Every time the half-year mark comes around, I think to myself, "This has been a great year for cameras." It happened last year and the year before, and it has happened again this year. So far in 2026, we've been treated to some fantastic cameras and drones, and brands continue to prove that there's still room to grow and develop in terms of imaging tech.

If you don't know me, my name is Nikita and I'm a Senior Reviews Writer, testing the best drones and the best cameras. This year, I've tested 12 of these nifty gadgets so far — from keychain cameras like the Kodak Charmera and black-and-white snappers like the Leica Q3 Monochrom, to speedy mirrorless beasts like the Canon EOS R6 Mark III and aerial wonders like the DJI Avata 360.

After a somewhat slow start to the year, we've been spoiled thanks to new launches from the likes of Leica, and DJI coming out with a range of drones and gimbal cameras. Now that we're well into July, I thought I'd round up my top five cameras and drones of 2026 so far. Has there been a camera or drone that's been a standout for you? I'd love to hear from you in the comments!

5. Kodak Charmera

Just a no-frills, fun keychain camera
My rating: ★★★★☆

When I was putting this list together, I knew the Kodak Charmera was going to be included. If there's one thing 2026 has shown us already it's that cameras can be whimsical and just pure fun — and the Charmera proves it. You may have seen this nifty little keychain camera on TikTok or Instagram. It went viral earlier this year for its compact form factor and oh-so little asking price, and if you need a no-frills camera for a night out, this is the one to get.

Though the camera is fitted with a 1.6MP 1/4-inch CMOS sensor that doesn't take award-winning images, the Charmera is all about fun. The charm lies in its lo-fi images that remind me of the photos in my family's photo albums. What makes the Charmera unique is its extremely portable body — clip it on to your keys or your bag and you're good to go.

What I love most about the Charmera is its ease of use. Your 5-year-old niece who's just getting to grips with using her hands will be able to use it, as will your 60-year-old uncle who just wants to immortalize memories without caring much about image quality. Pass it around a table at a pub, or add it to the camera gear that's going to be at your wedding — the Charmera is for everyone.

Read my full Kodak Charmera review.

4. DJI Osmo Pocket 4P

DJI's best gimbal camera just got better
My rating: Not scored yet

The DJI Osmo Pocket 4P is perhaps one of the industry's worst kept secrets. Rumors have been circulating for months, so when the DJI Osmo Pocket 4 dropped, people wondered why it didn't have two dual lenses — and then the Osmo Pocket 4P dropped. Well, you can't buy it yet, but it's out there. I've held it; I've recorded footage on it in Malta; and I can tell you that it's very real. I can also tell you that this gimbal camera might give the Insta360 Luna Ultra a run for its money.

But my lips are sealed due to embargoes and restrictions, and all I can really tell you about the Osmo Pocket 4P is this: it features D-Log2 support and a whopping 17 stops of dynamic range, and it comes in black and white. It's also got two lenses, one of which is a 60mm medium-telephoto.

I've spent a fair amount of time using the Osmo Pocket 4P, and it didn't take long for it to become one of my favorite cameras of 2026 so far. And why wouldn't it be? It builds on the success of the base Osmo Pocket 4 (which received a 5/5 rating from Senior Reviews Editor, Peter Wolinski). If you haven't bought the base model, I think it's worth waiting for the Osmo Pocket 4P. Trust me, I've been gobsmacked by it, and I'm sure you will be too.

Read my first impressions of the DJI Osmo Pocket 4P.

3. Canon EOS R6 Mark III

Good becomes great
My rating: ★★★★½

The Canon EOS R6 Mark III succeeded the second-gen model in November 2025, but I tested the camera in 2026, so it counts! Good became great as Canon introduced substantial upgrades to its predecessor to deliver one of the best mid-range cameras. Having taken over 6,000 photos on the EOS R6 Mark III, I've been extremely impressed with its capabilities. The camera packs a 32.5MP full frame sensor that captures plenty of detail and gives you some room for making crops in post-production, too.

Combine that beautiful sensor with 40fps burst shooting and best-in-class autofocus, and you've got yourself a powerful camera for sports, wildlife, portraits, landscapes, you name it. As someone who loves photographing birds and animals, I appreciated the EOS R6 Mark III's ability to quickly lock on to subjects and capture stunning images. Canon's vaunted color science is the cherry on top of the cake.

And it's a delicious cake topped with many, many cherries. 7K Open Gate video and 4K/120fps video capabilities make the EOS R6 Mark III a competent hybrid camera. The addition of CFExpress support means the camera can accommodate 7K RAW files and sustain its rapid 40fps drive.

Read my full Canon EOS R6 Mark III review.

2. Leica SL3-P

Finally taking the fight to Canon and Sony
My rating: ★★★★½

Leica’s a legacy brand and though it has always made excellent (albeit very expensive) cameras, it’s always struggled to compete with heavy hitters like Sony and Canon, in my opinion — until now. The Leica SL3-P is one of the finest mirrorless cameras I’ve ever tested, and certainly the best of 2026 so far. What makes the SL3-P a standout is its sublime handling, superb build quality (you'd expect nothing less at this price), and imaging prowess.

I was seriously impressed with its 40fps high-speed drive and best-in-class autofocus that ensures you never miss an action shot — and as a wildlife photographer, I love it. Throw in a 44MP sensor, 8K Open Gate video, strong dynamic range performance, and sublime handling, and you’ve got yourself a winner. Well done, Leica.

The SL3-P makes Leica a serious alternative to Canon and Sony, and if you think, "Nope, Leicas are way too expensive," you'd be wrong. Sony's flagship A1 II and Canon's EOS R5 Mark II bodies cost almost the same. I don't think Leica's price tag should scare you any longer — especially when you're getting a ridiculously sharp sensor.

Read my full Leica SL3-P review.

1. DJI Avata 360

DJI claims its stake as the king of the skies
My rating: ★★★★½

When the Antigravity A1, the world's first 360° drone came out last year, I thought to myself, "This is an excellent drone; I wonder what DJI's answer is going to be." And DJI's answer was simple: the Avata 360 did everything the Antigravity A1 does but better, and at a much lower price. It undercut its primary rival, and DJI delivered a 360° drone that doesn't give you much to complain about.

I absolutely adore the Avata 360, and as someone who has spent nearly a thousand hours flying, testing, writing and reading about drones, it's one of the best today, period. Fitted with twin lenses that capture every angle in 8K at 60fps without any stitching lines, and 120MP hi-res stills, the Avata 360 is a formidable content creation tool.

Exceptional build quality, dual ways to fly (FPV and with a standard controller), user-friendly software for editing, you name it: the Avata 360 does it all. Out of all the cameras and drones I've tested this year so far, this is the one I come back to time and again. DJI, despite facing a ban on its drones and enhanced scrutiny in the U.S., shows no signs of stopping with its Avata 360, Lito X1 and Lito 1 quadcopters, and I can't wait to see what else the Chinese giant has up its sleeve going forward.

Read my full DJI Avata 360 review.

There's more where that came from...

There are, of course, other cameras I've tested that haven't made the list, but they still deserve a shoutout. The first honorable mention that springs to my mind is the Fujifilm Instax mini Evo Cinema, a hybrid instant camera that redefines everything we know about instant cameras.

It's one of a kind: it lets you shoot photos and print directly from your smartphone, and you can record video clips up to 15 seconds long, choose a frame, and print on Instax film with a QR code that plays said video on a smartphone. It's fun and it's different, and it earned a 4.5-star rating from me.

Then there's the Fujifilm Instax mini 13, which takes things back to basics. It's an analog instant cameras that simply shoots and prints photos within 90 seconds. Image and print quality is great, with retro colors that remind us all why we fell in love with instant photography in the first place.

I also tested the Potensic Atom 3, a powerful DJI alternative that, for the first time on a Potensic drone, introduces 4K/60fps video and RAW images. At an affordable price tag, the Atom 3 packs up to 50 minutes of flight time and accurate AI subject tracking.

But that's all from me (for now). I hope you've enjoyed reading about my favorite cameras and drones of 2026 so far just as much as I've enjoyed writing about them. And like I said, do let me know in the comments what's been your favorite release this year!

More from Tom's Guide

• The best tech of 2026 (so far): 26 products we've actually tested, rated and loved
• I’ve spent over 900 hours testing all the best drones: here are my top picks
• The best cameras in 2026

When I'm not writing 10,000 words a week, I can usually be found playing video games, at a concert, planning my next tattoo... or out on a walk with a camera in hand. I've loved photography for as long as I can remember, and I'm very lucky that I get to bring my love of photography to my job.

As a reviews writer at Tom's Guide, I test the best mirrorless cameras, and last year alone, I reviewed nearly 30 cameras! And I'm showing no signs of stopping this year. For the last two weeks, I've been putting the Canon EOS R6 Mark III through its paces, and now that I've finished testing it, I can confirm that it's a phenomenal mid-range shooter.

Once I'd finished testing the EOS R6 Mark III, I took a look at how many photos I'd taken on it — and there were 6,569 stills for me to sift through. Many of them were throwaways or part of burst sequences (of which I only edited and finalized a few). I've been thoroughly impressed and delighted with the photos I've taken, so I thought I'd share my favorites with you. So please, enjoy!

Wildlife

Some of my favorite subjects to photograph are animals and birds, and the Canon EOS R6 Mark III is adept at wildlife photography. What I love about the EOS R6 Mark III is its rapid autofocus system featuring no fewer than a whopping 6,097 selectable points. In my testing, I found the EOS R6 Mark III was quick to lock onto the subjects I was photographing. It didn't falter even once.

All the images in the gallery above were captured with the AF set to Auto, and the camera was quick to recognize the subjects as birds, so it switched to Animal Detection.

When I wanted to capture birds in flight or in action, I took full advantage of the camera's 40fps sequential shooting or high-speed drive. The EOS R6 Mark III is capable of capturing 330 JPEGs and 150 RAW images with its electronic shutter. 40fps drive ensures you never miss a moment of action, and 0.5 seconds of pre-burst capture records 20 frames when you half-press the shutter button.

As soon as I spotted the two pairs of moorhens fighting with each other, I pointed the camera in their direction, and it locked onto them. I then fired off a burst (while 'Kung Fu Fighting' by Carl Douglas played in my head) and captured hundreds of images of the birds attacking one another with their feet and beaks. You can see a few of the sequential images in the gallery above.

Portraits

Alongside being a fast camera, the Canon EOS R6 Mark III is great for portraits, whether those are taken indoors or outdoors. The 32.5MP CMOS sensor captures plenty of detail, and there's enough room for making tight crops in post-production. Human subject detection and tracking is fantastic, and if the camera can't detect any eyes, it automatically and seamlessly switches to face and body detection, so the EOS R6 Mark III is very reliable.

There are a few in-camera filters to play with too, such as Vivid, Warm, Cool, and Monochrome, to name a few. The black and white color profile is adept at capturing dramatic portraits. I took a couple of photos of my colleagues in the Monochrome filter, as you can see above. Also, thanks to up to 8.5-stops of in-body image stabilization (IBIS), you can confidently shoot at slow shutter speeds when lighting isn't adequate.

The portraits I captured outdoors turned out just as lovely, even when the lighting was unpredictable and uncontrollable (unlike in a controlled studio environment). I adore the photos of my partner in the gallery above. The colors have come out beautifully, and I love the different shades of gray in the first slide.

Landscapes

The Canon EOS R6 Mark III is truly a jack of all trades, and if you pair it with a wide-angle lens, like the Canon RF 14mm f/1.4 L VCM, you've got a winning combination for landscape photography. You can capture a lot of the scene, as I did in the photos above.

Another feature that makes the EOS R6 Mark III an outstanding landscape snapper is its excellent dynamic range. The camera excels at retaining both shadow and highlight detail. This gives you more wiggle room in post-production as you can lift the shadows to reveal detail, and recover highlights by pulling them down. The result is a balanced image where highlights don't appear blown out, and dark areas remain noise-free.

The EOS R6 Mark III is fully weather-sealed too, and it's protected against dust and moisture, so you can shoot confidently in changing environmental conditions. As someone who lives in the U.K., where it can start raining out of nowhere, you have no idea what a boon this is.

Details

I'll be the first to admit that I'm not a massive fan of macro photography, but I've enjoyed capturing close-ups with the Canon EOS R6 Mark III. Well, the photos in the gallery above aren't exactly macros or close close-ups, but they're shots I've used to test the camera's ability to capture the finer details.

Thanks to the camera's 32.5MP CMOS full-frame sensor, the images are packed with detail, intricate textures, crisp edges, and fine gradations. As I mentioned earlier, you can crop a fair amount too to really highlight your subject — as I did with the photos of the bees on the flowers. The soft pastel shades of the flowers look gorgeous, too.

To sum up...

There's a lot more I can say about the camera, which is what my full, in-depth Canon EOS R6 Mark III review is there for, of course. For $2,799 at Adorama / £2,799 at London Camera Exchange, you're getting a camera that pulls out all the stops. 7K Open Gate video, CFExpress Type-B support, a 32.5MP sensor for beautiful photos, advanced autofocus, 8.5-stops of IBIS, and Canon's vaunted color science — all of these come together to deliver a powerful mid-range package.

Testing the EOS R6 Mark III has been a lot of fun, and if you're on the hunt for a camera that doesn't compromise on image quality and doesn't break the bank, few are better than this. Have you tried the EOS R6 Mark III yet, or would you like to? Let me know what you think in the comments below!

More from Tom's Guide

• I’ve taken over 6,000 photos on the Canon EOS R6 Mark III — and this feature-packed camera is nothing short of a mid-range masterpiece
• I tested the Canon EOS R5 Mark II to photograph wildlife — and this one feature has changed how I take photos forever
• ‘Few wildlife cameras come close to this’: why the OM System OM-1 Mark II is perfect for photographing birds in flight and other animals

Canon is no stranger to making some of the best mirrorless cameras out there, and the EOS R6 Mark III is one of the finest mid-range shooters you can buy today. Sitting comfortably between enthusiast and pro-grade cameras, it improves on its predecessor by introducing a 32.5MP sensor, 7K Open Gate video, and CFExpress Type-B support. It retains 40fps burst shooting for wildlife and sports photographers, but brings with it more advanced tracking which powers its excellent autofocus system.

On paper, the EOS R6 Mark III sounds like a standout choice for practically any genre of photography. In practice, it’s even more impressive. It’s responsive, dependable, and it delivers sharp, vibrant images. And even though the price has crept up and the camera’s overheating limitations may be frustrating for some, these shortcomings do little to overshadow what is otherwise a well-rounded camera in its class.

To find out whether you should buy it, and how I got on during the two weeks I spent with it, read my full Canon EOS R6 Mark III review.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Specs

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Price & availability

The Canon EOS R6 Mark III, as its name suggests, is the third iteration of the EOS R6 and the third model in the lineup — and there’s a fourth, if you count the Canon EOS R6 V. The EOS R6 Mark III succeeds the three-year-old EOS R6 Mark II and is a little pricier than its predecessor ($300 precisely).

Its body is available for $2,799 at Adorama / £2,799 at London Camera Exchange. There are two kits available too: one with the RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM lens for $3,149 / £3,149, and another with the RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM lens for $4,049 / £3,899.

Given this price and the camera’s features, the EOS R6 Mark III finds itself competing against the likes of the Sony A7 V ($2,899) and the Fujifilm X-H2S ($2,499), with both cameras boasting fast high-speed drives: 30fps and 40fps respectively.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Design

If you put the Canon EOS R6 Mark III next to its predecessor, you’d hardly be able to differentiate between the two. The EOS R6 Mark III features an almost identical physical body design, sculpted grip, and control layout. But if something ain’t broke, don’t fix it, and the EOS R6 Mark III is wonderful to handle.

Its protruding grip is spacious enough to wrap your fingers around and even use the camera one-handed comfortably — if you’ve got medium-sized hands like I do, at least. Dimensions remain fairly identical too, with the EOS R6 Mark III measuring 5.44 x 3.87 x 3.48 inches and weighs 1.54lbs with battery and memory cards. It doesn’t feel bulky or too heavy to carry around my neck or in my backpack.

The camera’s overall handling will naturally be affected by the lens you’re using. I tested the Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM and the Canon RF 14mm F1.4L VCM lenses with it, and the former on its own weighs nearly 3.2lbs. The kit, then, weighs approximately 4.7lbs which sounds like a lot, but thanks to great weight distribution and the EOS R6 Mark III’s sculpted grip, I didn’t find it too unwieldy to handle.

Viewfinder

The EOS R6 Mark III’s 0.5-inch OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF) is spacious and comfortable to look through, and it’s plenty bright too. It has a resolution of approximately 3.69 million dots so you get a sharp, detailed and life-like representation of the scene you’re capturing, and this, in turn, helps you accurately frame and capture your subject.

This is the same resolution as the Sony A7 V and the Panasonic Lumix G9II ($1,899), but it’s a little lower than the similarly priced OM System OM-1 Mark II’s 5.76 million dots ($2,399). If you want a higher-res EVF, you’ll have to splurge on the likes of the Sony A1 II ($6,499) or the Sony A7R VI ($4,499), both of which pack 9.44 million dots each in their EVFs.

One thing I love about the EOS R6 Mark III’s viewfinder is its 120Hz refresh rate — which is the same as the OM System OM-1 Mark II and the pricier Canon EOS R5 Mark II ($4,299). The fast refresh rate ensures subjects you’re tracking remain free of motion blur, and the camera delivers smooth and realistic motion — great for fast-paced wildlife or sports photography.

It’s important to note that the EOS R6 Mark III doesn’t feature blackout-free shooting. That means in the EVF you get short bits of black screens between shots. They’re hardly noticeable by the naked eye, especially when shooting at 40fps, although this will obviously be an issue for sports or wildlife photographers, but those people should be looking at a high speed blackout-free camera like the Sony A1 II or A7R VI instead. Or, if you can sacrifice sensor real estate, the OM System OM-1 Mark II.

Monitor

The EOS R6 Mark III’s rear panel houses the 3-inch TFT LCD touchscreen which has a resolution of approximately 1.6 million dots. This is the same resolution as that on the OM System OM-1 Mark II and the Fujifilm X-H2S. It’s a little lower than on the Sony A7 V (2.09M) and the Canon EOS R5 Mark II (2.1M), but it’s still bright enough that I haven’t had trouble reading the screen even in direct sunlight.

In my testing, I found the EOS R6 Mark III’s touchscreen highly responsive as all of my taps and swipes were registered instantly. The vari-angle mechanism also meant that I could shoot at awkward angles with ease, like when I wanted to take a low-angle photo of a duck loafing on the ground, or of birds flying right overhead.

Ports

Canon hasn’t spared any expense when it comes to the EOS R6 Mark III’s ports, and the camera features better connectivity when compared to its predecessor. You’ll find the battery compartment on the bottom plate, and this houses an upgraded LP-E6P battery pack. Located next to this is a standard tripod mount thread.

All other ports are located on the camera’s left-hand edge, and they’re protected by dust- and water-resistant covers. The biggest upgrade, in terms of connectivity, is the presence of a full-size HDMI Type-A port on the EOS R6 Mark III (versus Micro HDMI Type-D on the EOS R6 Mark II). Next to the HDMI port is a USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 for charging, data transfer, and 4K/60fps UVC live-streaming functionality (a first for an EOS body). And as this is a hybrid stills and video camera, there are two 3.5mm jacks for a mic as well as headphones, and a 2.5mm remote control terminal.

Two memory card slots are located on the EOS R6 Mark III’s right-hand edge. While the EOS R6 Mark II featured dual UHS-II SD card slots, its successor has one SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-II card slot and one CFExpress Type-B slot, supporting up to 8TB. The latter is there to match the camera’s higher resolution, accommodate 7K RAW files, and sustain the 40fps drive.

Weather-sealing

The EOS R6 Mark III features virtually identical weather-sealing to the EOS R6 Mark II — which means it’s resistant against sand, dust, moisture and rain. You should be able to use the camera in challenging conditions comfortably. I’ve tested it in light rain and haven’t had to worry about water getting inside or damaging the monitor.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Controls

As I alluded to earlier, the Canon EOS R6 Mark III’s control layout is fairly similar to that of its predecessor’s. Though it’s cheaper, I’ve found the EOS R6 Mark III as easy to use (and get to grips with) as the pricier EOS R5 Mark II. All the buttons and dials are well-placed and within easy reach. There’s also a Lock switch located between the On and Off button which prevents accidental settings changes.

Many of the EOS R6 Mark III’s buttons are customizable via the settings menu. For those who photograph different genres, there are three Custom Shooting Modes — C1, C2 and C3 — located on the mode dial. You can tailor settings, such as autofocus modes, button layouts, and exposure parameters, and save entire custom setups to these.

I also like how thoughtfully-placed the customizable buttons are. For instance, the Rate button located in the top-left corner of the rear panel can be fully customized, and I found it easy to press with my left thumb. There’s a Multi-Function (M-Fn) button near the shutter button on the top plate which I customized to swap between drive modes.

The EOS R6 Mark III’s menu system is, as per, a joy to use. I’ve always enjoyed how well-designed Canon’s color-coded menus are, with everything easily understandable even by those who may be picking up a Canon for the first time.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Autofocus

The EOS R6 Mark III utilizes Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF II autofocus system to detect and lock on to humans, animals/birds, and vehicles. The EOS R6 Mark III features no fewer than 6,097 selectable points, which is a hell of a lot more than the Sony A7 V’s 759 points and the Fujifilm X-H2S’s 425 points.

Regardless of the subject I was photographing, I found the EOS R6 Mark III quick to focus. Similar to the Sony A1 II and Canon EOS R5 Mark II, the EOS R6 Mark III features Auto subject-detection, so when that’s selected, the camera automatically switches between human, animal and vehicle detection.

I found this extremely useful when going from photographing birds at the park to my partner, and then randomly jumping to a bicycle. Not once did the EOS R6 Mark III fail to detect the subject. If you want the camera to do even more thinking for you, you can toggle AI Focus, which is an intelligent autofocus setting that automatically changes between One Shot (for still subjects) and Servo (for tracking motion). This is handy for when you’re photographing birds and they suddenly fly away, as an example.

The photos in the gallery above were taken with the EOS R6 Mark III’s autofocus set to human detection. I love that the camera automatically switches between Eye, Face, Head and Body detection, thanks to its deep learning AF system. It searches for the eyes first and if it can’t find one, it seamlessly switches to finding other body parts. I appreciated not having to swap between these detection settings every time.

Indoors, in a photo studio with bright lights, the camera was quick to lock onto my colleague’s eyes, as you can see in the first slide. Outdoors, I was impressed by the EOS R6 Mark III detecting and locking onto the person holding the umbrella, even though you can’t see their face and their body is obscured by the bridge’s railings. Similarly, it was quick to focus on my partner, too.

Animal/bird detection works just as well if not better. The EOS R6 Mark III quickly locked onto the swan in the first slide in the gallery above, and I could see on the monitor that it was focusing on the eyes — even though they aren’t that obvious. In the second shot, even though the moorhen chick was far away and small, the EOS R6 Mark III didn’t struggle to find it, and likewise, it was adept at focusing on the group of ducklings huddled together in the third shot.

I’ve enjoyed using the EOS R6 Mark III’s focus joystick too, as the omission of which I always miss when testing cameras like the Leica Q3 43 ($7,380). I’ve used it extensively to quickly reset focus points, and even used it to focus on a specific subject in a crowded area, like in the photo of the pigeon drinking water (above).

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Stabilization

Depending on the lens you use with it, the Canon EOS R6 Mark III is capable of delivering up to 8.5-stops of in-body image stabilization (IBIS). This means that you can shoot at slow shutter speeds handheld and in low-light conditions without worrying about blur from camera shake.

The RF 28-70mm F2L USM lens I tested doesn’t feature any stabilization (bizarre, I know) so for the two photos above, I relied entirely on the EOS R6 Mark III’s IBIS. The first image was shot at 1 second and the second at 2 seconds. As you can see, the first shot is clear and stable while the second has been impacted by camera shake — and I expected that, given the weight of the lens. But this is great as it shows the camera’s stabilization works excellently.

I then took a few photos at varying shutter speeds with the RF 14mm F1.4L VCM which, again, doesn’t feature an image stabilizer. But because the lens is much lighter than the RF 28-70mm F2L USM, my hands didn’t feel as unstable and I was able to shoot at even slower shutter speeds. The image above was captured at 4 seconds!

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Image quality

I’m yet to test a mirrorless camera from Canon that doesn’t produce stunning images. The EOS R6 Mark III is an imaging powerhouse, packing a 32.5MP full frame CMOS sensor. Boasting Canon’s vaunted color science, color reproduction is faithful and true to life, and different shades and hues look beautiful. You can see a few sample images in the gallery above. All the colors are well-balanced with none appearing oversaturated or light on contrast.

While the EOS R6 Mark III doesn’t feature a sensor as high-res as, say, the Canon EOS R5 Mark II with its 45MP Stacked CMOS or the Sony A7R VI with its 66.8MP Stacked CMOS, you still get enough resolution to create crops.

The first image in the gallery above is an extreme crop of the second, and the third of the fourth. That’s as far as I could crop in without losing detail. In the portrait of the pigeon, you can still make out its individual neck feathers, and you can still see the different skin texture in the photo of my partner.

Like many other cameras from Fujifilm and Sony, the EOS R6 Mark III comes with built-in picture styles and filters, such as Vivid, Monochrome, Cool, Warm, and so on. In the gallery above, the first photo was taken with Vivid, the second with Cool, and the third and fourth in Monochrome.

I love how the greens pop and look bright in the first shot, and the green water in the second shot appears muted and cinematic. Meanwhile, the shadows look deep and highlights look bright (but not too bright) in the grayscale images, making the Monochrome filter great for portraits.

High-speed drive

The EOS R6 Mark III utilizes Canon’s DIGIC X processor for 40fps sequential shooting with the electronic shutter, and the camera captures 330 JPEGs and 150 RAW images in this mode. Having 40fps drive at your disposal means you can capture every single moment of action, which makes the EOS R6 Mark III a strong choice for wildlife and sports. If you want an even higher drive, the OM System OM-1 Mark II boasts 120fps blackout-free sequential shooting, but you’d be sacrificing resolution for that.

I found 40fps to be more than sufficient for capturing birds in action, as you can see in the gallery above. With the camera set to High-speed Continuous Shooting+ via the Drive quick menu, I was able to photograph the pigeon landing on the stump, and the crow frantically hopping about with a berry in its mouth. The electronic shutter also has a shutter speed of 30s to 1/16,000s, giving you plenty of speed to capture blur-free images.

Thanks to the 40fps burst and best-in-class autofocus, I was able to capture a series of photos featuring two pairs of moorhens fighting with each other, and you can see four shots of that in the gallery above. I was limited by the RF 28-70mm F2L USM’s longest focal length which prevented me from getting really close-up shots, so imagine what you could do with a telephoto lens, like the RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM ($2,249).

Similar to many other high-speed Canon cameras, the EOS R6 Mark III supports pre-burst capture up to 0.5 seconds, and unlike its predecessor, you don’t need to enable the RAW Burst mode to do so. The EOS R6 Mark III records 20 frames when you half-press the shutter button and these are saved to your memory card when the button is fully pressed — handy for never missing a split-second moment.

ISO performance

The EOS R6 Mark III boasts good high ISO performance. It has a base ISO of 100 and it tops out at 102,400, just like the Sony A1 II, the Sony A7R VI, and the Canon EOS R5 Mark II. To see how it fared, I put the EOS R6 Mark III through an extreme ISO test indoors.

Images come out as you’d expect at ISO6400 so I’ll shift focus to high ISO values instead. The images above were shot at 12,800: the first is a JPEG export of the CR3 RAW file, and the second is the straight-out-of-camera (SOOC) JPEG. As you can see, the EOS R6 Mark III’s in-camera noise reduction has done well to reduce the noise or grain in the SOOC JPEG. There’s no loss in sharpness either as the legends on the scale are still discernible.

I then upped the ISO to 25,600. There’s a lot of noise in the JPEG export of the CR3 file (first slide above) but once again, the camera has done well to smoothing it out in the SOOC JPEG (second slide above). The blue background does appear a bit grainy but it’s far from ruinous. Again, there’s no drop in sharpness. This was also the case with the EOS R5 Mark II and the A1 II.

Finally, ISO 51,200, which is the limit I’d recommend pushing the EOS R6 Mark II — as a last resort, that is. As you can see in the SOOC JPEG (second slide above), the plant in the background has lost the sharpness around its leaves and it doesn’t look as detailed anymore. It has a watercolor effect which we’ve seen on micro four-thirds cameras, like the OM System OM-1 Mark II.

Dynamic range

The EOS R6 Mark III offers up to 14+ stops of dynamic range at base ISO100, so in theory, you can make extensive adjustments in post without negatively impacting image quality. To test this, I took a couple of photos outdoors and lifted the shadows and reduced the highlights in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom.

In the backlit photo of my partner above (the original of which you saw earlier), the camera’s done a great job of maintaining highlight detail while also exposing for the comparatively dim unlit face.

The EOS R6 Mark III keeps shadows relatively noise-free too. In the gallery above, I reduced the highlights and lifted the shadows and doing so revealed many leaves that I couldn’t see in the first unedited shot.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Video

The Canon EOS R6 Mark III doesn’t skimp on video either. It’s a powerful hybrid camera capable of recording 7K/30fps Open Gate video where it utilizes its entire uncropped sensor and resolution, as well as 7K/60fps RAW video. The presence of a full-size port means you can shoot 7K RAW ProRes via HDMI too. Naturally, you can record 4K video at 120fps too. You can see a sample video, shot in 4K at 60fps, above. The video looks smooth and plenty of detail has been captured. The colors look lovely, too.

Alongside these resolutions and framerates, the EOS R6 Mark III is capable of recording in Canon Log 2 and Canon Log 3, where the latter captures a wide dynamic range of up to 13.3+ stops. C-Log is usually reserved for Canon’s Cinema lineup, so it’s good to see it on the EOS R6 Mark III as well as the EOS R5 Mark II mirrorless cameras too.

While the EOS R6 Mark III boasts solid video specs, it doesn’t feature a built-in cooling fan or system, so it can get very hot, and in turn, it doesn’t last very long. Canon says that the camera can record 7K/60fps RAW for only 23 minutes at 73°F / 23°C. This isn’t great news for hybrid shooters, but this is why the Canon EOS R6 V exists. The EOS R6 Mark III’s video-first sibling features an active cooling fan and airflow vents to prevent shutdowns caused by overheating (and it even packs the same 32.5MP sensor).

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Battery life

Like I said before, the Canon EOS R6 Mark III introduces and utilizes a new and upgraded LP-E6P battery pack. It’s also compatible with LP-E6NH and LP-E6N packs but not with the original LP-E6. The EOS R6 Mark III is CIPA-rated for 620 shots when using the LCD monitor or 390 shots when using the EVF.

Of course, CIPA-ratings are generally conservative as they’re determined using strict and usually single-shot testing parameters, so more often than not, your camera will last you longer in the field. In my testing, I took nearly 2,500 photos before charging the camera. Your mileage will heavily depend on your shooting settings and modes.

For the purposes of comparison, we’ll use the 620-shot LCD CIPA-rating. This is slightly lower than the Sony A7R VI’s 670-shot, the Sony A7 V’s 750-shot, and the Fujifilm X-H2S’ 720-shot battery life. The EOS R6 Mark III upstages the OM System OM-1 Mark II, though, which is rated for 520 shots. But like I said, the EOS R6 Mark III has lasted me comfortably for a full day’s worth of shooting, so you should get by just fine.

As for video, while the EOS R6 Mark III is capable of shooting 7K/30fps RAW and Open Gate, it’s worth noting that it doesn’t feature an active built-in fan or cooling system, so it has a tendency to overheat, as it did in my testing after about 20 minutes. It’s disappointing that the EOS R6 Mark III doesn’t cope well once it gets too hot (sounds like me during a heatwave), but like I said, that’s one of the reasons why the EOS R6 V, the lineup’s video-first camera, exists.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III review: Verdict

Canon’s EOS R6 lineup hasn’t failed to impress us so far. The EOS R6 Mark III delivers a genuinely well-rounded shooting experience. It feels at home capturing wildlife, sports, landscapes, studio portraits, travel, what-have-you. The combination of a sharp 32.5MP CMOS sensor, class-leading autofocus and stabilization, and 40fps burst shooting make the EOS R6 Mark III a remarkable creative tool. Throw Canon’s beautiful color science, intuitive controls and ergonomics into the mix and you’ve got a camera that’s easy to enjoy.

There are a few caveats, though. While the camera boasts 7K video capabilities, videographers will likely run into the camera’s thermal limits sooner than they’d like. Some rivals offer longer battery lives too.

But these compromises feel relatively minor when weighed against everything the EOS R6 Mark III offers. For photographers seeking a fast, versatile and dependable camera, this is one of the strongest options available today — and a worthy successor to the EOS R6 Mark II.

Printing your photos using one of the best printers can give you newfound appreciation for your own work — and that’s exactly what happened when I used (and tested) the Canon PIXMA Pro-200S. This is arguably one of the greatest printers for photographers as it can make large and tiny prints, ranging from A3+ to postcard-sized.

The Pro-200S is quick to print, and the resulting prints are high-quality and nothing short of stunning. Whether you’re printing to sell, exhibit, or for personal use, this printer gives you very little to complain about. While Wi-Fi connectivity could be easier to set up, and the yield isn’t the highest, these are minor drawbacks in the grand scheme of things. Neither should stop you from getting the Pro-200S.

For the complete breakdown, read my full Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review.

Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review: Specs

Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review: Price & availability

For photo printers and prosumers, the Canon PIXMA Pro-200S is an excellent choice — and it’s well-worth the investment if you want gallery-style prints to sell. The Pro-200S retails for $647 / £459 at Amazon. If that sounds like a lot, it’s worth keeping an eye out during sales events, like Black Friday, as we’ve seen the printer drop to $429 / £367 in the past.

The Pro-200S is cheaper than its direct competitor, the Epson SureColor P700 ($849) which is also a 13-inch A3+ printer. While there are even cheaper photo printers available, like the Epson Expression Photo XP-8800 ($329) and the Canon PIXMA G620 ($356), the Pro-200S is the better choice if you want best-in-class A3+ size prints and peerless quality.

Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review: Design

The Canon PIXMA Pro-200S is a hefty boy, and given that it’s an A3+ printer, it takes up quite a bit of space. The printer measures 25.2 x 15 x 7.9 inches and weighs 32lbs, so it’s best suited to staying put in one place. It sports an all-black design with subtle branding, so it fits right into most office and home spaces.

This is a print-only printer so unlike multifunction ones, like the Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II ($702), it can’t scan or make copies. The Pro-200S features a rear automatic document feeder (ADF) which can, as the name suggests, automatically feed either 100 A4/A5/B5 sheets or 50 A3/B4 sheets.

You have the option to manually feed sheets as well, one at a time. The manual sheet feeder is ideal for thicker fine art media or creating banners up to 39 inches long and 13 inches wide.The Pro-200S packs a front-feeding tray too which can be used for printing directly onto white-faced CDs, DVDs and Blu-rays.

Build quality is sublime as the Pro-200S features a metal chassis build, and there are no hollow-sounding parts, so you’re getting great value for money here. Just as sublime are the Pro-200S’ controls and buttons. The physical navigation, home and back buttons are located around the 3-inch color LCD screen which can be used to check ink levels, among other things. You’ll find the print and power buttons next to the front tray. All of them give good tactile feedback when pressed, and I found them to be highly responsive in my testing.

Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review: Setup

It’s extremely straightforward to set up the Canon PIXMA Pro-200S. The first thing you need to do is remove the orange tape on the printer’s body and inside the paper trays. Once that’s done, you need to plug it into mains and turn it on by pressing the power button. It takes about a minute or two for the printer to come to life from a completely powered-down state — and a few seconds when it’s waking up from its sleep state.

After that, all you need to do is follow the on-screen instructions which are self-explanatory and easy to understand. You’ll then need to install the print head and the ink tanks. The ink tank placements are color-coded so simply pop them in until you hear clicks. If you’re struggling, refer to the included physical manual or Canon’s helpful online guide.

Loading the paper into the rear ADF is easy to do as well. The Pro-200S features automatic skew correction to ensure the fed paper is absolutely straight, which prevents misprinting (and wastage of paper). When you’ve loaded the paper and selected ‘OK’ on the screen, the printer will perform an alignment check which takes a couple of minutes, depending on the paper size.

Once you’re done setting up the printer, you can get printing, and there are two ways to do so: wired or wirelessly. You can plug in an Ethernet cable or a USB-B to USB-A cable into the back — the USB-A side would go into your laptop. You’ll then be able to print directly.

If you want to print wirelessly, you’ll need to download the Pro-200S dedicated driver onto your Windows or macOS machine. Follow the on-screen instructions to hook up the printer to your Wi-Fi. Once that’s done, the Pro-200S will synchronize with the Wi-Fi network, enabling you to print from any device that’s connected to the same network.

While it doesn’t take long to get the Wi-Fi hooked up, I do wish the process was easier. For instance, the Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II requires you to punch in the Wi-Fi password on its touchscreen — no software required.

Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review: Print speeds

Any printer’s print speeds will naturally depend on the complexity of the image, and the number of colors involved. Keeping that in mind, the Canon PIXMA Pro-200S takes neither too long nor too little to produce prints. As this is a photo printer, I put it through its paces by printing a number of photos on four different kinds of paper of varying sizes.

I kicked things off with printing on A3 Pro Luster paper, in standard quality, and it took the Pro-200S one minute and 14 seconds to produce a color print. This dropped to one minute and 10 seconds when producing a mono print. I was impressed with how quickly the Pro-200S printed a packed image of flowers that I’d taken on the Leica SL3-S. Printing at the highest quality took a little longer, with a color print taking three minutes and 40 seconds — still not bad, and the quality was exceptional, which I’ll discuss shortly.

The next thing I did was print on A3+ Premium Matte paper. The Pro-200S produced a color print in one minute and 58 seconds, and a monoprint in a minute and 57 seconds. Both these prints were borderless, and perhaps the printer would be even quicker to produce bordered prints. Printing on A4 MP-101 matte paper didn’t take very long either, with a colored print taking 58 seconds and mono print 38 seconds — almost four times faster than the category average of four minutes.

I love that the Pro-200S isn’t just for large format printing. The printer can accommodate smaller prints too, all the way down to 4 x 6-inch. Canon provided me with a pack of 4 x 6 PP-201 Glossy II paper for testing purposes, so I printed out a few photos I’d captured. It took the Pro-200S 40 seconds to produce a color print and 39 seconds to produce a mono print.

The Pro-200S produces small prints quicker than the Epson Expression Photo XP-8800 which, in our testing, took a minute and 27 seconds to do the same. The Pro-200S performs much better than the category average of one minute and 56 seconds.

Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review: Print quality

As an inkjet printer, the Canon PIXMA Pro-200S utilizes eight dye-based Chroma Life 100+ inks and runs on CLI-65 cartridges. Because the printer utilizes eight inks, it delivers a wide color gamut and extensive tonal range, so prints turn out beautiful and detailed. Additionally, according to Canon, Chroma Life 100+ inks create prints that are resistant to fading for over 100 years when stored in an album.

Print quality is sublime, especially on glossy or luster paper, in both standard and high quality modes. I especially like how vivid shades of greens turn out, as well as the bright blues that feel textured. My favorite print is the one of an Icelandic waterfall, where the water gushing down looks highly detailed. If I look closely, I can see the individual water droplets. The printer performed phenomenally here.

Color printing on matte paper is good but not as beautiful as on glossy paper. To me, the same photo of the waterfall lacks depth ever-so slightly, and appears flat. For glossy color prints, the Pro-200S is second to none, and it suffices for matte prints too.

Printing in black and white is another area where the Pro-200S dominates. The Pro-200S did well to produce rich, deep and inky blacks with plenty of detail, and the overall tonal range is simply excellent, as I noticed in the photo of the man standing outside a theatre. The shadows and highlights are balanced well, and the image looks just like it did when I edited and prepared it for printing.

Small prints look lovely too, and I appreciate the ability to make bordered or borderless prints as the former frames the images well. The Pro-200S’ ability to produce small prints is fantastic for those who want to make postcard-like prints for selling, or for personal use.

Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review: Ink cost & yield

The Canon PIXMA Pro-200S comes with a set of eight ink tanks, 12.6ml each, to get you started — but they won’t last you very long. Canon says that you’ll be able to create just 139 A3+ mono prints with these, or 860 4 x 6-inch mono photos. While that isn’t a lot, the Pro-200S’ running costs aren’t that high.

Each CLI-65 ink tank costs $15, and a set of eight tanks will set you back approximately $120, which isn’t too bad — and certainly not as expensive as the Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II’s cartridges and toner. These are similar costs to the inks used by the Epson Expression Photo XP-8800.

As with other Canon printers, you can sign up for Auto-Ink Delivery when buying the Pro-200S directly from Canon, or even after you’ve bought it. When your printer is running low on ink, it automatically notifies the company who then ships out ink without you having to place an order manually.

Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review: Verdict

It really wasn’t difficult to rate the Canon PIXMA Pro-200S so highly. Once I saw the print quality, I was floored. Designed for photographers and creative professionals, the Pro-200S delivers exceptional print quality across a range of sizes — from postcard to gallery-worthy A3+ prints. Thanks to the printer’s eight-color dye-based ink system, colors appear vibrant, and blacks are deep and rich.

There are a couple of drawbacks preventing a perfect score, such as the complicated wireless setup, and low ink yields for heavy users. But these issues are relatively minor considering the overall experience.

At the end of the day, the Pro-200S stands out as one of the best photo printers in its class, offering professional-quality results that will have falling in love over and over again with your own work.

If you’re after the best laser printer for your small office or personal use, look no further than the Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II. Its inconspicuous, all-white design makes it fit into most professional spaces, and it comes with four cartridges to get your started — and they’ll last you a while, too.

What makes the MF753Cdw II an outstanding choice in a crowded market are its rapid print, scan and copy speeds. The printer is outfitted with a larger paper output tray, and if you want to increase the input capacity, you can buy an additional accessory for around $250. Oh, and the printer’s got a customizable and responsive touchscreen too.

To find out if this is the best all-in-one printer for you, read my full Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review.

This printer goes by two different names: Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II in the U.S., and i-SENSYS MF754Cdw II everywhere else. For the purpose of this review and your convenience, I’ll refer to it as Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II, its American name.

Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review: Specs

Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review: Price & availability

The Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II is a solid mid-range printer, and it retails for $702 at Amazon U.S. We’ve seen it drop to $499 in the past though, so it’s good to keep an eye out during sales events. Outside of the U.S., the printer goes by i-SENSYS MF754Cdw II, and is available for £539 at Amazon U.K. Similar to the States, the printer can be bought for around £390 during sales events.

This printer is available in white only. As a 4-in-1 laser printer that can print, scan, copy and fax, the MF753Cdw II finds itself competing with the likes of the Brother MFC-L8930CDW ($899), the Brother MFC-L2750DW XL ($689), and the HP Color LaserJet Pro MFP 4301fdw ($859). It’s ideal for small office owners and those who work from home.

Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review: Design

The Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II sports an all-white design with black accents, and it fits right into a professional office space. It doesn’t look too loud so it doesn’t draw eyeballs to your desk. It’s big but not too large, measuring 18.2 x 16.8 x 17 inches. It’s a little heavy, though, weighing 48.5lbs so it’s best for it to stay put in one spot.

As a multifunction printer, the MF753Cdw II can scan, fax, print and copy, and it’s well-equipped to do so. It features a 50-sheet Automatic Document Feeder (ADF) on top with a glass scanner located underneath it. There’s a main paper in-tray at the bottom which can hold up 250 sheets, and an out-tray which can accommodate 150 prints in the middle. If you want even more print storage — say, 550 sheets of letter or A4 paper — you can grab the Canon PF-K1 Optional Cassette for $284.

Located on the right-hand side is a 5-inch color LCD touchscreen that can be tilted vertically to optimize the viewing angle. It can be customized too, to display functions and settings you use the most. There’s a power button located under the screen to switch off the MF753Cdw II or wake it from sleep (takes about seven seconds).

Overall, the MF753Cdw II is designed well, and the settings on the touchscreen feel accessible and easy to understand. Additionally, the build quality feels solid too, and you can rest assured that you’re getting bang for your buck here.

Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review: Setup

Setting up the Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II couldn’t be easier. It takes about 14 seconds for it to warm up from a powered-off state, or seven seconds when waking from sleep mode.

When using it for the first time, all you need to do is plug the printer into the mains and follow the on-screen instructions. It took me just a few minutes to get the printer up and running. Fitting or replacing the ink cartridges is fairly straightforward too, as all you need to do is open the tray, align the cartridge with the color-coded slot (Black, Cyan, Magenta, or Yellow), and press down firmly until it clicks into place.

There are two ways to use the MF753Cdw II: wired or wirelessly. You’ll find ports for Ethernet and fax modem cables at the rear, and a USB-A port on the front. You can use the front USB-A port to print directly from USB sticks too, which is quite handy and doesn’t require any settings to be changed.

To print wirelessly, you’ll need to use the touchscreen to enable Wi-Fi and input your network’s password. Once that’s done, you’ll see the printer pop up in your computer’s (or phone’s) settings. You may need to download the printer’s driver from the Canon website if your laptop doesn’t automatically detect it. I found this easy to do, and Canon happily provides a QR code on the printer’s touchscreen that you can scan with your phone to access the Quick Start guide, if you’re in a pickle.

If you’re in a literal jam when paper gets stuck in any of the trays, the touchscreen will show you step-by-step instructions to remove the blockage too. I encountered paper jam only once in my testing, and I found the on-screen instructions super easy to follow.

Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review: Print speeds

The Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II’s print speeds are extremely impressive. If it’s rapid printing you’re after, this is the printer for you. I put it through its paces by printing a variety of documents. It took the MF753Cdw II 11.31 seconds to print a five-page text document — or 26.5 pages per minute (ppm). That’s really quick, and the MF753Cdw II bests the likes of the Brother MFC-L2750DW XL and its 18.5 ppm.

I then printed a two-side text document, which took 9.55 seconds, and the MF753Cdw II managed to print a 10-page text document onto five double-sided sheets in 30.13 seconds. These are the fastest printing times of our most recently reviewed laser printers.

The MF753Cdw II is capable of printing mixed documents rapidly too. I put this to the test by printing a six-page mixed PDF consisting of text and color graphics, such as charts and graphs. It took the printer 18.74 seconds to do so, or 19.21 ppm. The Brother MFC-L2750DW XL, on the other hand, can do only 11 ppm, making the MF753Cdw II the better choice.

Laser printers are better suited to printing documents and inkjet printers are best for photo printing. Even so, the MF753Cdw II is capable of printing decent color prints. I printed an 8 x 10 hi-res image, taken on a Leica SL3-S, on Canon Photo Paper Glossy II. In 7.06 seconds, the print was ready. I’ll get into print quality shortly to discuss what the print looked like — but as speediness goes, the MF753Cdw II doesn’t give you much to complain about.

Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review: Copy & scan speeds

The Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II boasts best-in-class copy and scan speeds. In my testing, it took 6.86 seconds for a black-and-white copy and 8.6 seconds for a color copy. It’s faster than the Brother MFC-L2750DW XL which takes 8.4 seconds to make a copy.

Scanning is just as quick. I inserted a USB-A stick into the front port and chose that as the save destination. A color scan took 6.22 seconds while a black-and-white scan took exactly six seconds. Again, it’s faster than the Brother MFC-L2750DW XL which takes 8.4 seconds to scan a monochrome document, and a snail’s pace 38.4 seconds for color scanning in JPEG format.

Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review: Print & copy quality

The Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II makes attractive prints and copies, both color and black and white. The text-only documents I printed came out with sufficient contrast, and looked just as they did on my screen. I found the text easy to read, and none of it was misaligned on any of the prints.

Graphic prints were fairly attractive too, as the colors appeared natural and the different hues and tones appeared well-balanced. The colors didn’t appear oversaturated or heavily edited. I didn’t notice any bleeding either.

I was very surprised by the quality of the glossy photo print. As I mentioned earlier, inkjet printers are better suited to photo printing. Still, the MF753Cdw II’s photo quality is respectable. The print packed plenty of detail, such as the flowers’ stigma and the patterns in the petals. Greens appeared vivid while pinks appeared bright — albeit slightly more saturated than I’d have preferred. But again, this isn’t a photo-first printer. You may want to consider the Canon PIXMA TR8620 ($199) or the Canon PIXMA Pro-200S ($647) if you want a photo printer.

Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review: Ink cost & yield

The Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II’s box comes bundled with four starter toner cartridges, and Canon claims that these can last you 1,100 color pages or 2,100 monochrome prints. This should be enough to get you started.

It’s important to note that it isn’t cheap to run the MF753Cdw II. The printer’s 069 cartridges cost $142 each, which is quite a bit. For four cartridges, you’re looking at an expenditure of $568 — or 51 cents per color page and 27 cents per mono print. The Brother MFC-L2750DW XL offers lower printing costs, approximately 3.75 cents per page.

If you don’t want to buy the cartridges manually every time you’re about to run out, Canon offers an Auto Replenishment Service which you can sign up for at checkout. An order is automatically placed with Canon when your printer is running low on toner. You can do so after you’ve bought the printer, too.

Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review: Verdict

The Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II is an exceptional all-in-one laser printer designed for small offices. You can print, copy, scan and fax — and speedily too. The MF753Cdw II delivers blazing-fast output speeds across the board, and the resulting text prints are sharp while color graphics are bright and detailed.

Beyond raw performance, the MF753Cdw II provides a seamless user experience. Setup is ridiculously easy, and the 5-inch customizable touchscreen makes navigation a breeze. The all-white design, though unremarkable, fits right into any workspace — but its 48.5lbs footprint means you’ll need to find a fixed spot for it.

While some people may find the high cost of replacement cartridges a tough pill to swallow, I don’t think that should put you off from getting the MF753Cdw II. If it’s a robust, reliable workhouse you’re after, few laser printers are better than the MF753Cdw II.

It's been quite an eventful few week for cameras. Insta360 launched a Go 3S Retro Bundle, we saw the GoPro Mission 1 lineup, and on Wednesday May 13th, Sony and Canon dropped a camera each — what a time to be alive! Sony and Canon's announcements came out of the blue, with teasers posted on their respective social channels either a week or just a few days prior to the launches.

Canon has expanded its V-series lineup of video-first cameras with the new EOS R6 V, while the Sony A7R VI succeeds the four-years-old A7R V. Sony's offering sounds like the ultimate hybrid that builds on its predecessor's success, while Canon's latest camera looks like it could be the best mirrorless camera for video.

Needless to say, I'm excited and thrilled. As someone who reviews cameras for a living and loves photographing her surroundings, I'm intrigued by both cameras. But is there one I'm excited about more than the other? Well, that's what we're here to find out.

A quick rundown of specs

Who are the Canon EOS R6 V and Sony A7R VI for?

Both the Canon EOS R6 V and the Sony A7R VI have different target audiences — but with some overlap. The A7R VI sets a new gold standard for high-resolution full frame cameras with its 66.8MP sensor and 30fps RAW burst capabilities, which make it great for all genres of photography, including wildlife, sports, and portrait. It also features 8K/30fps video so it sounds like a fantastic all-rounder.

Bolstering the A7R VI's position as a powerful hybrid camera is its OLED viewfinder with a 120fps refresh rate and 9.44M-dot resolution. You also get a 3.2-inch 4-axis LCD monitor with a 2.1M-dot resolution. Oh, and 8.5-stops of in-body image stabilization (IBIS) which means you can shoot at very slow shutter speeds and still walk away with a usable photo.

And what about the EOS R6 V? It's the second R-V body Canon has introduced, and it joins the excellent Canon EOS R50 V. The 'V' version of the EOS R6 is also the fourth EOS R6 body in existence — and as the 'V' suggests, it's a video-first take on Canon's hybrid camera. There's no viewfinder so you must rely on the camera's 3-inch vari-angle screen and its 1.62M-dot resolution. The EOS R6 V offers 7K/60fps RAW and 7K/30fps Open Gate video capabilities, both of which make it ideal for content creation.

In addition to that, you get 40fps continuous shooting which is... surprising, and something I wasn't really expecting in a video-first camera. While this camera sounds like it would be peerless for video, I'm sure it will be ideal for capturing photos of birds in flight too with its 32.5MP CMOS sensor and best-in-class Dual Pixel CMOS II autofocus system. And did I mention it packs up to 8.5-stops of IBIS, just like the A7R VI? Yep, it's almost got it all.

The one I'm most excited for (and why)

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the Canon EOS R6 V. It features the same 32.5MP sensor as the Canon EOS R6 Mark III. As a video-first iteration of the series, it packs an active cooling fan — which you'll most certainly need if you're shooting 7K/30fps Open Gate... or even 4K/60fps, really, especially outdoors.

With the EOS R6 Mark III and its predecessors, battery life while recording video was always a sticking point, but this time around, Canon's going for the "best battery life" crown. The company claims the EOS R6 V can record for two hours or more as long as the built-in fan is toggled on, the overheat limit is set to high, and the camera's on a tripod.

While all of this sounds great (and I'm looking forward to test the camera for my full review), the EOS R6 V isn't the one I'm most excited about — it's the Sony A7R VI. The A7R VI packs a newly developed 66.8MP sensor and enables you to shoot RAW photos at 30fps. This will certainly be a boon for wildlife photographers such as myself.

I loved the Sony A1 II when I tested it and it's the one camera I've thought about buying myself time and again. I captured some of my best photos on it, and being able to make extreme crops was a walk in the park thanks to the 50MP resolution. But 66.8MP sounds even better, and the sensor's stacked nature delivers faster readout speeds and minimizes rolling shutter distortion. Then you've got the new BIONZ XR2 processor for 30fps blackout-free bursts, so you don't lose track of your subject because of, well, black screens between shots.

The A7R VI also borrows Auto subject detection mode from the A1 II, so you don't need to manually change the subject you're photographing — handy for anyone who captures a variety of subject. I loved this on the A1 II as I photograph birds, animals and (occasionally) humans and I can't wait to see how it holds up on the A7R VI.

A new trick up its sleeve

In addition to all the goodies the Sony A7R VI offers, it also features a new battery pack: the 2,670mAh NP-SA100. Sony says that with this battery pack, the A7R VI is CIPA-rated for 600 shots with the viewfinder or 710 shots with the monitor. Its predecessor, the A7R V, is CIPA-rated for 440 shots, so Sony's made some strides.

CIPA testing is done under strict conditions and the number is often conservative, so it'll be interesting to see how the battery holds up in real-world use.

I think it's going to be interesting to see how both the A7R VI and the Canon EOS R6 V perform in practice as, in theory, they both sound great in their own right. I'm obviously not pitting both cameras against one another. That would be unfair as they have different target audiences (and there's quite a bit of a price difference). Needless to say, though, it's an exciting time for photographers and camera enthusiasts. I can't wait to get my hands on both cameras and put them through their paces!

More from Tom's Guide

• I tested the Sony A1 II for 2 weeks — and its autofocus results blew my mind
• I just tested the Canon EOS R5 Mark II to photograph wildlife — and this one feature has changed how I take photos forever
• ‘Few wildlife cameras come close to this’: why the OM System OM-1 Mark II is perfect for photographing birds in flight and other animals

It's not news anymore that Gen Z and the younger generations love "retro" tech. MP3 players, vinyl, film cameras, and flip phones have all had a resurgence. Add to that list compact cameras like the much-talked-about Fujifilm X100VI, Ricoh GR IV, and Canon PowerShot G7X Mark III. These three are the usual suspects and the darlings of TikTok. Look up any article, video or short on the best compact cameras, and you'll see one or more of these cameras guaranteed. There's just one problem: you can't find them anywhere new.

The hype around them is just too much for manufacturers and retailers, making it impossible for the average person to buy one at retail value. But, they're not the only game in town. Older cameras like the Panasonic GX1 and GX85 are well-known, reasonably priced cameras that produce great images. And they're easy enough to find, so I got one of each… for less than half the cost of a Fujifilm X100VI.

Though Lumix shooters are well aware of these two pocket rockets, Gen Z photographers aren't clamoring for them like they are the Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A. I believe they should.

Smaller sensors need love too

The bigger the sensor, the better the image quality. You get better low-light performance and less noise thanks to larger and more sensitive photosites (the analog light sensors that become digital pixels). You get a shallower depth of field, and there's less crop as the sensor size goes up — 35mm full-frame sensors don't have any crop because thanks to the legacy of 35mm film, it sets the standard. But, despite what YouTubers say, bigger isn't always better.

The advantage of a smaller sensor is a smaller camera body. That's why the three aforementioned Fuji, Canon and Ricoh point-and-shoot compacts all feature APS-C sensors instead of full-frame sensors. At roughly 2/3 the size of a full-frame sensor, APS-C sensors are small, but they're not the smallest.

The Micro Four Thirds format is twice as small as full-frame, with a 4:3 aspect ratio, hence the name. This system used by Olympus and Panasonic has produced some of the smallest digital cameras to date, like the legendary Panasonic Lumix GM1 (an absolute powerhouse of a compact camera). While the size and sensor help it stand out, it's the choice of lenses on such a small body that makes it so sought-after.

M43 compacts give you options

The point-and-shoot experience is simultaneously freeing and limiting. The fixed lenses on these cameras are great and allow you to keep your kit small when going on a shoot. The Fujifilm X100VI has a 23mm lens, which gives a field of view equivalent to a 35mm lens on a full frame camera — a classic all-purpose field of view. You can't go wrong with it. After a while, though, the convenience becomes a setback. If you want to shoot landscape, portraits, or sports photography, you're out of luck. That's not an issue with an interchangeable lens compact camera like the GX85 and GX1.

On a trip home to South Texas a few years back, I brought my recently purchased Lumix GX85 and the kit lens it came with. This cheap, plastic 12-32mm, f/3.5-5.6 lens turned out to be all I needed. I snapped a ton of great images of my family, and I got to see the city I once lived in and knew so well in a whole new light with this dinky little lens. And due to the collapsible design of the lens, the entire kit was still small enough to fit in my Wandrd D1 crossbody sling. When I want to travel light but am unsure of what I'll be shooting, this lens is a no brainer.

Another lens I've grown to love is the Lumix 14mm f/2.5 pancake lens that came bundled with my used Lumix GX1. This stubby lens is a community favorite because of its small size and unique 28mm equivalent shooting experience that’s great for street photography. The wider aperture, while not incredible for low-light shooting, is fine for most dusk and indoor shots — the built-in flash on the camera is a lifesaver here.

But if you want options and you're on a budget, spare a thought to the Lumix 14-140mm f/4-5.8 lens. Since this ends up being a 28-280mm equivalent lens, it's great for sports photography, street, landscapes, and portraits all at once. It's the biggest lens I own, and it's even bigger when I max out the focal length. Though it looks ridiculous on a smaller body like the GX1, it's worth the additional size and weight. I've taken it to several MLS matches, where I've captured my Rapids up-close as if I was standing on the sidelines. Most sports venues won't let you bring a telephoto lens inside, but if you can, this is the one.

You don’t get that versatility with a fixed-lens compact.

Access to Leica glass

Panasonic and Leica have a longstanding partnership that goes back to the early days of digital photography, when the two brands worked on the Lecia Digilux 1. Since then, Leica has been making glass for Panasonic in formats like Four Thirds, Micro Four Thirds, and L-Mount — the latter is a partnership between the two and Sigma to create full-frame L-Mount lenses. That means Micro Four Thirds shooters are spoiled for choice when it comes to quality lenses.

One of those lenses is my all-time favorite, the Leica Summilux 25mm f/1.4 lens. This 50mm equivalent lens is my go-to when shooting at night or indoors. It's a must-have for concert photography, which is where I've taken some personal favorite shots. Despite having to shoot manual because of loud and slow focus, this is also my top choice for shooting video due to the superior image quality. It's basically glued on to my Lumix GH5 these days, which I use any time I'm headed out the door on the weekends.

A lens I got recently and have been using a lot is the Leica 45mm f.2.8. It's a prime macro lens great for shooting detail up-close, though I've mostly used it to scan 35mm film at home. That said, it has a lot of potential as a portrait lens since it offers a field of view equivalent to 90mm on full frame. If you're shooting product photography or videography, this is one lens you need in your kit for close-up shots and b-roll.

Get more value for your money

The Micro Four Thirds system is alive and well — the Lumix GH7 is a heck of a video camera with the option for Arric LogC3. But the M43 cameras and lenses I've mentioned have been around for a while. You can pick them up for relatively cheap on the used market.

The Lumix GX1 goes for about $200, while the Lumix GX85 tends to fetch a higher price of roughly $400-500. I got lucky when I purchased mine, finding it a local used camera shop for $350. It came bundled with the kit lens, charger, three batteries, and a half-cage. All in, that’s $700 max for my two cameras — less than half the asking price of a new (if you can find one) Fujifilm X100VI ($1,799).

Lenses aren't expensive, either. The trusty Lumix G 14mm pancake lens goes for about $120-$200, and the 12-32mm kit lens sells for $125-$175. The Leica lenses are a bit pricier used, but it's nothing outrageous. My favorite Leica Summilux 25mm is in the neighborhood of $300-$400. Seeing as how this lens has made me many times what it costs through client work, I don't regret purchasing it.

Leave the hype to the influencers

The compact point-and-shoots that everyone is hyped about are great cameras. They're not so good that they're worth paying way above retail value or waiting years until they become available. Let the influencers do that. If you care more about creating images than the status of owning one of these cameras, then there are other options out there.

Micro Four Thirds are near and dear to my heart because they offer a ton of value for not a lot of money. Their compact size, modern features, and lens selection make them more viable for just about any type of shooting you're planning to do. And you don't have to wait years to get one.

More from Tom's Guide

• Seven years later, the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III is still TikTok’s favorite compact camera — here’s how it holds up in 2026
• I swapped out my modern mirrorless for this 20-year-old DSLR and I've never felt more creative
• I bought this 5-year-old Fujifilm and it proves newer isn't always better

TikTok is responsible for a lot of things. Making retro games go viral. Fantastic edits of your favorite TV show characters. "Influencing" you into buying a product that has been (sometimes) wrongfully romanticized. The last bit is very true, as I often see videos of content creators sharing their favorite tech that, as a tech journalist and reviewer, I don't agree with.

Recently, we've seen this with the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III which first came out in 2019 but has since exploded on TikTok and received cult-like status. The demand for decade-old cameras that are near-impossible to buy new has skyrocketed since, and it has claimed another victim: the Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A. In fact, this camera originally came out in 2016 but ever since Kendall Jenner was spotted using it, it became so popular that Canon decided to re-release it in 2025 with an "A" at the end of its name.

Well, I'm here to "de-influence" you, which is another TikTok trend where people talk you out of buying either overpriced or overhyped products. Look, the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A is a good camera — I've even taken some of my best pics on a compact on it so far — but is it worth nearly $400 when there are so many other value-for-money options available? Let's find out.

What's good about it?

The Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A (as it's known in the U.S.) or the IXUS 285 HS A (as it's known in other parts of the world) features a 20.2MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor and it can record FHD/30fps video. It's extremely easy to use thanks to its well-placed buttons and straightforward menu system, and it packs a few creative modes which make it a versatile snapper. One of its biggest selling points is its 12x optical zoom which lets you zoom in to subjects without losing much image quality and sharpness to digital processing.

I've tested many compact cameras and not all of them boast sharp image quality — but the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A does. You can see a few sample photos in the gallery above, and these are some of the best photos I've taken on a compact camera yet. Canon's color science has always been excellent and it has rarely given me much to complain about. As you can see in the gallery, the reds are popping while the greens are vivid. There's a good amount of contrast in the images too and the images look neither too dark nor too bright.

One of my favorite features is the Hybrid Auto mode which records a short video clip when you press the shutter button, so it shows the lead-up to the image. You can see what this looks like in the video above. This is a great feature to have for those who like to share behind-the-scenes footage on their social media accounts, or even those who just like capturing candid moments. It's like a live photo on a smartphone but better.

Okay, sounds great, so what's wrong?

There are... a few things up with the Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A. It isn't the strongest camera when it comes to battery life, as it's CIPA-rated for just 180 shots. This means that if you're taking the camera to a day-long festival, for instance, it won't necessarily last a full day of capturing stills or recording video. In my testing, the camera lasted me just over 190 photos, which isn't great.

That isn't even my biggest issue with the camera, though. The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is fitted a USB-B port for data transfer, which means it doesn't feature in-camera charging. To charge the camera, you need to remove the battery pack and insert it into the included external charger — which uses a proprietary cable, so it isn't like you can use a USB-C cable to charge it either. My issue with this is that the camera originally came out in 2016, and for that time period, the USB-B port was fine, but for 2026? It's a no-go.

Then you've got the lackluster build quality. It feels plasticky and fragile, especially the sliding cover that protects the battery pack and the microSD card. It honestly feels like it could snap into two if you used just a bit of excessive force. Oh, and speaking of, Canon has replaced the SD card on the 2016 version with a microSD card. It isn't a massive drawback, but SD cards are simply faster and are better for heat dissipation.

What are my options?

All of this for a camera that costs $379 / £379 is simply not good enough, in my opinion. But there are other options out there, and you've come to the right place if you want a compact camera that's powerful and doesn't break the bank.

More from Tom's Guide

• Kendall Jenner and Dua Lipa made this 10-year-old Canon compact go viral so I tested it to find out if it’s worth the hype — here’s how it went
• Seven years later, the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III is still TikTok’s favorite compact camera — here’s how it holds up in 2026
• I took 200 photos on the Leica Leitzphone and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL to see which is better — and it’s not even close

Compact cameras aren’t dead, hooray! While many of us thought that the compacts we grew up with would become obsolete and get phased out by DSLRs and mirrorless snappers, that hasn’t happened, and Canon has proven it won’t be anytime soon with the re-release of its PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A. This 10-year-old compact features a 20.2MP CMOS sensor and packs digital image stabilization as well as a 12x optical zoom. The nostalgia-inducing image quality is lovely, and the camera relays vibrant colors too.

But is it worth the premium? The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A has some significant drawbacks, such as the lackluster build quality, poor battery life, and an old-fashioned USB-B port which means there’s no in-camera charging.

To find out if this is the best camera for you, read my full Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 A review.

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Specs

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Cheat sheet

• What is it? A 2025 refresh of a 2016 compact camera with a 20.2MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor
• Who is it for? Anyone who wants an easy-to-use portable camera
• How much does it cost? The Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HA S is available for $379 / £369
• What do we like? The image quality, handy 12x optical zoom, ease of use, portability, and built-in flash
• What don’t we like? The lack of in-camera charging, poor build quality and battery life, and the asking price

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Price & availability

First things first, this Canon compact goes by two different names. In the Americas, it is known as the Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A, while in the U.K., Europe and Australia, it’s sold as the Canon IXUS 285 HS A. The “A” in the name doesn’t stand for anything, but it denotes that this camera is a 2025 refresh of the original 2016 model. If that sounds familiar, it’s because the original Elph 360 HS / IXUS 285 HS went viral recently thanks to Kendall Jenner and Dua Lipa, so chances are you’ve seen it on TikTok or in paparazzi photos.

To make this review easier to read, I’ll be referring to this camera as the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A throughout. Now that that’s out of the way, let’s talk about the pricing. The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is available for $379 at Adorama U.S. / £369 at Amazon U.K. That’s a lot of dough for a compact camera, and it’s one of the most expensive compacts I’ve tested so far.

The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is priced similarly to the Panasonic Lumix ZS99 ($499), and is more expensive than the likes of the Pentax WG-1000 ($196) and the Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 ($179). But hey, at least it’s cheaper than the atrociously priced Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III ($879). While the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is a decent compact camera, is it worth spending that many doubloons on it? Let’s find out.

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Design & build quality

Compact cameras, as their name implies, are compact and portable, and the Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is no different. It’s smaller than your average smartphone — certainly smaller than my Google Pixel 10 Pro XL — and can easily slide into even your jeans’ front pocket. The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A measures 3.92 x 2.28 x 0.89 inches and weighs 5.15oz, so you barely notice it in your pocket or handbag.

Even though the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is small, I didn’t have any problems using it with one or both hands. The light weight also means that my hand didn’t hurt after long periods of holding up the camera — when shooting video, for example.

The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A comes in either black or silver, and I tested the black model which looks nice and certainly looks like a premium product. The design also brings back a lot of childhood memories for me, as many of the compact cameras my family and I owned looked very similar to the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A.

My only issue with the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A’s otherwise premium design is the lackluster build quality. The camera is made entirely of plastic which feels low quality, and sounds hollow when you tap it. The covering on top, which protects the USB-B and micro HDMI ports, feels very plasticky and I wish Canon had used a rubber flap instead. It’s also frustrating to open as you have to use a fair bit of force.

In a similar vein, the plastic sliding cover protecting the battery pack feels just as plasticky, if not more. It feels fragile too, like it could snap easily without too much force. If you want a camera that feels more well-built, I’d recommend either the Panasonic Lumix ZS99 or even the cheaper Pentax WG-1000. The WG-1000 is even shockproof and can withstand falls up to 6.5 feet.

Ports

You’ll find just two ports on the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A, and both are located on the top plate (when the camera is sitting upright). There’s a micro HDMI output and a USB type-B port for data transfer. This feels obsolete, as most cameras now feature a USB-C port, which is more up-to-date and offers much higher data transfer speeds.

Monitor

The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is fitted with a 3-inch fixed TFT LCD monitor with a resolution of approximately 416,000 dots. It’s nearly double that of the Pentax WG-1000 (230K dots) but is much lower-res than the Panasonic Lumix ZS99’s (1.84M dots). The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A’s monitor is bright enough to see in most lighting conditions, even in bright sunlight. It can help you frame your shots better and change settings accurately.

Unlike the Lumix ZS99, the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A’s monitor is fixed which means it can’t be flipped or tilted, limiting shooting capabilities from awkward angles. For instance, the Lumix ZS99’s monitor can be flipped up 180º to become a selfie screen. But it isn’t uncommon for compact cameras to have immovable screens, as this is something I’ve seen on other compacts I’ve tested, like the Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 and the Kodak PIXPRO FZ45 ($99).

Weather-sealing

The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is not weather-sealed. It isn’t protected against water, dust or falls. I’d be careful using the camera in the rain as there are no protective coverings over the ports. It’s worth getting the Pentax WG-1000 if weather-sealing is important to you, as that camera is fully weatherproof.

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Controls

If you’re looking for an easy-to-use compact camera, the Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is perfect for you. Its straightforward control scheme, well-laid out buttons and easy-to-read menu system makes it a compact camera fit for everyone, regardless of your photography expertise level.

Most of the buttons are exactly like the ones you’ll find on the majority of compact cameras, but alongside being able to swap between stills and video, Canon has added a Creative Shot mode. Pressing the shutter button with this mode enabled captures six photos and a few different filters and effects are applied to your images.

For instance, in the series of images in the gallery above, the camera has applied different color profiles to each shot, and has created crops in different aspect ratios as well. While I believe that this can give you some creative freedom, I can’t see myself using it much if I owned the camera. I suppose these photos would be good for social media, but having spoken to a few of my friends about this feature, none of them seemed too convinced, and they felt it was a gimmick.

You’ve also got a Hybrid Auto shooting mode which records a short video clip before the shutter button is pressed to capture a still, creating a behind-the-scenes video akin to B-roll, ideal for your Instagram feed or TikTok. This feature alone has me convinced that the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A was designed for TikTokers and social media users. It’s really nice seeing the lead-up to the image. The photo above is the result…

…and above is the video leading to the image. I had fun using this feature, and I’m sure social media users who like sharing behind-the-scenes footage with their followers or friends.

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Lens

The Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is fitted with a 20.2MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor with a focal length of 4.5-54mm (25-300 mm full frame equivalent). This focal range is great for group photos, landscapes, portraits, street and travel photography. The f/3.6-f/7 aperture is adjusted automatically by the camera, and so is the shutter speed (15s to 1/2000s). ISO range is limited to 80-3200, which is what I expected from a sensor this size.

You get a 12x optical zoom, a 24x ZoomPlus, a 4x digital zoom, and a 48x combined zoom. The 12x optical zoom is handy as it enables you to magnify subjects and capture high-res images. This is better than a digital zoom which enlarges a portion of an image using software, which results in some pixelation and lower-res images.

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Image quality

The Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A captures 20.2MP images that are ideal for sharing on social media and making small prints for your physical photo album or scrapbook. The resulting images have a vintage, retro aesthetic and charm to them which reminds me of the photo albums my family compiled when I was growing up. So while image quality isn’t the best and the most highly detailed, it would be unfair to mark a compact camera down for not being able to go toe-to-toe with DSLRs and mirrorless cameras.

Image quality, by compact camera standards, is great, and you can see samples in the gallery above. These images were taken on sunny and overcast days, and even those taken in cloudy conditions have turned out well, with colors that capture the moodiness of the scenes. Colors appear true-to-life, and I especially love the photos of the flowers and holly. The reds pop very well against the vivid greens, and the yellows appear beautiful too.

Most of the images are sharp as well, especially the one of the holly and the reflection of the building in a puddle, as the edges of the subjects are well-defined and distinguishable. These might actually be the best photos I’ve taken on a compact camera so far!

As I mentioned earlier, the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A’s 12x optical zoom is extremely handy, and is one of the most compelling reasons to buy this camera. Take a look at the two images in the gallery above. The first was shot with the camera fully zoomed out, and the second was taken with the 12x optical zoom. As you can see in the second photo, plenty of detail has been captured and the image has turned out great. There isn’t much loss in sharpness either, as the patterns in the bricks and the details in the window pane have been retained.

You will, however, notice that there’s some chromatic aberration in the second photo, with purple color fringing along the right-hand edge of the building. This is due to the camera’s optics not dispersing light properly so different wavelengths of the same light hit the sensor in different places — it’s an undesirable characteristic often reflective of cheaper optics. It doesn’t ruin the image, but it’s important to note that it is prevalent.

Alongside a handy 12x zoom, you also get a macro mode which reduces the minimum focusing distance to just 1cm. In theory, this can help you get detailed shots of the finer details, such as the patterns on flower petals. In my testing, though, I found the macro mode to be hit-or-miss. The first two images in the gallery above are sharp and in-focus, and you can make out plenty of detail in the white flowers.

The third image, on the other hand, is all over the place. I couldn’t get the camera to focus on the dark berries no matter how hard I tried, and regardless of how far I placed the lens from the fruits. Instead, the camera ended up focusing on the bunch of berries in the top-right corner. At first I put it down to the wind blowing and displacing the berries, but even after I held the berries’ branch with my hand, I still couldn’t get the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A to focus on them, which is quite disappointing.

On the plus side, the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A packs good autofocus for human beings, and it utilizes Canon’s TTL AiAF system with Single, Continuous, Servo AF/AE and Tracking AF modes. The camera also features human and animal subject detection, and in my testing, I found human face detection to be very reliable.

In the gallery above, the camera was quick to lock on to mine and my partner’s face in the first shot, and her face in the second shot. Even though these images were taken at different times of the day with different lighting — one after dark and one in the daytime — the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A’s autofocus never felt sluggish.

Animal detection works well too, as the camera was quick to lock on to the common wood pigeon and European robin in the gallery above. Even when the birds were obscured by the branches, the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A did not struggle to focus on the subjects.

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Video

Alongside shooting stills, the Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A can shoot FHD video at 30fps too, making it a versatile hybrid compact camera. It’s the same resolution and frame rate you’ll find on the Pentax WG-1000, but the Panasonic Lumix TZ99 should be your port of call if you want a 4K shooter.

You can see a compilation of clips shot in FHD/30fps above. While you don’t have a lot of room for cropping and the video isn’t as high-res as 4K, it’s still good and doesn’t look too choppy, at 30fps. You also get 4-axis Intelligent IS, which is digital image stabilization, which helps negate some choppiness from camera shake.

The PowerShot Elph 360 HS A features a built-in mic too which is good enough for recording ambient sounds. I love how clear the European robin’s song sounds in the video above. Although, it’s worth noting that the camera also records the sound of it zooming in and out so I’d avoid doing so when you’re recording video as it can be unpleasant and jarring.

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Battery life

The Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A utilizes a removable and rechargeable Lithium-ion NB-11LH battery pack. One of my biggest gripes with the camera is that you can’t charge the camera directly. It’s because the camera still features a mini USB-B port which, in my opinion, feels a bit old-fashioned. This means that you need to remove the battery pack, slide it into the included external charger, and plug it into a power port.

I’m really surprised that Canon has decided to retain the USB-B port and not replace it with a USB-C port. Why refresh a 2016 model and not fit it with up-to-date technology, given that even keychain cameras like the Kodak Charmera ($29) now feature in-camera charging? I can understand Canon wanting to make the camera readily available since the 2016 model went viral, but why not update it with useful features?

My rant aside, the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A is CIPA-rated for 180 shots or 265 shots when using the camera in Eco mode. This is shorter than the Panasonic Lumix ZS99’s 380-shot and the Pentax WG-1000’s 380-shot CIPA ratings. But of course, CIPA tests are conducted under very strict conditions, and the rating is usually conservative, especially compared to real-world usage.

In my testing, I was able to take just over 190 photos between charges, while using the camera’s monitor to view my images every now and then. This isn’t great, and it means that you might run out of charge before the end of, say, your day-long music festival.

Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A review: Verdict

As compact cameras go, the Canon PowerShot Elph 360 HS A / IXUS 285 HS A is a decent choice. The images it captures have a retro aesthetic to them which is fit for today’s social media age, and the colors are bright and vivid. The autofocus works well, and the handy 12x optical zoom lets you zoom in without losing too much sharpness. You can also record FHD/30fps video, and I particularly like the Hybrid Auto mode which captures a short clip of the lead-up to the still you’re capturing.

But with underwhelming battery life and plasticky build quality that feels subpar, and the lack of in-camera charging, the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A falls just behind other compact camera offerings from the likes of Pentax and Panasonic. Given that the camera costs nearly $400, I feel like your money would be spent better elsewhere.

If money isn’t an object and you want a compact camera that’s extremely easy to use, then the PowerShot Elph 360 HS A could be perfect for you. After all, if Kendall Jenner (who isn’t a professional photographer, as far as I know) can use the camera, I suppose anyone can.

Ah, TikTok. A social media platform with hundreds of thousands of videos pertaining to anything and everything on the planet. You've got your classic "brainrot" memes like 6-7, and existential videos discussing the meaning of life all in one app. I won't lie, I love scrolling through TikTok and laughing at the silly things people post on there — or crying at videos of puffer fish, and polar bears struggling to survive as the snow around them melts, with Twenty One Pilots' "Drag Path" playing in the background.

Aside from humorous and inspirational content, TikTok is also responsible for popularizing products we thought would fade into oblivion as the years went by. Retro cameras are very popular on TikTok, with Gen Z going gaga over the likes of the Kodak Charmera and the Camp Snap CS-8. And you'll never guess what TikTokers' favorite compact camera is — it's the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III. Yes, the one that came out all the way back in 2019.

But why is the PowerShot G7 X Mark III still so popular, seven years after its launch? That's the question on everyone's mind — well, on mine, at least. Looks like I might finally have the answer to that, now that I've spent a week testing this camera. If you're wondering whether it's worth the hype in 2026, here's what I've learnt, and here's everything you need to know.

A quick rundown

• What is it? The Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III is the third iteration of Canon's popular compact camera, and it packs a 20.1MP CMOS sensor, and is capable of recording 4K/30p video. You get a 4.2x optical zoom to get stuck into the detail, and the camera is easily portable, thanks to its small size, making it great for travel snaps.
• Who is it for? TikTokers, apparently. I jest! The PowerShot G7 X Mark III is for anyone who wants a compact camera, really, and doesn't want to spend more money on a mirrorless camera or DSLR.
• How much does it cost? It's on the pricey side of things. The PowerShot G7 X Mark III retails for $879 / £1,035, or you can buy the 30th Anniversary Graphite Edition for $1,299 / £859.
• Is it available to buy? Well, it depends. In many places, such as the U.S., the PowerShot G7 X Mark III is either on backorder or out of stock, and you can blame the camera's TikTok popularity for that. The 30th Anniversary Edition is available but limited, so I'd recommend grabbing it ASAP.

What are the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III's specs like?

Explaining the TikTok phenomenon

When I picked up the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III for the first time, I wondered, "Why does TikTok love this camera, specifically?" After all, there are many other competent compact cameras out there. You've got the Pentax WG-1000 and the Kodak PIXPRO C1 — both great, both much cheaper than the PowerShot G7 X Mark III. But then I realized, there's no point in trying to find much logic here as with most trends on TikTok, that's all they are: trends. This video alone has nearly 400,000 likes!

But the PowerShot G7 X Mark III has reached legendary status, given how popular it is seven years since it was first introduced. It's like a cult classic movie nowadays. If there's one thing Gen Z and Gen Alpha love, it's the sweet spot that lies somewhere between professional quality and nostalgic, lo-fi aesthetics. And that's really what the PowerShot G7 X Mark III is catering to: its 20.1MP sensor is enough to capture good images while teetering on the image quality being just lo-fi enough.

Professional, high-end bodies can often reveal too much detail, such as the many pores in your face, and make everything look like a production. The PowerShot G7 X Mark III, then, strikes a balance between good-quality images and video and the candid vibe, and instead feels like a cool, chill, low-key camera. As a millennial who is mostly confounded by Gen Z-isms, that's what I'm guessing they want (but feel free to disagree with me in the comments).

A joy to handle

As is the nature of compact cameras, the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III feels wonderful to handle. Its buttons and dials are thoughtfully laid out, and everything is signposted clearly, so even if you aren't familiar with cameras, you should have no trouble getting to grips with it. I'm guessing the ease of use is one of the reasons why this camera is loved by TikTokers. I've always liked Canon's menu system as well, as it's detailed but easy to understand, with most settings being fairly self-explanatory.

The PowerShot G7 X Mark III is an excellent choice for those who want to photograph their travels, as it measures 4.13 x 2.4 x 1.63 inches and weighs 10.7oz, so it doesn't take up much space in your pocket or handbag, and it doesn't weigh you down either.

Another advantage of owning the PowerShot G7 X Mark III (or any compact camera) is that you can take it with you to music festivals and concerts. In the U.K., where I'm based, concert-goers aren't allowed to bring cameras with interchangeable lenses into venues, but that rule doesn't apply to the PowerShot G7 X Mark III as it features a fixed lens. I've personally seen many people with this camera (or similar) at gigs I've been to, so it's a safe choice for live music lovers.

One button to rule them all

Somewhere along the line during my testing period, I think I cracked the code re: why the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III is so popular amongst "influencers" and TikTokers. The answer lies in its Q/Set button, located next to the monitor. This button gives you access to Color Profiles, Background Blur Degree, Brightness, Contrast, Saturation, and color tones, all of which pop up on the screen, and the changes are displayed in real-time.

I think this is a fantastic addition to the camera, and will surely appeal to many users. Since you can adjust the brightness and contrast, and apply filters while shooting, you can tailor the shot to look exactly the way you want it to. After that, it's a simple matter of using the camera's built-in WiFi and Bluetooth to transfer the images to your phone, and share them straight to social media — no need for post-production or hours spent color grading (unless you aren't bound by time, of course).

One-touch real-time editing is a boon for social media, where it's a race to see who breaks the news first, or who reveals a new product first. I myself had a lot of fun playing around with it during testing. I do wish, though, that you could save your own custom color profiles to the camera, akin to saving custom film recipes on my Fujifilm X-T50.

The image quality surprised me

The Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III packs a 1-inch Stacked CMOS sensor, capable of capturing 20.1MP images. That's not a lot of megapixels, so you don't have much room for making extreme crops, but it's enough for sharing your photos on Instagram, Facebook (though I'm not sure how many Gen Zers use it) and TikTok. Alongside this, you get a 4.2x optical zoom (which means you can zoom in without the quality being negatively impacted), and an 8.4x digital zoom.

Optically zooming in is great, but once you push past it and venture into "ZoomPlus" territory, image quality suffers, as the camera begins to digitally crop rather than optically magnifying the scene. But it's still good to have for those who want to get stuck in the detail. In addition to shooting stills, the PowerShot G7X Mark III records 4K/30fps video, which is more than enough resolution for social media sharing.

Having tested many Canon cameras in my time, one thing I've always loved is Canon's color science. Colors are reproduced faithfully and appear true to life — what you see with your eyes is what the camera will replicate (with 99% accuracy, I'd say). This applies to the PowerShot G7 X Mark III as well, and you can see a few sample images in the gallery above.

In the first shot, I love the popping oranges and neon colors, which add life to an otherwise dull scene (it was an overcast day in Bath, U.K., as most days are). In the second photo of the flowers, I upped the saturation in-camera via the Q/Set button, and I adore the vivid greens which add depth and character to the white flowers.

I also have to give credit to the PowerShot G7 X Mark III's contrast-detection autofocus system. I've seen users talking about it being frustrating to use on online forums like Reddit, but I didn't have any issues with it. The camera does a respectable job of tracking and keeping locked onto faces/subjects you've tapped on via the touchscreen.

You can see sample images in the gallery above. I found the camera was fairly quick to lock onto the swans as well as my partner. This autofocus system isn't as advanced as Canon's Dual Pixel CMOS AF/AF II which you find on cameras like the Canon EOS R50 V, but you usually get that in the brand's DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, not compacts.

I won't lie, the PowerShot G7 X Mark III's image quality actually surprised me. The photos I've taken are packed full of detail, especially the ones of the swans. For instance, in the first shot, you can clearly make out the individual feathers and kinks in the swan's coat. Even its webbed feet are highly detailed, and you can see water droplets on them too.

Is it the best option in 2026? Well...

Though the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III is a good camera that takes very lovely photos, I don't think it's the best way of spending your hard-earned money — unless you already own it, of course. But buying it secondhand or pre-loved? I'd consider other options. Seven years is a long time, and technology has come a long way since then.

Canon's own PowerShot line has developed a fair bit, with cameras like the Canon PowerShot V1 ($899) boasting amazing autofocus and 4K/60fps recording capabilities. Budget options, like the Canon PowerShot V10 ($429), are fairly competent too. Then you've got competition from other brands like Sony and Fujifilm, with the Sony ZV-1F ($499) and the Fujifilm X-M5 ($799) providing affordable vlogging solutions. Heck, for a price lower than the PowerShot G7 X Mark III, the Fuji X-M5 features interchangeable lenses, making it more versatile.

For serious content creation, all of the aforementioned cameras are arguably better than the PowerShot G7 X Mark III. I'd even add the Canon EOS R50 V ($699) to that list. And yet, the PowerShot G7 X Mark III reigns supreme. In fact, it's so popular that most places have it on backorder. Sound familiar? It's what happened with the Fujifilm X100VI ($1,599) when it exploded on TikTok.

My best guess is that TikTok content creators aren't looking for the most pixels. After all, you don't need 4K/60fps footage as TikTok downsizes it anyway. They probably want a compact camera that requires minimum effort to make something look great, and that's fair enough — that one-touch in-camera editing is a blessing.

As a professional reviews writer and someone whose job it is to scrutinize tech to figure out whether it's worth the money, I struggle to understand why the PowerShot G7 X Mark III is as popular as it is. But as a photographer and consumer, I can kinda see why: it's easy to use, it's very compact, it takes nice photos, and it can record 4K/30p video. It really depends on the lens you view the situation through.

What do you think? Is there any other tech that's popular but you don't understand why and would like me to check out? Let me know in the comments below!

More from Tom's Guide

• Best cameras in 2026
• 'Always be prepared for anything’: here are my 7 expert tips for amazing wildlife photography
• This camera’s ‘killer feature’ finally solved my biggest frustration with film photography — and I'd recommend it over a high-end vintage camera any day

The year's drawing to a close and many of us are starting to wind down to enjoy the holidays and well-deserved breaks. This is the time of the year when many of us start coming up with New Year's resolutions, whether they're related to hitting the gym more often, quitting a bad habit, or picking up a new hobby.

You know what's a great hobby that I, personally, vouch for? Photography. It's a wonderful hobby that involves learning new skills and technical knowledge, as well as going outdoors, spending time in the natural elements. Photography can be very rewarding too — take it from someone who has been doing it since she was a child. Nothing beats the feeling when you grab a shot of, say, a bird, that you've been vying for for a long time.

I love photography as a hobby and it's also part of my job as senior reviews writer here at Tom's Guide, which means I test the best cameras. If you want to take up photography as a hobby in 2026 but don't know which camera to get, I've got you covered.

Budget pick

Currently ranking as our top pick for best budget mirrorless camera, the Canon EOS R100 is a superb all-purpose camera. Whether you want to capture pet portraits, family group photos, or landscapes, this camera can do it all — and without burning a hole in your pocket too. It's the next step up from smartphone photography, thanks to its straightforward control scheme and compact and lightweight design.

Featuring a 24.1MP sensor, the EOS R100 captures lovely-looking stills which are perfect for sharing on social media. What makes this camera ideal for beginners is the 'Display Level' section of the menu which offers a Guided Menu display option, Interactive Mode guide, and a pop-up Feature guide. All of these help you find your way around the camera, and learn how to use different shooting modes. The EOS R100 teaches you photography, basically!

The EOS R100 is an interchangeable lens camera (ILC) which means you can swap its lenses. It's compatible with Canon's RF-S (APS-C) and RF (full frame) lenses, giving you the freedom to experiment with different focal lengths, apertures and more. For a beginner camera, this is a great feature to have, as you can always invest in more advanced lenses down the line.

For those who want to capture videos of their family, friends, pets and travels, the EOS R100 is up to the challenge as it can record 4K/25fps video too. It's the ultimate, beginner-friendly all-purpose camera, which is why I recommend it to every smartphone user looking to build on their photography skills.

Check out more sample images and videos in our Canon EOS R100 review.

Video work

If you want a camera specifically designed for videography, and one that doesn't break the bank, I've got a great recommendation for you: the Fujifilm X-M5. Similar to the Canon EOS R100, you can mount different lenses on to the X-M5, giving you more versatility and freedom. It's an excellent video and/or vlogging camera, thanks to its ability to record 6.2K/30fps footage. This resolution gives you some headroom to crop to 4K while maintaining a high resolution.

The X-M5 records 10-bit video, which means it’s capable of capturing a wide color gamut with a total of 1.07 billion individual hues. Fuji's color science is breathtaking so you know you're getting your money's worth. It's a versatile camera as it can shoot detailed, colorful 26.1MP stills too. Autofocus works well in both video and stills, as the camera is quick to lock onto animals and humans.

What makes the X-M5 an absolute steal (in addition to its solid video and photo capabilities) is its compact size, making it a lovely travel companion, and dedicated film simulation dial. Film simulations are, essentially, filters which you can apply to videos and photos, and there are many different ones to choose from. These help you produce usable footage without the need for post-production — something beginners will definitely appreciate.

For videography, the X-M5 boasts good audio performance too, thanks to a wind filter and three internal directional mics. You can choose to record surround sound, front or back priority, or front and back priority. The camera captures environmental, ambient sounds as well as human voices well, negating the need to buy an external mic right off the bat.

Check out more sample images and videos in my Fujifilm X-M5 review.

Vlogging on a budget

The best cameras can help elevate your content creation, and you don't necessarily need to spend thousands on one. If you're planning on picking up a camera specifically for vlogging (perhaps that's your New Year's resolution!), it's worth checking out the Sony ZV-1F, which currently ranks as our best cheap vlogging camera.

Sony's beginner-friendly vlogging camera is extremely compact and portable, and easy to use. Firstly, it takes nice photos with its 20.1MP sensor, and there are a few color profiles/filters for you to play around with. It shoots great 4K/30fps footage and can shoot in S-Log 3 to capture a wider dynamic range for more freedom in post-production.

The ZV-1F's prowess lies in its vlogging-specific features, which make it easy to create content. One of these is Product Showcase, where the ZV-1F automatically focuses on the subject close to the camera and blurs the background. This is a great tool for product reviews, for instance, where you want to put the object of your choice front and centre.

There are many other vlogging features to be enjoyed, such as the built-in three-capsule mic with a windscreen for clear audio, Background Defocus for quick transitions, and more. If there's one camera you need to kick off your vlogging career, it's none other than the ZV-1F.

Check out more sample images and videos in my Sony ZV-1F review.

Wildlife

My favorite non-human subjects to photograph are birds and animals. I love wildlife photography, so I'm always on the lookout for a camera that will help me achieve lovely shots. Thing is, proper wildlife cameras can be really expensive for many reasons, such as high-speed burst shooting, rapid autofocus, etc. Telephoto lenses designed to capture close-up shots of animals can easily cost you over ten grand.

But wildlife photography doesn't need to be an expensive hobby, and for that reason, I recommend the Nikon Coolpix P1100, a bridge camera featuring a 125x zoom with an effective optical focal range of 24-3000mm (and 6000mm with 4x digital zoom). Though its body is bulky (similar to DSLRs) and the ISO tops out at 6400 which means low-light performance isn't the best, this is still a fantastic camera to get for bird watching... and moon photography too!

The Coolpix P1100's biggest selling point is its long-reaching zoom, which helps you get up close and personal with animals without actually disturbing their peace. The modest 16MP sensor captures plenty of detail with great color reproduction. There's a dedicated Bird Watching mode which toggles the continuous 7fps drive, so you can keep the shutter button pressed and the camera will capture seven frames. This is handy for capturing birds (or animals) in motion/action.

The Coolpix P1100 handles well too, thanks to the chunky, ergonomic grip, as well as the well-placed controls. Speaking of, the Coolpix P1100 is very straightforward to control, so if you're a beginner, you should have no problem getting to grips with the camera's buttons and dials. If you don't want to spend thousands and thousands on a mirrorless camera and telephoto lens for wildlife photography, the Coolpix P1100 is the one to get.

Check out more sample images and videos in my Nikon Coolpix P1100 review.

Aerial

Photography doesn't need to be restricted to just staying on the ground, of course. If you're interested in aerial photography, it's worth investing in one of the best drones — and many doesn't cost thousands. For beginner pilots, the DJI Neo 2 is the ideal choice. The Neo 2 is extremely easy to fly, either via a smartphone, controller or even hands-free via the buttons on its body and Gesture Control.

It's packed with powerful imaging tech too. For stills, you get a 12MP sensor which captures detailed shots, especially in bright conditions, and for video, you get smooth, stable 4K/60fps footage. But what makes the Neo 2 a downright incredible mini drone is its omnidirectional obstacle avoidance, which means it can either brake in front of or bypass obstacles — an invaluable safety feature for all pilots.

The Neo 2 is a wonderful selfie drone too. It features an array of QuickShot Intelligent Flight modes, where the drone takes photos or videos before returning to its takeoff position. These include Follow, Circle, Rocket, SelfieShot, and more, and they're great for hands-free shooting either solo or with other people.

If you want a drone that's easy to fly, is fit for beginners, allows you to capture stunning aerial footage via manual control, and one that's built extremely well, the Neo 2 should be your port of call. It'll help you take your first steps into the vast world of drone videography and may even convince you to spend more on an advanced quadcopter in the future!

Check out more sample images and videos in my DJI Neo 2 review.

More from Tom's Guide

• Best cameras in 2025
• This $1,100 camera beats out $10,000 super telephoto lenses for wildlife photography, and I've taken some of my best photos yet
• I ditched my Google Pixel 7 Pro for the new Fujifilm X-M5 — here's why I won't be going back

Hello, dear reader, happy holidays! It's the most wonderful time of the year, as streets are decorated and lit up, making it a fantastic time to take your camera out for a spin. If you know me or are familiar with my work as a senior reviews writer at Tom's Guide, you'll know that not only do I adore cameras, but I review them day in and day out. Since joining the team in April 2024, I've tested my fair share of instant, mirrorless and film cameras.

2024 was a great year for photography gear, but it can be argued that 2025 has been even better, something I didn't think was possible. Major releases from Sony, Canon, Fujifilm, Leica and so on, have proven that gear continues to evolve, making photography more accessible and better than it ever has been.

Do you know how many cameras I've tested this year? Just under 30. Because I test so many cameras, it's all-too-easy for me to forget the stunning photos I've taken as part of the process. I've become a better photographer this year, so as I did last year, I've rounded up the best photos I've taken. Welcome to my Photography Wrapped 2025.

Every camera I've tested this year

• Sony A1 II : $6,998 / £5,900 @ Amazon
• Sony ZV-1F : $599 / £499 @ Amazon
• Sony A7 V : $2,898 @ Adorama / £2,799 @ Clifton Cameras
• Canon EOS R5 Mark II : $4,399 / £3,321 @ Amazon
• Canon PowerShot V1 : $1,029 / £959 @ Amazon
• Canon EOS R50 V : $949 / £732 @ Amazon
• Fujifilm GFX100RF : $5,599 @ Adorama / £4,699 @ Clifton Cameras
• Fujifilm X half : $849 / £699 @ Amazon
• Fujifilm X-T30 III : $999 / £829 @ Amazon
• Panasonic Lumix GH7 : $1,999 / £1,599 @ Amazon
• Leica M11-D : $10,055 @ Adorama / £7,899 @ Clifton Cameras
• Leica Q3 43 : $7,380 @ Adorama / £5,890 @ Clifton Cameras
• Leica SL3 : $5,665 @ B&H / £4,489 @ Clifton Cameras
• Nikon Coolpix P1100 : $1,049 / £880 @ Amazon
• Sigma BF : $2,199 @ B&H / £1,969 @ WEX
• Novocolor Swiss+Go 35mm : £39 @ Amazon
• Camp Snap Screen-Free : $69 @ Walmart / £65 @ Oliver Bonas
• Camp Snap CS-8 : $149 / £152 @ Camp Snap
• Pentax 17 : $496 @ Best Buy / £489 @ Clifton Cameras
• Kodak Ektar H35 : $59 / £61 @ Amazon
• Kodak PIXPRO C1 : $119 / £79 @ Amazon
• Fujifilm Instax Wide Evo : $409 @ Best Buy / £319 @ WEX
• Fujifilm Instax mini 41 : $116 @ B&H / £94 @ Amazon
• Fujifilm Instax mini LiPlay+ : $199 @ Walmart / £189 @ Amazon
• Lomography Lomo’Instant Automat : $149 @ Amazon / £100 @ Selfridges
• Lomography Diana Instant Square
• Lomography Lomo'Instant Wide Glass
• Hori Piranha Plant Cam : $39 @ Walmart / £39 @ Amazon

My best shots on digital cameras

I absolutely adore animals and birds, so I love photographing wildlife whenever I can — and this year, there was no better camera to do that with than the Sony A1 II. It didn't take long for the A1 II to become one of my favorite cameras, and that's thanks to its plethora of pro-level specs packed into a body that handles sublimely.

A 50.1MP sensor means you can crop right in, 8.5-stops of IBIS ensure you can shoot at slow shutter speeds, and the high-res 9.4-million-dot viewfinder with a maximum 240fps refresh rate means you never miss the action. Its ridiculously fast autofocus system and 30fps blackout-free burst shooting make it the best mirrorless camera for any high-speed photography.

Speaking of high-speed cameras, I also tested the Canon EOS R5 Mark II this year, and I was amazed at just how easy this pro-shooter was to use straight out of the box. It shares a few characteristics with the aforementioned A1 II: 30fps burst shooting, 8.5-stops of IBIS, intelligent autofocus, and more.

But its stacked 45MP sensor (whose stacked nature enables speedier readouts to minimize rolling shutter distortions) and in-camera 180MP upscaling make it a formidable full frame camera — and the best that came out in 2025. Whether it's sports, wildlife, portrait, studio or landscape photography, the EOS R5 Mark II is up to the challenge.

2025 was also the year I finally got the hype behind Leica cameras, having tested my fair share here at Tom's Guide. The Leica M11-D was one of the most challenging cameras I'd tested, due to its lack of autofocus and rangefinder nature, and I believe it made me a better photographer. Pinpoint precision while focusing enables you to get stuck in the detail, while the 60MP sensor captures images that are bursting with life.

Other Leicas I tested this year were the Leica Q3 43 and the Leica SL3, both formidable mirrorless snappers. The former is all about pin-sharp precision, and the camera utilizes Leica's most advanced autofocus system, as well as a 60.3MP sensor that makes any mundane scene look beautiful. The SL3, on the other hand, is the meeting point of power and luxury, boasting 5-stops of IBIS and 8K/30fps video capabilities too.

But if I could afford it, which Leica would I buy? It has to be the Q3 43 — simply because it's compact and looks sleek! Let me know in the comments at the end about which one you'd buy.

When the year started, I attended the Photography & Video Show in London, U.K., and I had the chance to go hands-on with some fantastic cameras — and the Sigma BF was one of them. I was so excited to get the camera in for review, and it did not disappoint. Carved out of a single aluminum ingot, the BF oozes luxury and minimalism.

But don't write it off as just a statement piece. It captures lovely 24.6MP images and can even record 6K/30P video! The BF is a joy to use, and that's down to its minimalist interface and straightforward controls. It was one of my top 10 cameras of 2025, hands down.

This year wasn't all about mirrorless cameras, of course. I got to try a bridge camera, which bridge the gap between compact cameras and DSLRs, and are primarily designed for astro- and wildlife photography. I am the Nikon Coolpix P1100's target audience, and I thoroughly enjoyed utilizing its dedicated Bird Watching mode to capture swans, pigeons and robins.

Why did I love it so much? Because the camera's 4.3-539mm focal length equated to 24-3000mm on a full frame camera through a whopping 125x optical zoom, which allows you to zoom right in and capture detailed photos of animals without disturbing them. It's wonderful, really.

Although I didn't review it this year, I did buy myself a Fujifilm X-T50, and it's one of the best decisions I've ever made. I've always loved the X-T50 and its powerful 40.2MP sensor, beautiful color science, film simulation recipes, and reliable autofocus, all packed into a very compact body.

But I didn't realize just how much I loved it until I took it with me to Iceland. I could wax poetic about the X-T50 all day, but I'll let you scroll through the images and let my photos do the talking for me.

My best shots on film cameras

Although I predominantly shoot on digital/mirrorless cameras, I love a good film camera too, such as the Novocolor Swiss+Go 35mm, and I often test them for work. I tested many this year, and each had something unique to offer. But the one thing that remained consistent throughout was that lovely, retro-style, vintage aesthetic that makes film photos appear timeless.

I also tested half-frame film cameras, such as the Kodak Ektar H35 and the Pentax 17, and I love these nifty devices. They essentially double the shot count by printing two photos on one frame. Film cameras are never about perfect; they're more about living in the moment as you can't see the photos you've taken until you get them developed.

My best shots on instant cameras

In a similar vein to how film cameras are about living in the moment, so are instant cameras. Alongside testing mirrorless and film ones, I test instant ones too. I'm a 90s kid who grew up with photo albums and getting images printed, so I love physical prints — and instant cameras are perfect for that. The photos are rarely perfect, but it's hard to beat the sense of nostalgia they carry.

2025 has been a superb year for my photography and I don't doubt 2026 will be the same — or better, even. I can't wait to get my hands on more mirrorless, instant and film cameras, and capture more photos of birds and portraits of my beautiful partner and family.

And there you have it. Thanks for tuning into my Photography Wrapped. I wish you all restful holidays, and I'll see you next year.

More from Tom's Guide

• Best mirrorless cameras in 2025
• Best cheap cameras in 2025
• I reviewed every drone that came out in 2025: these are the best photos and videos I’ve taken

The Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 ($249) is an entry-level ink tank printer that offers basic features and very low ink costs. It is outfitted with four ink tanks, comes with four bottles of ink and has a flat-bed scanner for copying and scanning.

The duplexer enables two-sided printing, but otherwise this Canon foregoes additional features such as a second paper tray, a USB thumb drive port or an automatic document feeder.

Yet this printer remains versatile and easy to print from despite its frugal design. You can connect to this MegaTank via the USB port, wireless, and Wi-Fi Direct. Mobile devices can use the Canon Print app to perform print, scanning and copy functions.

In our tests, the MegaTank G3290 turned in consistent speeds and image quality. It's no speed demon, but neither does it have an Achilles' heel. The Pixma G3290 can copy documents up to 8.5 x 11.7 inches, make borderless prints up to letter size, and has a duty cycle of up to 3,000 pages per month.

For delivering that level of reliable workhorse performance with such low ink costs, this Canon is one of the best printers you can buy if you're on a budget. In this Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 review I'll show you why.

Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 review: Design

The G3290 has a 2.7-inch LCD touchscreen on its control panel, which can be angled upward roughly 45 degrees. There are physical buttons for home, back, monochrome copy/scan and color copy/scan, as well as a stop button. The LCD offers four scene selections: standard, work, study and lifestyle (pattern papers, e.g.).

The LCD responded well to input in our testing, but menu navigation wasn't always ideal. For example, using the LCD to change paper size required scrolling past many sizes I will never use, and some I don't even know. Locating my preferred print sizes was made less intuitive because they were identified by multiple names, such as KG/4"x6" (10x15). However, after using 4 x 6-inch paper, this paper size setting showed up at the top of the menu list.

The paper tray can hold up to 100 sheets of paper or 20 sheets of photo paper. The paper tray is at the back of the unit; you raise a support and load paper vertically. This adds a few inches in height and depth to the printer. The G3290 measures 16.4 x 14.3 x 7 inches closed up for shipping, and measures 16.4 x 21.9 x 10.6 inches with the output tray and input support extended. This MegaTank model weighs 14.2 pounds.

The black ink tank is to the left of the control panel. The three color ink tanks are to the right. Windows into the ink tanks allow you to see the ink levels.

Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 review: Print speed

The MegaTank Pixma G3290 was consistent in our speed tests. Neither blisteringly fast nor agonizingly slow, the G3290 tended to perform at roughly average speeds. It printed our five-page text document in 32.8 seconds, or 9.2 pages per minute (ppm). This was faster than the similarly outfitted Epson EcoTank ET-2850, at 8.7 ppm, though slightly slower than the category average of 9.8 ppm for the ink tank models we've tested.

The G3290 printed two-sided text documents quickly at 7.2 ppm, which was the fastest duplexer speed amongst recently tested ink tank models. This was a little faster than the Epson ET-2850, at 6.5 ppm, and significantly faster than the category average duplex speed of 5.5 ppm.

The Canon G3290 printed our six-page PDF of mixed text and color graphics in 2 minutes and 42 seconds, or 2.2 ppm. The Epson ET-2850 was faster, at 2.7 ppm, and ink tank models in general have averaged 3 ppm.

Using its duplexer, the G3290 printed the same color PDF at 1.9 ppm, which is the slowest time for recently tested ink tank printers—but not by much. The Epson ET-2850 made the same two-sided print at 2.4 ppm; the category average is 2.5 ppm.

The G3290 took 4 minutes and 12 seconds to make a high-resolution 8 x 10-inch glossy photo print. This was only 10 seconds slower than the category average. The Epson ET-2850 was significantly slower, taking just over 6 minutes to make the same print.

Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 review: Copy and scan speed

The MegaTank G3290 made copies at roughly average speeds. It took 27.5 seconds to make a color copy, compared to the category average of 25.3 seconds. Similarly, black-and-white copies took 12.5 seconds on average to produce, compared to the average of 11.4 seconds for ink tank models.

The G3290 was relatively quick to scan in color, but slower than average at scanning and saving in grayscale or black-and-white (see the Software section for more details). Making a 600 dpi scan to JPEG format was quick, taking 1 minute and 5 seconds. The category average, by contrast, was slower, at 1 minute and 23 seconds.

Scanning in black-and-white at 300 dpi to PDF format took 21.8 seconds. The average for ink tank models is a much quicker 14.4 seconds.

Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 review: Print quality

The MegaTank G3290 makes attractive text document prints. Letterforms look fairly sharp and sleek. The text looked sufficiently dark, though not quite the darkest we've seen. Some duplex prints had a top line of slightly misaligned text.

Graphics prints were similarly attractive. Colors looked natural and adequately saturated. Details in graphics were reproduced well. The quality on duplex prints was comparable. However, there was some very slight banding in some flat areas, and some black boxes with white text printed with a slightly different background shade than the surrounding area, which had matched in single-sided prints.

Glossy photos printed with well saturated colors and plenty of details. Dark shadow areas retained fine details rather than get blocked up, skin tones looked natural, and images had a warm appearance overall.

Copy quality was good overall. Copies of magazine pages were reproduced with sharp-looking text. Copies of a laser print of a text document, however, had letterforms that looked a little thick, having lost their sleekness. Reproductions of graphics were very attractive and retained the colors and details in the original.

In particular, copies of photographic prints were impressive. Most copies of professional photo prints looked nearly as sharp as the original, and were faithful to the color tint and saturation. Only one photo print copy looked subpar, losing some mid tones, which gave the photo a slightly unnatural and flattened appearance.

Scans of photographs and documents were faithful to the originals. Photo scans looked attractive, with well saturated colors that looked natural and warm overall. Scans also retained fine details in dark shadow areas.

Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 review: Ink cost and yield

The MegaTank G3290 delivers bargain ink costs of just 0.4 cents per text page, which is the category average. On color pages, however, this printer offers drastic savings of 0.9 cents per color page—significantly lower than the category average of 1.9 cents.

A bottle of the pigment-based black ink costs $21.99. The three dye-based color inks cost $13.99 each. The bottles of ink last an estimated 6,000 text pages or 7,700 color pages.

Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 review: Setup and software

Packing material was minimal, and I quickly had this MegaTank out of the box and ready to set up. The printed setup guide instructs you to plug in the printer and to follow the instructions on the LCD.

After installing the two printheads (black and color), the LCD's on-screen animation depicted how to unlatch the cover of the carriage in order to install the printheads. But, I did not find the animation totally clear; it took some tinkering to figure it out. Then, I poured the inks into their respective well, which was easy. The LCD said it would take about seven minutes for the printer to complete the setup process. Thereafter, screen displayed a URL for setting up the printer with a computer or smart phone. From the web page, I downloaded the software to my Windows 10 PC. It's called Canon Print, but it also offers scanning functionality.

Putting the G3290 on my network was simple. I used the WPS method, which took a few menu steps on the control panel LCD and a press of the WPS button on my router.

Basic copy and scan functions can be performed from the control panel of the G3290, using the dedicated buttons and LCD menu. When my original photo matched the loaded paper, all went well. But, when I tried copying a 5 x 7-inch photo print to 4 x 6-inch photo paper, I did not get a print with the entire image shrunken to fit. The LCD had not offered a choice to fit the entire image or crop; the G3290 simply cropped the image. It did offer an on-screen preview, however. In addition, you can scan multiple photos at one time. The LCD had a tendency to say that the G3290 had failed to correct a slanted photo or document, however, even when I had placed it snuggly in the upper corner, as instructed.

The scanning software in Windows 10 is basic. I did not find a way to customize settings on my PC and set up shortcuts for various document types. As a result, I had to make these selections with each scan. The LCD, however, does offer a little customization; there are four "scenes" to choose from: standard, work, study, and lifestyle. Standard has on-screen buttons for print, copy and scan. Work has buttons for standard copy, two-sided copy, and save to computer. Lifestyle offers three print functions: wallpaper-like patterns, templates, and print from cloud.

Canon Print software asks you to set the type of the original before scanning, either document or photo. But you can't select color or black-and-white scanning—you make this choice when saving the scan, in color, grayscale, or true black-and-white. When scanning from the G3290's control panel, pressing the "black" copy/scan button produced a grayscale JPG or PDF file.

The latest version of the Canon Print iOS app requires iOS 16. However, you can still use a previous version of the app with an older device, such as my iPhone 7, which runs iOS 15. Using the Canon Print app you can print, scan, store to the cloud, and make a smartphone copy (as opposed to scanning on the flatbed). This last feature I am typically skeptical of, but the app did a good job in my testing. Using the flatbed scanner, the G3290 made a copy of a magazine page that was attractive, but had areas where text was distorted because the slightly wrinkled page did not press firmly down on the glass (the scanner lid is lightweight). However, using the Canon Print app, the resulting copy had text in these same areas that was less blurred than in the flatbed copy. In both cases, graphics looked attractive and colorful, and text was moderately, but not razor-, sharp.

The MegaTank G3290 starts up in 12 seconds, which is a few seconds faster than the category average.

Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 review: Verdict

The Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 offers a fair number of features for a bargain price, making it a good choice for those who need an all-in-one printer without a lot of frills.

This ink tank model performs consistently well, delivers very low ink costs, and includes a duplexer. The G3290 creates high-quality prints, copies and scans. Although the included software is basic, solid performance and high image quality make this MegaTank model worth a serious look, especially for students and folks on a budget.

Japanese camera giant Canon has been on a roll this year. In March, it dropped not one but two brand new cameras no one saw coming: the fixed-lens Canon PowerShot V1, and the ILC (interchangeable lens camera) Canon EOS R50 V.

No, neither of these are aimed at photographers — they're purely for vloggers and videography enthusiasts looking for easy-to-use cameras. And you know what? It's a hella smart move from Canon.

I'm not a videographer or a vlogger, and I hate hearing my voice played back to me. But I'd be lying if I said I didn't thoroughly enjoy testing both of these cameras... especially the EOS R50 V.

It's basically a baby Cinema EOS camera (Canon's, well, lineup of professional cine cameras) which sets it apart from the other cameras part of Canon's EOS R System mirrorless lineup.

The EOS R50 V is like the EOS R50 if the latter didn't have a viewfinder and had very video-specific features — that's what the "V" stands for, of course.

The reason I think that the EOS R50 V is Canon's smartest decision of the year (so far) is simple: it's stripped back, it's cheap, and it's perfect for beginners/enthusiasts who mostly shoot in auto and want to dabble in manual shooting, and will eventually upgrade to a better, faster camera.

You don't know how to drive stick shift?

In my Canon EOS R50 V review, I repeatedly say that this camera is for those who want to step up their videography game, and primarily for those coming from a smartphone.

It's like riding a bike with training wheels on or driving a fully automatic car, so if you don't know how to drive stick shift (which you should), you'll be just fine using the EOS R50 V.

That's because most of the camera's default video modes don't require you to adjust shutter speed, ISO or exposure.

There are three customizable ones for those who dare (and you should definitely experiment with them) but for spur-of-the-moment vlogging, you can put the camera into, say, Cinema View mode and record 4K/24P video in 2.35:1 widescreen aspect ratio for a film-like look. Yes, it really is that easy.

The EOS R50 V's video specs are great too — 4K/60fps or 30fps oversampled from 6K, FHD/120fps slow-mo, C-Log 3 for capturing a wide dynamic range, you name it. 4:2:2 10-bit video also means the camera is capable of capturing up to 1.07 billion individual hues which is fantastic. For a camera aimed at beginners, the EOS R50 V really doesn't disappoint.

Wait... can I not take photos with the EOS R50 V?!

The Canon EOS R50 V, like I said, is a video-first camera but it's still a camera, and you can take photos with its 24.2MP CMOS sensor. There's a dial on the top plate which lets you swap between eight different modes... and only one of them is for stills, which isn't a bad thing at all.

Then it's a matter of choosing either auto settings adjustment or manual where you can adjust the shutter speed et al.

And the photos the EOS R50 V takes are actually quite good. It's packed with Canon's best-in-class autofocus with Auto subject detection and accurate color science that makes colors pop, as you can see in the gallery above. The camera accurately tracks and focuses on birds, animals, humans, vehicles, what-have-you, in both stills and video.

Locked into one system... forever

Okay, not forever but the thing with buying a budget camera from one brand is that you will eventually want to upgrade, and once you've accumulated a couple lenses for a particular mount, you'll want to upgrade to a camera from the same brand. That rings extra true in the Canon EOS R50 V's case.

Yes, it's a great camera for beginners but it's borderline useless for serious shooters. No in-body image stabilization, limited native RF-S lenses, and a kit lens with a maximum f/4 aperture (not great for low light).

Eventually, the day will come when you get bored of the EOS R50 V and want to upgrade to, say, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the EOS R5 Mark II — the natural course of things — and if you've already dropped a couple grand on glass, at least you won't have to buy new lenses every time. Same mount, see? Well, you can use RF-S lenses on full frame cameras as long as you're okay with the crop.

That's why the EOS R50 V might be the smartest camera Canon has made so far. Not for its autofocus as the EOS R5 Mark II takes the cake. Not for its electronic shutter as the EOS R8 outclasses it with its 40fps. And not for its RF-S lenses as they're thin on the ground. But for being so cheap that you can barely resist it.

Pricing the EOS R50 V's body at just $699 / £729 is a Big Brain Move. It's cheaper than the Sony ZV-E10 II ($999), the Fujifilm X-M5 ($799) and the Nikon Z 30 ($709). Canon has basically undercut its major competitors, and as someone who is well-versed with its cameras, boy does Canon know how to make 'em.

Even if you're locked into the EOS R System forever, trust me, that's not a bad way to live.

More from Tom's Guide

• I just tested the Canon EOS R50 V — and it’s the perfect video camera for enthusiasts who want to become professionals
• I ditched my Google Pixel for Canon's latest compact vlogging camera — and I'm blown away by the results
• Best mirrorless cameras in 2025

All photographers and videographers need a good camera that can stand the test of time and is reliable. For video work, you don’t necessarily need to drop thousands on a half-decent camera anymore, as proven by the entry-level Canon EOS R50 V. Inspired by the brand’s Cinema EOS lineup, the EOS R50 V offers an accessible entry point for those looking to step up their video game and venture into the world of the best mirrorless cameras.

Thanks to its intuitive and straightforward control scheme, the EOS R50 V is extremely easy to use. It captures lovely 4K/60fps footage and comes with a dedicated Cinema View mode for creating film-like videos. Not just that, it takes good, detailed 24.2MP stills too. The EOS R50 V is also very lightweight and compact, making it the ideal camera to travel with. And the best part? It costs just $699 for the body.

To find out if this is the right video camera for you, read my full Canon EOS R50 V review.

Canon EOS R50 V review: Cheat sheet

• What is it? It’s like the Canon EOS R50… but specifically for video. It’s the first entry in Canon’s EOS V series
• Who is it for? For enthusiasts who want a mirrorless, video-specific camera that’s also compact and portable
• How much does it cost? The Canon EOS R50 V’s body costs $699 / £729
• What do we like? The dual video recording buttons, smooth 4K/60fps footage, good stills performance, fantastic autofocus, and lightweight and compact body
• What don’t we like? There’s no IBIS and native RF-S lenses are limited

Canon EOS R50 V review: Specs

Canon EOS R50 V review: Price & availability

The Canon EOS R50 V was launched in March 2025 alongside the Canon PowerShot V1. It’s the spiritual successor to the Canon EOS R50 and is aimed at those who want a video-first EOS R System camera. Its body retails for $699 / £729 at Amazon, making it cheaper than the PowerShot V1 ($899) but slightly pricier than the EOS R50 ($679).

Canon also launched a new video-centric lens to accompany the EOS R50 V: the RF-S 14-30mm F4-6.3 IS STM PTZ. With the lens, the camera costs $849 / £959 which is great value for money. There’s also a plethora of RF (full frame native) mount lenses that the camera is compatible with, providing shooters with more flexibility, but you’ll need to calculate the extra reach due to the APS-C crop factor. RF-S lenses (APS-C native) are relatively thin on the ground, though.

As an ILC (interchangeable lens camera), the EOS R50 V finds itself competing against the likes of the Sony ZV-E10 II ($999), the Fujifilm X-M5 ($799) and the Nikon Z 30 ($709). It offers an inexpensive way for beginners or enthusiasts to step into the world of mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras.

Canon EOS R50 V review: Design

Although it’s the Canon EOS R50’s sibling, the Canon EOS R50 V sports a different, more compact design. Measuring 4.69 x 2.9 x 1.77 inches, the EOS R50 V is slightly longer but thinner and shorter than the EOS R50. Both cameras are near-identical in weight too. The EOS R50 V is a little lighter at 13.05oz, which means you can easily carry it in your pocket or bag without feeling weighed down.

The EOS R50 V is, of course, shorter than the EOS R50 because of the obvious absence of a viewfinder and built-in flash which is fine because this is a video-first camera. Even though it’s made entirely of plastic, it doesn’t feel or look cheap. It’s great to handle too, thanks to good weight distribution and a slightly protruding sculpted grip on the right.

There are also two tripod threads on the EOS R50 V: one on the bottom plate and another along the camera’s right edge. The latter is especially handy if you want to shoot vertical video while the camera is mounted on a small tripod or grip without a rotating head — and it’s something that’s missing from the likes of the Sony ZV-E10 II and the Fujifilm X-M5.

Ports

Ports on the EOS R50 V are as you’d expect from a video camera in this price range. These are all housed on the camera’s left edge and include: 3.5mm headphones and mic jacks, a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, and a micro-HDMI for external monitor/recorder hookup. The headphones port is a new inclusion as it was missing from the EOS R50, and it enables you to monitor sound levels while you shoot.

On the bottom plate, you’ll find the battery compartment which houses the LP-E17 battery pack, the same as the one found in the Canon PowerShot V1. Located next to it is a slot for a SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-II memory card.

Monitor

The EOS R50 V is fitted with a 3-inch fully articulating LCD touchscreen that has a resolution of 1.04 million dots, similar to the Fujifilm X-M5 and the Sony ZV-E10 II. In my testing, the touchscreen was highly responsive and easy to read. Accessing the quick settings Q menu or changing settings on the fly was extremely easy.

In most lighting conditions, I could read the monitor easily too, and even monitor sound levels. The monitor’s tilt and turn mechanism was extremely handy when taking selfies, shooting at low angles close to the ground or at awkward angles overhead.

As this is a video-centric camera, there is no viewfinder. If you want a camera that you can also use for photography, a viewfinder is essential, so I’d recommend the Canon EOS R50 or the Lumix G97 ($849).

Weather-sealing

The EOS R50 V is not weather-sealed so you’ll need to be wary when shooting in the rain or in dusty environments. Again, this is par for the course in cameras at this price, and you’ll need to spend upwards of $1,700 on a camera like the Fujifilm X-T5 or Lumix GH7 ($2,199).

Canon EOS R50 V review: Controls

What I said about the Canon PowerShot V1’s control scheme applies to the Canon EOS R50 V too. The EOS R50 V sports an extremely straightforward and intuitive control scheme, so much so that I was shooting within a minute of unboxing the camera and setting it up.

The main dial on the top plate lets you swap between eight shooting modes (one for stills) and the C1, C2 and C3 modes are fully customizable. I found it extremely easy to assign different shooting settings, such as video resolution, focus modes and color profiles, to each. A new addition to this dial is the Slow & Fast (S&F) mode which lets you shoot slow motion and timelapse footage straight out of camera with no editing required to achieve the effects. This isn’t something I’d naturally reach for but it’s good to see that Canon has taken every kind of videographer into consideration.

I also really like the dual recording buttons which no other Canon EOS R System camera has. There’s one on the top plate near the dial and another in the bottom left corner on the front, under the lens, which I found easy to reach when shooting with my non-dominant left hand. Overall, the EOS R50 V is a joy to use, and its straightforward controls make it suitable for those just stepping into the world of mirrorless cameras.

Canon EOS R50 V review: Autofocus

I have always been highly impressed by Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF II autofocus system, which the Canon EOS R50 V utilizes. It’s the same AF system also found in the (much) pricier Canon EOS R6 Mark II ($1,999) and in the Canon PowerShot V1. It utilizes deep learning technology for high-speed subject detection, and the EOS R50 V can quickly detect animals’, birds’ and humans’ eyes and faces, and vehicles too — and it works like a charm.

The EOS R50 V uses 651 automatic focus points and 4,503 manually selectable points for stills, and this drops to 527 automatic and 3,713 manual points for video. Both are far better than the Fujifilm X-M5 (425 phase-detection points and 117 contrast-detection), the Nikon Z 30 (209 points) and the Sony ZV-E10 II (759 phase-detection).

The camera quickly locked onto my partner’s face in the first photo above, and it had no issues detecting my friends’ faces (second and third photos above) even in an environment with tricky lighting and lots of objects in frame (often partially obscuring faces).

Similar to the Canon EOS R5 Mark II ($4,299), the EOS R50 V features Auto subject detection which you can toggle via the Q menu. This negates the need to swap between the subject you want the camera to focus on. Swapping from photographing a bike to a bird one after the other presented zero issues. This is something missing from both the X-M5 and the ZV-E10 II, and I wish both Fujifilm and Sony would rectify this as it takes a step out of the photography process.

Autofocus in video works just as well if not better, as you can see in the video above. The camera was quick to lock on to my face every time I entered the frame.

Similarly, the EOS R50 V reliably locked on to the duck and then on the flock of ducks as I panned to them. Overall, the camera’s a winner when it comes to its autofocus capabilities, and would suit nearly every genre of videography and photography.

Canon EOS R50 V review: Stabilization

Similar to the Canon EOS R50, the Canon EOS R50 V does not feature in-body image stabilization (IBIS), which isn’t uncommon at this price point. For context, the Fujifilm X-M5, the Nikon Z 30 and the Sony ZV-E10 II don’t feature IBIS either.

Instead, the EOS R50 V utilizes Movie Digital IS for video, while almost all (except the niche ‘VR’ virtual reality versions) of Canon’s APS-C native RF-S lenses feature optical stabilization.

No IBIS means you are reliant on lenses for true, uncropped stabilization (digital IS crops your image to align frames and effectively stabilize footage). This limits the choice you will have when branching out to other lenses — primes, for example — as while most RF-S lenses have IS, there aren’t very many of them. There are a decent number of Canon’s full frame RF lenses with IS, but many of the affordable prime lenses don’t have stabilization. It’s a little limiting.

No IBIS will also affect how low you can drop shutter speeds for photography, as IS lenses typically offer less stabilization than sensor-shift IBIS, although this isn’t a stills camera, so the main issue here is about the stabilization of video.

The kit lens compounds this issue, as indeed does Canon’s whole RF-S lens lineup. There isn’t one single constant aperture zoom lens, with many of the lenses (including the kit lens) topping out a maximum aperture of f/4. There are no primes either, except the VR lenses which are a niche product.

Without a constant maximum aperture, your lens will be hampered at longer focal lengths by being restricted to narrower apertures, meaning less light and cinematic bokeh effects. In short, you’re going to want to switch away from RF-S lenses, as they’re not very good, and your choice will be limited even when you do.

Anyway, on to the good bit now. Movie Digital IS has two levels: On and Enhanced. Both of these incur heavy crops, but you’ll still be outputting at 4K, so it isn’t a huge issue if you have a suitable wide angle lens (like the kit lens) to maintain a wider field of view. You won’t be able to shoot at 4K/60fps with Movie Digital IS, though, which is more of an issue if not using an IS lens.

In the compilation above (shot in 4K/30P), you can see the difference between Movie Digital IS Off, On and Enhanced — and the lens’ IS was also enabled. In the first clip, camera shake is very visible, as you’d expect, but this is negated in the second clip and by the third clip, it’s a thing of the past. I have naturally shaky hands so I highly appreciate the camera not making that apparent.

Canon EOS R50 V review: Video performance

The Canon EOS R50 V’s video specs are similar to that of the Canon PowerShot V1 — at a lower price. The camera is capable of shooting 4K video at 60fps (with a crop), 4K at 30fps (without a crop), and out-of-camera slow-mo (or time lapse) at FullHD/120fps with its dedicated Slow & Fast mode.

While these specs are great, the Fujifilm X-M5 offers 6K video, so it might be worth spending an additional $100 if that matters to you. If you shoot in 6K, you’ll be able to crop right into the frame or oversample the 4K output, ultimately providing you with more flexibility in post-production. But (there’s always a but) the EOS R50 V already captures 4K footage oversampled from 6K — so dealer’s choice.

Without incurring a crop, you can shoot 4K video at 30fps. I used the camera on a day out with my friends at Bubble Planet in London, U.K., and you can see sample footage above. The footage is smooth and the colors are popping. Also, because the camera is so compact, I was able to slip it into my trousers’ pocket and pull it out as needed without many hiccups.

4K/60fps video is, of course, one of the camera’s biggest selling points, and you can see sample footage above. The colors look stunning and you can even see the tiny details in the flowers. The EOS R50 V’s autofocus works well, again, keeping the seagull in focus as it takes off. I love how crystal clear the footage is. Keep in mind, though, that shooting in 4K/60fps incurs a 1.4x crop and, as I mentioned earlier, you lose out on stabilization too if you aren’t using an IS-enabled lens.

Canon has also added Cinema View Mode to the EOS R50 V, which can be found on some Cinema EOS cameras. Basically, it records video in a 2.35:1 widescreen aspect ratio — often used in films — and drops the frame rate down to 24P to achieve a cinematic look. You can see sample footage above, which I love the look of.

This could be a game changer for enthusiast videographers, as you can always use Color Profiles and filters, allowing for more creative possibilities.

Similar to the PowerShot V1, the X-M5, the ZV-E10 II, the EOS R50 V can shoot 4:2:2 10-bit video, making it capable of capturing a total of 1.07 billion individual hues. Shooting in C-Log 3 is an option too, which captures a wider dynamic range than SDR, although requires color grading in post-production. You can see what unedited C-Log 3 footage looks like above.

Canon EOS R50 V review: Audio quality

The Canon EOS R50 V has a decent built-in microphone which should suffice when shooting on-the-fly, but I’d recommend grabbing one of the best microphones to give your audio a professional feel.

The dual channel 48 KHz 24/16-bit stereo microphone performed decently in my testing — although it didn’t blow me away — as you can hear in the clip above. It does sound slightly echo-y though, even though my home office isn’t.

Canon EOS R50 V review: Image quality

The Canon EOS R50 V is a video-first camera so I’ll keep this section short and sweet. The camera’s 24.2MP CMOS sensor captures lovely stills with a good amount of detail. Its resolution is more than the PowerShot V1’s 22MP sensor but less than the Sony ZV-E10 II’s and the Fujifilm X-M5’s 26MP sensors.

Still, I’ve been pleased with the images I’ve captured, which you can see in the gallery above. Canon’s fantastic color science is at display here as the colors appear vibrant and true to life. The kit lens’ 14-30mm focal range gives a wide field of view that captures a lot of the scene, making the EOS R50 V great for landscapes and street photography.

Its 15fps electronic and 12fps mechanical shutters are faster than the ZV-E10 II’s 11fps shutter and should suffice for moderately fast-paced action. If you want a faster camera, the X-M5 has a 30fps shutter which should be better for photographing sports or wildlife.

ISO performance

The EOS R50 V has an ISO range of 100-51,200 which should suffice in most shooting conditions. As with other cameras I test at Tom’s Guide, I put the EOS R50 V through an indoors ISO test — bear in mind that this is an extreme test and you’re unlikely to be shooting at ISO25600 in most real-world scenarios.

Photos taken at ISO6400 turn out fine with barely any grain visible, but it’s at ISO12,800 that things start to get noisy. The first photo in the gallery above is a JPEG export of the CR3 RAW file, while the second is the straight-out-of-camera (SOOC) JPEG.

The EOS R50 V’s DIGIX X processor has eliminated some grain but a lot of it still remains in the second photo, as you can see in the bobblehead’s chin and the wooden desk. There’s also a general loss in sharpness from the smoothing of noise suppression, visible in the art print in the background where the greens and blues look muddled together. There’s also a loss in sharpness around the bobblehead’s chin.

It only gets noisier from here, as noise at ISO25,600 completely ruins the JPEG export of the CR3 file (first photo above). Even in the SOOC JPEG (second photo above), the noise is very clear and ruinous. A lot of sharpness has been lost in the art print as well as the bobblehead’s hands. I’d only recommend shooting at such high sensitivity only as a last resort where there’s no other way out.

Canon EOS R50 V review: Battery life

When it comes to stills, the Canon EOS R50 V has a CIPA rating of 480 shots which sounds like a lot but, alas, it pales in comparison to the Sony ZV-E10 II which is rated for 610 stills. However, it performs better than the Fujifilm X-M5 and the Nikon Z 30, both of which are CIPA-rated for 330 stills.

Real-life results always differ from CIPA ratings as those are done under strict conditions. In my testing, on a single charge, I was able to snap nearly 600 photos while shooting indoors and outdoors, with regular settings tweaks and playback.

Canon doesn’t specify the CIPA rating for video which is what matters more considering this is a video-first camera. I left the camera recording 4K/30fps video indoors to try and drain the battery, and kept regularly checking for signs of overheating. I was able to get approximately 60 minutes of footage with three very brief periods of overheating at the 20-minute, 32-minute and 48-minute mark. Good news is that you can charge the camera while using it, unlike the X-M5, so you can shoot long form video.

Canon EOS R50 V review: Verdict

The Canon EOS R50 V is a great stepping stone for those who want to dip their toes into the ocean of mirrorless cameras — especially video-specific mirrorless cameras. Canon has packed the EOS R50 V with its quick and reliable autofocus with Auto subject detection and accurate color science.

As a video-first camera, the EOS R50 V sports two recording buttons for easy access. It’s capable of recording smooth 4K/60fps and modes like Cinema View and C-Log 3 give shooters more flexibility. Not just that, but the camera is great for capturing stills too with its 24.2MP sensor. But since the camera costs just $699, you’re missing out on in-body image stabilization, which may be an issue if you want to experiment with non-IS lenses (and given the restrictive nature of Canon APS-C native, RF-S lenses, you probably will want to before long).

Overall, though, I’d recommend the EOS R50 V to anyone who wants to step up their videography. And since you can change lenses, you get more flexibility as opposed to the fixed-lens Canon PowerShot V1. The EOS R50 V is a compact but powerful camera that’s been a pleasure to use.

Like most people, I use my smartphone for everything: doomscrolling on social media, spamming my friends with photos of my family dog, and filling up its storage with photos and videos from concerts or taken on my daily walks. Smartphone photography has come a long way, and I always say the best camera is the one in your hands.

Naturally, it will take a lot of convincing to make someone ditch their smartphone for photography, videography and vlogging. I’ve tested many cameras that come close, but I believe it’s the Canon PowerShot V1 that gives compelling reasons to forego my Google Pixel 7 Pro.

The PowerShot V1 is Canon's answer to Sony's vlogging cameras, as it tries to take on the Sony ZV-E10 II, and you know what? It comes out on top. While you can't change its lens, the PowerShot V1 is fitted with a versatile 16-50mm wide-angle lens that captures a lot of the scene, and its vlogging-specific features make it a force to reckon with. I ditched my Pixel 7 Pro for it, and here's why I don't regret it.

In my influencer era

The Canon PowerShot V1's prowess lies in its many, many vlogging-specific features, and one of these is Product Demo. You might be familiar with its under a different name used by Fujifilm (Product Priority) and Sony (Product Showcase). It basically focuses on the subject closest to the lens while effectively blurring the background — a great tool for product reviews and unboxing videos.

The PowerShot V1, like many modern cameras, can shoot 4K video at 60fps. Now, my Pixel 7 Pro can do that too, but it overheats a lot, and it eats up my phone's storage as quickly as me inhaling a treat pizza on pay day. This is where the PowerShot V1 comes in.

Load it up with a 512GB or even a 1TB SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-II and you're good to go. What's even better is that the camera has a couple of cooling vents which ensure the camera doesn't overheat and shut down. And the footage looks lovely and smooth too, with Canon's color science shining in all its glory, as you can see above.

I hate hearing my voice played back to me, which is ironic considering I was a vocalist in a high school band a decade ago. But testing a vlogging camera means I have to make a vlog and record audio. One reason I would take the PowerShot V1 with me to a concert (where permitted) is its built-in mic which performs surprisingly well — and you can hear it in the clip above.

The clip was also shot in Dramatic B&W, one of five available creative filters that help you create videos for quick sharing to social media. There are lots of other vlogging features to discover, and you can read about them in my full Canon PowerShot V1 review.

Really good stills... on a compact?!

When I test a high-speed camera like the Canon EOS R5 Mark II or the Sony A1 II, I put it through its paces by shooting bursts of birds in flight or fast-moving animals. Compact cameras are different as they aren't always the fastest and they're more suited to portraits and landscape photography — but the Canon PowerShot V1 blew me away. Its 22MP sensor captures lots of detail.

While primarily a vlogging camera, the PowerShot V1 is fantastic for stills too. It can shoot 30fps bursts with its electronic shutter and boy are they good, and I mean really good. The photos in the gallery above are part of a longer burst, and you can see just how sharp the pigeon's features look.

Truly a compact

As I said up top, the Canon PowerShot V1 is an extremely compact camera, easily slipping into your coat's or trousers' pocket. Put your smartphone in one pocket and the PowerShot V1 in the other — perfectly balanced, as all things should be.

Given its 4K/60fps capabilities, vlogging-specific modes, and ability to capture surprisingly detailed stills, it's one of the most powerful compact cameras money can buy. Canon's put its best foot forward against Sony's and Fujifilm's vlogging cameras, and it has come out on top. It's one of those cameras I've been sad to return as part of the loan.

More from Tom's Guide

• Best cameras in 2025
• Fujifilm X-S20 review — A powerful hybrid camera for video creators
• I ditched my Google Pixel to shoot with this budget vlogging camera — and it’s perfect for beginners

The Canon PowerShot V1 is Canon’s answer to Sony’s domination of the compact vlogging camera market. For its size, the PowerShot V1 is a beast of a camera. Not only does it record lovely, bright 4K/60fps and FHD/120fps footage, but it comes with a plethora of vlogging-specific features that take the pain out of content creation.

It’s a good-looking camera too, sporting an all-black design, and it’s extremely comfortable to hold. Canon has also done a great job of simplifying the control scheme, which means if you’re stepping up from smartphone photography, you should have no issues using the V1.

But while you get Optical Image Stabilization, it isn’t as good as in-body image stabilization and it incurs a crop. And unlike its chief rival, the Sony ZV-E10 II, you can’t change the lens on the PowerShot V1, which might prove limiting for those who want to expand their creative options down the line.

Could this be the best camera for vlogging for you? Read my full Canon PowerShot V1 review to find out.

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Cheat sheet

• What is it? A compact digital camera with a fixed wide-angle lens
• Who is it for? For content creators and vloggers… and for whom money is no object
• How much does it cost? The Canon PowerShot V1 is available for $899 / £909
• What do we like? Lovely 4K/60fps footage, plethora of vlogging tools, sturdy and pocketable design, reliable autofocus, and good stills performance
• What don’t we like? No in-body image stabilization, and can’t change lenses

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Specs

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Price & availability

The Canon PowerShot V1 was announced in March 2025, becoming the latest addition to the Japanese giant’s line-up of compact digital cameras. The camera is available for $899 / £909 at Amazon, and it serves as a spiritual successor to the six-years-old PowerShot G7 X Mark III.

This price tag makes it the most expensive Canon compact but as it’s a fixed-lens camera, you don’t have to worry about spending extra on glass. The PowerShot V1 is a step up from the cheaper Canon PowerShot V10 ($429), offering premium features.

It’s also level-pegging with Sony’s vlogging cameras, primarily the Sony ZV-E10 II ($999) and the Sony ZV-1 ($799). Not to mention the Fujifilm X-M5 ($799) and Fujifilm X-S20 ($1,299) which, at the time of writing, is our pick of the best mirrorless cameras for vlogging and content creators — but is pricier due to its much more advanced features (including 6.2K video and IBIS).

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Design

For a camera that sports an all-black design, the Canon PowerShot V1 is a looker. It sports an all-black matte colorway which looks great. The camera measures 4.65 x 2.67 x 2 inches so you can slip it into your pocket.

It’s got a good weight to it too — 14.8oz (body only) — and I loved holding the camera. The PowerShot V1 is heavier than the Sony ZV-E10 II (10.3oz) and the Fujifilm X-M5 (10.8oz) and I much prefer its weight over the two.

Aiding the camera’s ergonomics is a slightly protruding sculpted grip that makes it easy to hold the PowerShot V1 with either one or both hands.

Although you can’t change lenses as you can with the ZV-E10 II and the X-M5, the PowerShot V1 features a versatile 8.2-25.6mm f/2.8 (16-50mm full-frame equivalent) wide-angle lens which provides a superb field of view for both vlogging and stills.

Ports

Ports on the PowerShot V1 are minimal. On the bottom plate you’ll find the battery compartment which houses the LP-E17 battery pack as well as the slot for a SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-II memory card. A standard tripod thread is also located on the bottom plate.

All other ports are located on the camera’s right edge. These include: 3.5mm headphones and mic jacks, a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, and a micro HDMI for external monitor/recorder hookup. These are protected by rubber flaps that stay securely locked in place.

I really appreciate the cooling vents located on the top and left-hand edge of the PowerShot V1, as they ensure the camera doesn’t overheat and shut down while shooting 4K video — a problem all too common with the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and the PowerShot V10.

Of course, overheating is still possible, but it’s nice to see attention has been paid to thermal performance. The camera’s monitor displays a handy thermometer to alert you.

Monitor

As a video-first camera, the Canon PowerShot V1 does not have a viewfinder, so you’ll be relying on the touchscreen monitor for both stills and video. If you also want a camera for taking stills, a viewfinder is important, so you may wish to buy a camera that has one.

The Fujifilm X-S20 and Sony a6700 ($1,400) are both vlogging oriented ‘hybrid’ cameras — that means they’re intended for both stills and video — and feature viewfinders accordingly.

The back of the camera houses a 3-inch fully articulating LCD touchscreen with a resolution of approximately 1.04 million dots, similar to the Fujifilm X-M5 and the Sony ZV-E10 II. I found the touchscreen highly responsive in my testing, especially when tapping to change autofocus points or adjusting shooting settings like shutter speed.

The monitor was also bright enough to read in most lighting conditions, and I appreciated the tilt and turn mechanism as it enabled me to record swans close to the ground or leaves dancing directly overhead. It also worked just as I expected for taking selfies.

Weather-sealing

The Canon PowerShot V1 is not weather-sealed so you’ll need to be wary of water splashes, rain and dust. Not only is that down to the camera sporting exposed cooling vents, but also the fact that weather-sealing is uncommon at this price point. Weather-sealing is something you get when spending upwards of around $1,500, like on the Fujifilm X-T5 ($1,699).

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Controls

The Canon PowerShot V1 is a straightforward camera to use, sporting an intuitive control scheme. It’s perfect for those stepping up from smartphone photography.

All controls are on the right-hand side of the camera, so you can control the camera with one hand and keep your left hand free. The top plate houses the shutter button (which gives good tactile feedback when pressed) which doubles as the zoom rocker, a bright red record button, and a switch to toggle between stills and video.

It also houses the dial to swap between different shooting modes, such as Manual, Aperture Priority, etc. and the dial doesn’t move too freely so you don’t have to worry about accidentally knocking it while shooting.

Canon’s menu system is also extremely easy to read and straightforward to navigate, as every sub-menu is color-coded, so you can distinguish between settings effortlessly. Overall, the PowerShot V1 is a ridiculously easy camera to use.

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Autofocus performance

The Canon PowerShot V1 utilizes Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF II autofocus system to lock onto animals/birds and humans. For context, this is the same AF system found in the pricier Canon EOS R6 Mark II ($1,999), and it utilizes deep learning technology for high-speed subject detection.

Similar to the pro-level Canon EOS R5 Mark II ($4,299), the PowerShot V1 features Auto subject detection, which means you don’t need to manually swap between animal/bird and human modes, thereby making photography more intuitive. Switching from photographing my partner to photographing a bird one after the other, in the same spot, proved effortless as the camera quickly locked on without me having to do anything.

The autofocus system works well in video work too, as you can see in the video above. The camera was quick to lock onto each individual bird as I panned to them. When there were multiple birds in the frame and I wanted the PowerShot V1 to focus on, say, the pigeon and not the ducks, I simply tapped on the screen and the camera worked its magic.

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Stabilization

The Canon PowerShot V1 doesn’t feature in-body image stabilization (IBIS) and instead utilizes Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for stills and Movie Digital IS for video. By default, the former is always enabled while the latter needs to be toggled as and when needed.

Unfortunately, image stabilization isn’t available for 4K video at 60fps, so you’ll need to drop down to 4K/30p when vlogging on foot — or if you have shaky hands like I do.

Movie Digital IS has two levels, On and Enhanced, and both of these incur heavy crops. Good news, though, is that the PowerShot V1’s wide-angle lens doesn’t cut off as much area as the Sony ZV-E10 II or the Fujifilm X-M5.

You can see the difference in the compilation above. Camera shake is very visible in the first clip while the other two clips are stable. I especially like how the Enhanced setting has completely eliminated any shake, and the footage looks fantastic.

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Video performance

The Canon PowerShot V1 is capable of shooting 4K video at 60fps and Full HD slow-motion video at 120fps. These are similar shooting rates to the Sony ZV-E10 II, but if you want 6K video, Fuji has both cameras beat with the X-M5 and X-S20.

Shooting in 6K will give you more flexibility in post production, allowing you to crop into frame and maintain a 4K resolution, or oversample your 4K output.

But still, 4K/60fps footage is fantastic, and you can see how crystal clear the clips are in the video above. The camera’s autofocus performs excellently here too, as it quickly focussed on the pigeons as I switched between subjects.

Shooting in 4K/60fps does yield a 1.4x crop though, and you lose out on image stabilization, as I mentioned before.

Similar to the X-S20, the X-M5 and the ZV-E10 II, the PowerShot V1 can shoot 4:2:2 10-bit video, which means it’s capable of capturing a wide color gamut with a total of 1.07 billion individual hues.

You can shoot in C-Log 3 too, which captures a wide dynamic range and provides more flexibility in post-production and color grading.

One of the most important features of a vlogging camera is its ability to ease content creation — and the PowerShot V1 does just that. Like with the Sony ZV-E10 II and the Fujifilm X-M5 and X-S20, you get a product demo mode which makes the camera focus on the object closest to the lens while blurring the background, and you can see how this works in the video above.

The camera quickly focuses on the bobblehead, film camera and drone, and it effortlessly focuses back on my face once the object is out of frame. This is a very handy feature for product unboxing videos as well as reviews.

Also available are five creative filters: Dream, Old Movies, Memory, Dramatic B&W, and Miniature. The footage above shows the Old Movies and Miniature filters in action. I really like the latter, which, basically, gives footage a tilt-shift effect and makes everything look like a toy set.

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Audio quality

While we’d recommend using one of the best microphones for audio recording and content creation, the Canon PowerShot V1 has a decent built-in mic too for on-the-fly recording or if you’re away from your kit. It features a wind filter and noise reduction and performs well.

You can hear a sample audio clip above, which was recorded on my balcony with vehicles passing by, and the camera has managed to eliminate those to highlight my voice and make it clearer, which is great. The clips were also shot in the Dramatic B&W creative filter, and I much prefer it over the PowerShot V1’s standard monochrome color profile as the colors appear bolder and, well, dramatic.

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Image quality

The Canon PowerShot V1 is a video-first camera but it produces lovely still images too. It’s fitted with a 1.4-inch 22MP CMOS sensor which takes detailed images.

22MP is a slightly lower resolution than the Sony ZV-E10 II’s and the Fujifilm X-M5’s 26MP sensors, but I’ve been pleased with the shots I’ve captured. Canon has also nailed its color science so colors appear true to life in most lighting conditions, as you can see above.

The PowerShot V1’s 16-50mm fixed lens has a 3.1x zoom range so it’s great for portraits and when you want to get closer to a subject. The first photo of the tree branches and the third of the bed of flowers, both were shot slightly zoomed in and have turned out lovely.

Burst shooting

Compact and vlogging-first cameras aren’t always the fastest, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised by the Canon PowerShot V1’s burst shooting capabilities. It utilizes the DIGIC X imaging processor for 30fps bursts when using the electronic shutter, or 15fps when using the mechanical shutter.

In comparison, the Fujifilm X-M5 has 30fps electronic and 8fps mechanical shutters, while the Sony ZV-E10 II has just an 11fps electronic shutter.

The photos in the gallery above were shot using the electronic shutter, at 1/8000s and ISO 6400. This maximum shutter speed is nowhere near as fast as pro-level cameras, like the Sony A1 II ($6,499) or the Fujifilm X-H2S ($2,499), but that’s not the PowerShot V1’s purpose in the first place. But if you do need to take casual photos of fast-moving subjects like birds in flight, it will certainly suffice.

ISO performance

As I do with other cameras I test at Tom’s Guide, I put the Canon PowerShot V1 through an indoors ISO test. The camera has an ISO range of 100-32,000 (expandable to 51,200) for stills, so it should suffice in most shooting conditions.

The photos above were shot at ISO 6400 — the first image is a JPEG export of the CR3 RAW file, while the second is the straight-out-of-camera (SOOC) JPEG. As I expected, the camera has done a good job of eliminating any grain and has produced a great, usable JPEG.

At ISO 12,800, when noise started to creep in in the RAW file (first photo), the camera succeeded in smoothing it out, albeit with some loss in sharpness in the bobblehead’s har, as you can see in the SOOC JPEG (second photo).

The photos above were taken at ISO 25,600. While the camera does a decent job of reducing noise, you can still see some grain in the Funko Pop’s chin, on the table and the colorful background. There is also a loss in sharpness, again, with the bobblehead appearing soft and the indents in the hair not appearing as detailed.

The sensitivity is already very high, and I wouldn’t recommend pushing past it to 32,000 or 51,200 as the photos will not be usable. The results may vary in real world scenarios, but you should be using such high ISO values only as a last resort.

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Battery life

The Canon PowerShot V1 is powered by an LP-E17 battery, and it’s the same battery pack you’ll find in the Canon EOS R100 ($479) and the Canon EOS R10 ($979). According to CIPA standards, the PowerShot V1 is rated for 400 stills or 70 minutes of 4K/60fps video recording. Both the EOS R100 and EOS R10, though, are rated for 430 shots each.

The PowerShot V1 is outshined by the Sony ZV-E10 II which is rated for 610 stills/195 minutes and the cheaper Sony ZV-1F that is rated for 540 stills (but 60 minutes of video). The Fujifilm X-S20 takes the cake here as it’s rated for a whopping 750 shots and 85 minutes of 6.2K recording. However, the PowerShot V1 edges out the Fujifilm X-M5, which is rated for 330 stills and 45 minutes of 6.2K video, and the Sony ZV-1, rated for just 260 stills (but 75 minutes of video).

Real life battery tests will differ from those conducted under strict CIPA guidelines. In my testing, I achieved nearly 500 shots while shooting a mixture of bursts and single shots indoors and outdoors, and regularly checking the settings and playback.

As for video, the camera yielded 57 minutes of continuous 4K/60fps recording indoors. I kept a check on the on-screen thermometer to see if the camera could handle the heat, and it suffered two short periods of overheating: once at the 17-minute mark and another at the 52-minute mark. This isn’t terrible, but if you want a camera with excellent thermal performance, you’ll need to spend more.

The Fujifilm X-S20 can be fitted with an attachable fan to allow for longer stints of recording, while professional-tier Panasonic Lumix S5IIX ($2,199) features a built-in fan for unlimited recording at 4K/60p.

Canon PowerShot V1 review: Verdict

Vlogging cameras need to do a few things to be considered the best of the best: they need to be easy and intuitive to use, boast vlogging specific features, and record smooth video. The Canon PowerShot V1 does all this and more.

Its 4K/60fps footage is superb, while features like product demo and creative filters make content creation easy. Its autofocus system is reliable too, and Auto subject detection means you don’t have to waste time manually switching between the subjects.

While the PowerShot V1’s wide-angle lens is great and captures a lot of the scene, you can’t change the lens, so you’ll need to consider the Sony ZV-E10 II or the Fujifilm X-M5 if that’s a necessity, or if you can extend your budget, the Fujifilm X-S20.

If you want to capture popping yet true to life colors and a camera that’s comfortable to handle, the PowerShot V1 easily warrants a recommendation.

If you know me or are familiar with my coverage of the best mirrorless cameras here at Tom's Guide, you'll know that nothing brings me more joy than photographing wildlife.

I've loved animals for as long as I can remember, and I always want to capture them in all their glory. But to do that, I need a fast camera that I can use as an extension of myself.

Enter the Canon EOS R5 Mark II: perhaps the easiest pro-level camera to use money can buy right now. Canon has made professional photography more accessible with its flagship.

As I noted in my Canon EOS R5 Mark II review, it took me less than a minute to start shooting. Straight out of the box, the EOS R5 Mark II is a beast.

But it's the camera's 45MP Stacked CMOS sensor, 1,054 autofocus points and 30fps burst shooting that make it outstanding. Not only is the camera easy to use but it also takes gorgeous photos that appear true to life with faithful color reproduction.

Having tested the EOS R5 Mark II for two weeks, it came very close to dethroning the Sony A1 II as my favorite wildlife camera — and there's a very big feature behind that reasoning. Let me show you.

Stacked to the brim

Let's talk about the Canon EOS R5 Mark II's 45MP Stacked CMOS sensor: what does that mean? The first-gen EOS R5 did not have a stacked sensor, so the EOS R5 Mark II's stacked nature enables speedier readouts to minimize rolling shutter distortions by improving light collection efficiency.

And boy is it good. The EOS R5 Mark II takes incredible sharp photos, and it retains lots and lots of detail, enabling you to create extreme crops for large format printing or putting the focus on a specific part. Combine that with the EOS R5 Mark II's 30fps burst capabilities and you've got yourself a winner.

Utilizing two imaging processors (DIGIC Accelerator and DIGIC X), the camera captures up to 191 raw images (and 15 frames in pre-capture) at shutter speeds of 1/32,000s — that's very fast. This means that you can rely on its autofocus system and follow a subject while keeping the shutter button pressed, and you'll get plenty of impressive shots, as you can see in the gallery above.

Upscale me to the moon

But the reason you're reading this article is because of my headline where I talk about one feature that has changed how I take photos. And it's one I haven't seen on any other camera (yet). It's called 180MP in-camera upscaling.

Here's the technical bit: it enhances resolution by 4x by extrapolating the image’s EXIF data, creating stills up to 180MP from the original 45MP image. The 45MP image already gives you lots of resolution for extreme cropping but having a whopping one hundred and eighty megapixels at your disposal changes the game.

To demonstrate this, I took a photo of a swan and then upscaled it (which ate into my CFExpress card's memory), which you can see in the gallery above.

The first photo is the original 45MP file, the second is a crop of the 45MP file, the third is an upscaled crop, and the fourth is an extreme upscaled crop. While the original files have retained a lot of detail, the upscaled version shows more in the tiny water droplets on the swan’s head.

This is an invaluable features for all types of photography: landscape, portraits, weddings, what-have-you. For wildlife too — if you're shooting in burst, you can select a range of images to upscale at once. This also means that if you take a photo you don't think is sharp or high-res enough, in-camera upscaling will save you some grief.

The EOS R5 Mark II is unique, and it has made me wish every camera had this feature — but that would make Canon's offering 'just another camera' and I wouldn't want that either.

Be my eyes

Here are a couple more photos for you to feast your eyes on. Remember the 1,054 focus points I mentioned earlier? The EOS R5 Mark II uses that many to accurately track birds, animals, humans and vehicles. I was highly impressed by how quickly the camera locked onto both subjects in the gallery above.

I especially love the first shot of the pigeon. While I'm proud of the artistic composition, it wouldn't have been possible without the EOS R5 Mark II tracking the pigeon in flight. I'm almost tempted to print it out and put it up on my wall.

And that second photo of the squirrel? Funny story: I couldn't actually see the squirrel with my eyes (yes, even with my prescription glasses on). I could hear it squeaking so I pointed the camera in the direction of the sound and voila: within milliseconds, the EOS R5 Mark II had found the little rodent. It worked better than my own eyes did — now that blows my mind.

The EOS R5 Mark II is a ridiculously good camera. Its 180MP in-camera upscaling feature could come in clutch for a lot of pro shooters. It's one of the best full frame cams worth the premium, and it thoroughly impressed me regardless of what or who I photographed.

More from Tom's Guide

• It took me less than a minute to start shooting with the Canon EOS R5 Mark II — is this the easiest pro camera out there?
• Best mirrorless cameras in 2025
• I tested the Sony A1 II for 2 weeks — and its autofocus results blew my mind

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II succeeds the powerful EOS R5 and brings outstanding features for all types of photographers and content creators. Featuring a 45MP Stacked CMOS sensor, the camera takes stunning photos with plenty of detail for extreme cropping.

Its rapid AF, 30fps burst shooting, up to 8.5-stops of IBIS and CFExpress Type B support make it ideal for wildlife and sports photography. It’s a hybrid powerhouse too, capable of recording 8K/60fps video with 10-bit 4:2:2 color depth. The EOS R5 Mark II’s handling is fantastic, and it’s an easy camera to get accustomed with straight out of the box thanks to its intuitive menu and controls.

This is one of the best mirrorless cameras thanks to these and many other reasons. Read my full Canon EOS R5 Mark II review for all the details.

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Cheat sheet

• What is it? Canon’s flagship full-frame hybrid camera that succeeds the EOS R5
• Who is it for? For professional wildlife and sports content creators
• How much does it cost? The Canon EOS R5 Mark II retails for $4,299 / £3,799
• What do we like? The autofocus system is quick and reliable, image quality is stunning with plenty of detail for cropping, there’s support for CFExpress Type-B cards, and the camera handles fantastically
• What don’t we like? Eye Control AF is finicky and battery life is underwhelming

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Specs

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Price & availability

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II succeeds the first-gen EOS R5 and has a retail price of $4,299 / £3,799 for the body only. I tested it with the Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM which is available for $2,399 / £2,629.

Given its pro-level features and premium price tag, the EOS R5 Mark II finds itself competing against other professional full frame cameras, such as the Sony A1 II ($6,499), the Canon EOS R1 ($6,299), the Nikon Z9 ($5,499), the Canon EOS R3 ($4,999) and the Sony A7RV ($3,898).

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Design

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II and its predecessor are near-identical. Place the two side-by-side and you’d find it hard to tell the difference. The EOS R5 Mark II is slightly bigger, measuring 5.45 x 3.98 x 3.68 inches, and a little heavier too, weighing 1.44lbs (without battery and memory cards).

The sculpted grip is deep and extremely comfortable to wrap your hand and fingers around. It also makes it easy to hold the EOS R5 Mark II with just one hand.

Ports

On the EOS R5 Mark II’s bottom plate, you’ll find a battery compartment which houses the LP-E6P battery pack, and next to it is the ethernet socket. Also located on the bottom plate is the tripod thread.

All other ports are located on the camera’s left edge. These include: 3.5mm headphones and mic jacks, USB-C, HDMI Type-A, PC flash sync socket, and an exhaust vent. These are protected by rubber flaps that stay securely locked in place.

On the right edge, you’ll find two card slots: one for a CFExpress Type-B card and another for UHS-II SD cards. The Sony A1 II supports two CFExpress Type-A cards, which are smaller. You can use a Type-A card with the EOS R5 Mark II as long as you have an adapter. CFExpress compatibility is extremely useful in a professional camera with this megapixel count, thanks to the faster write speeds versus SD.

Monitor

The EOS R5 Mark II’s back panel houses the 3.2-inch Color TFT touchscreen which has a resolution of approximately 2.1 million dots. This resolution is higher than that of the Sony A1 II (2.09M dots) and the Nikon Z9 (2.08M dots) but much lower than the Canon EOS R3 (4.15M dots). The Canon EOS R1’s display, though, has the same resolution.

I found the touchscreen highly responsive and bright enough so it was easy to read and see in most lighting conditions. Its three-way tilt mechanism is also handy for shooting at awkward angles, such as photographing swans close to the ground or birds flying directly overhead.

Viewfinder

The viewfinder has been significantly improved over the first-gen model. The EOS R5 Mark II has a 5.76-million-dot OLED viewfinder with a refresh rate of 120Hz. It’s large at 0.5 inches with a 0.7x magnification, and very detailed. In comparison, the EOS R5 utilizes 3.69M dots with a 0.8x magnification.

It’s important to note, though, that the Sony A1 II and the Canon EOS R1 have more detailed viewfinders. Both cameras boast 9.44M dots, and the A1 II has a 240Hz refresh rate, but both are also more expensive than the EOS R5 Mark II.

The EOS R5 Mark II inherits Canon’s Eye Control AF which, basically, tracks your eye movements as you scan the scene. It then shifts the focus point accordingly, making switching between subjects or tracking a bird in flight hassle-free.

On paper, this sounds like a game-changer but in my testing, it proved finicky and didn’t always work. I calibrated it a few times in different lighting conditions, as per Canon’s instructions, but I just couldn’t get the focus point to stay centred. I calibrated the first profile while wearing my prescription glasses, and then tried doing it without glasses. Neither worked well so I disabled the feature.

Canon also says that unlike its predecessor, the EOS R5 Mark II is blackout-free. This means that when you’re shooting in burst, the camera will continue to track the subject without the viewfinder going blank between shots — and it works just as intended.

Weather-sealing

The EOS R5 Mark II, just like its predecessor, is weather-sealed against rain and dust — so the camera can go anywhere you want to. I was treated to a short, sudden downpour while out shooting, and the camera and lens were unscathed.

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Controls

For a professional camera, the Canon EOS R5 Mark II is straightforward to use right out the box. Its controls are easy to get accustomed to and are very intuitive.

On the Mark II, Canon has made two significant improvements to the positioning of the power button and stills/video switch. The power button has moved to the right-hand side and sits around the Mode button. This makes turning the camera on/off with one hand much easier. The old power switch is now a wheel that lets you swap between stills and video.

Nearly every button and dial on the EOS R5 Mark II is remappable. For instance, I remapped the Multi-Function button to Drive Mode so I could quickly swap to burst shooting, and the AF-On button to Eye Detection AF. Even in stressful scenarios, the controls felt within easy reach and they became second nature to me, especially after customizing them.

Canon’s menu system is a cut above the rest as it’s easy to read and straightforward to navigate. The different colors help distinguish between settings too, which is a very handy feature for finding your way back to a setting.

Reviews editor, Pete Wolinski, used the camera for product photography, and was equally impressed: "I tested the EOS R5 Mark II in our photo studio for some product photography, and was very impressed with how well it handled for such a big, complex camera, and how easy it was to set up to my liking in the first place. It was a joy to use in a studio environment.

"Setting the camera up entirely for my own preferences took me just a couple of minutes, which is crazy given it was already set up for Nikita and that I'm not that familiar with Canon menus. I was shooting in no time.

“Everything I needed was within easy reach of my fingers at all times and buttons and dials felt intuitively placed, so while I was crouching down for some odd-angled close ups, I could change what I needed by feel."

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Autofocus performance

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II uses the brand’s Dual Pixel Intelligent AF system to great effect, with accurate and reliable subject detection. Almost the entire sensor can be used for phase-detection autofocus. The camera utilizes 1,054 AF points to detect animals, birds, humans and vehicles. In comparison, the Sony A1 II uses just 759 points and the Nikon Z9 uses 493 points.

Before I even started testing the EOS R5 Mark II, I had high expectations for its autofocus system — and it did not let me down. Whether I was photographing animals or humans, it quickly recognized the subjects and had no issues shifting focus to other subjects as scenes changed.

In the photo above, the EOS R5 Mark II automatically locked on to the front meerkat, but I wanted the one behind to be the subject. I used the joystick to shift between meerkats and the camera quickly locked onto the rear animal, rendering the other out of focus. The photo is extremely sharp too, with the meerkat’s fine whiskers easily distinguishable.

The EOS R5 Mark II is also quick to lock on to subjects slightly obscured. In the photo above, I heard the squirrel but couldn’t spot it immediately. I pointed the camera in its direction and it quickly focused on it, enabling me to pinpoint its location. In that moment, the camera became my eyes, and it left me impressed with its ability to detect subjects better than I myself could.

Similar to the Sony A1 II, the EOS R5 Mark II features Auto subject-detection but you need to manually select this via touchscreen controls. Once enabled, it’ll do what it says on the tin: automatically detect subjects which removes the need to switch between AF detection modes and potentially miss shots.

I found this extremely handy when shooting outdoors. I tested this by switching from photographing birds to my partner at a local park. The camera took milliseconds to register I’d switched subjects and it automatically focused on my partner and vice versa.

Eye Detection AF works well on humans too, even when they’re wearing sunglasses or their eyes are obscured in a way. In the photo above, the camera was quick to lock onto my mother’s face and eyes, resulting in a detailed photo.

The EOS R5 Mark II introduces two new modes: People Priority and Action Priority. People Priority is a fantastic face detection mode. Via the camera’s menu, you can ‘register’ up to 10 faces. All you need to do is take a portrait/headshot of the person and the camera will then prioritize them on a scale of 1 (most important) to 10 (least important).

Once you’ve done this, the EOS R5 Mark II will automatically focus on these faces in group photos — perfect for wedding and sports photography.

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Stabilization

Depending on the lens you use with it, the Canon EOS R5 Mark II is capable of delivering up to 8.5-stops of in-body image stabilization (IBIS). This means that you can shoot at slow shutter speeds handheld and IBIS comes in handy when shooting in low-light conditions.

Image stabilization

The first photo in the gallery above was shot at 2s and it’s very sharp. I then slowed the shutter speed down to 4s and the photo is (very) slightly blurry from camera shake, as you can see in the second slide. The lens I was using, the RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM, has built-in optical stabilization (5-stops), and the photos above were taken with it enabled.

I then disabled the stabilization on the lens (via the switch located near the zoom ring) and took a photo at 2s (first shot above) and then at 4s (second shot above). The first photo is sharp and usable but the second has been ruined by camera shake.

The results in the first gallery are great, so you can shoot at shutter speeds as slow as 4s as long as you have an IS-enabled lens on hand — and at 2s without an IS-enabled lens.

Video stabilization

For video, the EOS R5 Mark II has two modes: Movie IS On and Movie IS Enhanced. You can see samples of both in the video above. IS On incurs a 1.1x crop while Enhanced incurs a 1.6x crop, but both work extremely well.

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Image quality

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is an imaging powerhouse, producing detailed, sharp images with faithful color reproduction, the latter of which you can see in the gallery above, where the reds and oranges especially are popping. The camera is equipped with a 45MP Stacked CMOS sensor, whose stacked nature enables speedier readouts to minimize rolling shutter distortions.

There’s also plenty of resolution for extreme crops and large format printing, and cropping into images reveals the sheer extent of the EOS R5 Mark II’s 45MP Stacked sensor. The first photo above is a crop of the second. The detail is fantastic, and even in the cropped photo, you can see each eyelash and remnants of eye liner on the lower eyelid.

You can see other examples in the gallery too. The third is a crop of the fourth photo while the fifth is a crop of the sixth photo.

The EOS R5 Mark II, similar to Sony and Fujifilm cameras, comes with built-in picture styles/filters. Seven are preset (such as monochrome) while three can be designed and saved by the user. The photos of my colleague were shot under studio lighting at our photo studios and in the monochrome profile. Canon’s black and white profile looks similar to Fujifilm’s Acros, and the photos have come out sharp. Also, the camera quickly locked onto her eyes, even when they were closed.

The EOS R5 Mark II now features in-camera upscaling (powered by AI) for images shot as JPEG/HEIF. It enhances resolution by 4x by extrapolating the image’s EXIF data, creating stills up to 180MP from the original 45MP image. This could be an invaluable feature for all types of photographers. You can also select a range of images and upscale them together, but this will eat into your card’s storage.

I upscaled a photo of a swan. The first photo is the original 45MP file, the second is a crop of the 45MP file, the third is an upscaled crop, and the fourth is an extreme upscaled crop. While the original files have retained a lot of detail, the upscaled version shows more in the tiny water droplets on the swan’s head.

Burst shooting

The EOS R5 Mark II’s prowess lies in its ability to capture action-packed sports and fast-moving animals. It uses two imaging processors — DIGIC Accelerator and DIGIC X — for 30fps burst shooting (for up to 191 raw images and 15 frames in pre-capture) and shutter speeds of 1/32,000s. This is blisteringly fast. In comparison, the Sony A1 II can capture up to 153 raw images (in 30fps burst). However, smaller-sensored cameras like the 40fps Fujifilm X-H2S ($2,499) have the edge here.

Regardless, most of the photos I took turned out fantastic. The photos above were shot in High-Speed Continuous Shooting+ mode to leverage the 30fps electronic shutter, at 1/21,000s and ISO 1000. I adjusted the shutter speed, ISO and aperture manually with the camera’s Auto subject-detection mode enabled. The camera quickly locked on to the seagull’s eye, and thanks to the rapid AF and burst shooting, I was able to capture the split-second moments when it landed in the water.

Both photos of the pigeons in flight (above) are extremely sharp too, with each individual feather distinguishable. The camera also ensured there were no blackouts, and the CFExpress Type-B card ensured there was no downtime after bursts as the camera wrote the images to the card.

ISO performance

As with other cameras I test at Tom’s Guide, I put the EOS R5 Mark II through an indoors ISO test. Similar to the Sony A1 II and other cameras of its caliber, the EOS R5 Mark II has an ISO range of 100-51,200 (expandable to 102,400) for stills.

The photos above were shot at ISO 6400 — the first image is a JPEG export of the CR3 RAW file, while the second is the straight-out-of-camera (SOOC) JPEG. Noise starts to creep in but, as you’d expect, thanks to the in-camera neural network noise reduction, it is smoothed out and you don’t notice it in the second image.

I then cranked the ISO up to 12,800 in the photos above (first is RAW, second is SOOC JPEG), and once again, the EOS R5 Mark II did a fantastic job of reducing the noise, resulting in a usable image.

Even at ISO 25,600, the EOS R5 Mark II does a decent job of reducing noise. The photos above demonstrate this. The performance is neither fantastic nor awful, and these images should be used as a last resort only. This was also the case when I tested the Sony A1 II.

At ISO 51,200, images aren’t usable as noise appears destructive even in the SOOC JPEG (second photo). This is an extreme test, though, and the results may differ in real world scenarios.

Dynamic range

The EOS R5 Mark II’s dynamic range is impressive too, offering up to 16 stops. The two images in the gallery above are the same backlit photo of a lens, taken for an extreme dynamic range test, shot at ISO 100.

The second image is the same photo with the exposure and shadows boosted, and highlights reduced in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom. A lot of detail has been retained in the shadows and the highlights aren’t blown out either. This performance is similar to that of the Sony A1 II.

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Video performance

Not only is the Canon EOS R5 Mark II fantastic for photography but it boasts great video specs too, making it a great hybrid camera for pros. You can shoot in 4K/120fps, and 8K/60fps (versus 30fps on the EOS R5) with 10-bit 4:2:2 color depth, which means it’s capable of capturing a wide color gamut with a total of 1.07 billion individual hues.

You can also shoot in Canon Log 2 and Canon Log 3, where the latter captures a wide dynamic range of up to 13.3+ stops. C-Log is usually reserved for Canon’s cinema line-up so it’s good to see that a mirrorless camera has gained it too. There’s also no 4GB file size limit for video recording when using CFexpress or SDXC cards — an improvement over the EOS R5 — but the camera does have a maximum recording time of six hours, depending on the format used.

The EOS R5 Mark II offers a lot of flexibility with compression types and recording formats, including internal RAW recording, therefore gaining an edge over cameras like the Sony A1 II. It has also gained features like waveforms, a false color display and zebras, therefore becoming the first EOS R System camera to do so.

If you want a camera purely for professional video, the Panasonic LUMIX S5IIX ($2,199) is a good choice as it offers a plethora of recording features, data capture rates and compression types, 6K/30p, plus unlimited 4K capture — but you’d be sacrificing 8K/60fps video.

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Battery life

Unlike the first-gen Canon EOS R5 which uses the LP-E6NH battery pack, the EOS R5 Mark II is powered by the new LP-E6P pack. This battery pack doesn’t last nearly as long as the EOS R5’s, as it’s CIPA-rated for just 340 shots (viewfinder) or 630 shots (LCD monitor). In comparison, the EOS R5 is rated for 950 shots.

Now, this could be because the battery is fueling power-hungry features, such as the higher res EVF, image upscaling and AI noise reduction, but it’s still underwhelming. The EOS R5 Mark II is outshined by its competitors, when using the LCD monitor: Nikon Z9 (740 shots), Canon EOS R3 (860 shots), Canon EOS R1 (1330 shots). It is better than the Sony A1 II (520 shots) and the Sony A7R V (530 shots), though.

Real life battery tests will differ from those conducted under CIPA guidelines. I managed to get nearly 900 photos while shooting a mixture of bursts and single shots outdoors and regularly checking the monitor between shots. Burst shooting prolongs battery life, so it’s best to take the CIPA rating as reference.

Canon EOS R5 Mark II review: Verdict

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is an astonishing mirrorless camera that copes with anything you throw its way. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed using it, and for professional wildlife, sports and studio photographers, I believe it’s worth the premium. I was able to capture extremely sharp images with plenty of detail for extreme crops, thanks to the 45MP Stacked CMOS sensor.

Its rapid autofocus system quickly detects animals’ and humans’ eyes and faces, and it can track vehicles too. When I wanted to shoot fast-paced action, the 30fps burst shooting came in clutch. I also found the camera comfortable to handle for extended periods of time. It proves its worth in video work as well, enabling you to record 8K/60fps footage.

While its battery life is underwhelming and Eye Control AF doesn’t always work — as it didn’t for me — I can’t help but recommend the EOS R5 Mark II. If it’s speed, clarity and detail professionals need, the EOS R5 Mark II delivers.

How do you shoot video? You’ve probably got a smartphone at your disposal. What would make you upgrade to an actual camera dedicated to vlogging? A good sensor and the ability to shoot 4K video at 30fps or Full HD at 60fps? Enter the Canon PowerShot V10.

The PowerShot V10 is the same size as a pack of cards, so it can easily slip into your pocket. It offers strong video and audio quality, face tracking autofocus, and image stabilization that helps keep footage smooth. But it loses a few points because of subpar battery life when shooting video, no weather-sealing and heat management issues.

Could the PowerShot V10 be one of the best cameras for vlogging? For the full breakdown, read our full Canon PowerShot V10 review.

Canon PowerShot V10 review: Price & availability

The Canon PowerShot V10 is the manufacturer’s first vlogging camera, and has a retail price of $429 / £399. The lowest we’ve seen it drop to is $349 at Amazon U.S. and £275 at Amazon U.K. It is available in two colors: silver and black. Although, the body color remains black, and the only thing that changes color is the small block above the lens.

The PowerShot V10 finds itself closely competing with the Insta360 Ace Pro ($449), Insta360 Go 3 ($379), and the DJI Osmo Pocket 3 ($519) — an action camera with the 1-inch sensor, similar to Canon’s offering. But if you want to step up and pick up a camera with advanced video capabilities, you could get the Canon EOS R50 ($679) or the Sony ZV-1 ($799).

Canon PowerShot V10 review: Design

Take one look at the Canon PowerShot V10 and you’ll be struck by the fact that it’s small. Measuring 2.49 x 3.54 x 1.35 inches, it’s the same size as a pack of cards. It weighs only 7.44oz so it’s light enough to carry around and can be held comfortably for long periods of time. It’s got a 2-inch TFT LCD touchscreen (approx. 460,000 dots) which can be flipped 180° as and when required. The camera feels good to hold, with a premium matte finishing.

The PowerShot V10 is a simple camera with few controls. There’s a rounded red record button on the front, and a handful of straightforward controls on the back. There is no dedicated stills-to-video button, though, which I found a bit annoying. You can swap between modes by tapping the icon in the top right corner of the screen, but it’s a small screen, and it took me at least two tries to get it right every time — and I have medium-sized hands! It might be trickier for those with big hands.

What I really like about this camera is its built-in flip-out stand that can be tucked away. The stand itself can be rotated to a variety of angles ranging from -30° to -10° for high-angle shooting and 10° to 30° for low-angle shooting. This negates the need for carrying a clunky tripod. If you still want to mount it on a tripod, the PowerShot V10 has a standard ⅜ inch.

The PowerShot V10’s 6.6mm f/2.8 lens has an effective focal length of 19mm for videos (16:9 or 9:16 ratio) and 18mm for stills (3:2 ratio). When shooting video, it also offers 1.5x, 2x or 3x digital zooms. The camera doesn’t benefit from in-body image stabilization though, limiting you to digital IS only. Digital IS can be set to off, on and enhanced, and offers a good level of stabilization with a slight crop factor, and it makes a lot of difference to footage. Digital IS on and enhanced are demonstrated in the video above.

An important thing to note is that the PowerShot V10 isn’t weather-sealed, so don’t go jumping into the sea to vlog a snorkeling session. This is a bit of a shame, though, because I can’t just pull the camera out on British streets as, more often than not, it’s raining here. If you do want a weather-sealed camera for vlogging, check out the Insta360 Ace Pro ($449) — although it’s an action camera (hence waterproof to 33 feet), it also features a flip up screen for selfies and vlogging.

Canon PowerShot V10 review: Video performance

The Canon PowerShot V10 utilizes a 1-inch sensor, the same as the one in the Canon Powershot G7 X Mark III. But it’s important to note that the latter came out in 2019, so the tech feels a bit outdated. The PowerShot V10’s offers vloggers the ability to shoot 4K video at 30fps (up to ISO 3,200 which feels quite limiting) and Full HD up to 60fps (up to ISO 6,400).

The PowerShot V10 excels in bright conditions, as demonstrated by the clips in my mini daytime vlog (above/below). Most clips were shot in Full HD 50fps with Digital IS on. I tried shooting footage in 4K but the camera would overheat and shut down (more on this later). Even while walking, the Full HD clips came out stable. The 19mm focal length offers a great field of view for vlogging, so you can capture a wide scene. Face tracking AF works well, following my face through the frame.

The only viable 4K footage I got using the PowerShot V10 was of the rain at the beginning of the daytime vlog, the pigeons surrounding the duck, and the clip of me playing the guitar in the audio test below — before the camera overheated. The 4K video looks pretty good and smooth, and there were no issues with focusing when switching subjects. Raindrops trickling down the window look detailed, while the green plants and trees in the distance are slightly blurred but remain sharp enough to make out their shape. Moving indoors, I recorded myself playing the guitar, and the 4K footage looks good too. The guitar, my hands and my face remain in focus at all times, and the (little) sunlight coming through the window appears muted so it doesn’t disturb the scene.

While the PowerShot V10 shines in bright conditions, it falls short in dimly lit conditions, as can be seen in my mini night-time vlog above. Footage was grainy and the lens had difficulty focusing on more than one occasion thanks to its contrast-only detection, which will struggle to detect subjects if lighting (and therefore contrast) is low. The kickstand provides a lot of versatility and I shot the clips in the vlog at varying angles.

You also have the option to apply one of 14 filters — such as Retro Green — to your video, and adjust blue/amber and magenta/green color tones. There’s also a Smooth Skin Movie Mode which can be adjusted to your liking. Although, setting it to its max setting gave my face a plasticky look. I’m not a Barbie doll.

The PowerShot V10 also allows you to wirelessly livestream to YouTube and Facebook, at 3.5 or 6 mbps in Full HD 30p — a handy feature if you have an online presence. It doubles as a webcam too, as you can plug it into your laptop via the USB-C cable.

Canon PowerShot V10 review: Audio performance

I was impressed with the Canon PowerShot V10’s in-camera audio which was quite clear. Omnidirectional stereo microphones on the top of the camera capture crisp audio, both indoors and outdoors. In my testing, the camera recorded audio clearly, as you can hear and see below. In the first clip, you can clearly hear a motorcycle to the left revving and picking up speed while being able to make out that the cars are driving over a road that has recently been rained on. The second clip is quieter but the sound of pigeons cooing is discernible.

If you want even clearer audio, you can plug a mic into the 3.5mm mic jack on the camera’s side.

The stereo mics also have a built-in electronic wind filter, which is really handy. In my mini daytime vlog, it was considerably windy but it never sounded overbearing. If you want to reduce it further, Canon has partnered with SmallRig to offer furry windshields for $13. In the U.K, these come included in the Advanced Vlogging Kit — bought directly from Canon — which bumps the price up to £429.

Canon PowerShot V10 review: Stills performance

The Canon PowerShot V10 is a video-first camera. It still shoots decent quality photos but it’s nothing to write home about. Contrast is decent, colors are vivid and the 15MP sensor (in stills mode) has just enough resolution for sharp photos with reasonable amounts of detail. In the image of the flower above, for example, you can clearly make out the weaved pattern on the leaves. Remember those 14 filters I mentioned? Sadly, you can’t apply them to photos, so you can’t get too creative with stills. This seems like a missed opportunity, and I feel that it should have been extended to photos, too.

Canon PowerShot V10 review: App

With built-in Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity, it’s really easy to transfer videos and photos from your Canon PowerShot V10 to your smartphone, thanks to the Canon Camera Connect app available on iOS and Android. Setting up the app and connecting the camera to it was straightforward and took less than two minutes. While transferring media might be easy, it took a long time, even though I was on a very fast and steady home Wi-Fi connection.

Canon PowerShot V10 review: Battery life & overheating

Canon claims that the PowerShot V10 can shoot 55 minutes of 4K video and 90 minutes of Full HD video. However, in my testing, I was underwhelmed by the battery life. After approximately 20 minutes of shooting 4K video and stills handheld, the battery was down to its last bar.

The camera is also prone to overheating, so be wary. There is a handy heat indicator on the screen which lets you know when to shut down the camera. Having shot both handheld and with the camera on a table, I noticed the camera heated up more quickly when handheld, and it shut down due to overheating after about 15 minutes of 4K shooting. Your palm adds heat, so it makes sense, but it’s still a very disappointing figure.

It doesn’t take a lot of time to charge the camera, thankfully. With a 30W USB-A to USB-C adapter and the cable that came in the box, the PowerShot V10 went from zero to 100% in about 30 minutes — great for filming on the go, as is its purpose.

Canon PowerShot V10 review: Verdict

The Canon PowerShot V10 is a decent camera for vlogging, but it’s nothing outstanding. While the specs claim you can shoot 4K video at 30fps, I found it nearly impossible to do so as the camera would overheat, stop recording and shut down. In comparison, the DJI Osmo Pocket 3 offers 4K/60P video and really does record it.

The PowerShot V10’s Digital IS works well, as does face tracking AF — although not great in low light. Again, the Osmo Pocket 3’s gimbal stabilization blows Canon’s out of the water as it offers professional-feeling footage in most scenarios. The Osmo Pocket 3 also doesn’t overheat like the PowerShot V10, which is the biggest issue with the latter that affects its battery life too. You’ll get more than 20 minutes of battery life out of the Osmo Pocket 3, even when shooting 4K video.

Also, keep in mind that the PowerShot V10 isn’t weather-sealed so think twice before shooting in rainy conditions. Cameras like the Insta360 Ace Pro ($449) and the Insta360 Go 3 ($379) will be better suited to this.

The PowerShot V10 is… a vlogging camera. That’s all that can really be said about it. It’s worth considering if you want a 1080P camera that doubles as a stills camera and webcam, and allows you to wirelessly stream to YouTube and Facebook. It can shoot good footage in Full HD, but so can my Google Pixel 7 Pro and it has never let me down. I would have considered ditching my smartphone and using the PowerShot V10 exclusively for video if Canon actually walked the talk, but my phone will do for now.

For gamers…

Whether you're climbing pro-level leaderboards, exploring virtual worlds or just having fun racking up headshots, the right accessories link you seamlessly with your screen. This holiday season, Dell's presenting a carefully curated collection of tools and peripherals to delight casual and serious gamers alike.

Alienware Keyboard and Mouse 

The class-leading AW-510K keyboard shaves precious seconds off your reaction time and looks great doing it in Alienware's signature sleek style, with per-key RGB lighting for unrivaled customization options.

The specs are just as impressive, with a full array of Cherry MX Red mechanical switches, low profile for hair trigger actuation times, a comprehensive macro toolkit for pulling off complex commands at the press of a switch, and dedicated media keys so you can control your soundtrack without pausing the action.

The accompanying AW610-M mouse is one of the smoothest, most precise instruments you can buy, and features seven fully programmable buttons. Whether you go wired or wireless, it's the battlefield extension your right arm's been waiting for.

Logitech Headset and Mouse 

When you're coordinating killshots, communication's crucial. Logitech's Lightspeed gaming bundle pairs a high spec, dual wireless gaming headset and matching mouse.

Lightweight and comfortable, the G435 headset features both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity and delivers deep, immersive sound with its 40mm drivers, compatible with a wide range of surround sound standards, from Dolby Atmos to Windows Sonic.

Partnered with the G305 ultra-fast wireless gaming mouse, you have a class leading combo delivered at a 50% saving over buying both separately.

For creators…

Never before have there been so many ways to create, share and express yourself. And never before has such high quality recording and broadcast gear been so easily available. Here are some top picks for the artist in everyone.

Logitech Streamcam Plus 

Capturing footage at 60 frames per second and up to 1080p HD quality, the Logitech StreamCam Plus can switch to vertical 9:16 footage, ideal for Instagram Reels and TikTok, with just a flick of the wrist. And with auto-focus and auto-exposure you're free to concentrate on your content.

The advanced accompanying Logitech Capture software rounds out the package, with everything you need to professionally edit your piece right there in the box.

Blue Yeti X USB Microphone 

The Blue Yeti X looks as good as it sounds, with timeless Art Deco design notes, and customizable LED lighting. Ideal for YouTube stars and podcasters alike, the mic's adaptable to a wide range of environments, from solo commentary to roundtable discussions.

Form follows function and all the controls you need are right at your fingertips. Logitech's 'For Creators' software package gives you all the tools you need to make the most of this class leading microphone (the weapon of choice for Twitch and YouTube star Dr Lupo).

WD 4TB Passport Drive 

Digital masterpieces need a portable, speedy, spacious and secure place to call home. The WD Passport drive ticks all these boxes and more in style, the 208 gram form factor sitting snugly in your hand.

The 4TB of storage will store more than 500 hours of HD video, password protected for security and compatible with Windows, Mac OS and even Google Chromebooks via speedy USB 3.2 connectivity. The bundled My Passport software can automatically back up all your critical files and it even comes in a range of colors. 

For entrepreneurs…

Does your cousin have a side hustle? Is your grandma an undiscovered knitwear genius? Whatever and wherever you do what you do best, Dell can help you take care of the details and focus on making the most of your talent.

Google Nest Cam 

Security's a priority for us all, whether at home or in the office. Google's class-leading Nest Cam lets you keep eyes on your workspace 24/7, streaming 1080p HDR video to your phone via the ubiquitous Google Home app.

The sleek design comes in a choice of understated color schemes, and it’s flexible enough to put anywhere. You can even use the Nest cam to chat back and forth with remote colleagues, making this perfect for distributed offices.

Epson FastFoto Scanner Printer 

Digitize photos and critical documents in moments with the Epson FastFoto system. Operating as fast as one photo per second, this'll make short work of even the most expansive paper archive.

Both sides of the photo or document will be automatically captured and uploaded to your Dropbox or Google Drive account, so you can access your photo library or document archive anywhere, even on your phone.

For students…

Studying is hard. So do what you can to make it as easy as possible for the students in your life with this welcome range of tech accessories. From tools to help students focus, to comprehensive productivity suites, and accessories designed to make studying simple, Dell has a great choice of gifts for anyone in a higher education situation.

Bose QuietComfort Earbuds 

You can't put a price on peace and quiet. Bose's top of the line wireless earbuds offer bespoke noise canceling technology, measuring the acoustics of your ear canal to deliver perfectly optimized performance.

Ideal for distraction free studying, wherever you are. And when it's time to relax, sound quality is blissfully crystal clear.

Canon PIXMA 

The wonderfully compact Canon Pixma all-in-one will happily fit into the snuggest of workspaces. At less than six inches high and just 15.9 inches wide, this is a miniature marvel as well as a powerful and flexible workhorse.

The 1.44-inch color screen makes scanning, copying and printing a breeze, and your new Canon is as comfortable chatting to Google Home and Alexa as it is to Internet of Things (IoT) devices, so you can explore its many tricks and features from the palm of your hand.

Microsoft Office Home & Student Edition 

The original suite of office software is still the benchmark against which all its rivals are measured, and the most widely used standard across both home and office.

Well established productivity standards like Word, Excel and PowerPoint are here brought bang up to date with cutting edge features for seamless online collaboration and OneDrive integration for effortless and secure file backup.

Want more holiday gift ideas? Explore Dell’s gift buying guide for a huge range of holiday tech.

Look, this wouldn't be much of a guide to buying the best printers if I just told you to get the Brother INKvestment MFC-T780DW. I mean, if you just need to print, copy and scan documents with great print quality and low ink costs, then that's the very printer you'll be looking for (and you can see why in our in-depth review).

But here at Tom's Guide, we put the dozens of printers we review each year through a series of tests to see how fast, capable and, most importantly, affordable they are. You see, there are printers that are better for day-to-day work, but others offer up incredible detail for photo printing or the space for scanning those lengthy documents.

That's why I'm here to point you towards a variety of options to sort your printing needs. So, no more messy prints, runaway ink costs and terrible interfaces. Just mean, clean printing machines (that scan and copy, too). Let's take the pain out of printing with our top recommendations on the best printers around.

• View our Canon promo codes for a 10% discount

The best printers you can buy now

The best printer overall

The Brother INKvestment MFC-T780DW is the No. 1 printer for home use and the office, thanks to its exceptionally low running costs, just 0.3 cents per text page and under a penny per color page, and its snappy print speeds. When a printer produces a five-page text document in just 24.2 seconds, you know it's just the machine to get the job done.

When it comes to print quality, the MFC-T780DW delivers sharp text and attractive graphics, though text tends to be slightly lighter than what you’d see from a laser printer. The output on glossy photo paper looks vibrant and detailed, a strong showing for a printer that isn’t marketed as photo-centric.

Beyond printing, the MFC-T780DW proves itself as a true multifunction machine. Its four-tank ink system keeps you prepared for any print job, and scanning is notably fast: a 600 dpi color scan to JPEG took just over 50 seconds in our testing, well ahead of the category average. These features make it a reliable option for scanning, copying, and general document handling.

Compared to other models in this price range, the MFC-T780DW holds its own, as its per-page ink costs even rival those of the Brother HL-L2390DW. While the HP Smart Tank 760 can print photos faster, the MFC-T780DW’s balance of low ink costs and consistent print quality makes it the better all-purpose choice. The Canon Pixma TR8620 leads in photo output with its 5-ink system, but the MFC-T780DW keeps ongoing expenses lower and is better suited for regular office work.

There are some trade-offs. The automatic document feeder holds only 20 sheets, which might be limiting for higher-volume users. The small, simple LCD lacks the convenience of a touchscreen, and setup can be finicky. Wireless connections sometimes require a manual reset, and filling the ink tanks may get messy. That being said, the Brother INKvestment MFC-T780DW still stands out for anyone after dependable, cost-effective printing and scanning.

• Read our full Brother INKvestment MFC-T780DW review

The best budget printer

The Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 is an ink tank all-in-one that delivers great prints with low ink costs and an affordable up-front price, making it my top recommendation for folks seeking a great budget printer.

Of course, you shouldn't expect a lot of bells and whistles on this entry-level all-in-one. It has no document feeder and only one paper tray, plus the speed of copies and prints is pretty average, so you won't be flying through big print jobs.

But if you don't need to be printing all the time, this is a great choice because it delivers what most of us are looking for in a great all-in-one: reliable, high-quality prints with the versatility to do documents, photos and double-sided print jobs.

In our testing, this machine managed to print an average of 9.2 pages per minute, which is pretty on par with the competition. But when printing double-sided text documents that cranked up to 7.2 pages per minute, the fastest duplex print speed we've recorded of any recent ink tank printers.

And thanks to its easy setup process, robust wireless support (this thing can print via Wi-Fi, Bluetooth or a smartphone app) and low ink costs (we estimate color prints cost roughly 0.9 cents per page, significantly lower than the 1.9 cent per page category average), this is a great printer for anyone seeking a cheap, reliable ink printer for photos and documents.

• Read our full Canon MegaTank Pixma G3290 review

The best printer for students

The HP Smart Tank 7602 is a wireless multifunction printer that we regularly recommend as the best printer for students (most of the time) because it's easy to set up and prints good-quality prints quickly, with very low ink costs.

I know because our printer expert exhaustively tested it himself in his own home, and the HP Smart Tank 7602 surprised him by printing an 8x-10-inch glossy photo at high resolution in under 2 minutes, which is more than twice as fast as the category average (4 minutes 1 second).

It also scans and prints quite quickly, and is speedy at kicking out color and black-and-white documents. However, printed scans often showed small discolorations and pixelations, so this isn't a great printer for photojournalism students or others who prize perfection in prints.

However, our reviewer definitely had some hassles when trying to set up the printer via its included HP Smart software. You can connect the printer to a PC via either USB, Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, and unfortunately, you'll need a (free) HP Smart account to take full advantage of all the printer's features.

Still, despite these setup headaches, this printer is our top recommendation for students because of its ease of use, good print quality and low ink costs.

• Read our full HP Smart Tank 7602 review

The best photo printer

Photographers can see their work in fine detail on screens, but it's all for naught if the quality and colors don't match once it's printed out. That's where the Canon PIXMA Pro-200S comes in, as it's the printer with the best print quality. It's our top recommendation for photo enthusiasts who want to print gallery-worthy images at home.

With its wide-format support up to A3+ and an 8-ink dye system (double the ink tanks of any we've tested), it delivers vibrant color accuracy and flexibility for everything from panoramic landscapes to finely detailed portraits.

In our hands-on tests, the Pro-200S delivered images with remarkably true-to-life greens and bright blues that feel almost textured, details that often get lost on lesser printers. Fine textures in skin and foliage held up beautifully, and color transitions were smooth, making this an excellent choice for anyone obsessed with faithful photographic reproduction.

And it won't be slow printing off your masterpieces, either. On A3 Pro luster paper, the Pro-200S turned out borderless prints in just over a minute. Even when pushed to the highest quality mode, times stayed under four minutes, making it a fine choice for batch printing.

The Pro-200S isn’t perfect for everyone. Wi-Fi setup can be a little fiddly, and ink costs are higher than document-centric printers, especially if you print lots of large photos. Mono page yield isn't the best, so it’s not a great fit for heavy office use. But for photographers who care most about image quality and print flexibility, these trade-offs are worth it.

• Read our full Canon PIXMA Pro-200S review

The best all-in-one printer

If you just want a printer that does it all and will last you for any printing jobs for years to come, the Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II is the highest-rated all-in-one printer we've tested, offering true all-in-one functionality with print, copy, scan and fax in a single device and a generous 250-sheet main paper tray.

Everyday tasks feel streamlined on this machine. The 5-inch touchscreen is responsive and intuitive, simplifying everything from walk-up copying to complex scan jobs. More impressively, print quality impressed us across the board: text was sharp in black and white, and color documents showed plenty of detail and vibrancy.

It's easy to set up, too, which means none of those typical printer pain points. As in, the touchscreen actually makes resolving paper jams much less of a hassle, guiding you step by step. Now that's a welcome feature. But you're also getting rapid print speeds here. In our lab tests, it printed a five-page text document in 11.31 seconds, equivalent to 26.5 pages per minute, meaning you'll be printing out documents on the fly.

If you’re weighing cost efficiency, the Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II is on the more expensive end with its pricier running costs. It's also heavy, so it's the type of printer that you'll want to stay in one spot in your home or office. In the grand scheme of how well this printer performs, though, those are only small nuisances.

From the blazing-fast print speeds to the sharp print quality it offers, the Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II is one reliable laser printer that's hard to pass up, especially for homes or offices that need a workhorse for all printing needs.

• Read our full Canon Color imageCLASS MF753Cdw II review

Also tested

There are lots of other great printers out there that don't quite have what it takes to knock any of our best printers off their perch. But it's awfully close, and when we test and review a printer that's nearly good enough to earn a spot on this list, you should know about it.

If you're after more printers to suit your needs, check out the other models we've tested.

• ^ Back to the top

How to choose the best printer for you

Finding the right printer starts with defining what you need that printer to do. There's a drastic difference between a large multifunction printer that will copy, scan and fax, and a pocket-sized photo printer that's perfect for printing snapshots on the go. The best place to start is to narrow down what functions you want and what aspects of printing are most important to you.

Inkjet or Laser: Inkjet printers are generally better at producing the full range of colors, making them more suited for printing graphics and photos. Laser printers, on the other hand, can quickly produce professional-looking text documents, often at a lower cost per page. Three ways to cut printing costs to a minimum include: Switching to a laser printer, opting for a tank-based inkjet printer or signing up for a subscription ink service. (See our article Inkjet vs. Laser: Which printer is right for you? to learn more.)

All-in-One printers offer more than just printing, with built-in scanners that can scan and copy everything from forms to photos. Some (but not all) will also have fax capability.

Photo printing is a separate concern, requiring support for printing on glossy paper, handling different photo paper sizes and sometimes requiring additional (and potentially expensive) inks to deliver better print quality.

Portable printing is all about mobility. Compact designs are paired with batteries and sometimes exotic print technologies to let you print from a hotel room, in your car, or even out at the beach.

• ^ Back to the top

Frequently Asked Questions

• ^ Back to the top

How we test the best printers

Every printer we review is extensively tested to give us a clear idea of how well it performs, in terms of print capability, general ease of use and expense over time. Our testing procedures include timed print tests to determine print speeds, with a set of standardized documents that have a mix of text and graphics and color photos.

Every print is examined and compared, with errors and print problems noted in the review and overall quality measured against the other printers on the market.

We also test the scanning and copying functions (when they are offered), timing how quickly it captures a page and comparing the results to the original images to determine how well it captures color and detail.

To measure the cost of owning and operating a printer, we look at the current street price of ink refills and the estimated number of pages that each cartridge can produce, and calculate the cost for printing a single page.

These specific tests are adapted as needed to handle all sorts of printers, from monochrome laser printers and portable snapshot printers to full-featured all-in-one inkjets. Wherever possible, we make sure that the tests are done in such a way that they can not only be compared within a specific category, but also across all printer types generally.

For more information on our testing process, check out our guide to how we test.

• ^ Back to the top

The best cheap printer for your needs is one that does everything you need it to and nothing you don't. You don't need to pay a fortune for high image quality and good performance. If you know what to look for—and what to avoid—a bargain printer can deliver what you need, without disappointment.

Low-cost models tend to forego the flashy and focus on the functional. For example, a bargain-priced printer is unlikely to have a color touch-screen LCD, a tilting control panel, or an automatic document feeder. But some bargain models offer a duplexer for making two-sided prints and copies.

If you don't need copy or scan functions and are looking for a single-function printer, you can likely get another attractive amenity, such as a second paper tray for specialty media. The best news is, you don't have to sacrifice image quality. Attractive prints, copies and scans can be had from models costing as little as $60.

At Tom's Guide, we put these bargain inkjet printers through the same test regimen as pricier models to find the best printers on the market. On some tasks, performance can vary widely, so it's important to compare test results to ensure that your primary task isn't the model's Achilles' heel. But that doesn't mean you can't find a budget printer that outperforms a more expensive model at a particular task—you absolutely can. It just takes a little digging.

Get the features you need most

Bargain printers are best suited for use with a PC or smart phone. That's because the control panel tends to be simple, with only a few dedicated function buttons, if any. If there is a screen, it's likely a small LED without backlighting. The control panel is unlikely to tilt, so where you place your printer is important for easy standalone operation. For example, a small LED on the front face of a printer will be difficult to read if it's on a low table in a dimly lit room. Some models offer a control panel on the top of the printer. Which configuration is best for you depends on where you place the printer.

If you need a printer mostly for office tasks, the Brother MFC-1205w ($130) is worth a serious look, for both its speedy performance and low ink costs. But if photography-related fun is more up your alley, you're more likely to gravitate toward the Canon Pixma TS702a ($130), which can print onto various specialty media, such as glossy magnetic photo paper, double-sided matte paper, fabric iron-on transfers and nail stickers.

Most bargain printers offer one paper tray. The Canon Pixma TS702a is one exception, offering both a paper cassette and a vertical rear paper tray. This allows you to keep two types of media loaded. The rear tray offers a straighter paper path, which can accommodate thicker media such as card stock.

Most bargain printers don't offer a duplexer—but both the Canon TS702a and the previously reviewed Canon MG3620 (priced at $60 when reviewed) do.

If you think you'll periodically move your printer—but don't want to specifically buy a portable printer—check out the weight. For example, the HP DeskJet 2755e weighs just 7.5 pounds. By comparison, the Brother MFC-J120 weighs just over 14 pounds, which is much more typical.

Photography features

The convenience of printing photos at home can't be beat. But not all budget printers put the same emphasis on photo printing and related features.

For example, the HP DeskJet 2755e does not support borderless photo printing at all. The Brother MFC-J1205w, on the other hand, won't make borderless photo prints via its Windows 10 driver—you have to use the company's iPrint&Scan software.

Also, the Canon TS702a offers PictBridge support for printing directly from a compatible digital camera. These days, with most photos taken with a smartphone, this is not as cool as it used to be. Neither the Brother MFC-J1205w nor the HP DeskJet 2755e ($85) offer PictBridge support—but like the Canon they offer an iOS and Android app for printing photos from a smartphone. 

 Connectivity and smart assistants 

Bargain printers all offer Wi-Fi these days. Some forego a USB port, so make sure you take your networking plans into account. As is typical, the HP 2755e and Brother J1205w offer a USB port and Wi-Fi connectivity. The Canon TS702a offers these as well, plus an Ethernet port.

In addition, if you're in the market for a printer with Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant compatibility, your only choice among these bargain models is the Canon TS702a.

Performance: Print, copy and scan speeds

Performance can vary widely among printers. Waiting around for a print job to finish can be frustrating. While very few printers excel across the board, this tends to be more true among bargain-priced models. 

To minimize your impatience and disappointment, pay particular attention to your most frequent tasks. Some models excel at printing and copying documents, but lag behind the pack at photo printing. And, even photo printing performance can be mixed. For example, the HP DeskJet 2755e was faster than the average at printing a 4 x 6 inch glossy, but was comparatively slow to make an 8 x 10 photo print. 

The Brother MFC-J1205w, on the other hand, was very slow to print photos at both sizes. For comparison, the Brother took almost 4 minutes to print a 4 x 6-inch photo print, while the Canon TS702a did so in 1 minutes and 3 seconds. 

The Brother, however, was much faster than average at printing documents on plain paper. It printed text documents at 12.2 ppm, and color pages at 3.2 ppm. The Canon printed text at 9.5 ppm and color pages at 3.5 ppm. The HP was the slowest model on these tests, printing text at 7.6 ppm and color pages at 2 ppm. The category averages are 8.8 ppm (text) and 2.7 ppm (color).

Similarly, the Brother was very fast at copying in black-and-white, reproducing a text page in just 10.8 seconds. The HP DeskJet took 25.1 seconds to make the same copy. Making color copies was average or slower-than-average: The Brother made a color copy in 28.1 seconds, which is exactly the average, while the HP was a little slower, at 32.4 seconds. 

Scanning, on the other hand, was brisk with the Brother. It made a 600 dpi color scan in just 37.5 seconds, while the HP took 1 minute and 36 seconds. (The average is 1 minute and 6 seconds). Scanning in black-and-white was also fast with the Brother, which captured a 300 dpi scan to PDF format in just 9.1 seconds, while the HP took 19.4 seconds to finish the same task. (The average is 11.7 seconds). 

Ink costs

If there's an elephant in the room when it comes to bargain printers, it's ink costs. Nothing will trigger buyer's remorse faster than seeing your initial savings get eaten up by pricy ink cartridges. 

Both the HP DeskJet 2755e and Canon TS702a have somewhat high ink costs. The HP's ink costs are 10 cents (text) and 22.5 cents (color) per page, when using high-yield XL cartridges. The Canon offers lower ink costs: When using its XXL high-yield cartridges, costs per page are 6.3 cents (text) and 17.9 cents (color).

Alternatively, the Brother MFC-J1205w offers only high-yield cartridges that have an estimated page output of 750 pages. (The HP's XL cartridges top out at 240 pages, while the Canon's max for color cartridges is 824 pages.

To rein in ink costs, a subscription plan is worth considering. If you buy an HP printer, you will be regularly solicited to sign up for Instant Ink. To figure out if it's right for you, see our article explaining what Is HP Instant ink, which reveals how this plan could deliver significant savings.

In contrast, the Brother Refresh program performs automatic ordering of ink cartridges, but unlike HP's program, you do not have to sign up for a specific number of pages per month. 

The Canon TS702a, oddly, did not come with printed information on the company's ink subscription program. But during setup with an iPhone, the Canon Print app prompted me to sign up for the Pixma Print Plan, which claims to save you 20 percent to 70 percent. These plans start at $3.99 per month. 

For a thorough breakdown of ink subscription plans from all the major vendors, see our story comparing HP Instant Ink vs. Canon vs. Epson to determine which subscription plan is worth the cost.

Print quality

All three of the budget printers mentioned in this article delivered high image quality. There were some subtle differences, however. The Brother and Canon models printed comparably dark and sharp text, while the HP's text was slightly softer around the edges.

All three models printed attractive color graphics. However, the HP had a little difficulty with our test PDF, and its reproductions of both text and fine details in graphics lacked the sharpness of the Brother and Canon prints.

Photo quality was very high for all three models. The differences were subtle, but in general the Brother made lower-contrast prints than the Canon did. The added contrast in the Canon prints added extra "pop". The HP tended to hype yellows and warm shades, and to make a lighter print than the Canon, which produced darker, richer reds in its glossies. 

Both the HP and the Brother made high-quality scans. 

Copy and scan quality

Both the Brother MFC-J1205w and HP DeskJet 2755e made attractive copies in our tests. Both models faithfully reproduced documents and graphics, with plenty of detail and natural-looking colors. (The Canon TS702a is single-function and does not copy or scan).

Both the Brother and the HP also captured high-quality scans in our testing. Both models had a tendency to lose some fine details is dark, shadow areas. The Brother tended to increase the exposure, preventing harsh shadows on faces, compared to the HP. The disappointment with the HP was the HP Smart scanning software's auto crop feature, which was unreliable and had a tendency to cut out a significant portion of the original image.

Excellent scan quality doesn't have to cost a lot. The $60 Canon MG3620 delivered excellent photo scans in our tests, and it actually beat the category average (see charts embedded above) in terms of copy speeds.

Software

Printers include software and a smart phone app. Our individual reviews offer details on these apps. In general, software packages with budget models are pretty basic, as are the smart phone apps. 

One oddity is the "camera scan" function, which is, for all practical purposes, just taking a picture. The HP Smart app also has a copy function. In both cases, these features capture passable facsimiles, but mostly the subpar quality is a waste of time. If the flatbed scanner is within reach, just use it. You'll get far superior results.

The final decision

To make sure you get the best bargain printer for your money, prioritize your wish list. Are you primarily outfitting the home office or buying a photo printer, or looking for a little of both? No single printer is the best fit for everybody, no matter how inexpensive it is.

Tom's Guide's tests reveal the strengths and weaknesses of each model, so you don't have to find out the hard way. Low cost doesn't mean low quality or poor performance—but you'll likely have to make a tradeoff somewhere. With the variety of bargain printers on the market, a little bit of research can ensure it's only a small tradeoff.

It took Canon a while to find its feet with mirrorless cameras, but the Canon EOS R6 is proof that those faltering days are well and truly over.

A quick look at its spec list shows it’s capable of going head-to-head with the best mirrorless cameras from Sony, Nikon and Fujifilm and indeed beating them in some regards. How so? Well it’s a 20.1-megapixel full-frame camera that comes with class-leading image stabilization, a 6,072-point dual-pixel autofocus system, 12fps burst shooting, 4K video and high-res OLED electronic viewfinder.

In short, it has almost everything you could want in an enthusiast mirrorless camera, and with only a couple of minor drawbacks. Chief among them are that it lacks the really high megapixel count enjoyed by its more expensive 45MP sibling, the Canon R5 and the similarly priced 33MP Sony A7 IV, while video falls short of the absolute best.

But make no mistake: the Canon R6 is right at the top end of full-frame mirrorless cameras and I’ve enjoyed every second of my time with it. It's an obvious choice for our best mirrorless cameras list, and indeed our best cameras list overall. Find out what makes it so special in this full Canon EOS R6 review.

Canon EOS R6 review: Price and availability

The Canon EOS R6 came out in July 2020 and costs $2,499 for the body alone. It’s also available with two kit lenses: the RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM for $2,799 or with the RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM for $3,599.

I tested it with the excellent RF 24-70mm F2.8 L IS USM lens, which costs $2,399 on its own. But don’t think you’d have to spend that much, as Canon now has a 24-model strong range of RF lenses, all of which are compatible with the R6. These range from the $199 RF 50mm f/1.8 STM to the $12,999 (yes, really) RF 600mm f/4 L IS USM. 

You can also use any of the dozens of older EF lenses by adding a $99 adapter, or there’s a $199 adapter that also gives any EF lens the special control ring function found on all RF lenses. There’s also a battery grip ($349).

To find some discounts, head to our Canon promo codes page.  

Canon EOS R6 review: Design

Some of the best mirrorless cameras have real flair about them, but the Canon R6 is not one of them. There’s no retro charm as on Fujifilm’s or Olympus’ cameras and no real attempt to move away from the look of older Canon DSLRs. That’s clearly a deliberate decision, too; Canon’s own marketing for the camera talks about how anyone who’s used an EOS camera before will find it “reassuringly familiar,” and it is. But while that decision makes a lot of sense, it also makes for a fairly nondescript camera.   

But looks aside, the R6’s design has a lot going for it. The body is mostly crafted from magnesium alloy but Canon added tactile rubber bits where your hands rest, and the grip is big and provides plenty of purchase. It’s quite a large camera — more than 15% bigger and slightly heavier than the Sony A7 IV, for instance — but it’s very well built, offering full dust and moisture resistance so you can shoot in poor conditions without worrying about damage. 

The electronic viewfinder is excellent. It’s a large 0.5-inch OLED EVF with a high resolution of 3,690k dots and a fast 120 fps refresh rate, although its 0.76 magnification is a tiny bit behind its key rivals the Sony A7 IV and Nikon Z7 II. But don’t worry too much about that — it’s big, bright, easy to shoot through and covers 100% of the view.

The LCD screen is similarly impressive. It’s a 3-inch touchscreen LCD panel with a 1,620k dot resolution; while it doesn’t have quite as many pixels as the Sony A7 IV, it beats that rival by being able to flip out and round so you can shoot selfies while seeing what’s on the screen. That’s particularly useful if you use it for video streaming, and it also helps when shooting stills in awkward positions.

One final bonus is that it comes with dual SD card slots; hardly surprising at this price point, but welcome all the same. 

Canon EOS R6 review: Controls

When it comes to controls, the Canon R6 feels very DSLR-like. There are certainly plenty of options: 16 buttons plus three control dials, a mode selector, on/off switch and AF joystick. And of course you get touch controls too. Add to that the fact that all RF lenses have an extra control dial on the lens itself, and you have plenty of ways to control the camera. 

That doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll always know what you’re doing, though. In theory, the three control dials give you control over your main shooting options, but because they aren’t labelled and can be customized to your heart’s content, you’ll need to spend some time with the R6 before it all becomes second nature. 

That’s particularly apparent when you’re changing settings in the R6’s menus, with one control dial scrolling through categories, one moving through pages within each section and the third scrolling through the various options on each page. I regularly found myself using the wrong one and jumping to another section when I just wanted to move down a list — though I imagine I’d get used to it in time. Personally, I prefer Fujifilm’s standard practice of a dedicated ISO dial and aperture controls on the lens, but that might just be familiarity.

Most of the buttons are more straightforward, although several serve more than one purpose depending on what else you’re doing at the time. The inclusion of a dedicated button for rating images seems unnecessary, but the fact there’s a ‘Q’ quick menu option is welcome. 

The joystick should be useful, but I found it slightly too shallow for my liking, and my thumb had a tendency to slip off it in use. Then again, autofocus is so special here that you may not use it much anyway.

Canon EOS R6 review: Performance

Autofocus is handled by an incredibly adept dual-pixel CMOS AF II system which offers a scarcely believable 1,053 AF zones and 6,072 AF points. But don’t worry too much about the numbers, because all you really need to know is that it works superbly.

First things first: it’s fast. I would say it’s blink-and-you’ll-miss-it fast, except that it’s probably faster than that, too. Quick as it is to lock on to subjects, though, its tracking capabilities are probably even more impressive. Not only can the R6 focus on and track people and eyes, but it also works with animals (specifically dogs, cats and birds) and vehicles. 

Fortunately, I have a suitable test subject in the form of a very energetic 15-month old chocolate Labrador that regularly moves too swiftly and unpredictably for most cameras. The R6 couldn’t quite capture every frame of his leaping and bounding, but it came damn close, giving me a far greater percentage of keepers than I could have hoped for. It’s even advanced enough to track an animal’s eye while it’s moving; truly this is witchcraft.

The below shot is cropped in to show just how good it is — the dog is mid-bound but is perfectly captured and in focus.

What’s more, it has amazing light sensitivity: the EOS R6 can go down as low as EV -6.5, making it possible to lock on seamlessly without hunting, even in dim conditions.

If the autofocus is excellent (and it is), the image stabilization is every bit its equal. As well as having 5-axis IS in the camera body, it can work together with any IS-equipped Canon lenses to provide up to an astounding 8 stops of IS. In practice, I could usually get sharp shots at 2 seconds and sometimes even as much as 4 seconds. Great news for photographers, less so for tripod manufacturers. 

The shot below was taken indoors at night, in fairly dim lighting and at f/8 — all conditions which should challenge most cameras. However, the R6 was able to get a super-sharp image at just 1/10 second.

Not all Canon lenses will get the full 8 stops, but even those without lens-based stabilization will get some benefit from the IS and if you’re lucky enough to own one of the five RF lenses that do give you the maximum effect, you’re in for a treat.

Of course sometimes you’ll want a short shutter speed rather than a long one, and here the Canon R6’s burst shooting comes into its own. It’s capable of hitting 12 fps with the mechanical shutter and 20 fps with the electronic one. Almost as importantly, it can do so for absolutely ages; you can take 1,000 JPEGs or 240 RAW images before its buffer fills up, which should be more than enough for anyone. 

Canon EOS R6 review: Image quality

With all of the above in mind, it should be no surprise that the Canon EOS R6 takes lovely stills. In fact, the combination of fast and accurate autofocus and subject tracking, speedy burst shooting and excellent image stabilization means that there are very few areas where the R6 trips up at all.

Some people might feel that 20.1 megapixels isn’t enough for them, particularly given that many of the R6’s direct rivals have more — sometimes a lot more. But the relative lack of pixels does have some obvious benefits. Speed is one of them — it’s why the R6 can shoot so fast for so long without filling its buffer — but the other concerns light sensitivity. With fewer pixels packed on to the sensor, the R6 can make each one bigger — and that in turn gives it serious low-light capabilities. 

That’s apparent with ISO sensitivity, which goes from 100 up to 102,400 (or 50-204,800 in expanded mode), and which is usable all the way across that range. Sure, at 102,400 there’s a fair amount of noise, but not to the extent that much detail is lost and you could confidently shoot at ISO 6400 the whole time and not regret it.

Below, you can see its ISO capabilities in full effect: on the left is a shot taken at ISO 200, on the right one at 102,400. Sure, the left image is sharper, but you can still clearly make out the shutter speeds etched on to the front of the old film camera. 

Though resolution may not be as high as on some cameras, there's still plenty of detail available. In another shot of Rigby the Labrador, you can see individual drops of water on his nose and fine whiskers on his chin. 

Fine details are also apparent in this shot of him meeting another Lab, where veins can be seen on individual leaves around their feet.  

There are a wealth of different settings to delve into if you want to play around with the R6’s images, including several HDR options. The R6 can also output in the HEIF (High Efficiency Image File Format) format that you might be familiar with from iOS devices. This lets you shoot higher-quality images than JPEGs — they can display 10-bit color rather than 8-bit, but without larger file sizes, for instance. Just bear in mind that to use them you’ll need to enable the HDR PQ setting and use the mechanical shutter.

Canon EOS R6 review: Video

Video is not a particular focus of the R6, so I didn't make it a particular focus of my testing. It's certainly good enough to satisfy a stills shooter who wants to take videos occasionally on vacation, but YouTubers will be better looking at one of the best cameras for vlogging. 

As you'd expect, it can shoot 4K video at up to 60fps, albeit with a small crop of 1.07x. There's also 1080p capture at up to 120fps, which could make for some lovely slow-motion videos. Plus, all of the various autofocus modes, and the image stabilization, are available in video as well as with stills.

The quality of the footage isn't the issue here — it's crisp and colorful, while the built-in IS, high sensitivity, full-frame sensor and superb autofocus all help you get smooth, well-exposed and in-focus footage. No, the problem is one of overheating: in 4K mode it gets seriously hot, so Canon limits it to just 30 to 40 minutes of footage if you're shooting at 60 fps. You get more than an hour at slower speeds, and there's no restriction in 1080p mode, but anyone who takes video footage seriously rather than just using it occasionally will probably find it too restrictive. 

Canon EOS R6 review: Verdict

The Canon EOS R6 is a superb full-frame mirrorless camera for advanced amateur photographers, particularly those who spend more time shooting moving objects and portraits than they do landscapes. 

The combination of incredible autofocus — seriously, it works like magic — with class-leading image stabilization and super-clean high ISO settings mean it's a supremely capable performer in almost every situation. It barely tripped up once in my time with it and if I wanted a camera to take on vacation with me tomorrow, I'd be asking Canon to lend me one. 

It's not cheap, but you're getting a lot of camera here and it's no more expensive than its main rival, the Sony A7 IV. 

Landscape photographers might prefer a higher resolution and committed YouTubers will also want to look elsewhere, but for anyone else this is an easy camera to recommend. 

The ongoing chip shortage is having an impact on Canon, which has had so much trouble sourcing components for its printer cartridges that it's now selling some of them without the chips Canon printers use to authenticate inks.

That's significant because Canon has made a lot of money selling cheap printers which will only print using ink and toner cartridges with Canon chips in them. Canon's not alone in this practice, of course; Brother, HP, and other printer makers all rely on similar schemes, which is why many of the best printers you can buy won't print using third-party cartridges.

However, the ongoing supply chain issues and chip shortages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have apparently made it so hard for Canon to get components for its toner cartridges that some are now being sold without the chip which authenticates them to Canon printers. 

This has put Canon in the remarkable position of having to publish a public warning and guide that instructs Canon printer owners in Europe on how to bypass error messages and continue printing on Canon ImageRunner printers using cartridges which don't have the requisite components.

"To ensure you enjoy a continuous and reliable supply of consumables, we have chosen to supply consumable products without the semiconductor component until normal supply resumes," reads a printer support guide published to Canon Europe's website. "While there is no negative impact on print quality when using consumables without electronic components, certain ancillary functions, such as the ability to detect toner levels, may be affected."

Essentially, Canon is publicly admitting that there really is no reason why its printers can't print using non-Canon cartridges. Like many printer companies, Canon says embedding chips in ink cartridges is helpful because they let the printer know how much ink is left in the cartridge. And while that does seem helpful, it's hardly valuable enough to justify locking Canon customers out of buying and using third-party print cartridges, which might be cheaper and better than what comes from Canon.

It's nice to think that this temporary snarl caused by the chip shortage might lead to a broader shift in business strategy on the part of Canon and other printer makers, but don't get your hopes up: Canon's guide to bypassing its own printer DRM is aimed at folks using the big, multifunction printers that you typically see in offices and businesses, rather than the slim little all-in-one printer you might have at home.

Shifting to working from home doesn’t mean the flow of paperwork has stopped. Many of us still rely on physical documents to do our jobs, and being out of the office sometimes means we don’t have access to the same tools we normally have, like scanners and copiers. 

Thankfully, useful machines like document scanners have become much more portable and affordable so they are easy to buy and can go with you anywhere. 

Canon is a household name in the world of document scanners and its wide variety of reliable models help you keep track of your documents no matter where you are. 

Although our world has gone increasingly digital, many times physical documents are still an important part of the job. The challenge can be that documents come in all shapes and sizes, so you need to be able to tackle everything with one machine.

Canon scanners can handle almost any type of document, including business cards, ID cards, insurance cards, drivers licenses and more. Some models can scan passports as well if you need that. Almost any document you need to work with can be scanned with a Canon scanner.

A lot of documentation today needs to be digitized so it can be shared or stored, without losing any of the vital information on the document. Canon’s scanners let you scan both sides of any document at the same time in color, black & white and greyscale so you can capture every detail and quickly share it with whoever you need to.

The new hybrid work environment means that everyone is more spread out so documents and information have become decentralized. It’s much harder to check a document or form at your desk if you're not at your desk. Scanners are a great way to create electronic files of important information that you can store and access from anywhere. 

Once you have your files, you need to be able to interact with and share them easily. Canon’s scanners interact seamlessly with all the document software you already use so you don’t have to learn a new workflow or waste time with proprietary software. Simply scan your document and instantly have a PDF that you can edit in Adobe Acrobat, or import directly into Microsoft Office. 

Having digital copies of important documents is also vital for safekeeping. We’ve all been unable to find our most important documents when we most need them. With a Canon scanner, you can digitize all your most important documents so you can easily find them. 

Everyone’s needs are different and Canon has something that fits your workflow, no matter what you need. If you work with large amounts of important documents that need to be digitized in batches, their high-performance desktop scanners are a great option.

If you’re a mobile warrior who needs to scan business cards, contracts, receipts or anything else while you’re out on the road, they have two mobile scanners that fit in a bag and can be plugged right into your computer, ready to go in seconds. 

Many of us may have changed where we work from, but that didn’t change the need for us to be able to manage important documents. Canon has the scanners you need to adapt to your new normal workflow without missing a beat. Check out all their scanners at their website. 

Canon has a wide range of reliable scanners

Whether you need to digitize large batches of documents for safekeeping, or scan a variety of things to store and search later, Canon has a scanner to meet your needs. 

Get yours here. 

The desire to save money on printing is nothing new. Replacing a printer's ink cartridges gets expensive in the long run. To ease the pain, some printer models offer high-yield cartridges, which offer some savings. A new strategy to reduce ongoing ink costs is with an ink cartridge subscription plan. All the major printer manufacturers now offer some variation of this.

When the ink in your printer is running low, these services automatically order and ship ink cartridges to you. This is undoubtedly convenient, saving you a trip to the office supply store.

Convenience aside, the big question is, will an ink subscription really save you money? That's what we set out to determine for this story.

We compared plans from the four biggest inkjet printer brands: Brother, Canon, Epson and HP. The plans vary and offer different terms, so you'll want to match your printing needs to the right plan in order to maximize your savings.

What are ink subscription plans?

These days, every printer manufacturer offers some sort of ink subscription plan. For a small recurring fee, you get to skip the inconvenience of running out of ink in the middle of a printing project, and save yourself a trip to the store, all while giving printer companies a new way to encourage brand loyalty and keep more dollars from going to third-party budget ink sellers.

Some plans have a monthly fee that includes a set number of printed pages, and the option to buy extra pages. Other plans simply offer a discount on the automatically triggered ink purchases, or just free shipping.

When the ink in your printer is running low, these services automatically order and ship ink cartridges to you. This is undoubtedly convenient, saving you a trip to the office supply store. In most cases, the shipping will be free, and you will receive an email notification that the order has been placed. Generally, you will have 24 hours to cancel the order, just in case you don't really need it. The printer needs to be connected to the internet for these subscription services to work.

All of these plans automatically ship ink cartridges to you when your printer is running low. The printer must be connected to the internet to initiate the order. And, of course, the printer must be eligible for the subscription plan. In our research, we found that most inkjet printers and all-in-ones we have tested are eligible for the manufacturer's ink subscription plan—but not all of them.

What types of subscription plans are available?

There are two types of ink subscriptions. Those with a monthly fee allow you a set number of printed pages. You pay only the monthly fee, not for the ink cartridges themselves when they are shipped to you.

An ink subscription with a monthly page count may be best suited to users with a consistent print volume. If your print needs vary widely, you may have to monitor your ink subscription plan in order to avoid excessive purchases of extra pages, or to avoid losing excessive pages that have been rolled over from previous months when you printed less than your plan allows.

The second plan type has no monthly fee—you just pay for the ink cartridges, sometimes at a discount price. There is no set number of monthly pages, or a monthly subscription fee, just free shipping and in some cases a discount on your order.

Regardless of the type of plan, the ink shipment is triggered automatically, and you are sent a notice, which gives you the option to cancel.

In some cases, third-party ink ordering programs are done in partnership with the printer makers. For example, Amazon Smart Ordering is offered by Brother.

If you already own a printer by HP, Brother or Epson, you have only one type of plan to choose from. Interestingly, Canon offers both types of ink subscription plans—but at press time only a couple models were eligible for its Pixma Print plan, which comes with a monthly fee and a set number of pages.

What makes a good ink subscription plan?

For this story, we evaluated ink subscription services for personal/small office inkjet printers. The majority of inkjet printers tested by Tom's Guide have a standard black ink cartridge that will print an estimated 1,000 pages or less. For these models, the average costs per page are 7.7 cents (text) and 20.7 cents (color). When using high-yield cartridges, these averages go down to 5.9 cents and 14.9 cents per page, respectively.

Both Canon and HP offer this type of plan, with page-count tiers. Both plans offer extra pages for 10 cents each, and a limited number of rollover pages. We have calculated the cost per page for the plans, assuming you printed exactly the monthly limit.

For these models, the average costs per page are 7.7 cents (text) and 20.7 cents (color). When using high-yield cartridges, these averages go down to 5.9 cents and 14.9 cents per page, respectively.

Basic cartridge replacement plans generally offer a set discount over retail pricing, but the amount varies by manufacturer. Even on those plans without special savings, you'll get free shipping and the added convenience of one less trip to the store when you run out of ink.

HP Instant Ink

Arguably the most popular and widely known ink subscription plan is HP Instant Ink, which offers a monthly fee-type plan that lets users pick the plan that matches their regular printing needs, and sends cartridges in the mail just when you need a refill.

HP Instant Ink offers five subscription tiers, ranging from 15 to 300 pages per month for the majority of home and business users. HP offers Instant Ink subscriptions on many models. You can find a complete list of eligible printers on the HP Instant Ink webpage. And unlike most ink subscription plans, HP offers toner for laser printers, as well.

Check our HP coupon codes page for discounts and offers. 

If you use all of your pages, your cost per page will be anywhere from 4 cents to 7 cents. Extra pages cost $1 for 10, or 10 cents each. You are allowed to roll over up to three times the number of pages in your monthly plan.

By comparison, the Envy 7855 has costs per page of 7.1 cents (text) and 18 cents (color) when using high-yield cartridges. The printer uses two cartridges: black and tri-color.

If you used all your pages in the Occasional plan that comes with 50 pages per month, your cost per page would be 6 cents, regardless of how much color you printed. At that rate, Instant Ink looks like a pretty good bargain. Upping your plan to 100 pages per month would drop your cost per page to 5 cents.

Verdict: If you don't let rollover pages expire, it's a pretty good bet you'd save money with HP Instant Ink.

Canon Pixma Print

Canon Pixma Print is one of two ink subscription plans offered for Canon printers, and uses the monthly page count approach, charging a monthly fee for an allotted number of pages, and then shipping fresh ink whenever the printer is running low.

Canon offers four tiers for its Pixma Print ink subscription plan, beginning at $3.99 per month. The plans' page limits range from 30 pages to 200 pages monthly.

One plan, Pay As You Print, limits you to 30 pages and does not offer extra page purchases or allow you to rollover unused pages. The other Canon plan tiers offer extra pages for 10 cents each, as well as rollover pages. Shipping is free.

Costs per page range from 5 cents to 17 cents, if you were to use all your pages. However, at press time, only two models were eligible for this plan: the Pixma TS6420 ($100) and Pixma TR7020 ($130). (To check the list of eligible models, see Canon's website.) Both models use two ink cartridges: one black, and one tri-color.

One important detail is rollover pages. Comparing each company's 100-page plan, HP allows customers to roll over up to 300 pages, while Canon limits you to 100 rollover pages. However, Canon does include 100 free pages in its plan, which are good for six months.

Without this plan, printing 4-by-6-inch color photos with the two eligible models costs 37.1 cents using standard cartridges, and 28.9 cents with high-yield cartridges. If you print photos almost exclusively, even the entry-level plan would save you a chunk of change, at 17 cents per print. At the highest volume, the 200-pages-per-month Frequent plan drops cost per print to just 5 cents. This assumes, of course, that you are able to use all your pages, and never lose any pages you roll over. It also assumes you never go over and have to pay 10 cents per extra print.

Verdict: The Canon Pixma Print plan can certainly save you money if you keep up with the plan's page count. However, only two models are currently eligible.

Brother Refresh

Brother Refresh offers a 5 percent discount on ink cartridges. There is no monthly fee, and you can cancel at any time without penalty. To enroll, you select either Brother or Amazon Smart Order as the fulfillment provider. You can use the Brother PrinterProPlus app to enroll in Refresh, check ink levels, and manage your account.

When you enroll, you select whether you want standard, high-yield, or super high-yield cartridges to be ordered. Standard shipping is free to the continental U.S., for orders over $20. Shipping on smaller orders costs $5.75. After an order is placed automatically, the customer receives an email notification. You have 24 hours to cancel the order.

Unlike previously mentioned printers, the Brother MFC-J995DW that we tested already offers very low costs per page. Using high-yield cartridges, the MFC-J995DW offers low costs per page of 1 cent (text) and 5 cents (color). These cartridges print an estimated 6,000 and 5,000 pages each, respectively. Signing up for this automatic ordering will save you five percent, and the shipping will always be free because even one standard yield ink cartridge for this model costs more than the minimum for free shipping.

You can find a list of eligible printers on the Brother Refresh website, and it includes both inkjet and laser printers.

Verdict: Brother's high-yield printers are known for low costs per page already. Saving another 5 percent is a no-brainer.

Canon Auto Replenishment

Canon's Auto Replenishment service offers free enrollment and free standard shipping on ink purchases. When your printer displays a low ink message, replacement cartridges will be ordered and an order confirmation email will be sent. Free standard shipping takes three to seven days, according to Canon.

Canon does not offer a set discount with its plan, which is disappointing. However, you will receive a discount if a promotional discount is being offered when your order is placed.

Of the Canon printers we've tested in this category, they averaged costs per page of 8.9 cents (text) and 22.1 cents (color) with standard cartridges, and 7 cents (text) and 16 cents (color) when using high-yield cartridges.

You can find a list of eligible printers on the Canon website.

Verdict: Canon's Auto Replenishment subscription does not offer a set discount, so the benefit is more for convenience than cost savings.

Epson ReadyInk

Epson does not offer an ink cartridge subscription directly. Rather, its ReadyInk program directs customers to enroll via a third-party ink subscription plan from Amazon or Staples. Both companies offer automatic ordering of ink cartridges, triggered by an eligible printer. (See the list of eligible printers on the Epson ReadyInk website.)

Both Amazon Dash and Staples Smart Ordering offer a 10 percent discount on ink purchases. Amazon Dash does not require an Amazon Prime membership. For Prime members, using Amazon Smart Ordering adds Alexa functionality with the printer. As with previously discussed plans, ink cartridge orders are triggered when the printer detects it is low on ink.

Amazon Dash offers free shipping if the product is eligible for free shipping. Staples Smart Ordering offers free shipping on every order.

If you don't yet need more ink, with Staples Smart Ordering you can not cancel the order, but must pause your subscription. You also are allowed to cancel your subscription without penalty.

For comparison, the Epson WorkForce WF-2760, which we reviewed, offers costs per page of 6 cents (text) and 17.3 cents (color), when using its high-yield ink cartridges. Getting a 10 percent discount and free shipping knocks that down to 5.4 cents and 15.6 cents, respectively. Those savings add up, and if you saved on your printer with an Epson coupon code, mean you're consistently paying less than the asking price for your printing setup.

Verdict: Epson's ReadyInk subscription will save you 10 percent on ink purchases, and Amazon Prime members can take advantage of Alexa integration on compatible printers.

Which ink subscription plan is right for you?

Which type of ink subscription is right for you depends on how consistent your print volume is. Whether you have the stomach for managing an ink subscription with a monthly page count, to make sure you don't leave money on the table, is a largely personal decision. If managed well, a page count plan can certainly save you money.

On the other hand, a subscription plan that offers a set discount on ink sounds like a no-brainer. With a set discount on ink purchases, which arrive automatically as with the page count plans, you know you're saving money without having to take any action whatsoever.

Whichever type of plan you choose, it appears the printer makers are offering a fair amount of flexibility. In one form or another, these plans allow you to change your page count, buy extra pages, carry over unused pages, pause the subscription, cancel an unneeded order, or cancel the service without penalty. No matter which variety you decide on, it's pretty certain you'll be able to lower your printing costs.

Canon has dropped a major surprise in the form of the EOS R3, a full-frame mirrorless camera that focuses by tracking your eyes and shoots at an astonishing 30 fps.

The R3 is still in development mode, but Canon has already revealed a few juicy details about it ahead of its full launch. And from what we know so far, it looks like it'll be pitched squarely against the new Sony A1 and forthcoming Nikon Z9 in a battle for the hearts and wallets of pro-level sports photographers. 

• These are the best cameras you can buy right now
• DSLR vs. mirrorless, which is best for you?
• Plus: Google Photos just got these killer upgrades for Android phones

The Canon EOS R3 looks like being a seriously speedy snapper: it can handle burst shooting at a phenomenal 30 fps when using the electronic shutter, but still allows for full autofocus in all modes.

That makes it way faster than any previous Canon camera while matching the performance of the Sony Alpha 1.

This speed is made possible by the R3's new back-illuminated stacked CMOS image sensor, a first for Canon, which allows for faster read-out speeds and lower "rolling shutter" distortion — a problem which has traditionally plagued electronic shutters. 

Autofocus is the other area where the Canon R3 looks like really shining: Canon says it uses Deep Learning technology to offer enhanced autofocus and tracking of subjects.

What's more, you'll be able use your eyes to set the focus points in the viewfinder simply by looking at it. This "Eye Control Function" will only work with still images and with the electronic shutter, but it promises incredibly quick focus changes. The feature will allow you to look at a specific person or object and have the camera instantly snap on to it. 

Canon has used a similar system before, though presumably a far less technologically advanced one given that it featured on the EOS-5 and EOS-3 in the 1990s. It's interesting to see it resurrected here and it offers the R3 something that no other mirrorless camera has.

For the latest offers from Canon, take a look at our Canon promo codes.  

Elsewhere, we also know that the R3 will have a rugged, weather-resistant body that Canon says will equal the pros' favorite 1D X Mark III for durability.

Obviously there's still a lot for Canon to reveal about the R3, not least its price and release date. In terms of the former, you'd better start saving up now — because this thing will be expensive. The Sony Alpha 1, for instance, costs $6500, and the R3 is unlikely to be much cheaper. 

On the latter point, getting the R3 in shops in time for July's Tokyo Olympics would have made sense, but that seems impossible given that Canon says it's still being developed. At the same time, it seems unlikely that Canon would have revealed the R3 in this much detail if its release was too far off, so we're guessing it will arrive in the second half of 2021. 

• More: Take your images to the next level with the best photo editing software

Canon's Pixma G6020 MegaTank ($270) is a great value and a solid performer. With a recommended monthly duty cycle of up to 3,300 pages, the G6020 built for a heavy workload. It prints, scans and copies, but does not offer fax capability.

Outfitted with four refillable ink tanks, the Pixma G6020 uses a pigment black and three dye-based colors: cyan, magenta and yellow. The refillable ink tanks keep printing costs extremely low. In the box, you get two extra bottles of black ink. These are valued at $18 each and will print an estimated 12,000 pages in total. Given the already low purchase price, this really adds to this all-in-one's value. We liked it so much, we named it one of the best printers in our 2021 Tom's Guide Awards, as well as one of the best all-in-one printers.

Canon Pixma G6020 MegaTank review: Design

The G6020 has a compact body and is well suited for a home office. It offers a duplexer for making two-sided prints, although it lacks an automatic document feeder (ADF) for multi-page copying and scanning.

For standalone operation, the control panel has a handful of physical buttons for selecting operations and navigating settings menus. There are dedicated buttons for copying/scanning in black-and-white and in color, for example. At the center of the panel is a small monochrome LCD. The two-line display lacks backlighting, which can make it difficult to read in poorly lit areas or due to reflections off the glass. The control panel angles upward 90 degrees.

The G6020 measures 15.9 x 14.6 x 7.7 inches, which is compact for a model with ink tanks. Because there's no ADF atop the scanner lid, it's a couple inches shorter than the similarly sized Epson ET-4760 with its ADF folded out for operation. The G6020 weighs 17.8 pounds.

There are two paper trays, with a total capacity of 350 sheets. The main paper cassette holds 250 sheets, while the rear paper tray can hold 100 sheets.

Canon Pixma G6020 MegaTank review: Print speed

The G6020 printed a five-page text document at roughly average speed, doing so in 33.5 seconds, or at 9 ppm. The category average is 9.1 ppm. The G6020 printed a six-page PDF of mixed text and color graphics in 2 minutes, 46 seconds, or 2.2 ppm, which was a little slower than the average of 2.6 ppm. By comparison, the more expensive Epson EcoTank ET-4760 was faster in both tests, printing text documents at 11.1 ppm and color documents at 3.9 ppm. The HP SmartTank Plus 651 was slightly slower, at 8.5 ppm and 1.7 ppm, respectively.

The G6020's two-sided print speed for text documents was roughly the same as its print speed for one-sided color documents. It printed two-sided text documents at 2.3 ppm, pausing roughly 14 seconds before printing the second side of each sheet. It printed two-sided color documents at 1.8 ppm, pausing about 18 seconds between sides. Again, the Epson ET-4760 was markedly faster, printing two-sided text documents at a brisk 6.5 ppm, and two-sided color documents at 3.2 ppm.

In black-and-white, the G6020 made a copy in 11.3 seconds, and a color copy in 31.2 seconds. The Epson ET-4760 was a little slower to copy a page of text, doing so in 12.8 seconds, but slightly faster at copying a color page, making the facsimile in 30.1 seconds. By contrast, the HP SmartTank 651 was agonizingly slow at copying, taking 2 minutes and 12 seconds to copy a page of text, and almost three-and-a-half minutes to copy a color page.

The G6020 scans quickly. It made a 300 dpi PDF in black-and-white in 8.4 seconds, which was much faster than the average of 11.6 seconds. By contrast, the Epson ET-4760 took 12.4 seconds to make the same scan. The HP Smart Tank was quick on this test, making the same black-and-white scan in 8.3 seconds.

The G6020 made a 600 dpi color scan to JPEG format in 1 minute, 5 seconds. This was 4 seconds faster than the average. By comparison, the Epson ET-4760 took 1 minute, 49 seconds to make the same scan. The HP Smart Tank was even slower, at 2 minutes and 16 seconds.

Canon Pixma G6020 MegaTank review: Print quality

The G6020 prints attractive text documents. In our tests, letterforms were dark, with sharp edges. There was only a little bit of errant spray and some slightly lumpy edges. In duplex prints, text looked just as dark and sharp as in one-sided prints. By comparison the letterforms printed by the HP Smart Tank 651 were a little sleeker, with slightly sharper edges.

The G6020 printed color graphics with lots of fine details, attractive textures overall and natural-looking, well-saturated colors. Some mild banding was visible, however, and upon close examination there was slight pixelation in otherwise smooth-looking textures. Two-sided prints of color graphics were equally impressive – something that the Epson ET-4760 did not do, producing two-sided prints that looked lighter and less sharp than single-sided prints. The HP Smart Tank (which only makes single-sided prints) printed color graphics of comparable quality to the G6020, but without the banding that was distracting in the Canon’s prints.

Glossy photo prints were very attractive, with plenty of fine detail and well-saturated colors. The Epson ET-4760’s glossy photo prints set themselves apart with warm reds and yellows that looked a little darker and richer than in the Canon’s prints. However, the Epson’s shadows were also darker, which caused some fine details to get lost amidst the increased contrast. The HP SmartTank’s glossy prints were also very attractive and detailed, with slightly less brightness in the reds and yellows, which arguably is more natural-looking but offers less “pop” than the Canon and Epson prints.

The Canon G6020 reproduced text accurately in its copies, and graphics retained their details and color accuracy. There was, however, some very mild banding in copies of both color and grayscale graphics, though this was not pronounced. By comparison, the HP SmartTank’s color copies looked a little muddy, lacking the brightness and mid-tone details of the G6020’s brighter color copies.

Scans also proved to be faithful reproductions. Sharp details and accurate textures were in both grayscale and color scans. Colors looked accurate in photo scans, and details were retained in shadow areas (something the Epson ET-4760 had difficulty with, producing blocked-up shadows lacking details).

Canon Pixma G6020 MegaTank review: Ink cost and yield

The Pixma G6020 keeps printing costs extremely low by using refillable ink tanks. At just 0.2 cent for text and 0.8 cent for color pages, this Canon keeps ink costs very budget-friendly. A bottle of pigment black ink sells for $17.99 and lasts an estimated 6,000 pages. The three color inks cost  $11.99 per bottle, and print an estimated 7,700 pages. There is a CMY three-pack, but it will only save you two cents, priced at $35.95. The $450 HP SmartTank Plus 651 offers the same low costs per page; the Epson ET-4760 differs only slightly on color pages, at 0.9 cent.

Take a look at our Canon promo codes for ways to save on your order. 

By comparison, the $129 Brother INKvestment MFC-J805DW (which does not have ink tanks, but uses larger-than-average cartridges) delivers costs per page of 1 cent (text) and 6.2 cents (color) when using its highest yield cartridges.

Canon Pixma G6020 MegaTank review: Setup and software

The startup guide directs you to go online, where pictures and videos step you through the setup. After removing a few pieces of packaging tape, you install the two printheads and fill the ink tanks. This is an easy process, with almost no risk of spilling ink and making a mess. With the G6020, as with all other refillable ink tank models we’ve reviewed, I’ve never spilled a single drop of ink during this process. The ink bottle nozzles fit securely into the ink tank valve, and you let gravity do its work.

Then you perform the printhead alignment. After printing a page of patterns, the G6020 draws each page back into the unit. You do not need to select which block of finely spaced lines is most properly aligned, as is necessary with the Epson ET-4760.

Setting up wireless was easy. The G6020 offers WPS method, which you select in the on-screen menu. After doing so, pressing the WPS button on my wireless router established the connection.

Printing and scanning from a Windows PC is smooth sailing. And, with the dedicated black-and-white and color buttons on the control panel, standalone copying is simple as well. But customizing settings  in standalone mode is not the G6020's strong suit. Navigating menus with the two-line monochrome LCD is not nearly as elegant as a large, responsive touchscreen. That said, it's also not nearly as frustrating as an unresponsive, kludgy touchscreen, or one that's too small to navigate efficiently.

Setting up my phone with the G6020 was no hassle. After downloading the Canon Print app to my iPhone, the app found the G6020, and the wireless connection was made.

The G6020 offers digital assistant compatibility, supporting integration with Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and IFTTT (If This Then That).

Startup time is very fast. The G6020 offered its menu screen in just 3 seconds. When choosing immediately to make a black-and-white copy, the G6020 produced the copy in a total of 30 seconds from when the power button was pressed.

Canon Pixma G6020 MegaTank review: Verdict

The Canon Pixma G6020 MegaTank offers a lot for the money—extremely low ink costs, attractive two-sided prints, and a high duty cycle for cranking out a high volume of prints. With an attractively low initial cost of $269—plus lots of extra black ink in the box—this office-worthy unit has a lot to offer, including high image quality across the board, and two paper trays.

The G6020 doesn't, however, offer every office feature. For example, if copying multipage documents is a critical feature for you, you might wish the G6020 had an ADF for feeding those documents (like the Epson EcoTank ET-4760 does). Also, two-sided printing is on the slow side and may not be up to par for a busy workgroup wanting to regularly make duplex prints. The Epson ET-4760, by comparison, is demonstrably faster at duplex printing, while the HP SmartTank 651 offers only single-sided printing. Also, the G6020 doesn't send faxes, like the ET-4760.

Nonetheless, if you don't need an ADF and two-sided printing doesn't need to be lightning-fast, this low of a price for an all-in-one with refillable ink tanks is impossible to ignore. With two extra bottles of black ink in the box, the Canon Pixma G6020 MegaTank's really low ink costs and top-of-the-line print, copy and scan quality deliver a whole lot of value for the money.

Time for an upgrade? The Canon EOS Rebel T8i is touted as an entry-level camera for beginners, hobbyists, and content creators, but it’s got a few features found in higher-end Canon cameras.

The most noteworthy is its ability to record video in 4K—including vertical video—which will appeal to the vlogging set. Combined with easy-to-use controls and guides, it’s one of the best DSLRs for novice photographers. 

Keep on reading the rest of our Canon EOS Rebel T8i review to see if it’s the right camera for you or someone you know.

Canon EOS Rebel T8i: Price and availability

The T8i is the most advanced camera in the EOS Rebel line. Released in February 2020, the Canon T8i is priced at $799 with an 18-55M STM kit lens. Take a look at our Canon promo codes for ways to lower the price. 

There aren't too many meaty differences between the T7i and the T8i other than a slight weight difference and the upgraded image processor. The most significant difference is that the T8i is powered by Canon's DIGIC 8 processor, which enables 4K video capture and 7fps continuous shooting, a feature the T7i (6fps) didn't have.

Canon EOS Rebel T8i: Design

The T8i was small enough to fit perfectly in my hands, and its buttons were placed so that I could make quick and easy changes without disrupting my flow. The 3-inch LCD touch screen gave greater visual control when setting my focus points, navigating menu settings and reviewing images. Its vari-angle design—it can flip out to the side and up and down— made capturing my go-to low angle shots much easier than with my Canon Mark 5D IV. 

Measuring  5.16 x 4 x 3 inches and 18.2 ounces (with battery pack and SD card), it’s light and compact enough that I could put it in my bookbag and forget it was even there. The downside is there are no illuminated buttons: Even for the most experienced photographers, illuminated buttons are a perk when shooting in low lighting conditions. Popping out the LCD screen might be a slight fix but not ideal when you need to be discreet. 

The T8i doesn't have environmental weather sealings to protect from water and dust, unlike pricier cameras such as the Sony Alpha a7 II.

Canon EOS Rebel T8i: Interface

If you're a visual learner or hate going through equipment manuals, the T8i’s 3-inch LCD screen will walk you through different camera functions and settings so you'll be ready to take sharp, crisp photos and videos in no time. These screens will prove especially helpful for novices as they learn the ins and outs of the T8i.

Creative filters will always be a win, especially for beginners who want creative shots without using photo editing software. The T8i filters include: Grainy B/W, Soft Focus, Fish-eye Effect (my favorite), Water painting, Toy camera, HDR Art Vivid, HDR Art Bold, and HDR Embossed. 

Canon EOS Rebel T8i: Image quality

The T8i is packed with a 24.1-megapixel sensor, 100 - 25600 ISO, 45-point all cross-type AF system and DIGIC 8 image processors. Capturing fine details and true-to-life rich colors with each shot won't be a problem. Portraits, sports, landscape, dorm life — this camera will tackle it all. 

I brought the camera on set with me to shoot behind-the-scenes footage during one of my photoshoots. We started shooting in the morning when the light settings were a bit extreme. The Scene Intelligent Auto Mode (A+) was able to quickly adjust between areas of shade and bright sun. I had no problem capturing rich colors and details created by our makeup artist. Makeup gurus, you won’t have to worry about losing fine details or discoloration in your beauty shots. 

Like many cameras, the T8i struggled with minimal lighting situations, especially when using the standard kit lens. I took a few images of my friends during a night skating session, but the T8i had trouble maintaining focus on the skaters that were zipping past my lens under the fluorescent park lights. I also came across the same problem at a dinner outing and photographing my friend’s new nail designs. Again, the T8i wasn’t able to produce rich colors and focus on subjects clearly. My iPhone was able to create better results. 

High grain, slight discoloration and blur will seep into your imagery when the ISO is pushed to the max, but that is nothing to fret over when you can easily pop open the flash or use a better lens suitable for low-light situations. 

You won't miss a shot with the T8i's 45-point All Cross-Type AutoFocus paired with Dual Pixel CMOS AF Systems. The 45-point phase-detection AF made it easy to shoot stills via the viewfinder. Even in average-to-mixed lighting conditions, it was swift and accurate when tracking of fast-moving subjects. Eye Detection AF is a feature that significantly helps maintain focus on a subject's eye if there is movement in the foreground and background or multiple people within your shot. 

When shooting Live view with the LCD screen or recording video, the Dual Pixel CMOS AF system was fast and smooth. The T8i makes it easy to record your socially distanced school and sports events, your crew’s #OOTD, or your quick getaway vacation. 

However, there’s no Auto ISO minimum speed; the T8i chooses the speed as you zoom and no there’s no image stabilization for still photography, only in video. 

Canon EOS Rebel T8i: Video quality

Not only does the T8i record video in crisp UHD 4K at up to 24fps, but a significant win is the support of 16:9 vertical video output, perfect for vloggers and content creators who use popular social media platforms like Instagram’s IGTV or Facebook’s Stories. The T8i’s vari-angle touchscreen LCD made it easy to compose shots from odd angles, and I especially liked the camera’s digital image stabilization, which minimizes camera shake for smoother footage.

The T8i captured smooth shots of my crew’s day time rollerblading adventure and gave even and fluid pans for a more cinematic image. 

Canon EOS Rebel T8i: Wireless

As a content creator, it is imperative to have consistent, timely, and relevant imagery to beat social algorithms and make sure your posts are seen. T8i’s has built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth sharing capabilities. After wrapping a shoot with an influencer, I was able to share the photos with her on the spot with the Canon Connect App. With this app, you are able to store and edit RAW and JPEG photos, making on-the-fly editing quick and easy. 

The time it usually takes to upload to my computer and send off images was drastically reduced. 

Canon EOS Rebel T8i: Battery life

When I’m shooting with my Canon cameras, I never have to worry about battery life. Unlike my Sony mirrorless cameras, one Canon battery will last me a whole day. The same is true for the T8i. According to Canon, its battery will last for up to 1240 shots when using the viewfinder alone. However, that figure drops to just 360 shots when using live view. 

One downside is there is no USB charging, so you’ll have to remove its battery to juice it back up.

Canon EOS Rebel T8i: Verdict

Overall, the T8i passes the test of being a newbie-friendly camera for novice photographers or content creators. Its ability to record 4K video with 16:9 support makes it a much-needed upgrade from the T7i, and places it in a class all its own. At the moment, the closest Nikon competitor is the Nikon D5600, which costs about $100-$200 less, but lacks 4K video. However, we expect its successor, the D5700, to arrive sometime in 2021.  

All in all, the Canon T8i delivers polished and crisp imagery in a camera that is easy to use and won’t break the bank. 

The Canon Pixma TR8620 is an inkjet all-in-one with home office features. It has a 20-page automatic document feeder (ADF), a duplexer for two-sided printing, and two paper trays for keeping two types of paper at the ready.

Unlike many of the best all-in-one printers, the TR8620 uses five ink cartridges, with two types of black: one for documents (pigment-based) and the other for glossy photo prints (dye-based). The other three inks are the standard cyan, magenta and yellow.

The TR8620 is also outfitted with a duplexer for two-sided printing, and supports smart home integration with Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant. We like it so much, we've consisntely ranked ti among the best printers ever since it launched.

Canon Pixma TR8620 review: Design

The TR8620 has a big 4.3-inch color touchscreen on its control panel, which hinges upward 90 degrees. There are no physical buttons for operation (only the power button), however, I found the touchscreen responsive and the menus intuitive to navigate. At the bottom left of the front panel is an SD card slot, so you can print directly from a camera's memory card.

Both the primary paper cassette and rear paper tray can hold up to 100 sheets of plain paper. The rear paper tray, which should be used for photo prints, can hold up to 20 sheets of photo paper. The paper cassette sits at the bottom of the unit, beneath the output tray. 

To use the ADF atop the unit, you open the cover, which hinges outward to serve as a paper input support. The TR8620 is outfitted with a duplexer for two-sided printing, but automatic two-sided scanning is not supported. That is, to make copies or scans of a two-sided document, you will have to run the document through the ADF twice, scanning one side at a time. The LCD offers a graphic to ensure you place the document properly to ensure a successful scan of the second side. 

The TR8620 has a Hi-Speed USB port, and you can put it on a network via its Ethernet port or via Wi-Fi (both 2.4GHz and 5GHz are supported). Wireless connectivity via Bluetooth 4.0 is also available. 

The body measures 17.3 inches (w) by 13.8 inches (d) by 7.5 inches (h). This is fairly typical of a home inkjet all-in-one. Although the official depth with paper loaded is 14.4 inches, I found that with the rear tray tilted back and loaded with paper, and the output tray extended with the catch folded forward, the total depth increased to 26 inches. In addition, opening the ADF for use increases the height by an inch. But, most importantly, you will want to have adequate vertical clearance for raising the lid to place documents on the flatbed scanner glass.

The TR8620 can send faxes via its 33.6 kbps modem, and can store up to 99 fax numbers and a maximum of 250 pages in its memory. 

Canon Pixma TR8620 review: Print speed 

Print speeds on plain paper were slightly faster than average. The TR8620 printed our five-page text document in 32.6 seconds (or, 9.2 ppm) versus the average of 8.8 ppm for comparable models. Similarly, the TR8620 printed our six-page document of mixed text and color graphics in 1 minute, 52 seconds (or,  3.2 ppm) compared to the average of 2 minutes, 13 seconds (or, 2.7 ppm).

The most impressive print speed was on glossy photos. The TR8620 printed a letter-sized photo on glossy paper in just 2 minutes and 4 seconds—roughly half the average time of 4 minutes and 3 seconds. Only a few models have been faster (all Canon printers), including our Editor's Choice, the Canon Pixma TS9120, at 1 minute and 57 seconds.

Using its automatic duplexer, the TR8620 made two-sided text prints at a respectable pace of 3.1 ppm. After printing the first side, the TR8620 paused for 14 seconds to let the ink dry before proceeding, taking a total of 3 minutes and 12 seconds to print the 10-page document on five sheets. By comparison, the HP Envy 7855 printed two-sided text documents at a brisker 3.7 ppm, while the Brother MFC-J995DW did so even faster, at 4 ppm.

The TR8620 made two-sided prints of our color PDF at 2.3 ppm. As with two-sided text prints, there was a 14-second pause before printing began on the second side of each page. Again, the Brother MFC-J995DW was faster, making two-sided text/color graphics prints at 3 ppm, while the HP Envy 7855 was substantially slower, at 1.2 ppm.

Canon Pixma TR8620 review: Copy and scan speed

Quick copying is arguably the TR8620's best office skill. From the flatbed, the TR8620 copied a color document in 20.5 seconds—much faster than the 28.7 second average. It copied a page of text in 10.8 seconds, which was significantly faster than the average of 16 seconds. By comparison, the Editor's Choice TS9120 was slower at making a text copy (at 14 seconds), but faster to make a color copy, at 17.3 seconds. The HP Envy 7855 was slower in both tests, at 15.7 seconds and 24.1 seconds, respectively, while the Brother MFC-J995DW, was slower to copy text (12.7 seconds), but faster to copy color documents (15.1 seconds). 

Using its ADF, the TR8620 copied a five-page text document in 45 seconds, or 6.7 ppm. The Brother MFC-J995DW was slightly faster, at 7 ppm. 

The TR8620 does not offer automatic duplex scanning and copying. Rather, it offers manual duplex copying and scanning, whereby the user places the document in the ADF twice: Once for each side. It's easy to follow the on-screen LCD instructions, which show you how to orient the document so the second scan is properly oriented. 

The Pixma TR8620 copied a 10-page text document (five double-sheets) in 5 minutes, or 2 ppm, not counting the time it took to reinsert the document in the ADF. By comparison, the Brother MFC-J805DW, which does offer automatic duplex copying, was significantly faster, making two-sided text copies at 3.1 ppm.

The TR8620 was faster than the average at scanning both color photos and documents. It scanned an 8-by-10 photo and saved it as a 600 dpi JPEG in 59 seconds, faster than the average of 65.8 seconds. By comparison, the Canon TS9120 and Brother MFC-J995DW were significantly faster, at 37.8 and 38.5 seconds, respectively.

The same was true of black-and-white scanning to PDF format at 300 dpi. The TR8620 captured a scan in 8.8 seconds, which was faster than the average of 11 seconds. The Canon TS9120 made the same scan in 7.7 seconds.

Canon Pixma TR8620 review: Print quality

The TR8620 offers high print quality overall, printing text that is sufficiently dark. Edges look fairly sharp, although the letterforms could be sleeker. Color graphics are attractive, with accurate colors and textures, although some mild banding was visible in dark areas.

Glossy photos print with high-quality accuracy: Natural-looking colors, sharp details and smooth transitions. 

Copy quality was good overall. Copies reproduced the details and colors of the original documents fairly well: Graphics closely resembled the originals, and text looked slightly lumpier around the edges. Copies of text documents fed via the ADF, in particular, came out with letterforms that looked fatter and had edges that were not as sharp as the reproductions placed on the flatbed.

One anomaly to copy quality, however, was that when copying from the control panel, the magnification function offered no option to prioritize an edge or select the copy area. As a result, the top portion of my document got cut off in the copies, instead of excluding the empty white space from the copy. To properly copy this particular document, I used the Canon IJ Scan utility on my PC, which offers this feature.

Similarly, to conduct our scan tests required doing so from a PC, where we could set the resolution in the scanning software. The on-screen menus of the TR8620 do not offer scan resolution settings.

Scan quality was high. Details looked sharp and colors were captured accurately from the originals. In particular, the scans of a photograph with dark shadow areas retained a lot of detail—more detail than the Editor's Choice Canon TS9120 did.

Canon Pixma TR8620 review: Ink cost and yield

The TR8620 uses five ink cartridges. The three color (cyan, magenta and yellow) inks and one of the black inks are dye-based. In addition, the pigment-based black ink is used for printing documents on plain paper, while the dye black is mostly used on glossy photo prints.

Using a standard cartridge, cost per text page is 8 cents. This calculation includes only the pigment black ink. The XL black cartridge reduces text printing to 6.2 cents per page, and the XXL cartridge reduces it further, to 5.8 cents.

The total ink cost for mixed color graphics pages is 21.9 cents, using standard cartridges. For this total cost of a text/mixed color graphics page, we included the cost of the dye-based black ink. It's barely used on plain paper prints, only adding 0.7 cents per page, at most. Using XL cartridges, cost per color page goes down to 18.9 cents, and down to 16.4 cents when using XXL cartridges.

In general, costs per page were slightly higher than the average for printers in its class (excluding models with refillable ink tanks). By comparison, the category average with standard ink cartridges was 7.7 cents per text page, and 20.7 per color graphics page. Using high-yield cartridges, the category averages were 5.9 cents and 14.9 cents, respectively. 

Take a look at our Canon promo codes for the latest discounts and ways to lower the cost. 

Canon Pixma TR8620 review: Setup and software

Setting up the TR8620 was simple: Remove a few pieces of tape, press the power button, and  install ink cartridges and paper. Following the on-screen instructions guide, you print a printhead alignment page, and scan it. The printed quick start guide directs you to the Canon website to download and install the software.

Putting the TR8620 on my wireless network was quick and convenient. After going to the Wi-Fi setup in the LAN settings on the TR8620's LCD screen, I selected WPS (push-button method) and pressed the corresponding button on my wireless router.

Connecting my iPhone to the printer was similarly easy. The TR8620's LCD menu for Wi-Fi Direct includes a QR code. I simply captured it with my iPhone, which triggered a prompt to join the Wi-Fi Direct network with the printer.

Startup is quick, at just 3.7 seconds. Making a black-and-white copy immediately only took 10 seconds longer than normal, delivering a copy before many models even offer you a home screen to begin operation.

Canon Pixma TR8620 review: Verdict

With a document feeder and duplexer, the Canon Pixma TR8620 delivers office features for a reasonable price. It makes copies quickly and prints on plain paper at better-than-average speed. You also get fax capability.

In addition, the TR8620 does not disappoint on image quality. Prints and copies on plain paper look good, as are glossy photo prints. Scans were captured with fine detail. 

However, for office duties the TR8620 may not be your best choice at high volume: Ink costs are above the average for comparable models. For example, the comparably priced Brother INKvestment MFC-J995DW (our top-ranked all-in-one printer) offers much lower costs per page, and faster document printing, but the Canon Pixma TR8620 is much faster for glossy photo prints. If you're buying a printer primarily to print snapshots, the Canon Pixma TR8620 is the better choice.

Nonetheless, if your printing duties are light enough, and you rarely need double-sided copies, the sub $200 and versatile Canon Pixma TR8620 will likely keep you happy with its high image quality and fast performance.

The Canon Pixma TR150 is a compact, portable inkjet printer offering basic features and solid performance. The TR150 is a single function printer; it does not copy or scan. What it does offer, however, is a compact size that can be carried in a standard backpack.

The printer alone uses a standard wall outlet. For off-the-grid printing, you can purchase the bundle with printer and mobile battery for under $250. The battery should last up to 330 sheets on a full charge.

Canon Pixma TR150 review: Design

The TR150 is small, measuring 12.7 x 7.3 x 2.6 inches, when closed for travel. The lid lifts up to serve as a 50-sheet input paper tray, dropping a front flap to reveal the output slot. The vertical paper tray increases the depth to 12.1 inches, and the height to 9.7 inches.

At 4.5 pounds, the printer is rather lightweight for a portable model. Attaching the optional battery to the back of the unit increases the weight to 5.1 pounds. By comparison, the HP OfficeJet 250 weighs 6.7 pounds, with battery.

Opening the lid reveals the control panel on the top of the body. There is a four-way control, a small 1.4-inch monochrome OLED display, and a wireless connectivity button. 

There are no memory card slots. The USB port is on the right panel, near the back, next to the power port.  It offers Wi-Fi and Wi-Fi Direct support, and comes with a USB-C cable. In addition to AirPrint, Google Cloud Print, and Mopria support, the TR150 also offers support for voice commands via Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant, and supports the pairing of devices using IFTTT (If This Then That).

Canon Pixma TR150 review: Print speed 

The Pixma TR150 performed well in our testing, printing a five-page text document in 40.5 seconds. or 7.4 pages per minute (ppm). The average for portable printers is 6.9 ppm. By contrast, our top-ranked portable printer, the HP OfficeJet 250, was faster, printing text at 9 ppm.

The TR150 was quick to print text from an iPhone 7, turning in the fastest times we've recorded on this test. The TR150 printed a single page in just 10.3 seconds, and a five-page document in 38.7 seconds, or 7.8 ppm. Other portable models averaged 14.6 seconds on a single page, and 1 minute and 3 seconds (or, 4.8 ppm) on the five-page document. By comparison, the HP Tango X printed a page of text in 11.3 seconds. Several other models were significantly slower to print the five-page text document, such as the Epson WorkForce EC-C110, at a much slower 54.3 seconds, or 5.5 ppm.

The TR150 was slightly faster than the average on mixed text and color graphics. It printed our six-page PDF in 2 minutes and 22 seconds, or 2.5 ppm. That's just a hair faster than the category average (2.4 ppm), but lagged behind the  HP OfficeJet 250, which printed the same document in just under 2 minutes, at 3.1 ppm.

Photo printing speed also was faster than the category average. From a Windows PC, the TR150 made a 4-by-6-inch glossy photo print at default settings in 1 minute and 4.8 seconds, versus the average of 1 minute and 11 seconds. Printing at high resolution, the TR150 made the same glossy print in 1 minute and 45 seconds, which was significantly faster than the category average of 2 minutes and 6 seconds. The HP OfficeJet 250, however, was twice as fast at default and high-resolution settings, making 4-by-6-inch glossy prints in 37.6 and 49.5 seconds, respectively.

Printing from an iPhone 7, the TR150 printed at comparable speed to printing from a PC, making a 4-by-6-inch glossy at default settings in 1 minute and 5 seconds. The Canon iOS app did not offer a high-resolution setting.

Canon Pixma TR150 review: Print quality

Text printed a little on the light side, rather than in a rich black. Edges of letterforms looked a little rough, and not razor sharp. Color graphics printed on plain paper looked a little washed-out, and banding was visible. The graphics also lacked the sharper details, stronger contrast and richer color saturation of better-looking prints, such as from the HP OfficeJet 250. Pixels were more visible in the TR150's graphics prints.

Glossy photo prints, however, were top-notch. Details looked very sharp and color saturation was very pleasing. In particular, the colors in our landscape photo looked very natural. By comparison, the same print made by the HP OfficeJet 250 looked a little unnatural due to hyped-up yellow shades.

Canon Pixma TR150 review: Ink cost and yield

The printer takes two ink cartridges: A dye-based ink cartridge with three colors (cyan, magenta, yellow), plus black. The second cartridge holds a pigment-based black ink.

The Pixma TR150 offers low ink costs for a portable printer. At 7.5 cents per text page, it is well below the 8.9 cents category average. By contrast, the HP OfficeJet 250 offers an estimated cost of 9 cents per text page. 

The same is true for color pages: At 14.8 cents, the TR150 offers the lowest color page cost of the portable printers we've tested. Buying an ink cartridge bundle should lower that cost to roughly 12.7 cents. By comparison, the HP OfficeJet 250 has the highest estimated color page ink cost we've seen, at 23 cents, and only lowers that cost per page to 17.3 cents when using high-yield cartridges (which are not available for the TR150).

Canon Pixma TR150 review: Setup and software

Setting up the TR150 was simple. You only need to remove a couple pieces of packaging tape. You lift the lid to reveal the cartridge bay, and first install the print head, which you insert in a similar way to the two ink cartridges, which follow. You download the software online, or insert the installation disc in your PC. I used my iPhone to capture the included QR code in order to launch the online setup instructions. After the printer performs a print head alignment, and you print a test page, you're ready to go. 

To ease the wireless setup, the TR150 has a dedicated wireless connect button on its control panel. Following menu instructions on the 1.4-inch OLED screen, I used the WPS connect method; pressing the WPS button on my wireless router put the TR150 on my network.

Alternatively, you can use Wi-Fi Direct and setup the TR150 as the wireless network connection on your mobile device. I had trouble with my first attempts to do this with my iPhone 7; one possible culprit is that my home wireless network was set to “auto join” and thus interfering with the printer connection. After turning off “auto join”, I connected successfully and printed to the TR150 over Wi-Fi Direct.

The TR150 starts up quickly, displaying its home screen menu in just 4.2 seconds.

Canon Pixma TR150 review: Verdict

The Canon Pixma TR150 performed solidly across our tests. Text printing, in particular, was fast—both from a PC and an iPhone. Color graphics and photo print speeds were faster than the average, and a quick startup time under 5 seconds will get you working quickly. Low ink costs make this portable Pixma very attractive to the pocketbook, and the high quality of the photo prints is tough to match. Text and color graphics quality on plain paper, however, left a little bit to be desired. 

By comparison, the top-ranked HP OfficeJet 250 is faster, makes copies and scans, and offers superior plain-paper print quality—but it's also larger and much more expensive.

Browse through our Canon promo codes to find the latest discounts from the retailer. 

Canon’s latest mirrorless camera, the compact EOS M6 Mark II, is built around a 32MP APS-C size sensor—the highest resolution camera in its class. At the same time, the M6 II shares a number of features with its DSLR-sibling, the Canon EOS 90D, including the sensor, image processor, 4K video and Dual Pixel CMOS AF. 

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II will appeal to enthusiasts as well as snapshot-loving beginners. The former will feel right at home with a solid feature set and customization options. The latter will appreciate the easy to understand menu and helpful modes designed to take the confusion out of basic photographic operations. And, its compact size is a bonus for anyone who wants to travel light. All these attributes make the EOS M6 Mark II one of the best mirrorless cameras and one of the best cameras for vlogging, but we wish it had a viewfinder built in.

• DSLR vs. mirrorless cameras: Which is best for you?
• Best cameras

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Price and availability

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II costs $850 (body only; no viewfinder); $1099 (with the Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM and EVF-DC2 viewfinder); $1349.00 (with the EF-M 18-150mm f3. 5-6.3 IS STM lens and EVF-DC2). Browse through our Canon promo codes for the latest discounts and ways to save on your purchase.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Design

Available in black or silver, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II measures a compact 4.71 x 2.76 x 1.94 inches (without the removable electronic viewfinder). With the battery pack and SD memory card, the camera weighs about 14.39 ounces. At the same time, the M6 Mark II is solidly built.

Even with the Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM kit lens, the combination remains fairly compact, especially when the lens is retracted. A small switch on the lens barrel locks/unlocks the zoom function. If you forget to unlock it, a reminder shows up on the LCD and you can’t take a picture until you move the switch and zoom the lens. This design is not uncommon and while it’s an extra step, it’s worth it to keep the lens as low profile as possible.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Ergonomics

How a camera feels in-hand is important, but is even  more significant with smaller cameras like the Canon M6 II. With the exception of the removable/optional electronic viewfinder, the M6 II is well built. 

A deep grip provides a solid handhold with a comfortable fit. The slightly angled shutter button, which is surrounded by main dial, is perfectly positioned for your forefinger, making it convenient to quickly grab a shot. Dual dials, the main (front) and quick control (rear), are within easy reach. They’re used for conveniently and efficiently adjusting shutter and aperture, as well as scrolling through menus and changing other settings. 

While all buttons and dials are located on the right hand side of the camera, they are logically arranged and easy to access. Although photographers with large hands should try the camera on for size before purchasing, external controls are a usable size for most everyone.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Touchscreen

The Canon EOS M6 II’s 3-inch touchscreen is highly responsive. The touch function can be disabled or set to one of two levels of sensitivity. I found that the default “standard” sensitivity worked perfectly.

In addition to touch autofocus and shutter release, the touchscreen can also be used to navigate menus and change settings. In Playback mode, you can swipe to review images and pinch to zoom. Of course, you can use hard controls for menus, settings and playback functions but the touchscreen is a convenient alternative.

But what I really like about the M6 II’s touch operation is the ability to choose the focus point while using the optional electronic viewfinder (EVF). This allows you to steady the camera with the EVF at your eye and tap and drag the focus point. Better yet, you can designate which part of the touchscreen is active. For example, you may find it easier if the upper left is touch sensitive and use that area for moving the focus point. I generally chose the whole panel and found that even when my nose was pressed against the LCD, there was no accidental movement of the point. These choices are only available in the menu system when the EVF is attached. Otherwise you have the basic touch/touch shutter options.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Performance

Even with its 32 MP sensor, this little camera is fast, shooting up to 14fps with auto exposure and autofocus. Tracking works pretty well although continuous AF can’t always keep up with a shooting speed of 14fps, so some images may not be in focus. Drop the continuous shooting speed to 7fps, and you’ll have a higher percentage of in-focus shots. At both speeds, the buffer clears fairly quickly and you can continue shooting while images are written to the SD card.

New for the M6 Mark II is the RAW burst mode, which pushes the camera to 30fps. You’ll end up with cropped 18MP images but when you feel the need for speed, give it a try. And, the camera starts shooting 0.5 seconds before you fully depress the shutter, so if the action happens a little early, you’ll still get the shot.

With dual pixel AF, like that found during our Canon EOS 90D review, auto focus performance is quite good as well. Even in lower light, the focus tends to lock in quickly, especially for single point AF. Face detection and eye AF are generally fast and accurate.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Image quality

Overall, image quality is quite good. Straight out of the camera JPEGs are usable with little to no processing, though you can also capture images in the RAW format.

Most test shots were captured using the Standard Picture Style, although a number of other options are also available including Auto, Portrait, Landscape, Faithful, Detail and Monochrome. Parameters, such as sharpness, are adjustable for most styles. And, you can even create three user-defined styles.

Although mid-winter outdoor shooting is more monochrome than colorful, a blue-sky-with-clouds and a yellow road edging show that the Canon M6 II re-creates colors that are pleasing and accurate.

Skin tones under LED lights were nicely rendered as well, even with auto white balance. You may have to make adjustments either to your WB setting or process the RAW image depending on your lighting gear.

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II exhibited good dynamic range. Details in shadow, such as those on the wooden boardwalk, and highlight areas were well maintained despite the high contrast areas. 

I’m not sure the 15-45mm kit lens was capable of pulling out the most of the M6 Mark II’s 32MP resolution, but the little lens managed to record some fine details in many of my test shots. 

For example, although this bridal dress on a mannequin was a little underexposed, you can see the weave of the material covering the mannequin as well as the dress. 

The details of this wooden barn were sharp and crisp. The camera also did a good job of capturing the texture of the wooden slats. 

Low light/high ISO shots were cleaner than expected given the sensor’s high resolution. The image below was shot at ISO 6400 and the exposure was adjusted in Adobe Camera Raw. Blown up to 100% (about 23 x 15 inches), you can see substantial noise but the bubbles in the beverage are still visible. For online use or smaller prints, high ISO images look good.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Features

The M6 Mark II has a long list of features ranging from the standard auto and manual exposures to customization options, peaking, white balance fine-tuning and more. At the same time, the camera is easy to use thanks to built-in help that explains each shooting mode.

Canon menu systems are excellent. They are logically arranged and easy to navigate so even beginners are able to explore the camera’s various settings and shooting options. With built-in RAW processing, users who don’t have the time, inclination or skills to “develop” Raw files in separate software can quickly edit these files with ease. 

And photographers who want to effortlessly explore their creative side will make good use of the M6 Mark II’s filter effects mode. In addition to funky effects that simulate fisheye and watercolor paintings, you’ll find several HDR (high dynamic range) options including HDR Embossed like the one below. There’s also Grainy B&W (below), Soft Focus, Toy Camera and Miniature effects. These are quick, easy and fun to use.

Connecting to a smartphone via the Canon Camera Connection app (Android and iOS) is seamless. This allows you to transfer images and video and operate the camera remotely. And be sure to check out our picks for the best photo editing software, as well as the best photo editing apps.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Video performance

The camera’s video features are pretty standard but more than sufficient for most casual recording. In addition to uncropped 4K (3840 x 2160 at 30p), the M6 Mark II offers full HD (1920 x 1080 at 60p and 30p), HD (1280 X 720 AT 60p) along with HDR movies and 4K and Full HD time-lapse movies. There’s also a 120 slow motion option and a microphone jack.

Image quality is good with accurate colors. Footage can be a little soft but you’re only likely to notice it on close examination. Keep in mind, though, that you’ll lose some quality if/when you opt for the digital image stabilization.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Optional electronic viewfinder

When designing with size and price in mind, there are always compromises. We assume that’s why Canon decided to continue to use an optional electronic viewfinder (the EVF-DC2), as it did with the M6, instead of a built-in electronic viewfinder like on the M5. 

Although we understand the logic behind this decision, there are some issues to be aware of. First, if you use the EVF—which attaches to the hotshoe—you can’t use an external flash or mount a microphone on top of the camera. The latter may not be an issue unless you want to flip up the LCD for vlogging.

Of course, adding the EVF adds more bulk to the kit, partially negating its appeal as a compact camera. If you’re traveling, you could always remove the EVF and stow it in your pocket or camera bag but, still, it takes up a bit more space and then there’s the inconvenience of having to attach and detach it.

The EVF is bundled with the M6 Mark III EF-M 15-45mm IS STM kit ($1,099) and the EF-M 18-150mm IS STM kit ($1,349) but you’ll have to budget an extra $200 for the EVF-DC2 if you buy the $850 body only version. 

The older EVF-DC1 ($300), although not currently in stock at the Canon store, adds the ability to tilt the viewfinder.

All that said, if you purchase one of the two kits, you’ll have the option to use/not use the EVF. With the EVF, you’ll be able to better steady the camera against your eye; without it, the camera maintains its compact size. It’s a personal preference and while testing I switched back and forth and ended up preferring shooting without the EVF. 

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Lens selection

Although I only tested the camera with the 15-45mm kit lens, with good results, it’s almost guaranteed that a higher end lens will deliver more detail and better image quality given the camera’s 32MP sensor. 

While Canon offers eight M-mount lenses, all but two are slow with a maximum aperture of f/3.5 or f/4. (Fortunately, many are image stabilized.) We hope that faster lenses are forthcoming in the future, with higher resolving power. Sigma offers a trio of fast, M-mount prime lenses (30mm f/1.4, 16mm f/1.4 and 56mm f/1.4), all for less than $500. Still, by comparison, Sony has 50 lenses compatible with its a6000-series mirrorless cameras, although some of them are priced well over $1,000.

An M-mount adapter is available for $200, which allows you to use Canon’s EF and EF-S lenses.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Verdict

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II is an appealing camera thanks to its image quality and high-speed performance. However, it has some stiff competition in this mid-range category of mirrorless cameras.

Naturally, the Canon M6 II tops the list when it comes to sensor resolution but, personally, I prefer the ergonomics and the color rendering of the Nikon Z50. Other options that are highly competitive across the board include the Fuji X-T30 and the Sony a6400. All three offer a built-in electronic viewfinder. The Fuji X-T30 beats the Canon M6 II’s shooting speed (20 vs. 14fps) and the Sony a6400’s tracking and autofocus system is a bit faster and more accurate than that of the Canon M6 II

While each may have slightly different benefits (and drawbacks), it’s a fairly level playing field. Think about what’s most important for your shooting needs and make a decision from there. At the same time, there’s an awful lot to like about the Canon EOS M6 Mark II. Other than the optional EVF issue, most people will be more than happy with this little camera.

The Canon Pixma TS3320 is a basic, no-frills, inkjet all-in-one printer. Priced at just $39, this entry-level model offers printing, scanning and copying. The TS3320 keeps operation simple, using just two ink cartridges (black and tri-color) instead of individual cartridges. You won't find any of the fancy extras you'll see on the best printers. For example, there isn't a second input tray for photo paper, an automatic document feeder (ADF) for multipage copying, nor a duplexer for making two-sided prints. 

You can connect to the TS3320 wirelessly, or via the USB port. The printer is compatible with mobile devices by using the company's Android/iOS app, although I was unable to get an iPhone 7 to work (more on that later).

Design

The Pixma TS3320's control panel is at the top of the device's body, to the left of the scanning bed. There are a few physical buttons: Two of them initiate a wireless connection to either a network or smartphone, respectively. Two additional buttons bring up – on the small liquid-crystal-display (LCD) screen – either the settings menu or status information. The small, 1.5-inch monochrome screen does not have a light, and can be difficult to read in a dimly lit space. Other than the simple Copy function, you'll most likely want to operate the TS3320 from a PC, and not standalone. 

Paper is loaded into the 60-sheet paper tray at the back of the unit. The tray also can hold up to 20 sheets of 4-by-6-inch photo paper or 10 sheets of 5-by-7-inch photo paper. You will have to use glossy photo paper; the printer does not support matte paper, though it does work with the more exotic magnetic and restickable varieties.

The output tray pulls out from the front of the printer, beneath a large recess in the body. To swap ink cartridges, you reach inside this cavity and fold down a cover to reveal the ink cartridge bay.

The TS3320 is neither compact nor extremely large for an inkjet all-in-one. With the paper trays retracted, it measures 17.2 inches wide by 12.5 inches deep; it's 5.8 inches tall. With the trays extended, the TS3320 becomes 21.8 inches deep and 8.4 inches tall. Lacking a duplexer and ADF, this unit is quite lightweight, at eight-and-a-half pounds.

This model comes in black, white or red.

Print speed

The TS3320 printed our five-page text document in 43.7 seconds (or 6.9 pages per minute [ppm]). This was significantly slower than the category average of 33.5 seconds, or 9 ppm. The device was extremely slow at printing in color, turning in one of the slowest times to date on our six-page PDF of mixed text and color graphics: The TS3320 took 4 minutes (1.5 ppm) to print the document. Comparable models printed the same PDF at nearly double that speed, taking just 2 minutes and 7 seconds on average, or 2.8 ppm.

The TS3320 was unable to complete our photo printing speed test, for which we make a full-page print onto letter-size photo paper (more on that later). So, I made 4-by-6-inch photo prints instead, for comparison.

• The best Canon printers available now

The TS3320 made 4-by-6-inch glossy prints in 2 minutes and 1 second. By comparison, most models we've tested were faster, though some were slower. Among speedier models were the Canon Pixma MG3620, which printed a 4-by-6 in just 43 seconds, and the HP Tango X, at 1 minute and 15 seconds. However, we've seen slower printing, such as the now-discontinued Epson XP-420, which took nearly 3 minutes to complete the same task.

Copy and scan speed

Color copying was slow. The TS3320 is the second-slowest inkjet model at color copying we've tested in this category. At 47 seconds, it was far behind the average of 27.8 seconds. Only the HP Tango X was slower, at 1 minute and 11 seconds. The Editor's Choice Canon Pixma TS9120 made a color copy in just 17.3 seconds in our tests—almost three times faster than the TS3320.

Black-and-white copying was more within range, but still somewhat slow at 19.2 seconds, compared to the category average of 15.8 seconds.

The TS3320 made a 600 dots-per-inch (dpi) color scan to JPEG format at roughly average speed. At 1 minute and 1.7 seconds, it came in under the average of 1 minute and 7.7 seconds. By comparison, the Editor's Choice Canon TS9120 made the same scan in just 37.8 seconds.

The printer scanned quickly in black-and-white to PDF format at 300 dpi. It captured a scan in just 7.5 seconds, compared to the average of 11 seconds; the TS9120 was similarly fast, at 7.7 seconds.

Print quality

Text prints were not extremely sharp, but adequate. On close examination, letterforms in text documents had soft edges, with errant ink spray around them. Letterforms in our PDF test document looked sharper, by comparison.

Graphics printed onto plain paper looked attractive, with sharp details and smooth mid-tone transitions. Banding, however, was clearly visible across all of our graphics prints.

Because the TS3320 would not print onto letter-size glossy paper, we were left to judge photo quality on 5-by-7 inch and 4-by-6-inch glossy prints. These prints looked very attractive, with sharp details and natural-looking color saturation. Although the device does not support matte paper, I was pleased with the look of the print I made on to matte paper using the plain paper setting.

Copy quality was similar to print quality: Text looked a little rough around the edges, and graphics looked very attractive — but mild banding was distracting on some prints. The banding was more pronounced on photographs or artwork with depth, versus illustrations with a flat appearance. The same was true in color and black and white.  

Scans of photos in JPEG format and documents in PDF format looked very true to the originals – sharp overall. Color photos were reproduced with accurate exposure and well-saturated colors, although some fine details in shadow areas got lost. Black-and-white scans of graphics also lost some details from the original, in dark areas.

Ink cost and yield

The TS3320 uses two ink cartridges: a pigment black and a tri-color cartridge of dye-based inks. Three tiers of ink cartridges are available, but the least expensive of them comes with a very high cost per page. Using the PG-243 black and CL-244 color cartridges, costs per page are 16 cents for text and 37 cents for graphics. Ouch.

Bumping up to the PG-245 black cartridge brings the text page cost to 10 cents — but that's still way north of the average of 7.2 cents for a standard cartridge. Using the CL-246 color cartridge, costs per color page are 22.8 cents, versus the average of 19.8 cents using standard cartridges.

Using XL high-yield cartridges, the TS3320 has costs per page of 8.7 cents for text and 18.7 cents for color. The averages for competing models using high-yield cartridges is 5.6 cents (text) and 14.4 cents (color). If you do a lot of printing, those ink costs will add up.

• Inkjet vs. laser: which printer is right for you?

Using the basic cartridges, printing a 4-by-6-inch photo costs a whopping 67.5 cents (if you buy them individually). Using the CL-246 color and PG-245 cartridges, a 4-by-6 requires 43 cents' worth of ink. The XL cartridges print a 4-by-6 for 34.3 cents.

Combo packs could lower those costs per page a little — in theory. The PG-243 (black) and CL-244 cost a total of $36.98 individually, and a two-pack costs $26.99. However, the high costs per page of these 100-page-yield cartridges already makes them difficult to recommend.

Disappointingly, a two-pack of the higher-capacity cartridges will not lower printing costs. The PG-245 black (180 pages) cartridge and the CL-246 XL color cartridge (300 pages) cost $54.99 when bought with 50 sheets of 4-by-6-inch photo paper. But buying them individually costs only $47.98. The Canon online store does not make clear if the pack includes standard photo paper or Photo Paper Plus Glossy II. But either way, it's not a deal. A 100-pack of 4-by-6-inch Photo Paper Plus Glossy II costs $10.99. The same pack of regular photo paper costs $5.99. The math doesn't add up.

Setup and software

The first step in setting up the TS3320 is simple. You remove a handful of tape and packaging material, and install the ink cartridges. Setting up a USB connection with a Windows 10 laptop, I was directed to download the software online at ij.start.canon. 

On my first attempt to print, however, I got an error message, because one cartridge was not fully seated. The ink cartridge bay is quite deep inside the body, behind a fold-down door. Reaching inside and installing the cartridges is a little cumbersome:You must press the cartridge in (forward) and angle it up slightly. 

As mentioned in the print speed section, the TS3320 could not make a full-page photo print onto letter-size glossy paper (nor smaller sizes, such as 4-by-6 and 5-by-7). Trying to print onto letter-size photo paper caused a conflict with another print setting — but it did not specify which one — and caused the print driver to switch the paper size setting to 4-by-6. Changing other settings such as Shrink to Fit, Borderless and Glossy Paper type did not resolve the issue. 

The company sent us a second test model, but the same test was still unsuccessful. I tried making a 4-by-6-inch photo print onto letter-size glossy paper, but received an error message saying that the media type and paper size were not set correctly. 

It is worth noting, for photo-printing enthusiasts, that the TS3320 does not support printing onto matte paper.

To set up the device with an iPhone 7, I scanned the QR code in the printed manual, which took me to the iOS app download (there is also a QR code on a sticker on the printer body). Scanning that took me to a page in Safari and initiated the setup process. However, the Canon app said that the printer could not be found. Holding down the mobile-connect button on the printer was also unsuccessful. 

Oddly, the TS3320 did show up in my WiFi network list of printers in iOS. But the connection failed each time I entered my network password. The printer's LCD said “E36”, which I had to look up online; the definition simply said  that the wireless connection failed. A second test unit also failed to show up in the Canon app. And, although the printer showed up in iOS, I was still unable to print to it from the iPhone 7.

The TS3320 supports Mopria on Android devices, although we did not test this. The specifications say that the device also supports Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant–and IFTTT (If This Then That) integration. 

The device started up slowly, taking roughly 12.8 seconds before printhead-priming sounds wound down and the power light stopped blinking. Making a black-and-white copy right out of the gate took a little longer than usual, which isn't surprising. Instead of making the copy in the usual 19.2 seconds, the first copy took roughly 25.5 seconds to make.

Bottom line

The TS3320 keeps it simple, foregoing many features aimed at photo-printing enthusiasts and busy home offices. The low up-front price is enticing, considering that you get high-quality photo prints and scans. But, text and plain-paper graphics printing was middle-of-the-road. 

Mediocre performance makes the TS3320 far from versatile. The device scans quickly in black-and-white, but is otherwise slow across the board, and suited for only occasional duty. The problems we encountered with two test units suggest that this all-in-one might be too error-prone for comfort. Neither test unit would print a photo onto letter-size glossy paper. And, neither test unit would work with an iPhone 7, even when the phone was able to detect it. Standalone operation is a little irksome, relying on a tiny, 1.5-inch segment LCD with no light to help you read it.

Ink costs are handily above the average with the standard and XL cartridges. But, if you make the mistake of buying the lowest-capacity ink cartridges, costs per page are really high. You'd think a combo pack of cartridges and photo paper would save you money, but it won't. 

All of these shortcomings make the TS3320 difficult to recommend. However, if the $39 price tag still entices you, it could work out in favor of your pocketbook. Compared to the $150 Editor’s Choice Canon Pixma TS9120, the TS3320 averages 2.1 cents more in ink costs per page. If you don’t print much, this may work out in your favor: To eat up the $111 difference in price, you’d have to print almost 5,300 pages.

It's been three years since Canon released the 24-megapixel EOS 80D DSLR, which was notable for its ease of use and a revamped Dual Pixel AF system. 

Its successor, the EOS 90D, includes a new, 32-megapixel APS-C sensor, 10fps continuous shooting, great ISO range (from 100-25600; expandable to 51200), 4K video and, thankfully, the return of an AF joystick. These features make the 90D one of the best DSLR cameras for advanced amateurs, especially those who want to shoot video.

Canon EOS 90D price and availability

The Canon EOS 90D is being offered for $1,199 (body only); $1,349 with an EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM lens; and $1,599 with an EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens.

Who is this camera for?

Advanced amateurs who are looking for a new DSLR and enthusiasts who want to step up to a more sophisticated camera — especially if they already have Canon lenses — will find a number of this camera's features appealing. And, current users of the 80D and earlier EOS D-series models may, rightfully so, be tempted by the 90D's higher resolution sensor, speedier continuous shooting and 4K video.

What I liked

Solid build and good ergonomics

Similar to its predecessor, the EOS 90D is solidly built and, at 24.73 ounces and 5.5 x 4.1 x 3 inches, is almost the same weight and size as the 80D. The 90D's body is weatherproof, although I wouldn't take it out in the pouring rain.

A slightly larger grip and a logical control layout provide good ergonomics and usability. Photographers with larger hands have plenty of wiggle room between the grip and the lens barrel. The camera's real estate is covered with buttons and dials that are within easy reach for all but those with petite hands. If you're a Canon DSLR user, you'll have an easy transition to this camera.

Fully articulated touch-screen LCD

A fully articulated LCD is one of the best camera inventions ever, in my opinion. The screen can be angled for low-level and over-the-head shots, to avoid wash out from bright sunshine. It can also be pushed to the side for easier viewing, flipped forward for self-portraits and folded into the back of the camera to prevent damage to the monitor.

With the 90D, you get all of this as well as a very responsive touch screen. You can touch to focus, trigger the shutter and quickly navigated on-screen menus.

Good image quality

Overall image quality from the EOS 90D was quite good. You'll get the best photos when shooting (and processing) RAW images, but straight-out-of-the-camera JPEGs were quite nice, with accurate and pleasing colors. For the most part, the 90D delivers good dynamic range by retaining details across a range of shadows and highlights. And with the higher resolution sensor, you have more flexibility to crop photos while retaining enough pixels for an enlargement.

A bright blue sky in the background of this goat portrait adds a nice bit of color to the subject's less colorful white, brown and black coat.

Check out the image below, shot in bright sunlight with a shadow to the right. Look closely and you can see that the 90D got the highlights and shadow exposure right but maintained details throughout. 

Practical and creative features

The 90D offers a solid feature set with practical functions that range from the expected (such as full manual and semi-manual exposure controls) to nice-to-have options such as in-camera RAW conversion. Although we recommend processing RAW files on the computer with imaging software, it's sometimes convenient to be able to make some quick adjustments to a RAW file and convert it to a JPEG while you're in the field.

On the creative side, the 90D comes with a set of creative filters that are applied after the shot. They include Grainy B&W, Toy Camera Effect, Soft Focus, Fish-eye Effect and more. And you can save the adjusted image as a new file so you don't overwrite the original.

• DSLR vs. Mirrorless Cameras: Which is better for you?

Fast and accurate eye- and face-detection tracking

With its iTR (Intelligent Tracking and Recognition) technology, the 90D quickly and easily tracks eyes and faces, whether you're shooting through the optical viewfinder or Live View. The face detection worked even when shooting a subject from the side, and it was easy  to keep up with the fast movement of a friend playing with my dog.

The 90D's 45-point phase-detect AF system, used when shooting through the optical viewfinder, is similar to that of the 80D and is relatively good. But the 90D's Dual Pixel AF system, available in Live View, is faster and more accurate.

Extended battery life

One of the great things about DSLRs versus mirrorless is battery life. The 90D's battery will last between 1,300 and 1,500 shots. Unless you're extremely prolific and/or are shooting a wedding or other event, you'll get at least a few straight days of shooting on a single charge (using Live View and shooting lots of 4K video will generally run down the battery sooner).

Easy Wi-Fi/Bluetooth connectivity

Canon's mobile app, Camera Connect, available for iOS and Android, is one of the easiest apps to set up with a camera. The directions are clear and there's an option to pair the camera and mobile device with a QR code. I opted to go through a manual pairing using a password, and it was a breeze — until I got a message that the 90D was not supported. (An update to the iOS on my iPad Pro fixed that.)

In addition to transferring files from camera to mobile device, Camera Connect also allows you to shoot remotely — great for photographing skittish wildlife or ensuring that you can get in a group photo.

4K video

The 90D offers a range of video options, including the new 4K video, which shoots footage uncropped. Image quality is decent but not award-winning. Still, it's certainly good enough for most users' needs. In addition to the fully articulated LCD, which comes in handy when shooting video, the 90D offers microphone and headphone jacks, as well as HDMI for output to external devices.

• YouTube Gets 4K Streaming: Here's How to Watch it

Recording for 4K is limited to 30fps; 1920 x 1080 can be captured at 60fps or 30fps; and 1080; 1280 x 720 at 30fps (unfortunately, there's no 24p for any resolution). There's a slow-motion option as well. And the responsive touch-screen LCD makes pulling focus a breeze. Just tap different AF points on the screen and the camera's AF moves where you want it.

What I didn’t like

No in-body stabilization

While in-body stabilization may be reserved for the best mirrorless cameras like those from Sony and Olympus, perhaps one day we'll see it in DSLRs like the 90D. But, for now, you have to rely on image-stabilized lenses for the 90D. And while the IS in the 18-135mm kit lens in the camera we tested was effective at eliminating blur from camera shake when hand-holding the camera, the lens' slow aperture (f/3.5-4.5) and less-than-stellar resolving power was disappointing.

Slow recharge for flash in low light

It's great to have a built-in flash on the 90D but when you need it the most — in very low light — it takes a little longer than we'd like to recycle. Although it's maybe a couple of seconds, when you're trying to capture several consecutive shots, you may miss a bit of the action. However, when used as fill flash outside, when it doesn't need as much power to fill in shadows, you can take 2 to 3 shots in quick succession, as I did in this image.

Image noise at high ISO

The 90D's broader ISO range (100-25600 and expandable to 51200 versus the 80D's 100-16000) is a welcome update but I was a little disappointed in how the 90D handled image noise. For the best results, keep the ISO as low as possible, of course. If you need to push the ISO, try not to exceed ISO 6400 and take care of the noise in post-processing software. The camera's noise reduction technology overdoes it and will result in softer than acceptable images.

Single card slot

A pet peeve of mine and other photographers is the single card slot. While you may never have experienced a card failure (and I hope you never do), a second card slot lets you have an immediate source of image backup. But, with 4K video and the large files from 90D's 32 MP sensor, you will fill up a single card more quickly and may well need a second card to capture the overflow.

Bottom line

These days, the question may be more about whether you want a DSLR or a mirrorless camera than which DSLR to buy. That's a valid concern but if you like the solid heft of a DSLR to balance long lenses, a never-blacks-out optical viewfinder (and the 90D has a good one), good battery life and a high level of responsiveness, then a DSLR may best meet your needs.

Although choices aren't quite as numerous as in days past, the 90D plays an important role in the midrange DSLR arena. It's more sophisticated than entry-level DSLRs like Canon's Rebel line, yet more affordable than, say, Canon's 5D series cameras or the Nikon D850. As such, the 90D is a good fit for photographers who want a sophisticated, high-performance camera that won't break the bank.

Take a look at our Canon promo codes for the latest offers from the retailer.

• More: Canon EOS M6 Mark II review

The Canon Pixma TS8320 ($129) is a compact, inkjet all-in-one that is best suited for photo-printing enthusiasts. It has an SD card slot on its front panel, can print on specially coated CD/DVD discs and offers two paper trays so you can keep plain as well as photo paper loaded. 

Most important for photographers, the TS8320 is outfitted with six individual ink cartridges, offering the possibility of a wider color gamut in photo prints by employing a photo blue ink cartridge in addition to two black inks and the traditional cyan, magenta and yellow.

The TS8320 comes in black, white and red, and offers some fun features aimed at smart home enthusiasts: support for Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa and IFTTT (If This Then That).

Design

With its paper trays retracted and the touch-screen control panel folded down against the body, the TS8320 is very compact, measuring roughly 14.6 x 12.5 x 5.5 inches. However, the depth increases to 14 inches when you extend the paper cassette beneath the body to hold letter-size paper. The rear input tray significantly increases the depth; it angles backward when lifted for use, making the total depth about 25 inches. The rear paper tray also increases the height to roughly 11.5 inches.

To operate the TS8320, you use the large, 4.3-inch color touch screen, which makes a big first impression and worked well in our testing. There are not any physical buttons on the control panel other than the power button. The big touch screen offers large virtual buttons for the three main functions (copy, scan and print) and smaller icons along the bottom for making changes to settings. We found the menus well organized and intuitive to navigate. 

The SD card slot is on the front panel, at the bottom left next to the paper cassette. This allows you to print photos directly from a camera's memory card, without having to plug it into a PC. There is no USB Direct print port for printing files from a thumb drive.

There is a paper cassette at the bottom of the body and a vertical paper tray on the back. The paper cassette holds up to 100 sheets of plain paper. The rear paper tray can hold up to 100 sheets of plain paper, 20 sheets of 4 x 6-inch photo paper, or 10 sheets of 5 x 7-inch photo paper. Both trays offer automatic paper detection; after removing the cassette or loading paper into the rear tray, the touch screen asks you to confirm the paper type detected. The output tray sits atop the paper cassette and extends automatically (if it's not already extended) when a print job is started.

Beneath the output tray, there is a storage slot for the CD/DVD disc holder. Before printing onto a coated disc, you push in the output tray, remove the disc holder and insert it into a dedicated disc slot above the output tray. 

The ink cartridges are easy to load. The bay sits behind a door on the front panel. Three capacities are offered: standard, XL high yield and XXL high yield. 

The TS8320 has a duplexer for making two-sided prints. It does not have an automatic document feeder for making multipage copies or scans. The flatbed scanner can accommodate documents up to 8.5 x 11.7 inches (letter/A4); the scanner lid's hinges do not offer any resistance and you will need to lift the lid a full 90 degrees for it to support itself.

You can connect wirelessly to the TS8320 using Bluetooth or Wi-Fi (both 2.4 and 5.0 GHz are supported). If you have Google Assistant or Amazon Alexa, you can use it to send voice commands to the TS8320, although the printer's manual offers no instructions on this feature. On an iPhone 7, telling Siri to "print a document" launched the Canon Print app. The printer also supports the IFTTT web service, which allows you to set up actions based on changed conditions in another web service, such as Gmail, Facebook and the like.

The USB port allows you to connect directly to a PC. The port is on the back panel and is recessed in a narrow cavity, which makes it a little difficult to access. It took me a few tries to connect the USB cable.

Print speed

Text printing was roughly average in speed. The TS8320 printed our five-page test document in 34.4 seconds, or 8.7 pages per minute (ppm), versus the category average of 9 ppm for comparable models. The Editor's Choice Canon Pixma TS9120 printed the same document in just under 27 seconds (11.2 ppm).

Our six-page, mixed-text and graphics PDF printed more quickly that average, arriving in 1 minute and 52 seconds, or 3.5 ppm, versus the average of 2 minutes and 14 seconds, or 2.7 ppm.

Photo printing was impressively fast. Our letter-size, high-resolution glossy print emerged in 2 minutes and 2 seconds — less than half the average time of 4 minutes and 15 seconds. The Canon TS9120 was similarly fast, printing the photo 5 seconds faster than the TS8320. The Epson Expression XP-640 was slower, taking 2 minutes and 33 seconds.

Using its duplexer, the TS8320 printed a two-sided 10-page text document in 3 minutes and 13 seconds, or 3.1 ppm. This was nearly identical to the Canon TS9120 and the average for comparable duplex inkjet models. The Epson XP-640, however, was much faster, at 5.5 ppm.

The TS8320 made a two-sided print of our six-page color PDF in 2 minutes and 37 seconds, or 2.3 ppm. (This was, again, nearly identical to the TS9120's speed on this test.) This was faster than the category average of 1.8 ppm on this test.

Copy and scan speed

The TS8320 made a color copy in 23 seconds, which was faster than the category average of 27.7 seconds. By comparison, the TS9120 made a color copy in 17.3 seconds; but the fastest model to date, the HP OfficeJet Pro 9025, made a color copy in just 12.5 seconds.

The TS8320 made black-and-white copies at roughly average speed, making a copy in 14.6 seconds, compared with the category average of 15.8 seconds. (The fastest model on this test is the HP OfficeJet Pro 9025, at 8.7 seconds.)

• Epson Vs. Canon Vs. HP Printers: Who Makes the Best All-in-One

The TS8320 made high-resolution color scans quickly, creating a 600-dpi JPEG in 44.6 seconds — significantly faster than the average of 1 minute and 8 seconds. 

The TS8320 was slower than the average at making black-and-white scans, however, creating a 300-dpi PDF in 14.4 seconds, versus the average of 11 seconds. The Canon TS9120 made the same scan in 7.7 seconds.

Print quality

Text prints from the TS8320 looked good, but not great. Letterforms looked adequately dark, but up-close edges looked somewhat bumpy. 

Graphics looked more impressive, printing with well-saturated, natural-looking colors and accurate contrast. Details looked sharp and midtone transitions looked smooth. Some very mild banding was evident in flat areas, as were the borders of text boxes in our test PDF. Duplex prints looked just as good as single-sided prints.

Glossy photos had plenty of detail and accurate textures. I liked the prints I got on glossy and matte papers. Colors looked well saturated and very natural. There were differences, however, compared with glossy prints from the Epson XP-640, for example: Our test portrait's light complexion looked "cooler" and was not "warmed up" like the Epson's, with reds and yellows more saturated in the skin tone.

On our landscape photo, however, this same tendency of the Epson model added warmth and brightness to some green shades that, when set next to the Canon print, would look a little unnatural to some eyes. In the Canon print's favor, however, was the appearance of more detail in dark midtones that looked slightly blocked up in the Epson's print. This phenomenon was the opposite, however, in our still life of richly colored food. The Canon's print hyped up the reds and yellows to create a very saturated but arguably slightly unnatural-looking print, while the Epson XP-640's treatment of reds and yellows looked slightly less saturated and arguably more natural.

The TS8320 made attractive, accurate copies of graphics. Copies of magazine pages produced text that didn't look quite as sharp as the original. Overall, copies of graphics looked very close to the original, with attractive colors and plenty of detail, although there was some mild banding in copies of both color graphics and black-and-white graphics.

• Best Photo Printers in 2019

Scan quality was high, capturing natural-looking colors and producing smooth midtone transitions. Shadow areas in scanned color photographs tended to be too dark, however, losing fine details. Black-and-white scans to PDF looked sharp in general, with accurate reproductions of graphics, although they tended to look a little too dark overall, with blocked-up dark shades losing some detail.

Ink cost and yield

The TS8320 uses six ink cartridges: a pigment black (primarily for text), a dye-based black (primarily for graphics) and four dye-based colors (cyan, magenta, yellow and photo blue). Three capacities of ink cartridges are offered: standard and two levels of high yield (XL and XXL).

Overall, according to our calculations, the TS8320's ink costs are higher than the average for comparable inkjet printers we've tested. For the following costs, we calculated using the cost of individual ink cartridges.

Using standard cartridges, the TS8320 offers costs per page of 9.5 cents and 23.6 cents for text and graphics, respectively, versus the averages of 7 cents for text and 19.6 cents for graphics. By comparison, the Epson XP-640 has lower-than-average costs per page of 5.8 cents and 18.8 cents, respectively.

Using high-yield XL cartridges, costs per page are an estimated 7.1 cents for text and 19.5 cents for graphics, respectively, compared with the averages: 5.4 cents for text and 14.1 cents for graphics. Using the XXL cartridges drops the text-page cost to 6.4 cents, and graphics pages to 16.8 cents, but this is still higher than the average for regular high-yield cartridges. Using high-yield cartridges, the Epson XP-640 prints text for less than half the cost per page, at 3.1 cents, and color graphics at a much lower cost of 10 cents per page.

Canon does offer some multicartridge value packs that can cut ink costs. In all cases, these value packs do not include the photo blue cartridge, which must be bought separately. The five-pack offering includes all the other inks, while the four-pack combos include only the pigment black, not the dye black.

Based on our calculations, buying the five-pack bundle of standard cartridges should reduce color page ink costs from 23.3 cents to 19.6 cents, while the four-pack product, which does not include the pigment black ink, will only reduce color costs to 22 cents per page. The five-pack group, including the XL, pigment black and four standard-yield dye inks, has a cost per color page of 19.1 cents, compared with 21.6 cents when purchasing individual cartridges. The lowest color page cost is still 16.8 cents with the XXL cartridges, which were not available in multipacks at press time.

• Inkjet vs. Laser: Which Printer Is Right for You?

Using estimated yields, we also calculated ink costs for printing 4 x 6-inch glossy photos. As with plain paper printing, the lowest cost per 4 x 6 was with the XXL cartridges, at 31.6 cents. (A complete set of XXL cartridges costs $169.94.) Printing a 4 x 6 photo with standard cartridges is pricier, at 48.6 cents per print, though buying the five-pack set with the XL pigment black and four standard-yield dye inks reduces this to 41.2 cents. 

However, you should also consider the cost of paper — not just ink — for printing glossy photos. A pack of 100 sheets of Photo Paper Plus Glossy costs $10.99, or 11 cents per sheet.

Setup and software

Basic setup of the TS8320 was straightforward. You remove half a dozen pieces of orange shipping tape and some cellophane. Plug in the printer, turn it on and select your language on the touch screen, which then walks you through the ink cartridge installation, showing a graphic of each cartridge as you install it.

Although a CD-ROM comes in the box, the printed start guide's large print instructs you to go online (ij.start.canon>setup>go>start) to download the software. (The CD-ROM setup is covered at the bottom of the page, in small print.) 

The software download includes the printer driver, scan utility (Win/Mac) and a Scan Utility Lite option for Macs. The online download, however, did not include the Easy-PhotoPrint Editor application. I had to find that myself on the TS8320's Drivers & Downloads page. The same was true of the online software installation I ran for a Mac running OS 10.12 (Sierra). Easy-PhotoPrint Editor is used to create and print collages, calendars, cards, stickers and CD/DVD disc labels.

In addition, the TS8320 has a disc label copy function you can use from the touch screen, without having to use a PC. You place a printed disc on the flatbed scanner, insert a blank disc in the CD/DVD tray and follow the on-screen prompts. I used this to copy a disc I had printed on another inkjet, with a label of a color photograph. The TS8320's copy looked just as good as the original.

Wireless setup was easy to find in the touch-screen menu. Using the WPS method, I pressed the WPS button on my wireless router to initiate the connection and put the TS8320 on my network.  

For mobile devices, you do not have to use the Canon Print app. The TS8320 supports AirPrint for iOS and Google Cloud Print for Android, as well as the Mopria Print Service. However, when using AirPrint to print a document from an iPhone 7, it chose the rear paper tray rather than the main paper cassette (and offered no way to select between the two). The rear paper tray was empty on one occasion, and on another my document printed on the glossy photo paper in the rear tray, which I did not intend to do. Using the Canon Print app, selecting plain paper as the media type was sufficient for the TS8320 to choose the main paper cassette rather than the rear tray loaded with glossy photo paper.

• Best Printers: All in one printers for home and office

Canon also offers cloud printing and social media integration via its IJ Cloud Print service, which you initiate by going to a designated URL from your mobile device. IJ Cloud Print offers links for printing from various cloud services. You set up your account using FaceBook, Google or an email address, and then you can print from various social media accounts and cloud apps.

The TS8320 started up very quickly, illuminating its touch screen in just 3 seconds. Not surprisingly, making a copy right away took longer than usual. Rather than the test time of 14.6 seconds, it took 23 seconds for the unit to fully warm up and make the copy.

Bottom line

The TS8320 offers a lot of features for photo enthusiasts, including high photo print quality using six inks, a second specialty media paper tray and an SD card slot. The large color touch screen is handy, and the ability to print onto CD/DVD discs adds to the fun, as does the cloud printing integration of your social media accounts via mobile device. Photo printing and color scanning are fast, though other tasks are done at roughly average speeds. Two-sided printing adds a little versatility, although less-than-razor-sharp text prints don't make this model a good fit for a home office — nor do the higher-than-average ink costs, despite two tiers of high-yield ink cartridges. Take a look at our Canon promo codes for ways to save on your order. 

Our favorite photo printer, the Epson Expression XP-640, offers comparably high photo quality, faster color printing on plain paper and quicker black-and-white copying. Like the Canon, the XP-640's text prints are not quite razor sharp, and its scan quality was inconsistent in our testing. It also lacks a touch screen, and its photo printing is slower. If faster photo printing or a large touch screen justifies the higher ongoing expense, the photo-centric offerings of the TS8320 are likely to be a pleasure to use.

A modern instant camera has to do two things: First, it must provide a print within seconds of your taking a photo. And it also has to include some of the niceties of the digital era, in a way that doesn't intrude on nostalgia. Canon's Ivy Cliq+ gets this mostly right: It takes great photos, and, via Bluetooth, lets you add filters and stickers, and even print photos you took on your smartphone. However, given its high price — for an instant camera — there's a few things it could do better.

Slim, stylish design

Although Canon's specs say the Ivy Cliq+ is only a tenth of an inch thinner than the Kodak Smile, it feels much svelter and easier to carry around. The camera is simply and stylishly designed, too: It doesn't feel busy, especially when compared with cameras such as the Fujifilm Instax mini LiPlay, which has far too much going on.  

The front of the Cliq+ is a solid color (you can choose from white, blue and red). Surrounding the camera lens is a large, circular selfie mirror, because millenials. A small viewfinder and LED flash sit just above and to the left. On top is a power button, shutter button and a slider to control the flash (On, Off, Auto). A single LED flashes different colors to give you the status of the camera.

On the back is the viewfinder, a button to switch from 2 x 3 photos to 2 x 2 photos and a reprint button. A large door pops off when you need to reload film. The bottom of the camera has a micro USB port for recharging the Cliq+'s battery and a microSD card slot for storing images.

The biggest drawback to the Cliq+'s design is the lack of a display or any means to review the photo you just took on the camera itself. Also, any photo you take with the Cliq+ will be printed, so you have to be extra careful to get your subject lined up just right in the viewfinder. Given the cost of photo paper — a 50-sheet pack of Canon Zink photo paper is $25 — I appreciate the screen on instant cameras like the Kodak Smile, which gives me the option of ensuring that the photo I took is worth printing out.

Photo Quality

The Ivy Cliq+ is a Zink instant camera; instead of using actual photo paper, like Fujifilm's Instax cameras, the Cliq+ uses Zink paper, which uses heat to create an image. In general, I've found Fujifilm's photo paper produces much richer photos than Zink, and this still holds true. However, the Cliq+ turned out some of the better photos I've seen from a Zink printer. 

MORE: Best Photo Printers of 2019

Images taken of a white cat on a pink carpet were on the colder side (read: more bluish), but his fur, as well as the colors in the carpet, was rendered more accurately than similar shots taken with the Kodak Smile; that camera tended to turn whites a shade of pink.

One of the other advantages of the Cliq+ is that you can connect it to your smartphone via Bluetooth, and, using the Canon Mini Print app (Android and iOS), use the Cliq+ to print out photos you've taken with your smartphone camera. More than anything, these shots that I printed showcased the Cliq+'s potential. A baby's pink jumper really popped, as did the greenery around a cat sitting outside.

App Features

The Mini Print app also lets you do a few more fun things with your photos. You can not only adjust settings such as brightness and contrast but also add borders, stickers, text and filters. 

Then, you can opt to print out the photo on a single sheet of paper, or create a four- or nine-sheet layout; as the Zink paper prints without borders, it's a useful way to make one larger image.

In addition to printing photos from your phone, the Mini Print app also lets you print photos from your Facebook, Instagram, Dropbox, Google Photos and iCloud accounts. 

MORE: 10 Best Photo Storage and Sharing Sites

Lastly, you can also use the Mini Print app as a remote shutter button for the Cliq+. However, you'll still have to use the camera's viewfinder to line up the shot, because there's no live preview in the app.

Bottom Line

The Canon Ivy Cliq+ produces very good-quality Zink prints, especially those from photos taken on your smartphone. Its slim design makes it easy to carry, and it's one of the better-looking instant cameras around. However, at $159, it's the same price as Canon's own PowerShot ELPH 190 digital camera, which has a 10x optical zoom and optical image stabilization. I also don't like the fact that the Ivy Cliq+ prints out every shot I take, but if you're looking for an instant camera that can also double as a mobile printer for your smartphone, the Cliq+ is one to check out.

For the latest deals on Canon products, check out our Canon coupon codes.