Tom's Guide > Forum > CPU & Components > Other Components > Windows 7 Screenshots

Windows 7 Screenshots

Forum CPU & Components : Other Components - Windows 7 Screenshots

TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!

Related content
News

See all topics related to "tomshardware"

Here it comes

Windows 7 screenshots

http://wepokers.blogspot.com/search?q=windows+7

Have a look at these beauties..

Then say to you self

Windows Vista ME

Add a reply

Yeah VISTA ME lol the best name for it
I hope the beauty wont be like the beauty of current VISTA

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

screenshots this early are not a good indicator of a final product... remember builds of longhorn?

------------------------------ macgirlfriend:
"Hey I don't get you people, the people on insanely mac were so much nicer"
Reply to skittle

That MinWin concept sounds really good. Hopefully Microsoft uses that in Windows 7 as the article claims they will.

Reply to runswindows95

A light Windows installation? Sounds like a great idea tbh.

Reply to Demonic Goldfish

32-bit??? Why do they bother?

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to anthropophaginian

anthropophaginian wrote :

32-bit??? Why do they bother?

To say they cared

and for num nuts to load on their pentium 4's and comming to people like me for upgrades..

whooo ahh

Reply to Harry-Plopper

Its based on the Vista Kernal i read, not MinWin.... Vista ME indeed, if can imagine

Reply to grieve

actually, current builds are based on a server 2008 kernel. Later builds will be built on whatever updates to the kernel there are.

minwin is more of a side project... it seems.

------------------------------ macgirlfriend:
"Hey I don't get you people, the people on insanely mac were so much nicer"
Reply to skittle

Looks good so far I suppose. Hopefully it will turn out to be better than Vista, otherwise I'll be using XP longer than I expected.

Those screenshots, while tempting, are way too early in the development process to be anything. They just load the kernel on Vista based GUI for testing. The final product will more-than-likely look nothing like that.

For MinWin, they're basically ripping the guts out of the current Windows kernel and starting from scratch, getting rid of all the bloat.

WinServ '08 uses a kernel called MinWin, which is "similar" in that they reduced the current Windows kernel somewhat, but it is not the same thing they are doing for the Windows 7 kernel, please don't confuse the two.

Where WinServ's MinWin is an apple (kernel) with the skin layer peeled away, the Windows 7 MinWin is nothing but the core of the apple (kernel) with all the juicy, bloated layers thrown away.

Don't forget, keyword for Windows 7 is Modular

Reply to seboj

I recon the images aint that far off....

I mean Vista images came out early and it ended up looking the same 2 years later...

Vista looked the same through out its beta releases so why cant it not look like it..

Anyway, its amazing how someone finds an artical and THW finds a article the very next day..

Reply to Harry-Plopper

looks good i guess, everything is big and squashy, wehn working with sysem a lot form over function any day,

Unlike most of you im actually content with vista and quite like, especailly over XP. with vista if you dont like something new, turn it off, ie UAC, the Aero...

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to dobby

dobby wrote :

Im actually in agreeance, i only recently installed VISTA on my gaming machine (after SP1 came out) and ive had very few problems. My main complaint is that there is no longer an "UP" folder button in Explorer only a "Back". My X-fi works properly (minor crackling due to another issue), and gaming wise its been great. Ive turned all UAC, Aero, Indexing and all the other turf off so im happy.

Quote :

A light Windows installation? Sounds like a great idea tbh.

Im actually looking at installing Server2008 in its command line mode to see how it goes, as its only going to be used for DNS and DHCP initially so it should be interesting.

------------------------------ "This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Reply to chookman

@Microsoft:

1. Kill the 32-bit, forcing every thing else to be (ie drivers,etc) to be x64.

2. Optimize for Dual/Quad/Hexa(?)/Octa(?) core CPUs.

3. Make installation like a Linux installation, which enables you to take off stuff (ie. help files, games,etc)

4. Make the full-installation small, preferably less tan 2-3GB. Kill all the bloat ware!

5. Tame the UAC.

6. Give users an option between XP/VISTA/2000 look.

7. Don't make more than 4 different versions. (Including a server version)

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Shadow703793 on 05-29-2008 at 12:43:39 AM

------------------------------

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/3815217176_0a5be7955d_o.gif

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3818083596_1a772f7162_o.gif

Reply to Shadow703793

Shadow703793 wrote :

@Microsoft:

1. Kill the 32-bit, forcing every thing else to be (ie drivers,etc) to be x64.

2. Optimize for Dual/Quad/Hexa(?)/Octa(?) core CPUs.

3. Make installation like a Linux installation, which enables you to take off stuff (ie. help files, games,etc)

4. Make the full-installation small, preferably less tan 2-3GB. Kill all the bloat ware!

5. Tame the UAC.

6. Give users an option between XP/VISTA/2000 look.

7. Don't make more than 4 different versions. (Including a server version)

1. That will kill off alot of users that only have 32bit machines (although scheduled release of 2010 should help that)
2. I agree with and alot of programs are getting there already
3. They used to have this in the Win98 days and got rid of it, kinda sucks not having it there. First thing i do is remove a heap of **** from the install.
4. I dont think there is much bloatware on windows itself, but i dont think 2-3gb is ever going to happen again.
5. I just turn it off
6. I dont get why people want to upgrade then make it look and act the same as the previous version? What s the point?
7. Agree completely cmon, Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Buisness, Ultimate... 32bit and 64bit of almost every version then you move to the server variants PUHlease

------------------------------ "This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Reply to chookman

1. I think those ppl. should upgrade. :lol:

5. True, but it's kind of a "helpful" tool if it works right.

6. Have you used Office 2007? PPl @ my school are going crazy trying figuring out all the new menus. (Thankfully all the shortcut keys still work the same ) imagine what it would do to the mases if they do a completely new GUI.

Also see:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7422924.stm

Yeah right, I will still be using my G5 till then and even after that.

Message edited by Shadow703793 on 05-29-2008 at 03:24:26 AM

------------------------------

Reply to Shadow703793

G5 all the way baby

------------------------------ "This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Reply to chookman

arnt those screens from the new windows touch??

Reply to zerosugar

Ask the community Add a reply

Tom's Guide > Forum > CPU & Components > Other Components > Windows 7 Screenshots

Go to:

Help |
Forum rules

There are 13 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Page generated in 0.315 seconds

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel

Google ads