What To Do With Your DCS Pro SLR/n?
- 1. Introduction
- 2. 14 Million Pixels... For What?
- 3. The Choice Of The 24x36 Sensor
- 4. The DCS Pro SLR/n In Detail (characteristics)
- 5. Pro SLR/n And Pro SLR/c... Canon EOS 1Ds And Contax N Digital... Vs. Digital SLRs
- 6. What To Do With Your DCS Pro SLR/n?
- 7. Ergonomics, Construction And Handling
- 8. Modes And Menus
- 9. Speed And Responsiveness
6. What To Do With Your DCS Pro SLR/n?

We'll come back to this point, but the DCS Pro SLR/n is not aimed at everyone. Its price, first of all, is high enough to scare off the general public, as the camera is geared for passionate amateurs and professionals. Its construction is too light to attract reporters, who are used to all-terrain cameras. And further, its slowness is more than noticeable, which, here again, will leave photojournalists skeptical. In fact, and this is finally what this test demonstrates most clearly, the Kodak SLR/n is aimed essentially at studio photographers, those who can afford the luxury of taking their time while totally controlling lighting.
Once these principles have been laid down, this nonetheless attractive unit still has the advantage of being the only 24x36 digital with a Nikon mount - a crucial point when you consider that competing Nikons offer only 4, 5, and 6 million pixels and reduced sensors (and thus focal-length multiplication) at prices that are barely below the Kodak's (except for the Nikon D70, which while excellent is not really competition, being aimed essentially at a consumer market). So as we've said, a dyed-in-the-wool Nikon user may well have to consider the Kodak.
- Previous page Pro SLR/n And Pro SLR/c... Canon EOS...
- Next page Ergonomics, Construction And Handling





Products such as the Canon EOS 300D or the Nikon D70 have made digital SLR cameras accessible to
Kodak's DCS Pro SLR Offers Very High-End Digicam (For A Price) : Read more
Good Afternoon:
I just wanted to take the time to comment on such an excellent and thorough review. IMHO this is probably the finest review I have seen on the 14n and one which is unbiased and clearly demonstrates a qualitative and in-depth on all aspects of the camera, with ample references to other cameras for comparison. I look forward to reading your other reviews, and if the rest are as good as this one, you will certainly make the job of choosing equipment a much simpler task.
Regards,
John Cassidy