Tom's Guide > Forum > General Networking > Firewall > Is the Netgear FVX538 any good ?
Is the Netgear FVX538 any good ? - General Networking
TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
XAnkth   11-24-2006 at 10:54:57 AM

We're contemplating using the Netgear FVX538 as it's considerably more cost effective than a WatchGaurd / SonicWall / Cisco solution. Is it any good though ? We need to plug about 200 users into it (email/browsing/etc. only), and 4 file servers.

Is the netgear support any good ? Or am I creating a problem for myself ?

Would much appreciate any help.

XAnkth.

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
blue68f100   11-24-2006 at 11:35:58 PM
- 0 +

I have the 538 younger brother FVS338. It has been a good router with some firmware issues. These issues have been resolved with beta software. Netgear only gives you 90 days of free phone tech support. There level 2 and 3 techs are good. The firewall has been good in my 338, no issues.

The 538 has a powerful xscale cpu and a good amount of ram. If you are planing on using the router for your proxy filter, may not be a good choice.

It supports the number of users with out any problems.

Are you planning on using the dual WAN port for load balancing or 1 for www and the other to your servers?

Will you be using VPN? The VPN wizards work fine on my 328 a long with their client software. Use it instead of ftp when I need access to my NAS boxes.

The 538 is just a fraction of what you will pay for the sonicwall/sisco setup.

Reply to blue68f100
XAnkth   11-25-2006 at 05:30:32 AM
- 0 +

We're not planning on using the VPN support or the dual load balancing. We don't have/need a DMZ.

What we really need is a decent firewall, with robust DHCP services, and the ability to block out p2p, and other bandwidth hogging apps (unless they're running over port 80).

Reply to XAnkth
claybell   02-07-2007 at 06:52:31 PM
- 0 +

AVOID USING THESE ROUTERS AT ALL COSTS!!!

The current (2.0) firmware has a memory leak that Netgear refuses to fix. Their solution is for me to reboot my router every 24 hrs. (I have FVX 538's, v1 and v.2 hardware, 338 and 318. All exhibit the memory leak behavior and if you use VPN tunnels between routers, you have to reboot every 24 hours. (about 3-4 days w/o using the VPN).

The tech support is possibly the worst on the planet. They refuse to pass information up the channel and constantly try and solve the problem with the same idiotic canned answers. 3rd tier support simply refuses to call back, never keeps appointments for trouble shooting and lies about the extent of the problem (everyone who upgrades has this problem).

FYI, if you don't upgrade there are multiple other issues (such as hung static routes and vpn incompatibility).

I’ve been a system admin for 20 years, I’m very proficient at networking and routing; and this has been the worst piece of tech I've ever had the misfortune to use.

Clay Bell.
clay.bell (at) innovative-gis.com

Reply to claybell
frediutah   10-03-2008 at 11:40:32 PM
- 0 +

I have 18 FVX538 and non of them experience leakage.

How are you testing this particular leak?

Are you using another hub or switch with port mirroring in between your modem (CSU/DSU) and the FVX538 WAN or what?

What firewall rules do you have on the FVX538?

Reply to frediutah
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Guide > Forum > General Networking > Firewall > Is the Netgear FVX538 any good ?
Go to:

There are 7 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.288 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Google ads