Tom's Guide > Forum > PDA > Palmpilot > Tungsten E2 Announced

Tungsten E2 Announced

Forum PDA : Palmpilot - Tungsten E2 Announced

TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

See details at:

http://www.palmone.com/us/products [...] /index.epl

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Looks quite nice. How does the $249 compare with the old T|E? UK price
seems unannounced as yet.

I'm surprised it's still only 32MB, especially if being flash means
it's allocated with less granularity, as has been discussed re the T5.

And does the new connector have any advantages over the T|E's mini-USB.
I like that I can use a standard USB cable to my T|E, so I can share it
with a digital camera and card reader (thereby saving a USB port) and I
don't have to pay for a Palm special cable if I want to sync to two
PCs.

- PG

Reply to PaddyG
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

I said:

> UK price seems unannounced as yet.

but it's now on the PalmOne site at £169, which is a fair bit more
than the T|E which was £129, IIRC.

- PG

Reply to PaddyG

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

This is what the bottom of the line for Palms should be. But I really think
Palm needs to start stepping things up. This will be an "Okay" palm for
newcomers or first timers.


But What are hardcore Palmists using?

the T5? ugh....

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

>- bluetooth
>- processor speed bump (from 126MHz OMAP to a 200MHz Xscale)

I wonder how much difference it would make?

>- nv ram
is it needed? so far I have never lost anything. the only true lockups I have
had were my fault.

>- brighter display
god I hope not the TE is way brighter then needed now. it is hard to dim it down
enough as it is.

>- better battery and better power management
that would be good though I can get 6 or more hours out of the TE now with the
right software.


--
Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

It was a time of great turmoil. The strong preyed on the weak, dogs
and cats lived together. One voice cried out in the wilderness:
"PaddyG" <disposable1@psae.f2s.com> wrote in
<1113486084.968876.12050@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>:

> Looks quite nice. How does the $249 compare with the old T|E? UK price
> seems unannounced as yet.

About $50 or a twenty five percent increase.
>
> I'm surprised it's still only 32MB, especially if being flash means
> it's allocated with less granularity, as has been discussed re the T5.

PalmOne recently released a patch for the Treo 650 which makes its
record storage more efficient. Originally its NVFS allocated each
record to a 512 byte sector. With the new system each sector is
divided into 32 byte subsectors which greatly reduces the amount of
slack space. I'd expect the TE2 to have similar record storage.
>
> And does the new connector have any advantages over the T|E's mini-USB.

It's supposed to have some multimedia-related wiring which would
theoretically allow Palm to develop connectors that hook in to AV
equipment like TVs and TiVos. But that's not likely to be too
important in this model so for the most part the only advantage is for
PalmOne since you have to buy a new cable.

> I like that I can use a standard USB cable to my T|E, so I can share it
> with a digital camera and card reader (thereby saving a USB port) and I
> don't have to pay for a Palm special cable if I want to sync to two
> PCs.
>
I got sick of swapping USB devices and installed an PCI card to add
four more USB ports to my PC.

--
Roberto Castillo
robertocastillo@ameritech.net
http://www.freewebs.com/robertocastillo/

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

It was a time of great turmoil. The strong preyed on the weak, dogs
and cats lived together. One voice cried out in the wilderness: "Lone
Bard" <barry.k@sympatico.ca> wrote in
<iZu7e.4201$MZ2.770104@news20.bellglobal.com>:

> This is what the bottom of the line for Palms should be. But I really think
> Palm needs to start stepping things up. This will be an "Okay" palm for
> newcomers or first timers.
>
>
> But What are hardcore Palmists using?
>
> the T5? ugh....
>
Check out the rumors swirling about the "Tungsten X."

http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_story.asp?ID=7765

Pretty lust-worthy if the rumors are true.

--
Roberto Castillo
robertocastillo@ameritech.net
http://www.freewebs.com/robertocastillo/

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

It was a time of great turmoil. The strong preyed on the weak, dogs
and cats lived together. One voice cried out in the wilderness: Steve
Knight <stevek@knight-toolworks.com> wrote in
<ro9u515t31kak8hmgho59216554bhcaklm@4ax.com>:

> >- nv ram

> is it needed? so far I have never lost anything. the only true lockups I have
> had were my fault.

It's not needed but it's very convenient. I've never lost anything
either but I have had the battery drain completely and had to restore
everything from my PC when I got home. That was annoying.
>
> >- brighter display

> god I hope not the TE is way brighter then needed now. it is hard to dim it down
> enough as it is.

That seems to be a trend. My Treo 600's screen is brighter than my
Tungsten E's screen and judging from the Treo 650's I see in the
stores, the 650 has an even brighter screen. The Tungsten T5's screen,
on the other hand, seems dim by comparison.
>
> >- better battery and better power management

> that would be good though I can get 6 or more hours out of the TE now with the
> right software.

I usually get five but I like to play video, MP3's and read e-books
for hours on end.

--
Roberto Castillo
robertocastillo@ameritech.net
http://www.freewebs.com/robertocastillo/

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Why would you want that 4gig hard drive? for music? if thats so, then why is
it as thick as two T3s? wouldnt having something that huge be stupid?

This story about the TX LifeDrive smell shitty.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Steve Knight <stevek@knight-toolworks.com> wrote:

>the TE is way brighter then needed now.
>it is hard to dim it down enough as it is.

You can use the free program SilkDimmer to replace the internal brightness
slider on your TE. It will allow you to dim the display as low as you want or
even turn it off.

http://silkdimmer.sourceforge.net/

Unfortunately no dimmers I've found including the above Silkdimmer work on the
newer Z72. And the Z72 is even brighter on the low stop than the TE. And they
say the TE2 is even brighter yet? I'll bring my shades when I check it out... ;)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Lone Bard wrote:
> Why would you want that 4gig hard drive? for music? if thats so, then why is
> it as thick as two T3s? wouldnt having something that huge be stupid?

I like to think of it this way: people don't mind having an iPod that's
that huge. If it also has Palm functionality built-in, why would that
be a bad thing?

We have entered a phase where Palm is not just competing against
Pocket PC (or Zaurus, etc.) based on price and features. People
only have a limited amount of space in their pockets, and they
don't want to carry around an MP3 player and a PDA and a phone and
possibly some other device (like a camera or a USB flash drive).
If they already have an iPod and a cell phone, then basically
that shuts the Palm out.

Basically, Palm is competing for market share AND "pocket share".
If they can combine two or even three of the above types of devices
into one, they could have a compelling product. This rumored
Tungsten X looks like it would be a PDA, an MP3 player, and a
USB flash drive all in one. iPods are selling like hotcakes, and
if Palm can manage to make this device as slick as an iPod, they
could probably sell a lot of them.

- Logan

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:22:42 GMT, Logan Shaw wrote:

>> Lone Bard wrote:
>> Why would you want that 4gig hard drive? for music? if thats so, then why is
>> it as thick as two T3s? wouldnt having something that huge be stupid?
>
> I like to think of it this way: people don't mind having an iPod that's
> that huge. If it also has Palm functionality built-in, why would that
> be a bad thing?
>
> We have entered a phase where Palm is not just competing against
> Pocket PC (or Zaurus, etc.) based on price and features. People
> only have a limited amount of space in their pockets, and they
> don't want to carry around an MP3 player and a PDA and a phone and
> possibly some other device (like a camera or a USB flash drive).
> If they already have an iPod and a cell phone, then basically
> that shuts the Palm out.
>
> Basically, Palm is competing for market share AND "pocket share".
> If they can combine two or even three of the above types of devices
> into one, they could have a compelling product. This rumored
> Tungsten X looks like it would be a PDA, an MP3 player, and a
> USB flash drive all in one. iPods are selling like hotcakes, and
> if Palm can manage to make this device as slick as an iPod, they
> could probably sell a lot of them.

But the question remains - why would the X have to be as thick as
two T3s? That's about twice as thick as a Palm III also, right?
Handera's 330 and TRGPro had CF slots and were no thicker than the
Palm III. (The 330 even had a second SD slot.) I'm sure they
wouldn't be able fully compatible with a 4GB CF microdrive, but it
would only require updated software to properly read the drive, and
that wouldn't add anything to its thickness. So it seems that the
Tungsten X could do it all and still fit in a T5 case. The only
thing I can think of that would justify such a large case would be a
mini Sears DieHard battery to keep the X running for more than 24
hours pre charge. The Handera 330, in addition to everything else
it contained also was able to hold 4 AAA batteries,

Reply to BillB

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Thanks for touching on the points that Logan so neatly avoided, I was
wondering if I had remembered to ask why the thing was so freaking huge.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

BillB wrote:
> But the question remains - why would the X have to be as thick as
> two T3s? That's about twice as thick as a Palm III also, right?
> Handera's 330 and TRGPro had CF slots and were no thicker than the
> Palm III. (The 330 even had a second SD slot.) I'm sure they
> wouldn't be able fully compatible with a 4GB CF microdrive, but it
> would only require updated software to properly read the drive, and
> that wouldn't add anything to its thickness. So it seems that the
> Tungsten X could do it all and still fit in a T5 case.

It will need a pretty beefy battery. Microdrives have to physically
move, so they require a lot more battery power than flash. iPods
are pretty big, and they don't even have the (relatively) giant
display that the Palm has.

I'm not saying it has to be literally twice as thick as the T3,
but there is reason for it to be a bit bigger than other Palms.

Of course, I'm not worried about the rumor that it's twice as thick
because rumors are notoriously inaccurate, so I'm assuming that
its being twice as thick is an exaggeration.

- Logan

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

>You can use the free program SilkDimmer to replace the internal brightness
>slider on your TE. It will allow you to dim the display as low as you want or
>even turn it off.

that's what I use but you have to watch leaving the level really low it seems to
cause random lockups.

--
Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Hello, "Lone Bard" !
You wrote:

> Why would you want that 4gig hard drive? for music? if thats so,
then why is

Music, video, documents, pictures. Just about everything you'd want to
carry. I've been waited for such a device.

> it as thick as two T3s? wouldnt having something that huge be
stupid?

Internal hard drive, wifi and Bluetooth radios, and a huge honking
battery to feed them power. I still have and old Visor Prism that I
carried everywhere not too long ago. It's considerably thicker than
two T5's and I loved it because it could do more than any PDA I had
owned up to that point.
>
> This story about the TX LifeDrive smell shitty.
>
It could ultimately turn out to be a false rumor. But a device like it
has to show up sooner or later. It just makes too much sense for some
electronics manufacturer to not try it.
--
"It's a long story. And it ends with me on the roof of a goddamned
nuthouse on Route 128 doing a one-man tribute to the Three Stooges."
-- Art in "Eastern Standard Tribe"

Roberto Castillo
robertocastillo@ameritech.net

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

It was a time of great turmoil. The strong preyed on the weak, dogs
and cats lived together. One voice cried out in the wilderness: BillB
<rainbose@earthlink.newt> wrote in
<07s061hiaq356rdq0umisl4s49rr580eb5@4ax.com>:

> But the question remains - why would the X have to be as thick as
> two T3s? That's about twice as thick as a Palm III also, right?

Actually the rumors suggest that it's as thick as two T5's. The T5 is
considerably thinner than the T3, IIRC. In any case, I'm pretty
certain that the PIII was thicker than the T3. I still have a couple
of Visors (Platinum and Prism) in my desk and they're both aabout
twice as think as my Tungsten E. I'm looking for this mythical TX to
be about the same size as the Visor Prism which was a brick but it was
a brick which I happily carried around for about a year and a half.

--
Roberto Castillo
robertocastillo@ameritech.net
http://www.freewebs.com/robertocastillo/

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

It was a time of great turmoil. The strong preyed on the weak, dogs
and cats lived together. One voice cried out in the wilderness: Logan
Shaw <lshaw-usenet@austin.rr.com> wrote in
<0X%7e.5765$AE6.5701@tornado.texas.rr.com>:

> Of course, I'm not worried about the rumor that it's twice as thick
> because rumors are notoriously inaccurate, so I'm assuming that
> its being twice as thick is an exaggeration.

One thought that has occurred to me is that the Tungsten E looks a lot
like the Tungsten T5. But it's thinner than the T5. Maybe the X is
only as thick as two TEs about same thickness as my old Visor Prism.

--
Roberto Castillo
robertocastillo@ameritech.net
http://www.freewebs.com/robertocastillo/

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

DELETErobertocastillo@ameritech.net (Zombie Elvis) wrote:

>I still have and old Visor Prism that I
>carried everywhere not too long ago.
>It's considerably thicker than two T5's...

Not quite. The T5 is 0.61" thick vs the Prism at 0.80".

(Source: PalmOne site and Ron Nicholson's FAQ.)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Zombie Elvis <DELETE-ME-2-REPLY-robertocastillo@ameritech.net> wrote:


>the Tungsten E looks a lot like the Tungsten T5. But it's thinner than the T5.

Not by much.

The TE is 0.5" thick vs the T5 at 0.63. About a tenth of an inch is all... ;)

(Same source as B4.)

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:49:16 GMT, Logan Shaw wrote:

> It will need a pretty beefy battery. Microdrives have to physically
> move, so they require a lot more battery power than flash. iPods
> are pretty big, and they don't even have the (relatively) giant
> display that the Palm has.

I considered battery size but didn't want to touch on too many
topics. I know the microdrives have been long used in cameras and
while they use more energy than flash, I think PDAs would be the one
type of electronic device that could really use them efficiently.
To protect against loss of pictures, cameras have to frequently read
and write to the drive, meaning the drive tends to spin a lot. For
playing (or even recording) mp3 files, the PDA could use techniques
that minidiscs use. They spin magneto-optical disks, not as fast as
hard drives, but up to 3,000 rpm. Even using highly compressed
formats such as 64kbps, which can be very high quality and can be
very hard to tell from the original source CDs (this is actually not
mp3, but Hi-LP, one of Sony's proprietary ATRAC3 Plus formats), very
little battery power is required. For playback, a single AA NiMH
battery can last from 25 to more than 30 hours per charge.
Recording is less efficient since the battery must also heat the
surface of the spinning disc, but even then you can get recording
times of 15 hours or more from the same battery. The minidiscs can
do this because they use memory to buffer the audio files being
transferred, and so the disc only has to spin for a small fraction
of the time it's being used. I don't know how much memory is used
by minidisc player/recorders, but I'm sure it's far, far less that
what would be available to most PDAs. If 50 MB of flash RAM (or
even cheap dynamic RAM) was used for the audio buffer, that could
hold maybe an hour or two's worth of audio (less if higher
compression is used), and the amount of time the microdrive would
have to spin to read or write that much data could be measured in
seconds, not minutes. Of course if the microdrive was used for
standard Palm apps instead, some of them could force the microdrive
to spin nonstop. The ideal solution would appear to forget about
hard drives altogether. Make the multipurpose PDA only slightly
thicker than normal, allowing it to hold 4 CF cards or even more SD
cards. Prices of the largest cards is still pretty high, but it's
only a matter of time before the currently available 8 GB cards
reach the price level of microdrives. Until then, using a couple of
affordable 1 GB cards would work very nicely, you'd have room to
expand, you wouldn't have to worry as much about things such as hard
disk failure, and they flash cards would be more flexible. You
could more easily share cards with friends that have similar PDAs,
and wouldn't have to rely totally on the PDA's USB port to transfer
files, but could pop the cards into a card reader while the PDA was
used for other purposes.

Reply to BillB
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:49:16 GMT, Logan Shaw wrote:

> Of course, I'm not worried about the rumor that it's twice as thick
> because rumors are notoriously inaccurate, so I'm assuming that
> its being twice as thick is an exaggeration.

I agree, you've convinced me! :)

Reply to BillB
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:43:26 -0500, Zombie Elvis wrote:

> Actually the rumors suggest that it's as thick as two T5's. The T5 is
> considerably thinner than the T3, IIRC. In any case, I'm pretty
> certain that the PIII was thicker than the T3. I still have a couple
> of Visors (Platinum and Prism) in my desk and they're both aabout
> twice as think as my Tungsten E. I'm looking for this mythical TX to
> be about the same size as the Visor Prism which was a brick but it was
> a brick which I happily carried around for about a year and a half.

I hope you're right. If so the TX sounds very nice, especially if
it will have corrected the T5's wasteful non-volatile memory usage,
as you mentioned earlier has been done for the 650 and possibly the
E2.

Reply to BillB

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

I saw a TE2 at a local retailer today, so I thought I would see if
silkdimmer would work on it.

It seemed to work normally, from 100% brightness down to about 20%.
Presumably this is just the range of the built-in dimmer. From 20% to
0%, the brightness was at full.

Either PalmOne put a hard-coded limit in that range (maybe so you
can't turn the light all the way off), or silkdimmer will need to be
slightly modified to work on that model.



On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:33:27 GMT, AaronJ <noemail@noemail.com> wrote:

>Steve Knight <stevek@knight-toolworks.com> wrote:
>
>>the TE is way brighter then needed now.
>>it is hard to dim it down enough as it is.
>
>You can use the free program SilkDimmer to replace the internal brightness
>slider on your TE. It will allow you to dim the display as low as you want or
>even turn it off.
>
>http://silkdimmer.sourceforge.net/
>
>Unfortunately no dimmers I've found including the above Silkdimmer work on the
>newer Z72. And the Z72 is even brighter on the low stop than the TE. And they
>say the TE2 is even brighter yet? I'll bring my shades when I check it out... ;)


Remove the BALONEY from my email address.
-----------------------------------------------------
Matthew Fries Minneapolis, MN USA
freeze@baloneyvisi.com

"Quit eating all my *STUFF*!" - The Tick

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Matthew Fries <Nobody@home.com> wrote:

>I saw a TE2 at a local retailer today, so I thought I would see if
>silkdimmer would work on it.
>
>It seemed to work normally, from 100% brightness down to about 20%.
>Presumably this is just the range of the built-in dimmer. From 20% to
>0%, the brightness was at full.

Thanks for trying that. I guess all the newer Palms have the new coding or
hardware limit, whatever it might be. I keep hoping that I will find a fix
because my Zire72 really excessively bright for some uses at the low stop.

For example, using SilkDimmer, my TungE registers at about 26% for the
brightness level seen at the built in internal low brightness stop. I have to
increase the TE level to about 39% to equal the brightness level of the Z72 at
it's low brightness stop. That's quite a difference. It's kind of like looking
at a flashlight when you're reading in a dark room...

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

>For example, using SilkDimmer, my TungE registers at about 26% for the
>brightness level seen at the built in internal low brightness stop. I have to
>increase the TE level to about 39% to equal the brightness level of the Z72 at
>it's low brightness stop. That's quite a difference. It's kind of like looking
>at a flashlight when you're reading in a dark room...

when you can take it down to below 8% then you start getting some big battery
savings.

--
Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

>Surprisingly not as much as you would think. Not on my TE anyway. I normally get
>about 4+ hours on a charge in ebook service. With the backlight completely
>turned off it only raises that by about an hour or so. That helps of course but
>IMO it's not worth the extra squinting.
I would only get about 3 hours and dimming the screen almost to no backlight
added about two hours. but I never really timed it. also lightspeed must help I
can slow down the CPU while reading ebooks that helps a fair amount too.

--
Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Steve Knight <stevek@knight-toolworks.com> wrote:

>but I never really timed it [battery usage].

For my OS5 units I use a free program called BatteryGraph. It graphs your daily
battery usage. You can directly see your daily on time, battery voltage, charge
percentage, and even on-off times. You can set the display graph for 1 day to 1
month. There is also a statistics page to average things out for you. Besides
being interesting, it will let you know when your battery is starting to fail.
For example since being new (in October of 2003) my TE has lost about 20% of
it's capacity. *If* I decide to replace the battery, that will be a good
indication of when to do it. Hopefully newer battery/screen technology will come
along soon and make the TE obsolete in which case it goes in the junk box.

For my OS4 and lower units I use the free program/hack BatteryLog. It does
nearly the same thing but doesn't graph it. Even though I just replace the AAAs
on those old mono units, battery longevity information is still interesting. For
example I can determine that I get an extra 10 to 15 hours by just slowing the
processor down. My record for my m125 was just under *50 hours* on a set. Those
were the days... ;)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 01:38:57 -0400, Galley
<Galley@Spam-Jammer.galleytech.com> wrote:

>
>The new connector can also transmit audio. The T5 cradle has a speaker built
>into it for listening to music on your desktop.

my T5 cradle has no speaker. It has an audio line-out on the back for
connecting it external speakers or a stereo system.

Besides, how could a speaker small enough to fit in the cradle sound
much, if any, better than the speaker built into the T5?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 02:11:34 GMT, pfw <pfw@pobox.com> spewed forth these words
of wisdom:

>On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 01:38:57 -0400, Galley
><Galley@Spam-Jammer.galleytech.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>The new connector can also transmit audio. The T5 cradle has a speaker built
>>into it for listening to music on your desktop.
>
>my T5 cradle has no speaker. It has an audio line-out on the back for
>connecting it external speakers or a stereo system.
>
>Besides, how could a speaker small enough to fit in the cradle sound
>much, if any, better than the speaker built into the T5?

Perhaps I was thinking of a iPod dock that has a built-in speaker. It looks
like a PDA cradle. True, the sound quality would be lacking to say the least.

--
"I'm not a cool person in real life, but I play one on the Internet"
Galley

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Matthew Fries wrote:
> It seems to me that OLED technology would be PERFECT for PDAs.
>
> -It requires less power than LCD (Because you won't need a backlight)
> -It won't make the whining sound that the Tungsten E screen sometimes
> does.
> -It's color!
> -It's Super THIN and lightweight.
> -It can be flexible (so it could be rather large, or unfolded or
> unrolled).

and:
- there is zero degradation when viewing it from ANY angle
- it's enormously expensive
- it has a short lifespan

The Sony Clie PEG-VZ90 actually did have an OLED display (Japan
only, possibly taken off the market already at only 6 months
after introduction). I held one in my hand for a few minutes
one time, and the display WAS really nice.

- Logan

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

Logan Shaw wrote:
> Lone Bard wrote:
>
> Basically, Palm is competing for market share AND "pocket share".
> If they can combine two or even three of the above types of devices
> into one, they could have a compelling product. This rumored
> Tungsten X looks like it would be a PDA, an MP3 player, and a
> USB flash drive all in one.

Somewhere I heard it was possible to make your PDA act like a flash
drive - I didn't see any software on PalmGear that would let me do this.

Anyone know how?

Jamie

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

James Pittman schrieb:
> Logan Shaw wrote:
>> Lone Bard wrote:
>>
>> Basically, Palm is competing for market share AND "pocket share".
>> If they can combine two or even three of the above types of devices
>> into one, they could have a compelling product. This rumored
>> Tungsten X looks like it would be a PDA, an MP3 player, and a
>> USB flash drive all in one.
>
> Somewhere I heard it was possible to make your PDA act like a flash
> drive - I didn't see any software on PalmGear that would let me do this.
>
> Anyone know how?

For example:

Softick Card Export
http://softick.com/cardexport/

PFB
http://pdassi.de/product.php?prod_id=13639

I'm sure there are others.

T5 can do that without extra software.

Greetings, Jan

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)

 

In article <5Ar9e.1$6w.0@bos-service2.ext.ray.com>, jpittman1@yahoo.com
says...
> Logan Shaw wrote:
> > Lone Bard wrote:
> >
> > Basically, Palm is competing for market share AND "pocket share".
> > If they can combine two or even three of the above types of devices
> > into one, they could have a compelling product. This rumored
> > Tungsten X looks like it would be a PDA, an MP3 player, and a
> > USB flash drive all in one.
>
> Somewhere I heard it was possible to make your PDA act like a flash
> drive - I didn't see any software on PalmGear that would let me do this.
>
> Anyone know how?
>
> Jamie
>

Card Export2 <http://www.softick.com/cardexport/>

--
Jim Anderson
( 8(|) To email me just pull my_finger

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Guide > Forum > PDA > Palmpilot > Tungsten E2 Announced
Go to:

There are 14 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Google ads