Performance vs. Distance

By TG Publishing Team, published on January 17, 2003
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , ,

9. Performance vs. Distance

With all the interoperability stuff out of the way, I ran my usual four-location throughput test, the results of which are shown in the chart at the top of this section. I also did Chariot runs, which are shown in Figure 14.

Figure 14: Four condition throughput
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

I actually went back and redid a few of the Chariot runs to make sure that the results showed warmed-up throughput. The resulting plots show that throughput drops off fairly smoothly as a function of distance, but also a very respectible 12Mbps average throughput at the farthest Condition 4 location. Finally, I ran a Condition 1 test with 128bit WEP enabled, and was glad to see no throughput degradation.

802.11g Wireless Performance Test Results
Test Conditions

- WEP encryption: DISABLED
- Tx Rate: Automatic
- Power Save: disabled
- Test Partner: Linksys WPC54G Wireless-G Notebook Adapter

Firmware/Driver Versions

AP f/w:
V1.05 Dec 17 20
Wireless client driver:
3.10.27.0 (WinXP)
Wireless client f/w:
No Info

Test Description Signal Quality (%) Transfer Rate (Mbps) Response Time (msec) UDP stream
Throughput (kbps) Lost data (%)
Client to AP - Condition 1 0 22 [No WEP]
22.5 [w/ WEP]
1 (avg)
1 (max)
499 0
Client to AP - Condition 2 0 20.4 1 (avg)
2 (max)
500 0
Client to AP - Condition 3 0 17.1 2 (avg)
4 (max)
499 0
Client to AP - Condition 4 0 12.1 1 (avg)
2 (max)
497 0
See details of how we test.
Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links