Departing from the competition: the Polaroid PoGo

By David Bénard, published on October 2, 2008
Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: , , | Themes: Digital Cameras

10. Departing from the competition: the Polaroid PoGo

After having compared the best 4x16 photo printers, we’d like to present to you something totally new from Polaroid. It’s a printer that breaks the norm. It’s not necessarily very efficient but it’s certainly original. Consider its dimensions: 4.7x2.8x.9 inches. What’s most striking when you first see it is that it fits in your pocket!

Provided you’ve charged it correctly and you’ve placed a few sheets of Zink paper inside, you can carry it with you wherever you go.

 

Whether your photos come from a Bluetooth-compatible cell phone or from a camera (which supports PictBridge), you’re going to be able to print at least a photo a minute (not including data transfer) onto on sticker paper in a 3x2-inch format.

The paper used actually has spots of color inside it that are stimulated by the heat that the printer emits when printing. It’s fast, even if the result isn’t amazing — prints come out tinted green. Though imperfect, the resulting snapshots are fun, and since they’re also stickers, you can stick them wherever you want.

Bluetooth and PictBridge required

To transfer an image from a cell phone, you’ll need to have Bluetooth. Your cell phone will locate the printer once it’s started up. All you have to do is send the image and it’ll be instantly printed. Ditto with the APN compatible PictBridge — just hook it up to the printer with a USB cable and you can start printing.

The PoGo is a great gadget that’s going to impress your friends, but don’t expect outstanding performance. In that respect, the Polaroid PoGo isn’t at all in the same category as the printers tested here. The PoGo fills its niche, instantly offering you images that fit in your pocket and that will surprise your friends and family. And that’s alone is pretty cool.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

Chipi 10/02/2008 8:49 PM
Hide
-0+

1. You forgot to mention one important advantage offered by printers that use solid ink with thermal sublimation: photos are said to last for 100 years (that means no color deterioration due to sunlight!), they are protected by the 4th and final laminating layer against water spills and fingerprints (yes, that's right)!
Don't know if it's really 100 years, but the fingerprint "protection" alone makes it a sweet deal.

2. The Epson and HP models aren't exactly portable. They are actually big if you compare them with Sony and Canon, and especially the Polaroid (WOW). A better term would be dedicated photo printers, in my opinion.

3. The Sony FP95 tops at no.2 regarding print time and you call it "mediocre printing time"? If that's true, then what about the others? You haven't even mentioned their performance, except for giving us the values.
I don't want to tell you how to do your job, but if you use only "mediocre" and not "worst" or "best/second-best" use it for the lowest performer.

Sorry Tom, I really am...

Chipi 10/02/2008 9:13 PM
Hide
-0+

I have to say I was expecting an answer from the author, but now I don't thik it really matters. Shortly after my first comment I decided to look into the printers in detail. The HP A626 you talk about in the articke is actualy a A826.

How did you manage to get the name right in the image slideshow? http://www.tomsguide.com/us/slides [...] -jpg-.html

Big thumbs down!

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links