Tom's Guide > Forum > CPU & Components > Sound Cards > realtek ac97 vs. soundlblaster audigy?

realtek ac97 vs. soundlblaster audigy?

Forum CPU & Components : Sound Cards - realtek ac97 vs. soundlblaster audigy?

TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Hey guys. I am currently using the onboard realtek ac97 audio. It has worked well so far, supplying decent sound. Will this soundblaster audigy se improve the sound quality AND improve fps in games? http://us.creative.com/products/pr [...] duct=14257

Thanks guys!

------------------------------ Amd x2 6400+ @ 3.5ghz | Ati 3870 | 3gb ram
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

You should see a slight improvement all round (provided its WinXP dont think Vista likes these yet)... although you will want some good speakers to hear it

------------------------------ "This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Reply to chookman

Are you running XP or Vista. Vista has done away with support for hardware audio and getting support is not easy.

Reply to allhands
- 0 +

Not really, that card won't do much gaming wise. I used to have one like that, the chip is crap and run EAX emulated, albeit a little better than realtek. As for sound quality if you have an realtek HD then it will not be much different. If you have an realtek AC97, then that card might improve the soung a little.


Message edited by thuan on 03-18-2008 at 04:33:02 AM
Reply to thuan
- 0 +

I recently upgraded from a Realtek 8 Channels ALC888 integrated Audio controller to the Audigy SE.
(Like you I was wondering if it was worth the money)

Result :
A slight increase in sound quality. Also I like the Creative Audio settings. it's a bit like my Iriver MP3 Player "3D" mode, although the Iriver still deliver the best sound quality of any hardware I have owned.

I also got a tremendous increase in Microphone input quality.
It's was one of the reason pushing the upgrade. I got crappy result with the Realtek microphone, and the micro integrated to my Microsoft webcam was not that great either. I was used to power on the Thinkpad for skype calls as it got a very decent micro.
Now recording quality is great, even better than on the Thinkpad.

If u want better quality you have to pocket much more money for the next good offering.
I understand that the first cards in the X-fi line (xtreme audio and xtreme player) are almost the same hardware wise as the audigy SE, with an heavier software package, so It don't seem a good deal. So if you want better you should look at the mid range X-Fi.

You may also want to read the user's reviews on Newegg, that here that I found the more user's opinions on the Audigy and on the others cards.


Message edited by leind on 03-26-2008 at 06:03:17 AM
Reply to leind
- 0 +

chookman wrote :

You should see a slight improvement all round (provided its WinXP dont think Vista likes these yet)... although you will want some good speakers to hear it



Sound quality will also depend on which AC97 chip is used. Some have better sound quality than the old audigies.

The audigy SE also does not have hardware DSP. As such dont expect any framerate gains as its all going to go onto the CPU anyway. For a cheap soundcard I would recommend a audigy 2 ZS it has hardware DSP and they are real cheap these days.

------------------------------ E6600 3.2ghz, HD3870, 4gb Ram.
XP 32 / Vista 64 Dual boot
Reply to MikosNZ

I agree with the above, also, being as you have a FX55 you will see a little boost since that card will offload the audio from the cpu to the card itself Audigy 2ZS

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn
Tom's Guide > Forum > CPU & Components > Sound Cards > realtek ac97 vs. soundlblaster audigy?
Go to:

There are 14 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Google ads