Tom's Guide Forums
  Tom's Guide Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Is call of duty 4 better graphics on PC or Xbox?
 


Word :   Username :  
 
 Page : 1 2
Next
Author
 Thread : Is call of duty 4 better graphics on PC or Xbox?
 
Stupid Question
More Information

Last message on previous page:

vip3569 wrote :

Soldier, is it really necessary to show a pic of your computer every time you post




Oh be nice, maybe that is all he's got going for him.


---------------
EVGA 750i FTW ¤ Intel E8400 @ 3.6ghz ¤ EVGA 8800GTS 512 ¤ 2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 ¤
Western Digital Raptor X 150GB ¤
MCSE, MCSA, Comptia A+ N+

 

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Quote :

Soldier, is it really necessary to show a pic of your computer every time you post

 

My rig:
http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/oldcomputer.jpg

 

I just added some LED's to the top of the keyboard though.

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by rgeist554 on 01-31-2008 at 08:00:15 PM
Stupid Question
More Information

rgeist554 wrote :

Quote :

Soldier, is it really necessary to show a pic of your computer every time you post



My rig:
http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp- [...] mputer.jpg

I just added some LED's to the top of the keyboard though.




And that thing may actually be worth more.


---------------
EVGA 750i FTW ¤ Intel E8400 @ 3.6ghz ¤ EVGA 8800GTS 512 ¤ 2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 ¤
Western Digital Raptor X 150GB ¤
MCSE, MCSA, Comptia A+ N+

 

www.warsow.net (Free FPS Game)
More Information

LukeBird wrote :

Not necessarily..
If a video card could output to full HD resolution, but with no filters, shading etc. then the 360 would look better.
You'd need a card capable of outputting to full HD, with say 4x AA (I'd guess thats probably along the lines of what the 360 runs, but it is just an educated guess...) all the effects and at a solid 40fps? I don't know what the target fps for the 360 is, but again just an educated guess at 40fps.
To do that on a CPU, I'd imagine you're looking at 3870 minimum, so not quite as clear cut as "Nope!" ;)



The 360 version is upscaled to 1080p from 1024x600 resolution (or it may be the other way around) either way it is low and strange and has 2x AA. On say a 24" monitor at 1920x1200 even without AA if the computer you are running on could handle the graphics turned up and all options on then there is no contest.

I own CoD 4 on PS3, 360 and PC. I play it on the PC you see in the sig on a 20" (1680x1050 res) lcd monitor with no AA and everything turned up and I can promise you that there is NO comparison other than modeling. The color definition and texture resolution on the PC is much higher and overall just better quality. Plus the the frames are better as I lose frames less often than the 360 or ps3 does.

From my own personal experience this is how the chain goes graphically. The 360 looks better than the PS3, but only marginally and the PC looks significantly better than both. That being said. It looks great on all 3, but I play it mostly on the PS3, which mind you...is my least favorite controller to play with of the 3 control schemes and it is the most laggy online, but none the less I have more friends playing on the PS3 and that is what matters most to me.

I have logged over a day of gametime in MP on my PS3, 360, PC and Laptop as well as beatin the SP on every platform usually playing a different difficulty. (I have not beatin veteran nor do I plan 2. lol) I have done side by side comparisons of all 3 platforms on the same TV and on the same Monitor and that is what I am basing this information off of.

So the answer the OP's question. No the 360 doesn't look better, but they all look and play good so just tell your friend to enjoy his game.

Best,

3Ball


---------------
ABIT AB9 Pro P965 Motherboard
Intel C2D E6420 @ 2.80ghz w/ (8x350mhz, 1.3625v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Orthos Stable)
(2x2048mb) G. Skill DDR2 8000 @ 875mhz w/ (5-5-5-10: 2T, 2.1v)
VisionTek HD4870 512mb @ (785mhz/925mhz/AC Accelero Twin Turbo)
Stupid Question
More Information

What, my "end of thread" answer wasnt good enough!?


---------------
EVGA 750i FTW ¤ Intel E8400 @ 3.6ghz ¤ EVGA 8800GTS 512 ¤ 2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 ¤
Western Digital Raptor X 150GB ¤
MCSE, MCSA, Comptia A+ N+

 

www.warsow.net (Free FPS Game)
More Information

LukeBird wrote :

Although I know the 360 can only output at 1080i, the PS3 can run 1080p can it not?



The 360 has no problem outputting in 1080p. Even in component it can be done as long as your TV supports it, but the VGA cable as well as HDMI do it for sure on every TV.

Best,

3Ball


---------------
ABIT AB9 Pro P965 Motherboard
Intel C2D E6420 @ 2.80ghz w/ (8x350mhz, 1.3625v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Orthos Stable)
(2x2048mb) G. Skill DDR2 8000 @ 875mhz w/ (5-5-5-10: 2T, 2.1v)
VisionTek HD4870 512mb @ (785mhz/925mhz/AC Accelero Twin Turbo)
More Information

rallyimprezive wrote :

anyone that is better than me must be cheating, thats all there is to it....


:lol: Nice one.


---------------
MSI P6N SLI Platinum, Q6600, 2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC8000,
SLI BFG 8800GT OC 512MB, SB X-Fi Fatality, Antec TruePower Trio 550W, Windows XP pro
*Smacks turpit with a +5 ban stick*
More Information

rallyimprezive wrote :

anyone that is better than me must be cheating, thats all there is to it....


So if I'm better than the cheaters, what does that make me?


---------------
http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w179/random1301/Ibanezrandom-1.png
Sig art copyright verndewd

Ode to Fanboi: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] l#t1862103
Plz write"click" on ur desktop
More Information

Graphics War:
PC vs Console
PC > Console?
PC < Console?
PC = Console?

Depends on the output capabilities of the processing hardware ouputting the signal, and the display medium used to display such a signal...

you want it simplified?

SAR = Standard Aspect Ratio
HD = Hi-Def
WS = Widescreen

SAR Monitor - 1280x1024, or 1,310,720 pixels
21" WS = 1600 x 1200, or 1,920,000
1080P = 1920×1080, or 2,073,600 pixels
24"/27" WS = 1920x1200, or 2,304,000 pixels
dual-monitor = 1280x1024x2, or 2,621,440 pixels
tri-monitor = 1280x1024x3 = 3,932,160 pixels
30" WS = 2560x1600, or 4,096,000 pixels

so yes and no... if your friend has a 21" widescreen with max resolution of 1600x1200, there may be a very small difference in picture...

HOWEVER... you also have to take into account Textures and compress method... when u have to fit all information onto a DVD, bet there's a loss in quality due to compression... but on a harddrive that can store DVD's like DVD's store textures, the textures can definitely be made to shine...

in this case of CoD4 though... no... the quality is NOT better... the textures had to be compressed to fit the game, in it's entirety, onto a disk... they were compressed enough to loss quality, and on top of that, the game, to run smoothly, was coded for a smaller resolution, which the xbox then scales to fit the screen... it's a good question though

let's not forget that some super-highend TV's support a resolution higher than 1080p... the biggest one on record is an 8 MegaPixel TV (8,388,608 pixels) let's see your console output to that! heck, I'd like to see an xbox emulator set to run at xbox's native resolution run on a monitor without full screen... wonder how much screen size it'll take up!!

Also, the xbox can't scale graphics for output beyond 1080p so if we stepped it up, there'd be a HUGE difference in quality... speaking of huge, in regards to quality, how big are the pixels? ;)

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by truromeo4juliet on 02-01-2008 at 12:34:15 AM

---------------
[WARNING:] Post counts do NOT reflect level of expertise.
[DISCLAIMER:] If I want your opinion, I'll ask for it.
[QUESTION OF THE DAY]: And just WHO is... Tom Shardware?
Master-de-bater
More Information

randomizer wrote :

So if I'm better than the cheaters, what does that make me?


A hacker?


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
More Information

randomizer wrote :

So if I'm better than the cheaters, what does that make me?


One who gets booted often. ;)


---------------
MSI P6N SLI Platinum, Q6600, 2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC8000,
SLI BFG 8800GT OC 512MB, SB X-Fi Fatality, Antec TruePower Trio 550W, Windows XP pro
*Smacks turpit with a +5 ban stick*
More Information

Or a developer using backdoors!


---------------
http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w179/random1301/Ibanezrandom-1.png
Sig art copyright verndewd

Ode to Fanboi: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] l#t1862103
Stupid Question
More Information

randomizer wrote :

So if I'm better than the cheaters, what does that make me?



A loser.


---------------
EVGA 750i FTW ¤ Intel E8400 @ 3.6ghz ¤ EVGA 8800GTS 512 ¤ 2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 ¤
Western Digital Raptor X 150GB ¤
MCSE, MCSA, Comptia A+ N+

 

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information
n°1785693
02-01-2008 at 01:02:29 AM