Conclusion: Fast Motion Is Very Efficient, But Not A Universal Solution, Continued
Contents
- 1. Perfect MPEG-4 Video: Resolution, Data Rate And Picture Quality
- 2. Optimization Of Flask Mpeg: Intel And AMD CPUs
- 3. Choice Of The MPEG-4-Codec: Fast Vs. Slow Motion, Continued
- 4. Focus On The MPEG-4 Fast Motion Codec
- 5. Focus On The MPEG-4 Fast Motion Codec, Continued
- 6. Low Resolutions: Better With Slow Motion Codec!
- 7. Compromise: Quality Vs. Resolution
- 8. Compromise: Quality Vs. Resolution, Continued
- 9. Trimming: Without Edges A Lower Data Rate!
- 10. 15 Percent Less Data Stream: Enable Deinterlace!, Continued
- 11. 900 MB Video On One CD-ROM
- 12. Conclusion: Fast Motion Is Very Efficient, But Not A Universal Solution, Continued
12. Conclusion: Fast Motion Is Very Efficient, But Not A Universal Solution, Continued
In summary, it can be said that MPEG-4 is currently one of the most efficient compression procedures, as illustrated in the table below.
| Compression | Resolution | Average Data Rate | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPEG-1 | 352 x 288 Pixels | 172 kB/s | satisfactory |
| MPEG-2 | 352 x 288 Pixels | 250 kB/s | very good |
| MPEG-4 | 352 x 288 Pixels | 80 kB/s | very good |
MPEG procedures in comparison: with reference to attainable quality with a low data rate, the MPEG-4 is the best compression procedure.
All the MPEG-4 videos incorporate these properties. The picture shows the features of a test sequence with a 500 kBit/s data rate.
- Previous page 900 MB Video On One CD-ROM
