- 1. Magazines: All the Fun that’s Fit to Read
- 2. Can We Pull the Plug On Paper?
- 3. WIRED: Paper version
- 4. WIRED: iPad version
- 5. WIRED: web version
- 6. Popular Science: Print Version
1. Magazines: All the Fun that’s Fit to Read
Magazines are evolving into more than just words and pictures, but what’s the best way to consume them? We test different devices against paper.
Reading a magazine is a very personal activity. Whether you pick up a good trashy read at the airport lounge, or you reach for something insightful while sitting on the toilet, magazines draw you in. Good stories, fun pictures and great layout (even if you didn’t notice!) all add up to the experience that is reading a magazine. And in the past, the experience of a good ‘zine just couldn’t be replicated with gadgetry – unlike newspapers, whose layout and advertising design model translate easier to the smallest screen. But now, with a spate of e-readers on the market and more hitting the shelves soon, can we start to love magazines on computers? We put several different methods of consuming magazines to the test.
What are the Options?
We tested the iPad’s apps for Popular Science and Wired, the Nook version of Popular Science (Wired isn’t yet available) the web versions of those two magazines, and the paper versions. We tested other magazines like Technology Review on the Kindle and the Sony E-Reader; they don’t have Wired or Popular Science available, thereby exposing one of the problems – not all content is available everywhere. Those two publications were chosen because of their techno-phile audiences; they were among the first to built apps and try to replicate the experience of reading a magazine in an e-format.
- 1. Magazines: All the Fun that’s Fit to Read
- 2. Can We Pull the Plug On Paper?
- 3. WIRED: Paper version
- 4. WIRED: iPad version
- 5. WIRED: web version
- 6. Popular Science: Print Version
- 7. Popular Science: Nook Version
- 8. Popular Science: iPad Version
- 9. Popular Science: Web version
- 10. Kindle and Sony e-Reader: What’s available?
- 11. Analysis
Personally, I prefer the paper version of every magazine I've ever read.
However, sometimes I wish someone would invent adblock for paper magazine. I HATE how some magazines split up articles with tons of full-page ads.
I prefer paper for mags also, they're cheaper and more resilient. The only thing lacking is the search function. If I read a mag/book in the bathroom and it gets wet; no prob. If a slate gets wet its gone.
progress requires:
magazines delivered on disks (flash cards or mini cds) or downloaded from the net which can be viewed on PDA or laptops
PDA's with a viewing area of a regular paper magazine
it'll save on paper and be easier to distribute
I love stacking my mags in the bathroom. My Kindle is good for long trips and it's a great advantage since I spend most of my time abroad, but I can't see myself subscribing to my favorite mags with it.
And the amount of ads with adblock? none!
Surely this review missed the other magazine apps - ones that scan a magazine, ads and all in presenting the question of whether we can do without paper. Zinio on an Ipad presents a great mix of showing the print version with a bit of interactivity (some active links). It's great to review full featured interactive magazine applications in a comparison, but unless you look at an alternative - can you really say that's about it as far as magazine apps go?