dominates Samsung is in battery life, specifically for the larger 45mm Pixel Watch 3. My challenge to Samsung: match that model's 48-hour battery life mark with the next-gen XL Galaxy Watch model.

Speaking of the big boy, I'd like to see Samsung increase the size of the Galaxy Watch 8 from 44mm to 46mm to match the Apple Watch 10 and differentiate it from Google's 45mm XL.

Finally, for all my fellow fidgeters out there, Samsung, please bring back the Classic-style clicky bezel. It's both useful and highly comforting to futz with.

What do you want to see in the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8? Let me know in the comments below.

More from Tom's Guide:

• Apple Watch 11 — all the rumors so far
• 5 smartwatch and smart ring predictions for 2025 — Apple Watch Ultra 3, Samsung AR glasses and more
• I test smartwatches for a living — my favorite wearable of 2024 is a battery-life champ

The Apple Watch Ultra 2 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra are two of the best smartwatch models you can buy today; they are also two of the priciest. With features and rugged designs meant to appeal to outdoor adventure enthusiasts — and cool dudes who like big chunky wrist candy — both devices promise advanced fitness tracking capabilities for all sorts of physical activities.

I decided to test the accuracy of each while enjoying a soggy and crisp November bike ride around Seattle, Washington. With both fully charged up, I slapped the Galaxy Watch Ultra to my left wrist and the Apple Watch Ultra 2 to my right before departing on my ~13-mile adventure.

A little over an hour and ten minutes later, I returned, covered in mud and with a laundry list of metrics from each device based on my efforts.

Read on to find out how the Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra compares accuracy-wise when it comes to tracking my distance, speed, pace, heart rate and more. But first, some impressions from the ride...

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Galaxy Watch Ultra: Bike test

The bike test started smoothly, but roughly a third of the way into my ride, I noticed that the running time on the Samsung Watch appeared to have frozen. Having accidentally bumped a button on the Galaxy Watch Ultra once before during a bike test, inadvertently ending workout tracking early, I immediately pulled my bike off to the side of the trail to check in on things.

Fortunately, when I held my wrist up to inspect the metrics, the display updated with my current time, distance and other stats. Presumably, this behavior is intentional and designed to save battery power, but I'm hoping there's a way to turn it off because I find it utterly annoying.

Comfort-wise, while the Apple Watch Ultra 2 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra each weigh roughly 61 grams — the former felt more comfortable and less chunky on my wrist. I mainly attribute this to the Galaxy Watch sitting noticeably higher than the Apple Watch Ultra 2. However, that's just my bony wrist; your mileage may vary.

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Galaxy Watch Ultra: Results

As a control, I also tracked my Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra bike ride test using the Strava app on my phone. With that in mind, the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra slightly beats the Apple Watch Ultra in distance accuracy, while the Apple Watch beats the Samsung Watch when it comes to elevation data. Still, both devices nailed these metrics within 99% accuracy of the control.

Moving on to the pace, only the Samsung Watch offers an actual metric post-ride, while Strava and Apple require you to calculate it (time divided by distance). While Samsung and Strava measured roughly the same pace, Apple calculated a noticeably slower pace; the Apple Watch also measured my workout time as roughly five minutes longer than Samsung or Strava.

It's worth noting that both Strava and Samsung Galaxy Watches are programmed to auto-pause a workout during brief stoppages in movement, something the Apple Watch appears less keen on doing.

The Apple Watch also recorded an oddly lower speed than the Samsung Watch or Strava. Both measured my fastest speed at around 24 mph, which mentally checks out in my mind based on previous speed recordings along this route.

On the flip side, the Samsung Watch's heart data seems a bit off to me. I've completed different variations of this bike route dozens of times, always while tracking it with some combination of devices. As a result, I have a good idea of where my average heart rate (~165 bpm) and max heart rate (~ 185 bpm) tend to be.

While the Apple Watch Ultra's heart data falls largely in line with these expectations and previous bike test challenges, the Galaxy Watch Ultra's average heart rate strikes me as a tad low, while the max heart rate of 194 bpm seems high.

Of course, without a third heart rate measuring device, it's hard to say for sure if the Galaxy Watch's data is an anomaly or truly reflective of my efforts.

Moving on to our final metrics, both devices measured over 700 calories burned during my ride. While, power consumption-wise, the Samsung Watch used a little more juice than the Apple Watch.

Bike test winner: Verdict

With distance and elevation accuracy being the two primary metrics I judge which device wins or loses a bike challenge on, I have no choice but to call this one a draw because both the Apple Watch Ultra 2 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra proved incredibly accurate at measuring each.

Ultimately, either of these watches will serve you well if you're looking for a buffet of precise and actionable data post-workout, whether your favorite activity is biking, running, walking, hiking or something more niche. That said, sorry, Samsung folks, only the Apple Watch offers a pickleball tracking mode.

More from Tom's Guide:

• Fitbit is exiting the cheap smartwatch race — and this brand could replace it
• Under $100 smartwatch test: I walked 5,000 steps with the Amazfit Bip 5 vs Armitron Matrix — here’s the winner
• I walked 6,000 steps with the Apple Watch Series 10 vs. Polar Vantage M3 — here's the winner

Samsung Galaxy Unpacked has wrapped up with the company announcing all kinds of good stuff. Some of the most exciting devices include the Galaxy Ring, Galaxy Watch 7 and Galaxy Watch Ultra — they all have the new Samsung Energy Score feature, which uses AI to rate how your body should feel based on measured health metrics. 

According to Samsung, the feature "enhances your awareness of the ways your health influences your daily life, so you can utilize recommendations based on your current physical state to  focus your daily efforts on making improvements." 

While Samsung is releasing the feature for its latest devices, those aren't the only ones with Energy Score and AI benefits. Several of the best fitness trackers, which happen to be various models of Galaxy Watches, will get it, but not all of them. 

Here's a complete rundown of all the Samsung Galaxy Watches and devices that will get access to Energy Score, either on day one or through a software update later:

• Samsung Galaxy Ring
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 7
• Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
• Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 4
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic

If you own one of those watches (or the Galaxy Ring), you can see your Energy Score based on Sleep, Activity, Sleeping Heart Rate and Sleeping Heart Rate Variability. However, there are other caveats you must meet besides just having the correct watch model.

You need a Samsung smartphone with Galaxy AI capabilities ready to go. As of this writing, that means you need to own the Galaxy S22 or later. Any other older Samsung phones won't support Energy Score.

The other two requirements aren't device-specific, but you do need to have the Samsung Health app installed on your devices and have a Samsung account.

Thankfully, outside of owning newer devices, the new feature has no financial requirements. Samsung elected not to lock everything behind a subscription, which is great for the bank account and different from the Oura model.

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs. Motorola Razr Plus (2024)
• Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 AI — 7 best features announced at Unpacked
• Samsung unveils Galaxy Buds 3 with AI features — here’s what they can do

It's finally time to say goodbye to Samsung's Tizen-powered smartwatches. Tizen OS is on track to lose full support by the end of 2025, Samsung has announced, marking the end of an era that began in 2018 with the original Galaxy Watch. And right now, Samsung is offering up to $100 in trade-in credit for your Tizen Galaxy Watch.

This includes the Galaxy Watch 3, Galaxy Watch Active 2, Galaxy Watch Active, and the original Galaxy Watch. Considering that most major retailers like Best Buy only offer between $5-15 dollars for these trade-ins, that's a significant boost, as 9to5Google notes. 

Samsung ditched Tizen OS, the company's proprietary operating system, starting with the Galaxy Watch 4 in 2021 as it pivoted to Google's Wear OS. Now, Samsung has outlined a termination schedule for Tizen watches, according to screenshots first shared by TechIssuesToday of a notice purportedly from a member of the Galaxy Store Operation. It looks like Samsung is gradually phasing out support for Tizen on its Galaxy Store, culminating in a full shutdown by September 2025. You can find the timeline below: 

• September 30, 2024: The Galaxy Store will cease sales of paid Tizen watch content, including apps, watch faces, and more.
• May 31, 2025: The Galaxy Store will discontinue new downloads of free Tizen watch content.
• September 30, 2025: The “My Apps” section in the Galaxy Store will stop allowing re-downloads, effectively shutting the door on accessing any further paid or free Tizen content.

The latest iteration of the Galaxy Watch is the Galaxy Watch 6. It runs Wear OS 4, the newest version of Google's Android smartwatch software that comes layered with Samsung's One UI 5 Watch for Galaxy-specific experiences. In practice, that means the watch is loaded with familiar Google apps, but has built-in programs like Samsung Health and Bixby, too.

But a new Galaxy Watch 6 doesn't come cheap. While you can often catch it on sale (just check out our best Galaxy Watch 6 deals), it's sticker price of $300 can be a tough sell for some. 

However, if you have an older Galaxy watch and are looking to upgrade, now's the perfect time to do it as Samsung is boosting trade-ins for its Tizen-powered models. That means an older watch will actually fetch a decent credit toward a newer model that’s miles ahead in terms of capabilities and performance. So be sure to head on over to Samsung's store to see how much your smartwatch is worth. 

Don't have a Galaxy watch to trade in, but still want some money off? Be sure to check out our Samsung discount codes for the latest deals. 

More from Tom's Guide

• Samsung Galaxy Watch X just leaked — and it could blow away Apple Watch Ultra on battery life
• Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Galaxy Ring key specs just leaked — here’s what we know
• Samsung's Galaxy smartwatches are about to get new AI health and wellbeing features — here's what we know

A new leak has all but confirmed the anticipated launch of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 this July, thanks to an interesting yet minor detail. 

According to SamMobile, a new Samsung wearable with the product code SM-L305U has been registered on the Bluetooth SIG (Special Interest Group) database. All Bluetooth devices must appear on the database before public release. 

The product code is speculated to relate to the US version of the wearable, specifically the 40mm Galaxy Watch 7 with LTE. According to the database, the certification document says the device features Bluetooth 5.3 with LE capability — the same Bluetooth version used in the Galaxy Watch 6.

While the certification doesn't tell us much about the next iteration of the watch, it does indicate that its launch is likely to be imminent. Rumor has it that Samsung is due to hold another Unpacked event in July this year, with plans to announce the new flagship wearable, the Galaxy Z Fold 6, the Galaxy Z Flip 6 and the brand-new Samsung Galaxy Ring. 

Like the previous models, we anticipate that the newest iteration (along with its accompanying variants) will be announced in July and available for purchase in August 2024.

New specs for Galaxy Watch 7

Several rumors have circulated recently regarding potential specs for the upcoming Galaxy Watch 7. One of the most notable whispers speculates that the new smartwatch will boast an enhanced battery life. Another recent rumor proposed that the company is considering a radical redesign, with the possibility of changing to a square display being "enthusiastically" considered.

Rumors also suggest a powerful new processor upgrade, which means the new watch could have vastly improved speed and stamina. For US users, there are mentions of sleep apnea detection being added to the device. 

We're not sure whether any of these significant improvements will come to life in Samsung's newest wearable, but if any appear true, it could call upon an early upgrade for Galaxy Watch aficionados. With a possible new design, substantially better performance and more robust battery life, the Galaxy Watch 7 could be a serious improvement compared to earlier models. 

Samsung has just announced an update for its Galaxy Watch series that looks set to bring it in line with the likes of Fitbit and Withings later this year. 

In a press release, the company revealed that the Samsung Health app will soon “detect signs of sleep apnea using a compatible Samsung Galaxy Watch and Phone” thanks to the feature finally getting authorization from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

While this isn’t a new ambition for Samsung (the company previously received approval from South Korea’s Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in October), the sign off has allowed the company to provide a vague timeline for the feature’s release in the United States. Samsung says that it will land in the third quarter of 2024 — which means at some point between July and September.

While that release date suggests it will be a launch feature on the upcoming Samsung Galaxy Watch 7, what’s less clear is which other wearables will be compatible. Samsung does say it will be “available on the Galaxy Watch series” which implies more than one model — though it’s possible that’s the company’s way of avoiding namechecking a product that doesn’t officially exist yet. We’ll have to see.

In any case, it’s a welcome new health feature. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a condition that prevents patients from breathing properly while asleep, which can lead to poor sleep quality and daytime fatigue if untreated. Worse, as Samsung points out, when untreated it can “compound the risk of cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias and stroke.” 

The update should detect “moderate or severe forms of OSA”, allowing Galaxy Watch owners to “seek medical care to reduce the possibility of health-related complications”.

It sounds like the feature will kick in passively, requiring users to simply track their sleep twice in a 10-day period for more than four hours at a time. Samsung does say it’s limited to those over the age of 22 who have yet to receive a sleep apnea diagnosis, however.

Samsung isn’t the only company aiming to track sleep apnea from the wrist. Fitbit introduced the feature with its Ionic smartwatch in 2017, and Withings followed suit in 2020. It’s also rumored that the Apple Watch X will introduce the feature when it arrives in September.

Apple isn't the only tech giant looking to bring breakthrough health-tracking to its wearables. Samsung is hard at work exploring the development of continuous blood pressure monitoring and noninvasive blood glucose readings for its devices, according to a new Bloomberg report. 

It's part of a larger push to bring game-changing health features to a range of devices, like the upcoming Samsung Galaxy Ring, said Samsung executive Hon Pak, who is overseeing the effort. Currently, to get an accurate reading of your blood sugar or blood pressure levels, you need a dedicated clinical device. But Samsung, Apple and other tech giants are aiming to bring those and other health features to the smartwatches and fitness trackers that consumers already wear every day. 

“If we can do continuous blood pressure and glucose, we’re in a whole different ballgame,” Pak, Samsung’s mobile digital health chief, told the outlet. “I think that’s where everyone is trying to get to. We’re putting significant investment toward that.”

We've heard rumors of a noninvasive blood glucose sensor joining the other health tech inside Apple's smartwatch since before the Apple Watch Series 7 launch. However, there have been conflicting reports about how much progress has been made. What we do know is that Apple has been working for years on incorporating a glucose reader that doesn't require users to prick their skin for a blood sample to test, something that could help millions of people better manage their diabetes. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman previously reported that the Apple Watch X, tipped to release in 2024 or 2025, could include blood pressure monitoring technology.

While Pak remained tight-lipped on an exact timeline for either feature, he said noninvasive glucose monitoring could arrive "in some form within five years." Looking ahead, Samsung aims to eventually provide consumers with a complete picture of their well-being by using sensors on different parts of the body and around the home.

“We are looking at everything from miniaturization to the various different technology platforms that can do some type of glucose monitoring or anything in between,” Pak said. 

Samsung is “evaluating all options” to improve its blood pressure features, he said, noting that traditional blood pressure readings aren’t “really that meaningful” beyond showing a range of normal and abnormal. “Whether it’s Apple or others, I think we are trying to redefine blood pressure in a way that it was originally intended, which is: How much cardiovascular risk do you have?” 

More health features headed for Galaxy Ring and Buds

Pak also shared a few updates about the Samsung Galaxy Ring, a new wearable capable of tracking users' health and fitness that was teased at the Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2024 event. It's expected to launch at some point in 2024 with built-in activity and sleep tracking, but "more health features" are planned for the future, Pak said. 

"The ring represents that community of people who want health tracking that is more comfortable and less obtrusive," he continued. "It's meeting a need of a specific population of people who want to track and measure, but in a different way."

Beyond just the Galaxy Ring, though, Samsung is looking into incorporating a range of different health-related sensors for future versions of its Galaxy Buds. The company is studying new ways to track a user's body temperature and heart rates through their ears, information that can then be combined with wrist and ambient data to build a more comprehensive picture of their health. Samsung is also exploring meditation and mental health options for mixed reality headsets, which could be a future competitor to the Apple Vision Pro. 

More from Tom's Guide

• 5 ways to get the best music experience from your Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
• Samsung Galaxy Ring: Everything we know so far
• Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5: which new foldable is better?

Unlike smartphones, wearables don’t tend to get annual upgrades to their processing power because they don't really need one. The demands of your average smartwatch are much more limited than smartphones, after all.

As such, Samsung tends to upgrade the processor after two or more generations. The Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Watch Active 2 and Galaxy Watch 3 all used the Exynos 9110, before the Galaxy Watch 4 and 5 took on the Exynos W920. Last year the Galaxy Watch 6 was upgraded to the Exynos W930, and we were fully expecting the upcoming Galaxy Watch 7 to pack the same processor.

Not so, according to WinFuture’s reliable tipster Roland Quandt. On X, Quandt posted that the Galaxy Watch 7 will be “based on Exynos 5535” — something he expects to eventually be marketed as the Exynos W940.

Unfortunately, that’s all we’ve got to go on for now, but there are some assumptions you can make based on the very presence of a new chipset. We’ll likely be looking at a bit more power for smoother operation in daily use and, more excitingly, a new chipset could well mean better energy efficiency. 

In other words, we might be looking at improved battery life — which is a good thing, as the current models stop just shy of two days with the always-on display disabled. If you keep it on, you’re looking at 30 hours, so anything Samsung can do to eke out more would be welcome.

This is actually the first rumor we’ve heard about the Galaxy Watch 7, but we’re broadly expecting more of the same iterative updates that Samsung has provided in recent years. Once again, we’d imagine that there will be a standard version, and the ‘Classic’ edition with its pleasingly tactile rotating bezel for non-touch controls (Samsung did away with this for the Galaxy Watch 5, but it was back last year.) 

Speaking of revivals, it will be interesting to see if Samsung brings back the Pro model this year. So far, the top-end smartwatch — with its massive battery, outdoorsy features and premium price point — has only had one release back in 2022 with the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro. It wasn’t updated last year, though it’s still sold prominently on the Samsung website.

We probably won’t find out until later in the year. Samsung typically refreshes its wearables line in mid-to-late summer, when we’re also expecting new foldables and perhaps a tablet or two.

Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2023 is almost here, preceded by months of leaks and rumors about what to expect at Samsung's keynote summer event. And while foldable phones figure to be the center of attention at the July 26 product launch, other devices could debut, too — including the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6.

It's that unannounced smartwatch which finds itself at the center of a new rumor, this time from noted tipster SnoopyTech. If true, it could mean the return of a fan-favorite feature as well as one of the largest Samsung smartwatches to date.  

As spotted by Android Authority, the tipster shared several high-quality renders purporting to show off the Galaxy Watch 6 and Galaxy Watch 6 Classic. Some of the images feature 40mm and 44mm models of the Galaxy Watch 6, while others highlight the 43mm and 47mm Galaxy Watch 6 Classic variants. 

In the past, the two smartwatch series have been largely identical on the inside, with the Classic designed to look more like a traditional timepiece. You can check out all the images on Imgur to see for yourself.

Return of the bezel

Most interestingly, the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic looks to have a rotating bezel, a popular feature that Samsung dropped from its smartwatch lineup with last year's Galaxy Watch 5 and Galaxy Watch 5 Pro. In the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic image, the bezel sits raised around the central display with groves around the edge. As has become standard for Samsung watches, the right side of the device features two buttons.

A previously leaked render of the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic pointed to the rotating bezel making a return with Samsung's next-gen smartwatches. But now we have more reason to believe it'll be exclusive to the Classic variant.

The size options of the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic mentioned in this new leak are also noteworthy. The Galaxy Watch 4 Classic shipped in 42mm and 46mm configurations. At 47mm, the larger Galaxy Watch 6 Classic would be the biggest Samsung smartwatch we’ve ever seen.

Other rumors we've heard about the Galaxy Watch 6 series suggest a possible move to a curved glass display, larger batteries, potential support for blood glucose monitoring and a feature for detecting irregular heart rhythms.

We'll have to wait another week-and-a-half for Samsung Unpacked to hear more, but the Galaxy Watch 6 potentially sounds like a shoo-in to make our best smartwatches list. In the meantime, if you're in the market for a new smartwatch, check out our guide about whether to pull the trigger on a Galaxy Watch 5 or wait for the Galaxy Watch 6.

More from Tom's Guide

• Should you wait for the Galaxy Watch 6 or buy the Galaxy Watch 5 now?
• Samsung Galaxy Unpacked set for July 26 — and you can save $50 on preorders
• Best smartwatches for Android

The rotating bezel is back! Yes, Samsung has revealed Galaxy Watch 6 at Galaxy Unpacked and, after a year hiatus, the Classic design has returned. Together with the sporty-looking Samsung Galaxy Watch 6, Samsung's smartwatch collection for this year is shaping up to be an exciting one. 

With competition from Google, Fitbit, Garmin, and Oura and more in the wellness-tracking market, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 prioritizes health monitoring with fresh activity and sleep tracking features. Plus, the launch of an Irregular Heart Rate notification feature positions it to be one of the best smartwatches for detecting for signs of Afib. 

Meanwhile, significant design upgrades include slimmer display bezels and a new interchangeable band mechanism. Plus, updates to Wear OS improve existing apps to make them play nicer with the Galaxy ecosystem.

And that's just the abbreviated version. Below is everything you need to know about the Galaxy Watch 6 and Galaxy Watch 6 Classic. Make sure you check out the details of the other products Samsung launched at Unpacked, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5, and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 series.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Specs

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Price and release date

Pre-orders are open for both the Galaxy Watch 6 and Galaxy Watch 6 Classic starting on July 26th, and the wearables will go on sale August 11, 2023.

Those in the U.K. who preorder the Galaxy Watch 6 will be able to claim a £50 Google Play Voucher, and those who order the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic will be able to claim a £75 Google Play Voucher. Everyone will be eligible to receive a free Fabric Band by simply placing a preorder for the Galaxy Watch 6 or Galaxy Watch 6 Classic.

For the Galaxy Watch 6, the 40mm version will start at $299/£289, and the larger 43mm version is priced at $329/£319. The Galaxy Watch 6 Classic will start from $399/£369 for the 44mm, with the 47mm watch costing $429/£399. Each smartwatch is available with LTE connectivity.

You will be able to pick up the 44mm Galaxy Watch 6 in graphite or silver, and the 40mm Watch 6 in graphite or gold. The Galaxy Watch 6 Classic comes in black or silver for both sizes.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Design and display

The Galaxy Watch 6 design is familiar, but improved. Samsung trimmed down the bezels of its new smartwatches, subsequently increasing the size of their displays. This results in 1.3-inch and 1.5-inch Super AMOLED displays on the 40mm and 44mm versions of the Galaxy Watch 6. As for the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic, it packs 1.3-inch and 1.5-inch sapphire crystal Super AMOLED displays for the 43mm and 47mm versions of the watch.

The headline from Unpacked is the return of the Watch Classic to the Samsung wearable line with rotating bezel functionality. The last time we saw a rotating bezel from Samsung was on the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic. But now it's 15% thinner, resulting in a sophisticated look that can pass for business or causal wear.

Last year, Samsung launched the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro instead, designed for extreme sports — where dust and dirt would've damaged a rotating bezel if it were there.

In terms of weight, the Galaxy Watch 6 maintains a rough weight of 0.98 ounces (28 grams) for the 40mm one, and 1.16 ounces (33 grams) for the 44mm watches. The Galaxy Watch 6 Classic though is heavier than both the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro and the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic, coming in at 2.08 ounces (59 grams) exactly for the 47mm and 1.83 ounces (52 grams) exactly for the 43mm version.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Software and performance

On the inside of both smartwatches, there's a new dual-core 1.4GHz Exynos W930 chipset, which is an upgrade from the internals of the Galaxy Watch 5. The new chipset runs a faster CPU and each device has an increase in RAM to 2GB and storage to 16GB.

In terms of the user experience, the Galaxy Watch 6 operates on Wear OS from Android, called One UI 5 Watch. As the UI is based on Wear OS, Google apps such as Google Assistant and Google Maps are included as standard on both the Galaxy Watch 6 and Galaxy Watch 6 Classic.

There are a greater selection of watch faces to choose from as well this year. Customers will also be able to take advantage of recently announced Samsung Wallet capabilities that allows for easy access to tickets, digital IDs, transport cards, and membership cards. Plus the updated Camera Controller app makes remote content capture with a Galaxy Z Flip 5 or Z Fold 5 a breeze. Uers can switch between photo and video, change angles, and zoom in and out before deciding to take a picture.

As expected, the Galaxy Watch 6 integrates best with other Galaxy devices, and now making it easier for users to find lost devices using the SmartThings app. 

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Sensors and fitness features

Health remains a major pillar of the Galaxy Watch 6 experience. With competition from the best fitness trackers at an all-time high, Samsung is making use of all of the sensors on the new devices, particularly the heart rate and temperature sensors.

Both the Galaxy Watch 6 and the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic come with the Samsung BioActive Sensor for optical heart rate, electrical heart signal, and bioelectrical impedance analysis, as well as a temperature sensor, accelerometer, barometer, gyro and geomagnetic sensor and light sensor.

With these sensors, these new smartwatches will offer better monitoring and analysis. Users can take advantage of personalized fitness coaching and better tracking in order to monitor goals closely. What's more, the skin temperature reader found on the Watch 5 series has been added once again and can be used to track menstruation cycles with the help of artificial intelligence.

Sleep coaching is another area where Samsung have upped its game, bringing new software features to help users get better rest. The sleeping app now analyses your behavior between the sheets and offers you coaching to improve sleeping patterns. The app also assigns you an animal depending on what type of sleeper you are, in order to make it easier for you to understand your sleeping patterns and how to get more shut eye.

There are new and improved heart tracking tools, including the roll-out of an Irregular Heart Rate notification. The smartwatches can be used to take emergency electrocardiograms (ECG), and give users personalized heart rate zones based on VO₂ max, which is the maximum rate of oxygen consumption attainable during physical exertion.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Battery and charging

The Galaxy Watch 6 series will come with an incremental upgrade to the batteries that are power each device. The 44mm Galaxy Watch 6 comes with a 425mAh, and the smaller 40mm one is backed by a 300 mAh unit. In comparison the Galaxy Watch 5 44m smartwatch came with a 410 mAh battery and the 40mm came with a  284 mAh battery.

As a result, both watches are estimated for 40 hours if the always on display is off, and 30 hours when it's on. For users who want the longest battery life possible for their smartwatch, the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro with an 80-hour stamina is remaining available for purchase. 

Both smartwatches support fast charging, with gains of up to eight hours of battery life by charging them for eight minutes.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Outlook

With the vast array of competition in the wearables market, we're glad to see Samsung make some tangible improvements to design and health features for the Galaxy Watch 6 lineup. 

What's more, by still undercutting the Google Pixel Watch, the Galaxy 6 Watch with its larger displays and free-to-use health service, Samsung seems motivated to keep its title as the best smartwatch for Android.

More from Tom's Guide

• Read more about what's appeared at Galaxy Unpacked today
• Your Samsung Galaxy Watch is getting 3 new apps — what you need to know
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 vs. Google Pixel Watch — what to expect

One of Samsung's most beloved smartwatch features was abandoned for the Galaxy Watch 5: the physical rotating bezel. Introduced in the Gear S2 watch, it let you select apps by twisting the dial, and remained an optional feature all the way up to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic. 

But neither the regular Watch 5 nor the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro has it, instead embracing a haptic version that simply isn’t as satisfying or distinctive. It was one reason why at least one of our writers decided to pass this time around.

Samsung may have learned its lesson and will reportedly be reintroducing the rotating bezel for the next generation. But only for the Pro version.

That’s according to the Korean YouTuber Super Roader who made the claim in a new video. The leaker identifies himself as a former Samsung employee and is someone who has proved correct in the past, so this is probably a source worth listening to.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Pro: Bring back the bezel 

It certainly seems like a sensible strategy. One of the big criticisms of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro is that — giant battery and mapping features aside — it doesn’t do a great deal to justify the $170 price leap from the regular watch. Reintroducing a popular feature exclusively for Pro models would be a sensible way of upselling to those on the fence about splashing out on a more expensive model. 

A rotating bezel may hardly be essential, but it’s a nice addition and one that’s very visible for those who like the status-symbol element of wearables. Add in a few more little luxuries, and Samsung can make a good case to wearable buyers of why they need to go pro in 2023.

While the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 isn’t expected until the fall — likely to launch around the same time as the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5 — this is the second rumor to do the rounds this month. Last week, Galaxy Club reported that the basic Galaxy Watch 6 would be getting a modest battery upgrade, going from 284 mAh to 300 mAh (40mm) and 410 mAh to 425 mAh (44mm). 

There was no word on a similar battery boost for the Pro version, but given the current model packs a massive (for a smartwatch) 590 mAh cell, that’s perhaps less of a priority — though with wearables, every little helps.

Samsung’s high-end TVs feature microLED, a display technology that is even superior to OLED. It sounds like future versions of the company's Galaxy Watch smartwatch could be getting in on the act as well.

That's based on a report from  Sammobile, which claims that Samsung could bring microLED displays to its wearable line-up in the “near future” and that Samsung Display established a team to work on this technology toward the end of last year. They apparently hope to complete the development of the tech by the end of 2023.

That would likely mean the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6, expected later this year, would continue to use OLED for its display. But if the timeline is correct, we could see a microLED screen as soon as Galaxy Watch 7 in 2024.

News of Samsung's apparent interest in microOLED comes days after Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reported that Apple could switch to microLED displays for its Apple Watch Ultra for future versions of that high-end smartwatch. 

Apple apparently plans to make the displays in-house which could possibly even lower prices of the Apple Watch Ultra. The iPhone maker currently uses OLED panels from Samsung for its watches. By making its own microLED displays for wearables, Samsung Display could hope that it retains Apple as its customer, but we will have to see how that plays out in the future.

MicroLED displays for wearables 

OLED has been powering some of the best TVs, high-end phones and even wearables like the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5, the Apple Watch 8 and the premium Apple Watch Ultra. But it might be time for the world to move to a superior display technology — microLED which has several upgrades over OLED, especially for wearables. 

MicroLED is much brighter, while offering a better contrast ratio and color reproduction. Most importantly, its visibility is much better under direct sunlight than an OLED display — something that is imperative for smartwatches. 

According to Gurman, people who have seen prototypes of the microLED smartwatch displays say that they “make content appear like it’s painted on top of the glass.”

Smartwatches also suffer from limited battery life, with some watches requiring nightly charges. MicroLED is more power efficient than OLED, which could be another game changer for smartwatches, since it is brighter and yet will not draw as much power.

MicroLED will be a big step up from OLED for Samsung’s Galaxy Watches. If Samsung Display does manage to beat Apple to the punch in getting the technology ready, it could meet the demand for both, Apple and Samsung. 

Apple seems to have bigger plans for using microLED. According to the Bloomberg report, the tech giant plans to use a microLED display in its highest-end Apple Watches and then eventually move on to other devices, including the iPhone. 

Samsung could follow in Apple's lead in this regard and we will have to see if we could see microLED displays on Samsung's flagship Galaxy S series in the next few years.

Apple could also bring the technology only in 2024 which means the best smartwatches next year are in for a solid upgrade.

Black Friday smartwatch deals are a great opportunity to get some wearable tech at a great price. Despite being a generation old, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic is still one of the best smartwatches on the market. In fact, I use mine every day — and you can get one cheaper than ever.

Right now you can get the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic on sale for $199 at Walmart. That's the best price we have ever seen for it, taking an additional $50 the previously lowest price we saw just days ago. 

That's right — this excellent smartwatch is now $200 off. Black Friday deals at their finest.

In our Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 review, we called it the best Android smartwatch available. Even after the launch of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 and Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, it still remains on our list of the best smartwatches. The smartwatch features Google's Wear OS 3, which includes a host of apps such as Google Maps all accessible from your wrist. It even has its own watch-sized QWERTY keyboard with a "swipe to type" system. 

Plus, health enthusiasts will love the heart rate monitoring, ECG reader and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) tracking. BIA tracking will analyze your BMI, muscle mass, body water percentage as well as several other factors, helping you tailor your health plan (and diet) to fit your needs. 

Although functionally identical to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4, the Classic has a more luxurious feel and build quality and comes with a rotating bezel, making it perfect for those more used to traditional wrist candy. Personally, I use this as my everyday watch and I could not live without the rotating bezel. In fact, it's the reason I haven't upgraded to the Galaxy Watch 5.

Normally we would recommend the budget conscious to just grab the basic model. But right now the prices are the same. Amazon has the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 for just $149, so go check it out if you don't need the rotating bezel. But trust me, it's a feature you'll want to have.

Smartwatch deals are always changing, as we can see with the price of the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic crashing another $50 in just days. So make sure to follow our Black Friday deals hub so you don't miss a single deal this holiday season. 

We view the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic as one of the best smartwatches on the market. But it's ever better with a discount — in fact, with Black Friday deals, this top-rated smartwatch is at an all-time-low price.

Right now you can get the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic on sale for $199 at Walmart. That's the best price we have ever seen for it, taking $149 off the regular price. This is one of the best Black Friday smartwatch deals we've seen all season.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic is one of the best Android smartwatches available. Although functionally identical to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4, the classic has a more luxurious feel and build quality and comes with a rotating bezel, making it perfect for those more used to traditional wrist candy. 

This smartwatch features Google's Wear OS 3, which includes a host of apps such as Google Maps all accessible from your wrist. It even has its own watch sized QWERTY keyboard with a 'swipe to type' system. 

Health enthusiasts will be in heaven with heart rate monitoring, an ECG reader and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) tracking more accurately than ever before. BIA tracking will analyze your BMI, muscle mass, body water percentage as well as several other factors, helping you tailor your health plan (and diet) to fit your needs. 

While normally we would recommend the budget conscious to just grab the basic model, at this price, those who like the finer things in life need not break the bank with the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic. 

If the rotating bezel doesn't matter to you, check out this lowest-price-ever deal for the standard Samsung Galaxy Watch 4.

This Black Friday make sure to check in with Tom's Guide regularly for all the best Black Friday deals and the biggest savings. Visit our Black Friday deals live blog and be the first to know when the best products are on offer.

Editor's note: The Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro are now available, and offer a new health sensor and longer battery life. However, you may be able to get the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 at a discount. Be sure to check out our guide to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 vs. Galaxy Watch 4. 

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 feels familiar, yet different, and I mean that in the best way possible. It looks like a Galaxy Watch, but this iteration is sharper and more sophisticated. The software works like Tizen, but the updated Google Wear OS platform is pragmatic and precise. 

Samsung ditched the ‘Active’ branding for its latest lineup, instead pitching a sporty-looking Galaxy Watch 4 as the company’s flagship and a ‘Classic’ version that carries on the luxurious characteristics of last year’s Samsung Galaxy Watch 3.

The Galaxy Watch 4 packs a 3-in-1 health sensor for measuring heart rate, taking ECGs and reading body composition — it's the first major smartwatch to offer bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). 

There's no question the Galaxy Watch 4 was best smartwatch and yet for people with Samsung smartphones, and the best Samsung watch ever. Read this Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 review to find out why, though, again, it's being replaced by the Galaxy Watch 5.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 price and availability

Both the standard Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch 4 Classic are available for purchase as of August 27, 2021.

The Galaxy Watch 4 starts at $249.99 for the 40mm Bluetooth model and $299.99 for the 40mm LTE model. The Galaxy Watch 4 Classic starts at $349.99 for the 42mm Bluetooth model and $399.99 for the 42mm LTE model. If you're looking to save, you can get discounts direct with the retailer with our Samsung promo codes.

As an aside, a Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro model has been tipped, and it could have a huge smartwatch battery.

Be sure to check our guide on how to set up the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 once you get yours.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 4 Classic: What’s different?

Our dedicated guide to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 4 Classic covers all the differences (and similarities) between the two smartwatch versions. 

Let’s get this out of the way — the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 and Watch 4 Classic are identical on the inside. From the new Wear OS software and Samsung’s One UI skin to the 3-in-1 health sensor and expansive watch face collection, you’ll get the same software experience. 

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic features fancier materials such as stainless steel case, leather straps and the physical rotating bezel. Think of it like the Apple Watch’s ‘Edition’ line. Except the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic is far more affordable than the Apple Watch Edition models, which are typically made from high-end materials like ceramic and titanium. Though it costs $100 more than the standard Galaxy Watch 4 Classic, it’s starting price is still less expensive than the entry-level Apple Watch 6.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Design

Both versions of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 feature a redesigned frame that allows for gapless transition from the smartwatch chassis to the straps. The uniform set of crown buttons also sport an oblong shape, rather than one protruding round crown accompanied by a flush side button.

Despite these subtle changes, the Galaxy Watch 4 pays homage to the Galaxy Watch models of the past. The Galaxy Watch 4 Classic gets the rotating bezel, which is both a handy navigation tool and excellent fidget spinner. Since the original Samsung Galaxy Watch debuted the bezel, it’s become as iconic to the product as the S Pen is — err, was? — to the Galaxy Note smartphone. Which is why it is controversial that Samsung opted to remove the rotating bezel from the new Samsung Galaxy Watch 5.

So as someone who’s used the Galaxy Watch 3 more recently than the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2, adjusting to a capacitive version of the bezel on the baseline Galaxy Watch 4 took time. But minus the mechanism, the smartwatch is a lot slimmer, making for a modern gadget that won’t be mistaken for a traditional timepiece.

• Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch Active 2: What are the differences?

I’d still wear it from the gym to dinner, though, especially in the Silver or Pink Gold options. That’s just my taste. I also appreciate the Green version that’s color-matched to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it only comes in the 44mm size. I prefer the 40mm model for my wrist size, though my male colleague tried on the 46mm Galaxy Watch 4 Classic and enjoyed the look of the larger display. 

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Wear OS pros and cons

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4’s software provides the best experience I’ve ever had using Wear OS, period. Although smartwatches with the old Wear OS have fooled me before — working fine at first until glitches start oozing out — the Galaxy Watch 4 doesn't falter. I will say the software still feels very Tizen-esque, but it’s a good thing. Finding my rhythm took no time, letting me switch between apps and menus and setting pages seamlessly. 

The rotating tiles are obvious remnants of Tizen, plus Samsung Pay and Samsung Health still take priority. Beyond that, Google’s new app cloud (which looks a lot like watchOS, but it’s convenient so who cares?) is loaded with Google’s programs. Including, as of May 23, Google Assistant.

You do get Google Maps, though. Having it on my wrist helps me get around easily, whether I'm walking in the city or driving in the suburbs. Check out more of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Wear OS features I'm enjoying so far. Also see our WearOS vs. watchOS comparison for how the Galaxy Watch 4's software compares to the Apple Watch's software.

Complementing Wear OS, One UI Watch makes the Galaxy Watch 4 a more active member of the Samsung device ecosystem. The software skin transition settings and tools from a Galaxy smartphone to a Galaxy smartwatch, and vice versa, automatically. One UI Watch also leverages an expansive watch face library, complete with a proprietary editing suite for developers. Bubbly numbers, animal animations and color-coordinated complications that remind me of Android 12 are some of my frequent face choices.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Body composition analysis

Samsung developed a new health sensor for the Galaxy Watch 4. It combines heart rate monitoring (PPG), an electrocardiogram reader (ECG) and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) for a 3-in-1 sensor that sits closer to the skin than the individual health sensors in the previous Galaxy Watch.

Of those, BIA is the big news. Similar to what you’ll find on the best smart scales, BIA sends a weak electric current through your body to analyze body fat percentage, body mass index (BMI), muscle mass, bone mass, body water percentage and more. Taking a BIA reading is quick, but you’ll need to hold your fingers against the crown buttons for about 15 seconds without those fingers resting on the skin next to your smartwatch. It’s a little awkward, so we made a guide on how to use Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 to measure body composition.

When used properly, body composition analysis can help you understand how changes you make to your diet or activity impacts your internal makeup — not just your weight. But there are caveats. For one, it's generally not recommended that people with pacemakers or people who are pregnant use BIA. While many smart scales have a mode that disables BIA. Samsung simply says those who shouldn't use it, shouldn't use it. 

Then there's concerns about the metrics gathered from BIA possibly perpetuating body dysmorphia. Samsung simply says the measurements might not be accurate for those under 20 years old, but doesn't appear to put a true age restriction on the feature.

I don't feel it appropriate to share the intimate details of my body makeup with the internet, but I will note the discrepancies with measurements. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4's readings did not match my Wyze Scale's. The measurements were as much as 5% off for metics like body fat perfect. It's hard to say which device is more accurate without seeing a doctor, but I probably wouldn't use either as my north star for wellness goals. And again, if you're pregnant, have a pacemaker or battle body dysmorphia, I'd encourage you to seek out professional medical advice before buying this smartwatch.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 review: Activity tracking

Over the course of one week, I used the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 to track a variety of workouts indoors and outdoors. For my Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 workout test I started with weightlifting, and while the watch lets you track individual types of movement (ie. arm curls, bench press, lateral raises, pull-ups) I stuck with the catch-all circuit training option. The Apple Watch has a few more options when it comes to tracking different sports, but the Galaxy Watch 4 has more niche selections. You'll likely need to add workout types from the Samsung Health app on your smartphone, though — the preset list isn't extensive.

When it came to yoga, I sensed my calorie count ran high, but I recognized my heart rate updated more quickly than it did on the Galaxy Watch 3. For a workout where your heart rate stays in a shorter range than, say, cardio, the frequent refresh is helpful for seeing how certain poses impact my body.

I couldn't monitor my wrist as closely while cycling as I could in downward dog. Luckily, the Galaxy Watch 4 provides audible and vibration updates on mileage, plus a brief activity summary every 30 minutes. Again, I think the watch's calorie count is too generous, but the GPS mapped my reliable 10-mile route well.

The Galaxy Watch 4's automatic workout tracking is similarly successful. Juggling my 90-pound dog, phone, keys and sometimes a coffee, I often forget to launch a walk workout. A buzz on wrist let me know when the Galaxy Watch 4 detects my walk and picks up tracking from when I left my apartment. It also has a useful auto-pause function, so my dog's need to say hi to every passerby doesn't result in me recording a 35-minute mile.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Sleep and stress tracking

Samsung improved sleep tracking metrics for its latest smartwatch. Blood oxygen is measured once a minute overnight on the Galaxy Watch 4, compared to once every 30 minutes on the Galaxy Watch 3. More SpO2 readings could mean more insight on rest quality, especially for those with conditions like sleep apnea. When you sleep next to a compatible smartphone, the sounds of your snores get tracked, too. 

I'm a quiet sleeper, but I do often wake up for an hour at a time in the early morning. In these instances, the Galaxy Watch 4 would record two separate sleeps, but show me the total time asleep in the morning recap. 

Another recovery tool, the Galaxy Watch 4’s stress app shows your stress levels. I stayed in the green, which means not too stressed, but the smartwatch still gave me the option to launch a breathing session. The Fitbit Sense takes a more convincing approach to stress monitoring and management, though it’s encouraging to see Samsung’s watch catching up.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Battery life

As much as I’d like to call the battery life a let down (some rumors hinted at a week-long battery life,) it’s a far cry from a dealbreaker. Samsung estimates the Galaxy Watch 4 can last 40 hours with regular use. It said something similar last year, but as I cover in my guide to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 3, with GPS, activity tracking and the always-on display enabled, I needed to charge every 24 hours.

Daily charging is just the norm for most mobile devices we use every day. Sure, many great smartwatches and many of the best fitness trackers last several days without a charge. But as long as you’re not disappearing into the woods for a week, I wouldn’t get caught up on the difference between 40 hours and a day. 

I wish the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 battery life was more consistent, though. I found some days the watch needed to be charged more often than 24 hours. 

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Verdict

With design updates, refreshed software and a breakout BIA system, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 is by no means an incremental upgrade. And all at a lower price, I might add. That's why Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic isn’t worth the money, in my opinion.

But sometimes, when you make many changes at once, there's more chances for individual changes to fall short. The battery life could be more consistent, and Wear OS is missing some key features at launch. I'm also hesitant to celebrate the benefits of wrist-based body composition analysis for the number of people the feature might be unsafe for. 

Instead, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4's success comes down to integrating as obnoxiously well with Galaxy devices as the Apple Watch does with the greater Apple ecosystem. It masters a convenience that's been absent for Samsung's users, letting all the other chips fall in place. It's the best smartwatch for Android you can buy now. Stay tuned to see if it maintains its place as competitors like the Montblanc Summit 3 and Google Pixel Watch (or even the rumored Samsung Galaxy Watch 5) enter the market.

Take a look at our Samsung promo codes for the latest discounts and offers. 

• More: How to use SOS emergency features on iPhone, Android and smartwatch

Update: Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro could be super tough — and super pricey. 

Two weeks ago, Samsung seemed set on simplifying its smartwatch line with the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5. There would be no Galaxy Watch 5 Classic, and we’d instead be treated to a regular and Pro model.

At the time, I wrote that this was likely to simply be a branding exercise and the rotating bezel — a fan favorite feature and Samsung USP — would likely be safe. But now it seems that Samsung may not have plans to simplify the line after all, as GalaxyClub has dug up a trio of code names and model numbers which suggests Samsung will be introducing three different wearables later this year.

First off, there’s Heart-S with the model number SM-R90X. It’s the smallest of the bunch, with sizes of 40mm and 42mm, likely making it the next-generation version of the basic Galaxy Watch 4. Then there’s the Heart-L — or SM-R91X — which is slightly bigger at 44mm and 46mm, and feels like the elusive Galaxy Watch 4 Classic’s successor.

Finally, there’s the Heart-Pro which packs the model number SM-R92X and will apparently only come in one size. Said size isn’t stated, but given we’ve previously heard that a Galaxy Watch 5 Pro will come with a monster 572mAh battery, I’m thinking at least 48mm, and likely more.

Schrödinger's Galaxy Watch 5

If there really are three watches, as the model numbers and code names seem to indicate, it seems unlikely that Samsung would be ditching the Classic for the fifth generation of Galaxy Watches. So why did an earlier report suggest the company will be doing just that?

One way of squaring the circle of the two contradictory reports is to say that there are indeed three watches, but that the Galaxy Watch 5 Classic isn’t one of them — either because it’s called something else but is essentially the same, or because Samsung is doing something new and different.

Only that doesn’t actually work, because the original SamMobile report was explicit: “Samsung will launch two variants of its upcoming smartwatch: Galaxy Watch 5 and Galaxy Watch 5 Pro.” It’s not just that the Classic wasn’t listed — a third was specifically ruled out.

One of these reports, then, will be proved wrong later this year. If Samsung sticks to its past wearable release schedule, then we’ll know which in August, when the Galaxy Watch 5 will likely debut alongside the Galaxy Z Fold 4 and Galaxy Z Flip 4. 

This Apple Watch 7 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 face-off compares the top two smartwatches on the markets. With the both of these smartwatches available now, you might be wondering which wins.

The Apple Watch 7 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 are two of the best smartwatches you can buy right now — period. Although each caters to different users, innovations in wearable computing are usually determined by the new features both companies can bring to customers' wrists.

But did Apple or Samsung produce the better device? This Apple Watch 7 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 face-off covers how the two smartwatches stack up. 

Apple Watch 7 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Price and availability

The Apple Watch 7 starts at $399 for the 41mm GPS-only model, which is how much the 40-millimeter Apple Watch 6 with GPS cost. It was announced alongside the iPhone 13 series and is available now.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 is available, too. It starts at $249.99 for the 40mm Bluetooth model and $299.99 for the 40mm LTE model. The Galaxy Watch 4 Classic model with elevated materials starts at $349.99 for the 42mm Bluetooth model and $399.99 for the 42mm LTE model. It was announced alongside the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, two of the best phones you can buy now.

Apple Watch 7 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Design

The Apple Watch’s design didn't get the sweeping flat-edged redesigned rumored in past months — the Series 7 is actually curvier compared to previous Apple Watch models. It's not as obvious unless you're looking at the Apple Watch 7 vs. Apple Watch 6 side-by-side, though.

But the Apple Watch 7 display is probably the biggest upgrade, making it the best Apple Watch yet. Apple hasn't changed the Apple Watch's display borders in several years. But now, the Apple Watch 7's display is up to 20% bigger than the Apple Watch 6's. With a tiny 1.7mm bezel, the Apple Watch looks a lot larger, even though the chassis size hasn't changed. It sure looks like it maximizes screen real estate better than the Galaxy Watch 4.

The Galaxy Watch 4 actually has two design options. First, the sporty-looking Galaxy Watch 4 as the company’s flagship and a follow-up to the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2. Second, the ‘Classic’ version that carries on the luxurious characteristics of last year’s Samsung Galaxy Watch 3. The Classic model looks more like a traditional watch, offering a good balance of fashion and function, complete with a physical rotating bezel you can use to navigate menus. 

Apple Watch 7 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: New features and software

The Galaxy Watch 4 has several more exclusive features compared to the Apple Watch 7. They include body composition analysis via BIA, plus better sleep tracking with more frequent overnight blood oxygen readings. 

Additional upgrades to both smartwatches will come via software. The Apple Watch 7 ships with watchOS 8, which offers new messaging options, multiple timers and a Mindfulness app. One software that is unique to the Apple Watch 7, though, is one we've had on our wishlist for a while now. 

Taking advantage of the expanded screen, the Series 7 gets a full keyboard for typing out messages. It's the one thing we said Apple Watch 7 should steal from the Galaxy Watch 4, so we're glad it materialized. 

The Galaxy Watch 4 is the first smartwatch to run the new Wear OS, officially called Wear OS 3. Samsung has customized the experience with One UI Watch, though, so it still feels like Tizen somewhat. As the best Samsung watch, we like that the Galaxy Watch 4 offers some familiarity.

If Wear plus One UI Watch lives up to its promises, it could make for the most convincing Apple Watch rival to date. See our Wear OS vs. watchOS face-off for more on how the two softwares stack up.

Apple Watch 7 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Battery life

Based on our usage, we found the Galaxy Watch 3 lasted just over a day with the always-on display and frequent activity tracking. It seems like the Galaxy Watch 4 lasts about the same length of time, though it can be stretched to two days.

The Apple Watch Series 7 battery life can also last up to two days, but that’s if you pass on popular features. Instead, the 18-hour battery life checked out with daily activity tracking, and always on display and a couple of phone calls answered from my wrist. The Series 7 ships with a new USB-C to Magnetic charger that's supposed to help it charge 33% faster than the Series 6, though.

Apple Watch 7 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: Which wins?

This Apple Watch 7 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 face-off doesn't have a clear winner. The Apple Watch is the top choice for iPhone users, while the Galaxy Watch 4 is the top choice for Android users. But now that Samsung has teamed up with Google, it could pull from Fitbit's fanbase with the best Fitbit devices, too.

Still not sure which smartwatch is right for you? See our smartwatch buying guide for more advice.

• More: Samsung Galaxy Watch 4: My favorite (and least favorite) Wear OS features

Have you heard about the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4? The next-generation smartwatch has finally arrived, offering several upgrades over the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3.

The differences between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 3 depend on which model of Samsung's newest smartwatch you're considering. The standard Galaxy Watch 4 looks more like Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2, while the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic's design is a continuation of the leather straps and physical bezel we loved about last year's model.

• Smartwatch buying guide
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 4’s One UI looks awesome — but can it beat watchOS 8?
• Plus: Galaxy Watch 4 won't pair with iPhone — and its best features won't work with non-Samsung phones

There are plenty of differences on the inside, though. The Galaxy Watch 4 is powered by an all-new processor, and run's the new Wear OS in hand with Samsung's One UI Watch platform. Samsung introduced body composition analysis for the Galaxy Watch 4, too.

Here are the top things to know about the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 3. And be sure to check out our guide on the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 4 Classic for an in-depth analysis on the two new smartwatches.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 3: Price

The standard Galaxy Watch 4 starts at $249.99 for the 40mm Bluetooth model and $299.99 for the 40mm LTE model. The 44mm model costs $279.99 for Bluetooth and $329.99 for LTE.

The Galaxy Watch 4 Classic starts at $349.99 for the 42mm Bluetooth model and $399.99 for the 42mm LTE model. The 46mm version is priced at $379.99 for Bluetooth and $429.99 for LTE.

When it first launched, the starting Galaxy Watch 3 price of $399.99 will got you the 41mm model, while the 45mm model started at $429.99. It was $449.99 and $479.99 for LTE models, respectively. Now, though, the Galaxy Watch 3 can be bought for much less — We've seen retailers take over $100 off.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 3: Design

Both the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch 4 Classic have redesigned frames that create a gapless transition from the smartwatch chassis to the straps. The uniform crown buttons also sport an oblong shape, rather than one protruding round crown accompanied by a flat side button.

That's where the similarities end. The like the last Galaxy Watch Active, the Galaxy Watch 4 sits flush to your wrist and comes with silicone straps. For a more elevated aesthetic, the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic comes with genuine leather straps, a stainless steel case and, yes, the rotating bezel.

Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic and Galaxy Watch 3 share an elevated aesthetic. These smartwatches look more like traditional timepieces.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 3: Features

Let's go over what's new for the Galaxy Watch 4 series, compared to the Galaxy Watch 3. Most notably, the software found on the Galaxy Watch 3, Tizen, has been absorbed into a unified Google Wear OS (now called Wear OS 3.) The interface feels familiar, and Samsung's own programs like Samsung Pay and Samsung Health still take priority, but the smartwatch is loaded with Google’s programs now.

In addition to Wear OS, the Galaxy Watch 4 has Samsung's One UI Watch platform for better integration with the rest of Samsung device ecosystem. The settings from a Galaxy smartphone transfer to a Galaxy smartwatch, and vice versa, automatically. One UI Watch also leverages an expansive watch face library with bubbly numbers, animal animations and color-coordinated complications that might remind you of Android 12.

In terms of health and fitness features, the Samsung's new health sensor for the Galaxy Watch 4 combines heart rate monitoring (PPG), an electrocardiogram reader (ECG) and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA).  Similar to what you’ll find on the best smart scales, BIA sends a weak electric current through your body to analyze body fat percentage, body mass index (BMI), muscle mass, bone mass, body water percentage and more. You take a reading by holding your fingers against the crown buttons for about 15 seconds.

Samsung improved sleep tracking metrics for its latest smartwatches, too. Blood oxygen is measured once a minute overnight on the Galaxy Watch 4, compared to once every 30 minutes on the Galaxy Watch 3. More SpO2 readings could mean more insight on rest quality, especially for those with conditions like sleep apnea. When you sleep next to a compatible smartphone, the sounds of your snores get tracked, too.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 3: Battery life

There are subtle differences in the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 3 battery life. Samsung said the Galaxy Watch 3 should last about two days on one charge, but we needed to charge our unit every day to keep up with how we used the watch. Activity tracking and enabling the always-on display were the biggest battery-drain culprits.

Samsung estimates the Galaxy Watch 4 battery life for 40 hours. We'd guess it's closer to a day, again. We're still testing the new smartwatch, though.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 3: Outlook

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 isn't an incremental upgrade over the Galaxy Watch 3. For a lower price, it's totally refreshed. The best part? It feels familiar, so there's not a huge learning curve or adjustment to the hardware or software.

We're not telling you to run out and exchange your Galaxy Watch 3 for a Galaxy Watch 4 — the previous-generation model is a great gadget, and will be supported with updates for at least three years. But if you're ready for a new experience, subtly sharper design and upgraded health features, the Galaxy Watch 4 is a well-rounded successor.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 4, the next-generation versions of the company's flagship wearables, could both be launching soon. 

According to a Twitter thread from tipster Ice Universe, the Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch Active 4 are due in the second quarter of 2021. This means Samsung could be launching its newest smartwatch models earlier than usual — the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 debuted in August 2020.

• Best smartwatches
• Everything we know about Samsung Galaxy Watch 4

If its successors are actually scheduled to release in Q2, that means they'll appear sometime between April and June. That said, it seems unusual that Samsung would release two new smartwatches less than a year since it overhauled the original Samsung Galaxy Watch.

What's less unusual is the names assigned to these rumored wearables. While one could argue it makes more sense to call the the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 follow-up the Galaxy Watch Active 3, Samsung is known for skipping numbers to avoid confusion among shoppers. That's why it called its latest smartwatch the Galaxy Watch 3, even though it was only the second lifestyle Galaxy Watch.

Samsung has never introduced Galaxy Watch and Galaxy Watch Active models beside one another. Based on recent intel, it seems for the first time the company will give customers two new options, similar to how Apple launched the Apple Watch Series 6 and Apple Watch SE together this past fall.

The standard Galaxy Watch will likely get the top-shelf features (including the rotating bezel, we hope) while the slimmer Galaxy Watch Active could be less expensive and more fitness-focused.

There's also no guarantee that Samsung has two different models coming as soon as IceUniverse  reports. The leaker shared a similarly questionable tweet that the next Galaxy Watch will replace Tizen with Android. While their account has a solid track record with Samsung intel, it's best to take Galaxy Watch rumors with a grain of salt until we see more substantial evidence.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 was already primed to become one of the best smartwatches around, but I think a switch to Wear OS from Samsung’s Tizen software will make it even better.

I know what you’re thinking: Kate, what’s wrong with you? Wear OS smartwatches are terrible. The software is glitchy and the fitness features are uninspiring and you’re delusional to think abandoning the perfectly fine Tizen platform is a good thing. 

• Smartwatch buying guide
• Best cheap smartwatches
• An alternative view: Galaxy Watch 4 switching to WearOS would be a disaster

Let’s get this out of the way: I don’t actually think Samsung will make the move. But when leaker IceUniverse tweeted last week that the company is making a jump from its proprietary wearable OS to Google's Wear OS, I started to get my hopes up.

Wear OS (formerly Android Wear) gets a bad rap. It’s popular among smaller smartwatch makers like Fossil and TicWatch, but devices running on Wear OS have lacked the powerful processors and advanced fitness-tracking features offered by Apple's watchOS and Samsung's Tizen OS.

And that’s exactly why Samsung should step in. It manages to build some of the best Android phones using Google's smartphone software, so why couldn’t it do the same for Wear OS? Samsung has the opportunity to make the Galaxy Watch the best Wear OS smartwatch in history.

Of course, Samsung couldn’t do it alone. Google would need to be revamping its wearable platform behind-the-scenes, introducing extensive open-source options and resolving pesky bloatware problems. Google and Samsung would also need to come to terms with developers, ensuring every app available on the Tizen store is also listed on the Wear OS one. There would need to be compromises on Google Fit vs. Samsung Health and Google Assistant vs. Bixby, too. 

There’s no question which AI butler we’d all prefer, but negotiating the health services might be more complicated. While Samsung Health is highly capable and widely compatible for Samsung TVs, Galaxy phones and more, Google Fit is taking significant strides to change the wellness game. As of this month, Pixel phones can read your heart rate and respiratory rate. The obvious solution would be to offer both services, and let users choose which they want as their default.

Tizen vs. Wear OS: Compatibility is key

I’ve hardly scratched the surface of the hurdles it would take for a Samsung Galaxy Watch running Wear OS to happen. So, again, it’s probably not happening. The reason I’m hopeful has little to do with which platform I currently prefer and everything to do with compatibility.

You see, the Galaxy Watch is technically usable with Android phones and iPhones. But it’s not, not really. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 is not all that different from my Apple Watch Series 6 in that it’s truly designed to work with Samsung phones. The fact that there’s even an iOS app is a tease, since it doesn't run well and you can’t use important features like ECG monitoring unless you have a Galaxy phone.

If the next Galaxy Watch runs Wear OS, I would use it more than I have previous models. I’ve enjoyed testing Wear OS watches, and even keep the iOS app around on my phone to poke around from time to time. Wear OS could also make the Galaxy Watch more appealing to Pixel smartphone users, who are still waiting on a Google Pixel Watch.

I can't and don’t want to speak for the existing, everyday Galaxy Watch wearers. I'm just here to tell you that a) you probably have nothing to worry about it, since the switch is long shot and b) in the small chance it does, it won't be all that bad. Really.

• Up next: How to watch Yellowstone online for free and without cable

All the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3's key specs may have just leaked earlier this week, but today we've learned the upcoming wearable has received a key certification that indicates it could launch soon.

As reported by SamMobile, five different Galaxy Watch 3 models have passed Bluetooth SIG certification for Bluetooth 5.0 with LE (low energy) connectivity. Though there could be more that five versions total, the ones published today include the Wi-Fi only and Wi-Fi + LTE variants we should expect to see next month.

• The Samsung Galaxy Fold 2 leaks are heating up
• Will the new Galaxy Watch be one of the best smartwatches yet?

The fact that these new Galaxy Watches will support Bluetooth isn't in itself existing (and certainly not unexpected,) but it is seen as a pivotal step towards the product launching. 

Previous Galaxy Watch 3 rumors have suggested the smartwatch will be unveiled in July alongside the Samsung Galaxy Buds Live, a pair of sub-$150, fitness-focused true wireless earbuds.

The Galaxy Watch 3, (not Galaxy Watch 2, as to avoid confusion with the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2), is a follow up to the two-year-old Samsung Galaxy Watch. The sequel is even expected to feature the physical rotating bezel of the original, though the design will be thinner based on leaked images.

It will be available in a 41mm case size with a circular, 1.2-inch AMOLED display, as well as a 45mm case with a 1.4-inch display. Gorilla Glass DX will protect the screen, while 1GB RAM, 8GB storage and Samsung's latest Tizen OS will support it from within. The smaller model will have a 247mAh battery and the larger version will be powered by a 340mAh one.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 could be on pace to offer blood pressure tracking

The Galaxy Watch 3 is expected to sport a heart rate monitor, and ECG and sleep tracking, similar to the upcoming Apple Watch 6. Whereas the Apple Watch's ECG technology is live on its smartwatches, Samsung is still waiting to send its version live via the Health Monitor app. The company says that could happen later this year in South Korea, perhaps before being cleared for use in more countries.

For now, blood pressure monitoring is rolling out to current Galaxy Watch Active 2 users in South Korea after it received approval back in April. It will likely appear in the Galaxy Watch 3, and though the sensors need to be calibrated monthly and can only detect changes in blood pressure, it's still a step ahead of what Apple has introduced.

That could change with the next-generation Apple Watch, which is expected to receive blood oxygen monitoring. Blood pressure monitoring sensors could also be included even if they're not ready to be activated, although that hasn't really been Apple's M.O. for launching new features in the past. It's more likely the SpO2 sensor will be capable of offering certain blood pressure inferences.

No matter which of these rumored features come to fruition, the next year in wearable computing is shaping up to be an exciting and competitive one.