Tom's Guide > Forum > Mobility Brands > Ericsson > S700i : any opinions yet ?

S700i : any opinions yet ?

Forum Mobility Brands : Ericsson - S700i : any opinions yet ?

TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

 

I'm interested in only 1 thing, and that is how bulky is it ? I owned a Z600
before and got rid of it because of the bulky size.

The rest of the specs of the S700i are ok with me.


--
"and hey...let's be careful out there"

David May
http://www.no-code.net
ftp.no-code.net

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

 

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.ericsson - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <2oa34oF81hkoU1@uni-berlin.de> on Sun, 15 Aug 2004 23:33:06 +0200, "In
Dreams I Walk With You" <pjREMOVETHIS@no-code.net> wrote:

>I'm interested in only 1 thing, and that is how bulky is it ? I owned a Z600
>before and got rid of it because of the bulky size.
>
>The rest of the specs of the S700i are ok with me.

The S700 is pretty big (4.23 x 1.93 x .96 in versus the Z600 3.5 x 1.9 x 1.1
in) and heavy (heavier than the Z600), and I think it's a shame that the big
screen isn't touch sensitive. Review, mostly of the camera:
<http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-s700-camera-en.shtml>
Sample pictures aren't terribly impressive.

I personally see little merit to a mediocre camera in a phone -- I'd rather
carry a good small digital camera (e.g., Sony DSC-P8), with some of
connectivity to my phone (Bluetooth and/or Memory Stick). With a strong
position in both product areas, but no integration, I think Sony is missing a
good opportunity.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

 

John Navas wrote:

> in) and heavy (heavier than the Z600), and I think it's a shame that the big
> screen isn't touch sensitive. Review, mostly of the camera:

Heh.

Considering there is no way to protect the display from errant touches,
I don't think that's such a bad thing that it doesn't have a touch screen!

> I personally see little merit to a mediocre camera in a phone -- I'd rather
> carry a good small digital camera (e.g., Sony DSC-P8), with some of
> connectivity to my phone (Bluetooth and/or Memory Stick). With a strong
> position in both product areas, but no integration, I think Sony is missing a
> good opportunity.

This is why my Nikon E5700 is always in my bag if I want to take
pictures. I do use the camera now and then though on my K700 and 6600.
It's just a matter of how badly I need the image.

I use my on-handset camera most often at work, capturing whiteboards!

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

 

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.ericsson - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <m9dUc.28033$Bb.16689@lakeread08> on Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:26:43 -0400,
incumbent <incumbent@gmail.com> wrote:

>John Navas wrote:
>
>> in) and heavy (heavier than the Z600), and I think it's a shame that the big
>> screen isn't touch sensitive. Review, mostly of the camera:
>
>Heh.
>
>Considering there is no way to protect the display from errant touches,
>I don't think that's such a bad thing that it doesn't have a touch screen!

It could be locked, just like the P800/900 with flip removed.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

 

John Navas wrote:

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.ericsson - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <m9dUc.28033$Bb.16689@lakeread08> on Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:26:43 -0400,
> incumbent <incumbent@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>John Navas wrote:
>>
>>
>>>in) and heavy (heavier than the Z600), and I think it's a shame that the big
>>>screen isn't touch sensitive. Review, mostly of the camera:
>>
>>Heh.
>>
>>Considering there is no way to protect the display from errant touches,
>>I don't think that's such a bad thing that it doesn't have a touch screen!
>
>
> It could be locked, just like the P800/900 with flip removed.
>

Yeah, I suppose that's true. I never liked having the flip off on my
P900 though. But it was the only way it'd fit into a Vaja case. Boo!

Though if SE made the UI more "finger friendly" and didn't require a
stylus, that would be pretty slick on a device like the S700.

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Guide > Forum > Mobility Brands > Ericsson > S700i : any opinions yet ?
Go to:

There are 11 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Google ads