GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 4870 x2 - Graphic & Displays
  Tom's Guide Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 4870 x2
 




Word :   Username :  
 
 Page : 1 2 3 4
Author
 Thread : GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 4870 x2
 
dtq
---------------
More Information

Last message on previous page:

yipsl wrote :

IMHO, ATI wins their test, even though they prefer Nvidia. CPU usage isn't all that great with ATI when Aero is enabled (who watches picture in picture anyways?), and they are comparing the latest Nvidia card with a prior generation 3870. We will see if this holds up when the 4850 and 4870 arrive.

ATI's image quality, except on one face scene in their review, is better than Nvidia's at default and Nvidia's fix for image quality actually causes more problems than it solves. Both card settings probably need tweaking but I've used Pure Cinema in a prior generation with a 7600gs and used AVIVO from the old All in Wonder cards to the 3870 generation and found it much better.

Plus, last time I checked, Pure Cinema costs an additional $50 or so direct download from Nvidia, whereas AVIVO is free and included in Catalyst releases. ATI began as the second best gamer GPU company but was always oriented towards video with gaming quality not far behind.

Considering the "tweaks" Nvidia's made at times to their drivers just prior to a game's release (Crysis demo's water fudging), I'm not sure that Nvidia wins hands down nowadays as the best gamer card. They are ahead in some titles but behind in others, ahead with some cards, but behind with others. Overall, it's neck and neck and I don't think that Nvidia deserves their rep as they've played fast and loose more often than ATI (i.e. their TWIMTBP program plus behind the scenes "tweaks" like boosting the PCIe x16 bus on certain Nvidia boards for 9600 benchies that actually led to instability overall).

Buy the GTX280 and enjoy, it won't be a bad card, but ATI's drivers get things balanced once the game's are released, and though Pure Cinema's improved over the past few years, IMHO, AVIVO still has it beat hands down where image quality is concerned.

Anyways, I hope this information helps you compare AVIVO and Pure Cinema. Hopefully, more sites like Tom's and Anandtech will update their comparisons once the new cards arrive.



I have to say I really coludnt give a fig about cpu usage during movies :D but it does sound as if the image quality differences are very give and take, would have to see it with my own eyes to decide between them, and if any advantage there was worth the posibility of sacrificing gaming performance. As I game more than I watch videos, if image quality during videos was an issue Id build a media centre PC dedicated to running the projector with the best video quality card I could find, but I dont have issues with the video quality I am getting. That said I do tend to play with settings to get things running where Im happy with them. Running a projector a decent focus probably makes more difference than the what card you are running it from.

I still reckon that a new projector will do more for me than a change to ATI, but I will continue to go with the gaming performance. I havent heard anything at all to convince me that ATI's current cards give better gaming images than Nvidias Current cards. (7800 vs 1950 was a different story and there I was looking towards the ATI).

I also believe I get far more extra image quality from display type (CRT over LCD) than I could get from ATI vs Nvidia, the biggest problem being the raw horse power required to drive a modern game at 2048x1536 with all the whistles and bells (and getting the whistles and bells running are one of the prime reasons to upgrade :D ) I quite often have to take a hit in the FPS to get the prettier image. But sli \ crossfire isnt the solution to my wants.

I am no Nvidia fan boy though, I am sitting back and waiting for actual benchmarks and will make my decision then, I would buy ATI in a heart beat if they offer what I want, (especially with the motherboard taking crossfire it gives extra options for upgrades should my gaming habits change) but the talk coming from the two companies it sounds like nvidia are aiming more for my current wants than ATI.

Now for another form of gaming performance enhancements one day I still want to test flash based hard drives effects on mmorpg's :D I do expect to see some considerable performance boosts from that, when I find the spare budget \ prices come down to something reasonable. Graphics cards have first priority at the moment though. Theres been nothing tempting from either camp for 18 months.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Reformulated with 20 percent less ahole !
More Information

Yeah, I'd buy ATI too, I always bought on value, but thius time I just wan't performance...so screw "VALUE" to a large degree...I am gonna keep the next system till it's old and crappy, so VALUE can take a flying leap for once.

If the 4870 x2 happens to win, I'll buy that, if the 280 wins, I'll get that.

I do have to say that red PCBs make me wanna barf, and that both catalyst and NV control center and NTUNE suck...ack. I hope if ATI wins, someone make's a black one, or at least green for christ's sake...I don't wan't fugly red and fugly driver.


---------------
X2 5400+, Biostar TA780G M2+ MATX, 4 gig mushkin, ECS 8800gts 512 , Asus 22", WD 6400aaks, CM 532, Kingwin 450w ATX 2.2

 

More Information

Waspy wrote :

Correct me if I'm wrong...it's not a 4870, it's a 4870X2...AKA it's one of those dual GPU crap solutions. Unimpressive.

Price aside, I'm sure 2x GTX280s could whoop on one 4870X2. But considering price, the 4870X2 might be a good way to go, who knows.

Price do matter,but look at it this way.If you are saying 2 GTX280 beats a 4870x2 then 2 4870x2 will beat 2 GTX280.Even though the 4870x2 has 2 gpu its still one graphics card just like the GTX280 is one graphics card.

More Information

royalcrown wrote :

Yeah, you laugh it up...we'll see when ATI loses...AGAIN...just like with the last 3 Nvidia generations. I don't hate ATI at all...they are just gonna be a generation behind performance wise yet again.

Lay off the CRACK with your toilet bowl fantasies :P




What last three generations? All I see is 2 generations with different names and a different manufacturing process. Geforce 9's are barely different from Geforce 8's. Not to mention, the 7's weren't really better than ATI. They each had their glory for a couple months while they other one stepped up their number of shaders and pipes. Nvidia and ATI have a history of trading blows and will continue to do so. As I remember it:

Radeon 9x00 > Geforce 5x00
Radeon xx00 < Geforce 6x00
Radeon x1x00 > Geforce 7x00 (I'm talking about shader intensive games, like oblivion)
Radeon HD 2x00 was hardly different than HD 3x00 < Geforce 8x00 was hardly different than the Geforce 9x00

Ati got far behind during their merger, but I wouldn't be too surprised if they came out on top this round, for a while anyway.

More Information

royalcrown wrote :

Yeah, I'd buy ATI too, I always bought on value, but thius time I just wan't performance...so screw "VALUE" to a large degree...I am gonna keep the next system till it's old and crappy, so VALUE can take a flying leap for once.

If the 4870 x2 happens to win, I'll buy that, if the 280 wins, I'll get that.

I do have to say that red PCBs make me wanna barf, and that both catalyst and NV control center and NTUNE suck...ack. I hope if ATI wins, someone make's a black one, or at least green for christ's sake...I don't wan't fugly red and fugly driver.


Old and crappy will be when 10.1 comes out some time this year.Nvidia have not implemented 10.1 because they cant.GTX280 will be a fast card now and a cripled card later

Jesus love boobies too.
More Information

ro3dog wrote :

Old and crappy will be when 10.1 comes out some time this year.Nvidia have not implemented 10.1 because they cant.GTX280 will be a fast card now and a cripled card later



+1

Evan the 3870 showed some surprising power when it went into DX10.1 mode.


God... I must sound like an ATi fanboy....... Sorry, its not that I'm pro ATi or anything, its just I like the way ATi went this time. They seemed to have learned from their mistakes, from the 8800 series and their merger digestion. I do think that the 4870 will be a decent card and I can only hope that it will be significantly quicker than my 8800 gtx. The 280gtx will be fast but I think it will start to lose out when it comes to quality. It will definitely lose out when games start to be more and more DX10.1 because of its inadequate architecture for the future.


---------------
And on the third day, God created the Remington bolt-action rifle, so that Man could fight the dinosaurs. And the homosexuals.
Reformulated with 20 percent less ahole !
More Information

I don't think the superset of direct x that is .1 is going to make any real difference anytime soon.


---------------
X2 5400+, Biostar TA780G M2+ MATX, 4 gig mushkin, ECS 8800gts 512 , Asus 22", WD 6400aaks, CM 532, Kingwin 450w ATX 2.2

 

free Paul Pantone
More Information



royalcrown wrote :

Okay, I am gonna go on record before release day, just my 2 cents here:

1. ATI 47xx series will just beat 8800gts /8800gtx...

2. ATI 45xx series will suck and get stomped by current 8 series cards AND 260's

3. 280's will stomp the 47xx into the ground period and ATI will NEED the 47xx X@ just to EQUAL Nvidia's performance.

4. After ATI get's embarrassed yet again, ATI'ers will whine about VALUE blah, blah because they'll have to, ATI will not compete on ABSOLUTE performance with the SOLE exception of X2 parts period.

Yes, sometimes their rending is better, but I don't have time to notice it during fast gameplay.

Time will tell I suppose, but I am putting it on record before launch. The 47xx series just brings ATI up to date with the 8800 series...well up to date plus maybe a little better, but not all that great, ATI is gonna get embarrassed yet again.




yes, lets face it no one would like to end up with egg on there face

god like
More Information

royalcrown wrote :

I don't think the superset of direct x that is .1 is going to make any real difference anytime soon.



did you even bother to read any of those DX10.1 reviews.first you say value isnt important.then you say value is important.again you said performance is important.next,you said hd4870x2 was crap.then you said you are going to buy it if its better.
:pfff:
dont worry.i wont quote you anymore.there is no point in.........ah forget it!
Have a nice DAY!

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by area61 on 06-10-2008 at 06:00:47 PM
Reformulated with 20 percent less ahole !
More Information

area61 wrote :

did you even bother to read any of those DX10.1 reviews.first you say value isnt important.then you say value is important.again you said performance is important.next,you said hd4870x2 was crap.then you said you are going to buy it if its better.
:pfff:
dont worry.i wont quote you anymore.there is no point in.........ah forget it!
Have a nice DAY!



No, I didn't say the X2s were gonna be crap, I SAID ATI needs the X2 just to keep up with the single gpu 280s...the 4850s will be the CRAP if their is a crappy ATI...regardless, I am just saying ATI is gonna get beat yet again....

If I am wrong and ATI wins, I'll be buying that.

I don't have any secret benchmarks...just looking at Nvidia's performance since the 6 series vs ATI's performance.


---------------
X2 5400+, Biostar TA780G M2+ MATX, 4 gig mushkin, ECS 8800gts 512 , Asus 22", WD 6400aaks, CM 532, Kingwin 450w ATX 2.2

 

Reformulated with 20 percent less ahole !
More Information

spaztic7 wrote :

The point is that Nvidia can not get true DX10 to work. They have had issues with it and have a hybrid card out... for the past few generations (8800, 9800, and soon to be 200 unless they add DX10.1 support). How can the better card manufacturer, who makes a better product, fail to deliver true DX10. The failed so hard, that Microsoft had to dumb down the requirements for DX10.

ATi got it working right out of the gate.

Also, Crysis is not DX10 with a patch, nor is Assassins Creed (um... that is actually DX10.1 until the recent patch because if Nvidias poor performance), SC2, S3, FC2, Spore are all native DX10 and hopefully DX10.1.


As an owner of an 8800gtx, I am waiting for the next generation and hoping that they are significantly better than my current card. I am also hoping that both manufactures have the highest technology possible on the cards to give the longest life and best performance out of them. As other have said, the best performance gets my money... well, best performance at 1920x1200.



I'd like to see how microsoft dumbed it down, considering that when NVIDIA released their hardware MS had just finished screwing around with the DX10 specs.


---------------
X2 5400+, Biostar TA780G M2+ MATX, 4 gig mushkin, ECS 8800gts 512 , Asus 22", WD 6400aaks, CM 532, Kingwin 450w ATX 2.2

 

Jesus love boobies too.
More Information

royalcrown wrote :

No, I didn't say the X2s were gonna be crap, I SAID ATI needs the X2 just to keep up with the single gpu 280s...the 4850s will be the CRAP if their is a crappy ATI...regardless, I am just saying ATI is gonna get beat yet again....

If I am wrong and ATI wins, I'll be buying that.

I don't have any secret benchmarks...just looking at Nvidia's performance since the 6 series vs ATI's performance.




Its cool, everyone flops like a politician every now and then.
There are a couple of features that 10.1 should have that can give it better results... like the free 2x-4x AA and such.


Oh, here are some benchmarks for the 280gtx and such.


Link:
http://resources.vr-zone.com/image_deposit/up/12129429920567edf598.jpg


http://www.imagehost.ro/pict/08211400484c2168ad54b.jpg




Message edited by spaztic7 on 06-10-2008 at 06:22:49 PM

---------------
And on the third day, God created the Remington bolt-action rifle, so that Man could fight the dinosaurs. And the homosexuals.
За повече контакти - търсете разклонители
More Information

:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Nvidia = loser :cry:
Long Live ATI :bounce:

...Waiting for HD4870X2 :) (the fastest card in the world)

Reformulated with 20 percent less ahole !
More Information
n°1824635
06-10-2008 at 06:30:51 PM
Hide