AMD OR Intel ?
Forum Overclocking : CPUs - AMD OR Intel ?
Whats up boys ?
What do you think is the best for gaming think ??
For me its amd
Intel definately!no doubt about that.even not gaming Intel will still be better.Intel is more efficient clock for clock.
From a price to performance standpoint they both have their strengths, and always will that is the nature of business. Intel has the advantage at the moment of having more expensive offerings that are faster than what AMD offers, of course this only applies if you are willing to pay more for more performance. Figure out your budget first, then take a look at what's in that range. Personally AMD has always had the price ratio that I've aimed for. But if I had the cash to drop on a Core 2 Extreme, I probably would in a heartbeat.
^OC will get you extreme series performance!
i would never buy a extreme CPU its just total waste of money.
That is What I am talking about guys . I dont wanna wast my money , so Amd has a good price and I think its very good 4 me
Reply to George-pc
worst thread ever
if you already think so why you even bother open this thread?
intell offer more value for money when you move from the lower end to mid and top.plus OC will blow AMD out of the water easily.
IMO, if you want to spend less than $600 on a build then AMD ftw. Otherwise, Intel is better. Although, the phenom is now at a very attractive price, $175 for the 9950. I still prefer the Q6600, it overclocks higher =).
Long live Q6600!
i wonder how the new Q8200 will fair.but i guess it will pwned the 9950BE so bad that will make AMD cry and reduce the price further!so we will be happy with the extra price reduction!
Look at more post by george-pc , he also did it with an ATI VS NVIDIA thread, cut the crap... this thread doesn't make any sense, it's al about flaimbait.
Message edited by radium69 on 09-08-2008 at 11:15:29 PM
but its like when he said
| Quote : .......Amd has a good price and I think its very good 4 me....... |
whats the point of asking other people which one should i go for?
you ask these sort of questions only when you are not clear of which one is better and is the extra worth it. but he is like AMD is for me
=.="
Message edited by iluvgillgill on 09-08-2008 at 11:15:29 PM
| radium69 wrote : Look at more post by george-pc , he also did it with an ATI VS NVIDIA thread, cut the crap... this thread doesn't make any sence, it's al about flaimbait. |
exactly.
GTFO George
2GB DDR400 Corsair VS (4*512) | eVGA nVidia GF 7600GS AGP vmod 1.46/1.91 OCd 759/907
WD 160GB & 640GB SATA
WinXP MCE 2004
Reply to KyleSTL
TROLL!
lol!!!512MB wasted!hmmm let see who/what can I possibly blame?let me think!!
.
.
.
.
thinking
.
.
.
.
.
AH!!!128bit bus!!!!
LOLZ
if you're actually plan to play newer games go Intel, besides it clock way better. I went from AMD to Intel few months ago, from what I can see I won't be going back. Unless AMD will introduce some performance 4 normal budget. But when it comes to GFX, AMD all the way though
2GB DDR400 Corsair VS (4*512) | eVGA nVidia GF 7600GS AGP vmod 1.46/1.91 OCd 759/907
WD 160GB & 640GB SATA
WinXP MCE 2004
Reply to KyleSTL
| KyleSTL wrote : Well, at least it's not the 8500GT 1GB |
i tell ya thats a even better joke then 8600GT 1GB!lol
| KyleSTL wrote : ...says the guy who owns an 8600GT 1GB. |
i lol'd. but if the question is which brand do you prefer, im gonna say neither. i buy whichever cpu offers the best performance for the price i intend to pay. right now i have an amd cpu because i was on an extremely tight budget, but when it's time for my next build, im not going to look at amd any higher than intel. for the record, every other pc that was ever purchased by anyone in my family has been an intel-powered machine.
Reply to Nik_I
and is it faster?
AMD is better around a $700 build and competitive up to $1200 builds. It's the way to go if you want a system with at least 2 full x16 PCI-E slots without feeling like you got hosed on the board. With the 780G and 790GX boards AMD is definitely the choice for HTPC setups. They are also good for upgradability since you should be able to put AM3 chips into AM2+ boards, assuming your board provides enough watts and your vendor gives you a BIOS update. At the higher end though Intel is definitely better right now.
Reply to megamanx00
| George-pc wrote : Whats up boys ?
|
What you need is a better video card............
Gigabyte M61P-S3
4 GB OCZ Fatal1ty DDR2 800
Asus 4850 512mb
Reply to caamsa
if you want a GOOD gaming machine you want intel. i was an AMD boy for a long time but i couldnt go past the Q6600 last time i upgraded. my mate told me i was crazy and he got a phenom BE and told me he would destroy me with overclocking potential......... oooh how i laughed for a week when it managed to reach a maximum 2.5 GHZ (stock 2.33) stable. mean while i have been runing at 3.6 GHZ (stock 2.4) for 6 months.
the point is intels ability to overclock is amazing and a child could do it!
if your a serious gamer with a bit of cash why wouldnt you buy it?
The way to avoid flamewars is to get specific. Who cares about whether the brand is AMD or Intel, if you are starting from scratch and pick your own MoBo?
A 45nm e5200 OC'd to 3.8 GHz is THE unbeatable budget processor. Couple it with a cheap $50 P35, an ATI 4850 (with rebate), and you have the foundation for a killer budget system.
Reply to husky mctarflash
TROLLS aren't looking to avoid flame wars, they are looking to start them.
Flame flame flame. Flame flame flame... flame, but, flame flame flame flame flame... flame.
IMHO.
There are 15 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
Please mind
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.
