Windows Validation Required!

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Hi,

Just to let everyone know, Micro$oft has got sick of all the illigal XP
users so now it is required to validate windows or else you wont be able
to update your computers or download anything from the Micro$oft site.

[image:
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/ [...] nTool.jpg]

Course' there is always a way to bypass this system legaly, all above
the law.

There is a very nice program called "AutoPatcher XP" avalible for
download since 2003 i think, its pretty big but it has a Lite and
UltraLite version. You can find it at http://www.autopatcher.com/.
There is usually a new version out every month, it alows you to update
windows xp without downloading anything exept for the program, every
month just download the upgrade for more updates.

The best thing about AutoPatcher XP is that it is free. Im not
advertising, im offering a sollution to peoples update problems. This
program is etremly good if you have a network of computers, just burn
it on CD, install on all computers and update windows without
downloading on windows update at all!

Have fun with this.


--
mupet0000

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

And why shouldn't Microsoft protect its interests by requiring validation
for downloads. If I stole something from you, you would be the first to
complain. Illegal copies amounts to theft!

--
John Barnett MVP
Associate Expert
http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org


"mupet0000" <mupet0000.1t5dpn@pcbanter.net> wrote in message
news:mupet0000.1t5dpn@pcbanter.net...
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to let everyone know, Micro$oft has got sick of all the illigal XP
> users so now it is required to validate windows or else you wont be able
> to update your computers or download anything from the Micro$oft site.
>
> [image:
> http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/ [...] nTool.jpg]
>
> Course' there is always a way to bypass this system legaly, all above
> the law.
>
> There is a very nice program called "AutoPatcher XP" avalible for
> download since 2003 i think, its pretty big but it has a Lite and
> UltraLite version. You can find it at http://www.autopatcher.com/.
> There is usually a new version out every month, it alows you to update
> windows xp without downloading anything exept for the program, every
> month just download the upgrade for more updates.
>
> The best thing about AutoPatcher XP is that it is free. Im not
> advertising, im offering a sollution to peoples update problems. This
> program is etremly good if you have a network of computers, just burn
> it on CD, install on all computers and update windows without
> downloading on windows update at all!
>
> Have fun with this.
>
>
> --
> mupet0000

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

"John Barnett MVP" <freelanceit@mvps.org.NOSPAM> wrote

> And why shouldn't Microsoft protect its interests by requiring validation
> for downloads. --
> John Barnett MVP

Because both PA and WGA are flawed and some legit XPs are being flagged as
illigitimate. Because MS assumes you're a pirate until you, if you're lucky,
prove otherwise. Not one pirate will be affected as the cracks come out one
or two days after MS "protects its interests". The ONLY people who are
affected are PAYING customers. Get it now?

Alias

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

bxf wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> "John Barnett MVP" <freelanceit@mvps.org.NOSPAM> wrote
>>
>>> And why shouldn't Microsoft protect its interests by requiring
>>> validation for downloads. --
>>> John Barnett MVP
>>
>> Because both PA and WGA are flawed and some legit XPs are being
>> flagged as illigitimate. Because MS assumes you're a pirate until
>> you, if you're lucky, prove otherwise. Not one pirate will be
>> affected as the cracks come out one or two days after MS "protects
>> its interests". The ONLY people who are affected are PAYING
>> customers. Get it now?
>
> And your alternative solution is???

LOL! F*#k Microsoft, by any means necessary.

MS is a proven corporate criminal. Both as a predatory monopoly, and as
an intellectual property thief.

It assumes EVERYONE is a scumbag, just as it is. So it treats is PAYING
CUSTOMERS as they are French criminal, guilty until proven innocent. In
the process, totally legitimate customers are getting screwed, but MS
doesn't gives a rat's ass about those who already paid for MS software
getting screw, they already banked those billions upon countless
billions! MS is more concerned about the pocket change they think PA
and WGA will bring in.

MS's KNOWS that completely innocent people get locked out by its PA and
WGA technologies, but it does care about those people. Well it's time
for customers to stand up for themselves, run to their windows and
scream, "I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it any longer!"

When MS sees how many people are pissed, and threatening to go
elsewhere, MS will start to listen, especially when its stockholders see
how little revenue PA & WGA technologies actually bring in. My guess is
that MS develops, impliments, and runs DRM, PA, WGA, and future
usage-limiting technologies in the red by very large margins.

What was you question, again? ;-)

I know and I'm getting there. The alternative is to educate as many
people as possible about the evil's of usage-limiting technologies.
Consumers, so they don't end up supporting it by continuing to fund
usage-limiting technologies by buying products from companies like MS
the develop and impliment them, and Stockholders, so they put pressure
on the operating officers of these corporation because these
technologies end up cutting into stockholders dividends!

So that is the alternative, to educate to promote change.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

He wants Microsoft to issue dongles to be plugged in to use the
operating system is my guess.

bxf wrote:

> Alias wrote:
>
>>"John Barnett MVP" <freelanceit@mvps.org.NOSPAM> wrote
>>
>>
>>>And why shouldn't Microsoft protect its interests by requiring validation
>>>for downloads. --
>>>John Barnett MVP
>>
>>Because both PA and WGA are flawed and some legit XPs are being flagged as
>>illigitimate. Because MS assumes you're a pirate until you, if you're lucky,
>>prove otherwise. Not one pirate will be affected as the cracks come out one
>>or two days after MS "protects its interests". The ONLY people who are
>>affected are PAYING customers. Get it now?
>
>
> And your alternative solution is???
>

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:54:58 +0100, "John Barnett MVP"
<freelanceit@mvps.org.NOSPAM> wrote:

>And why shouldn't Microsoft protect its interests by requiring validation
>for downloads. If I stole something from you, you would be the first to
>complain. Illegal copies amounts to theft!

John where have you been? I been reading in newsgroups and web pages
that legal installs of all kinds are having problems getting the wga
approval.

Legal bought preinstalled system from major companies.
legally bought xp operating system-Upgrade, oem. retail

Greg Ro


Greg Ro

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

John Barnett MVP wrote:
> And why shouldn't Microsoft protect its interests by requiring
> validation for downloads. If I stole something from you, you would be
> the first to complain. Illegal copies amounts to theft!

Alleged illegal copies, don't you mean?

Microsoft is a LEGALLY PROVEN Intellectual Property thief, but people
that failed activation or validation are only ALLEGED IP thieves. PA
and WGA are not legal proof of any wrong-doing!

Plenty of people that are totally legally legitimate users of XP get
denied by PA and WGA, is that OK to you?

John, my hope is that karma catches up with you, and you get screwed by
usage-limiting technologies!

>
>
> "mupet0000" <mupet0000.1t5dpn@pcbanter.net> wrote in message
> news:mupet0000.1t5dpn@pcbanter.net...
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just to let everyone know, Micro$oft has got sick of all the illigal
>> XP users so now it is required to validate windows or else you wont
>> be able to update your computers or download anything from the
>> Micro$oft site. [image:
>> http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/ [...] nTool.jpg]
>>
>> Course' there is always a way to bypass this system legaly, all above
>> the law.
>>
>> There is a very nice program called "AutoPatcher XP" avalible for
>> download since 2003 i think, its pretty big but it has a Lite and
>> UltraLite version. You can find it at http://www.autopatcher.com/.
>> There is usually a new version out every month, it alows you to
>> update windows xp without downloading anything exept for the
>> program, every month just download the upgrade for more updates.
>>
>> The best thing about AutoPatcher XP is that it is free. Im not
>> advertising, im offering a sollution to peoples update problems. This
>> program is etremly good if you have a network of computers, just burn
>> it on CD, install on all computers and update windows without
>> downloading on windows update at all!
>>
>> Have fun with this.
>>
>>
>> --
>> mupet0000



--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:

> Not to worry, Microsoft is investigating all the
> purported hacks and they will eventually be rendered
> useless!

After about a bazillion updates.

This one is even funnier than all the hacks to IE. One would think that
the largest software company in the world would get it right earlier,
rather than later.

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

> LOL! F*#k Microsoft, by any means necessary.

Agreed!

Alternative solution??? Maybe someone with the smarts can decompile, reverse
engineer XP as much as possible and put it up for free download for others
to put it back together as much as possible, for all to use, or put all the
XP components and resources from a decompile for public free download. They
can call it Windows XFree. Time MS got taken up on the binary guerrilla
warfare it's picking with it's customers. No one likes a trouble maker!

Until then SuSE is lookin' good.

- Winux P

"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org> wrote in message
newsi03Pu5lFHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> bxf wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> "John Barnett MVP" <freelanceit@mvps.org.NOSPAM> wrote
>>>
>>>> And why shouldn't Microsoft protect its interests by requiring
>>>> validation for downloads. --
>>>> John Barnett MVP
>>>
>>> Because both PA and WGA are flawed and some legit XPs are being
>>> flagged as illigitimate. Because MS assumes you're a pirate until
>>> you, if you're lucky, prove otherwise. Not one pirate will be
>>> affected as the cracks come out one or two days after MS "protects
>>> its interests". The ONLY people who are affected are PAYING
>>> customers. Get it now?
>>
>> And your alternative solution is???
>
> LOL! F*#k Microsoft, by any means necessary.
>
> MS is a proven corporate criminal. Both as a predatory monopoly, and as
> an intellectual property thief.
>
> It assumes EVERYONE is a scumbag, just as it is. So it treats is PAYING
> CUSTOMERS as they are French criminal, guilty until proven innocent. In
> the process, totally legitimate customers are getting screwed, but MS
> doesn't gives a rat's ass about those who already paid for MS software
> getting screw, they already banked those billions upon countless billions!
> MS is more concerned about the pocket change they think PA and WGA will
> bring in.
>
> MS's KNOWS that completely innocent people get locked out by its PA and
> WGA technologies, but it does care about those people. Well it's time for
> customers to stand up for themselves, run to their windows and scream,
> "I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it any longer!"
>
> When MS sees how many people are pissed, and threatening to go elsewhere,
> MS will start to listen, especially when its stockholders see how little
> revenue PA & WGA technologies actually bring in. My guess is that MS
> develops, impliments, and runs DRM, PA, WGA, and future usage-limiting
> technologies in the red by very large margins.
>
> What was you question, again? ;-)
>
> I know and I'm getting there. The alternative is to educate as many
> people as possible about the evil's of usage-limiting technologies.
> Consumers, so they don't end up supporting it by continuing to fund
> usage-limiting technologies by buying products from companies like MS the
> develop and impliment them, and Stockholders, so they put pressure on the
> operating officers of these corporation because these technologies end up
> cutting into stockholders dividends!
>
> So that is the alternative, to educate to promote change.
>
> --
> Peace!
> Kurt
> Self-anointed Moderator
> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
> http://microscum.com/mscommunity
> "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
>

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:40:19 -0500, Greg Ro <webworm11@yes.lycos.com>
wrote:

>Your and kurt need to take your fight the microsoft test group.

I didn't realize Kurt and I were fighting (did you Kurt?)... You
really need to get off the medicine and keep up with the conversation
before you make an idiot out of yourself again.

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Sorry ed & Kurt. I did not know you were joking with each other.


Greg R

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

"Alias" <aka@[notme]maskedandanonymous.org> wrote in message
news:uTkDNz4lFHA.3656@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
> "John Barnett MVP" <freelanceit@mvps.org.NOSPAM> wrote
>
>> And why shouldn't Microsoft protect its interests by requiring validation
>> for downloads. --
>> John Barnett MVP
>
> Because both PA and WGA are flawed and some legit XPs are being flagged as
> illigitimate. Because MS assumes you're a pirate until you, if you're
> lucky, prove otherwise. Not one pirate will be affected as the cracks come
> out one or two days after MS "protects its interests". The ONLY people who
> are affected are PAYING customers. Get it now?

This is what happens when Microsoft marketeers hang out too much with the
MPAA and RIAA, and begin to actually believe the inflated figures these two
dinosauric entities claim to be the "ravages of piracy", when in reality
such are more a result of "no new talent for years, and no new content."


--
Stephen Goodman
Cartoons about DVDs and Stuff
http://www.earthlight.net/HiddenTrack

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:28:53 -0500, Greg Ro <webworm11@yes.lycos.com>
wrote:

>Sorry ed & Kurt.

You are most graciously welcome....

Regards,
Ed