3DMark06 Score Post Them Here

Here's mine:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=676133

Summary:

4833 3DMarks
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ S939 @ 2.4GHz
1GB DDR RAM @ 436MHz
Radeon x1950 Pro 256MB (Core 600/Mem 1500)

not bad for a single 7900GS

Ah don't worry about it, you've made me feel better anyway that there's someone else with a normal system as opposed to one of these uber-rigs (I'm not bitter.... honest )

Theres nothing wrong with 6.5k. I ran +-5k wth my old pentium d 7600 rig, maxed out both on watercooling.

Now i run 13720 w/ moderate overclock.

Here's somethin to make all you ATi/AMD fans fairly proud.... 11,586 on my rig... I'm fairly pleezed

BTW the 3870 crossfire setup is berry nice, berry nice indeed. Crysis at high everything but shaders @ 1680x1050... Even tho COD4 looks better

edit: turned off a couple background programs n got 12073

Not bad for a poor little Phenom

lolz... JumpingJack was still here a year ago..

Too bad he left THGF... or it wouldn't be in its current state...

How do ya like them apples... not much to brag about. I would like 20+ on same hardware. I am waiting for new GPU coolers... but not sure if I want to go much higher with E8400 as I've heard it breaks down and you never achieve the volts you had before at 4.0ghz.

7000+ is good for now. My 8800 GT muscles me through games with good frame rate's and I'm playing at 1680x1050. I will upgrade system when a good video card is just not cutting it and my apps become slow, but my system is still smooth as silk.


[img]

16,280 default settings 1280x1024

1x 8800GTX at 756/1782/2160 (1.36v)
q6600 at 3.74GHz 416*9 (1.438v)
Vista 32bit Ultimate
EK Waterblocks
BlackIce 360GTX Rad
laing D5 Vario pump

Suicide run at 4.22GHz and GTX at 801/1839/2214 17,830 with ONE 8800GTX

Hay did you volt mod your 8800GTX? And hows it you know what your GPU voltage is? If I wanted to OC my E6600 to 3.8 I could but that would require over 1.56 volts to do it, I am still sane though.


By systemlord at 2007-12-10

Yup, I have voltmoded it. It is an A2 revision and requires a bit more voltage than A3 revisions. All GTX are supposed to run at 1.30volts stock and Ultra's at 1.35V. Memory voltage is supposed to be at 1.95volts. Mine though was 1.28v at idle and 1.23 at load. Now it is 1.39v idle and 1.36v load. You can find guides all over the net on how to do it. The voltage then is measured at another point on the PCB. My memory was at 1.91 and I raised its voltage to 1.95 exactly. Mine has Samsung 1ns chips and they don't gain anything over 1.95v. Just heat. However, if your board has Hynix chips it can benefit from even higher voltage. Whatever you do, don't mess with Vdroop mods. The same applies to your motherboard. There is an Intel paper describing exactly what Vdrrop is supposed to do and you shouldn't mess with it.

Last point, don't raise your GTX voltage without proper cooling. Stock nVidia cooler is not suitable.

8800GTX in SLI and 8800GTX Single scores listed below:

17,759..., and 15,782

Running Vista 64 (See sig)

Overclocked ram to 1066 @ 5-5-5-15, CPU to 3.207 12x FSB 267
Video cards are actually both at 800/1125

12,331

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5542403

Pretty happy that I'm keeping up with quad Intel systems... hehe amd rocks

I get the same with a stock Q6600 and a HD2900Pro 1GB. Mine was 11400 max under Vista Premium 32bit. Need to OC the card. Have the Q6600 OC'ed to 3GHz but haven't tested it yet.

your getting 11400, stock settings, vista and a HD2900Pro 1GB??? Seems kinda odd you would be higher then my 8800GTX.

3Dmark 06' (free version) score: 12,670

e6550 @ 3.15GHz 1800FSB
evga 8800gt 512 @ 700/1000
2gigs Crucial Ballistics 5,5,5,15 DDR2-800 @ DDR2-900


not too shabby for what i'm workin with!

It isnt low, it is in the top 200,000 out of 3million for similar machines (average). If i OC the processor to only 2.7 i get around 11,900

Thats what I have woundered. But the memory probably helps and its GDDR4 so its a bit speedier.

I might try that and OC and disable SpeedStep and C1E cuz the way 3DMark06 goes I think it runs my CPU at 2GHz instead of the full all out 3GHz. I have my memory at cas5 but might try for cas4. Just got it stable @ 3GHz a few weeks ago with a 1:1 FSB/memory ratio.

People never believe that I can play Crysis @ 1280x1024 at very high but I can. I usually lower shadows and water since they dont matter. Crysis is a video memory hungry due to the large textures at that quality so extra video memory cuts some FPS lag by being able to load more.

13686

E6600 @ 3.4 ghz
XFX 8800 GT @ 702 / 1020
2GB Kingston DDR-2 667
- turned off desktop icons, shutdown any programs running
also disabled a few services, disabled internet...

14141

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5365156

Actually thats the card at stock 600/1850(925) which is the stock for the Sapphire Radeon HD2900Pro 1GB's. I have an P5K-E WiFi/AP and Intel chipsets have mostly been known to have better bandwidth especially memory than NVidias.

I did a little tweaking just now since I got home (was at work) and tried again. Turned off SpeedStep and C1E also set my memory timings to cas4 so they are 4-4-4-12(considering I have the same memory as the Corsair PC2-6400 but higher voltage for PC2-8500) and OC'ed my card using AMDGPUTool to 800/2200(1100). My score was 12320 3DMarks so almost 1k more.

Here is a link for some proofage:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5556544

Makes me happy that I can keep up with the 8800 series and helps me acknowledge that this was a good buy especially since I only paid $219 for it. I got it right before I finalized my purcahse and was going with a HD2900XT 1GB for $400 then I saw this right as it popped up.

I think the HD2900Pro/XT series has potential just needs the drivers to go with it. I am tempted to flash it with a HD2900XT BIOS or even a stable custom BIOS but am a little antsy. I still think the 512bit memory bus is very underused by the drivers cuz I remember going from 128bit to 256bit and I was never able to go back to 128bit. So maybe after a few more driver revisions they will be taking more advantage of the memory bus and we will see more improvements.

Thats not bad. Try 3GHz and see if it pushes above mine. I noticed your SM 2.0 is better than mine but my SM 3.0 is better than yous. My CPU score is a little less than 500 more than yours. More than likely due to the OC and maybe your RAM timings. What are they set at BTW?

I understand why you would wounder how I could keep up with your machine especially since you paid quite a bit for that GTX so it should perform good.

But for the OC on the CPU if it is a G0 you shouldn't have to raise the CPU voltage at all to hit 3GHz stable. I have mine set at 1.25 and it runs at 1.224 when it is under load and at 3GHz.

Try that and let us know what happens.