Tom's Guide > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > AMD Winchester release date

AMD Winchester release date

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - AMD Winchester release date

TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Quote :

AMD Athlon 64 3700+ & 4000+ (Winchester) is the 90nm successor to the Newcastle Athlon 64 core, expected to be released in October 11th. The Athlon 64 3700+ is expected to run at 2.4Ghz and the 4000+ at 2.6Ghz. Both will contain 512Kb L2 cache.




<A HREF="http://freespace.virgin.net/m.warner/RoadmapQ404.htm" target="_new">http://freespace.virgin.net/m.warner/RoadmapQ404.htm</A>

Is it coming soon or what?



</font color=red><i><font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS </font color=blue><font color=red>AMERICA

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

90nm would be a coupe. Amd will be releasing chips on friday, available next monday. What they will be = ?

Reply to endyen

Do you think waiting to buy my A64 3000+ until after this release will get me a cheaper price? Or do you think the new chips will be priced accordingly, much higher, and keep these lower ones the same price? Much like the FX-53 or FX-55 being released at its high price has no effect on the lower A64s.

Reply to ohnoesaz

So, Newcastle 3400+ = Winchester 3700+?

------------
<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A>

<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig</A> & <A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/benchmark.html" target="_new">3DMark score</A>

Reply to Spitfire_x86

Erm, a good deal of all the information in that site is incorrect. Many of the things which are listed there have not been launched and won't be launched. Dates are wrong. Many things just don't match up-to-date roadmaps from both AMD and Intel.

This roadmap was mostly written with information that is too old and too optimistic. A64 4000+ and FX-55 will be 130nm parts, not 90nm parts - this is new information that has, for instance, not been added.

I could point to many more mistakes...

Reply to Mephistopheles
- 0 +

Ok.

I just hope it's out by January.

</font color=red><i><font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS </font color=blue><font color=red>AMERICA

Reply to dhlucke

current info says that the ahtlon 4000+ and fx 55 will debut around mid october, perhaps the 20th. they will both be on 130nm though. incidently, this is around the time the nforce 4 is suppose to debut as well, so we will see.

Reply to trooper11

You want one within January?

------------
<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A>

<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig</A> & <A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/benchmark.html" target="_new">3DMark score</A>

Reply to Spitfire_x86

That site is hilarious.

Shame it doesn't have a forum, or else I'd jump this sinking ship in a nano-second :lol: (joke)

_______________________
Whos round is it? Down that beer quick, smash my glass down, fall over the table - all rowdy and pissed

Reply to Ned_Flanders
- 0 +

We had a post last week from someone that was to get an fx53. His shop ended up offering him an fx55 instead. To be delivered oct. 18

Reply to endyen
- 0 +

Just hope it wasn't Michaels Computers :wink:

_____________________________________________
<font color=red> And the sign says "You got to have a membership card to get inside" Huh
So I got me a pen and paper And I made up my own little sign </font color=red>

Reply to RichPLS
- 0 +

I've heard once or twice that NDA for the NF4 (non-SLI variants, at least) ends October 19th...which just happens to be my 17th birthday :tongue: ! Anyway, it also happens to be 17 years after the day that the stock market crashed. Anyway, enough history on that day...I'm just hoping that NF4 brings some performance and isn't just a feature-set upgrade.

Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.

Reply to Vapor

Never realised you were that young! :eek:

:eek: When I was your age we all had to use an abacus to play doom on! You youngsters don't know how easy you've got it now.. [/Grumpy old man]

---
Epox 8RDA+ V1.1 w/ Custom NB HS
XP1700+ @200x10 (~2Ghz), 1.4 Vcore
2x256Mb Corsair PC3200LL/1x512Mb Corsair XMS PC4000 2.5-3-3-7
Sapphire 9800Pro (VGA Silencer Rev3) @418/742

Reply to ChipDeath
- 0 +

When he was born almost nobody owned a computer. If they did they were either a Mac 512/Mac Plus or some crap with a green/orange screen.

</font color=red><i><font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS </font color=blue><font color=red>AMERICA

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

Is the core on the current 939 90nm chips Newcastle then? I was looking at buying a 3500 and there were two variations listed, one regular 939 and one 939 on 90nm process.

Reply to Imp
- 0 +

I'm fairly sure that the 512kb cache CPUs are all Newcastle on the 939.

</font color=red><i><font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS </font color=blue><font color=red>AMERICA

Reply to dhlucke

According to what I just read on Anandtech, the 90nm 939 cores are Winchester, the 130nm cores are Newcastle. From what I could glean from the article, since they didn't say, is that Winchester is just a die shrink from the Newcastle at 130nm. Certain things had to be rearranged because of the 90nm process, but it's not a completely redesigned core.

Mike

Reply to fishmahn
Tom's Guide > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > AMD Winchester release date
Go to:

There are 12 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Google ads