Tom's Guide Forum
  Tom's Guide Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » QX6700 or x2 Xeon 5310s for rendering?
 




Word :   Username :  
 
 Page : 1 2
Next
Author
 Thread : QX6700 or x2 Xeon 5310s for rendering?
 
More Information

Last message on previous page:

Quote :

here is my initial list

I have included all the hardware for the whole rig, though some of the things i already own and the prices next to them are the price i got it at the time (some things are a bit cheaper now) all prices are in Australian Dollars


To Buy List

Intel Xeon 5310 x4
$1,026
Tyan Tempest i5000XT
$798
Kingston ValueRAM 1GB 667MHz ECC FB-DIMM x4
$832
XFX 8800GTS PV-T80G-THF9
$670
Promise SATA300 TX4
$139
Thermaltake ToughPower 750W Modular
$230
Thermaltake BigWater SE
$150
Thermaltake Copper Memory Heat Spreader x4
$68
Western Digital Raptor 150GB x2
$670

$4,583 SUB TOTAL


Already Have List

Thermaltake Armor Full Tower Black /w Window
$230
Wester Digital Caviar SE16 320GB x4
$540
Wester Digital Caviar SE 250GB x2
$500
E-MU 0202 USB
$203
Wharfedale 8.1pro Active Monitors (pair)
$330
Sennheiser HD280pro Headphones
$300
ASUS PW191A
$400
Logitech diNovo Bluetooth Media Desktop
$300
Pioneer DVR-111D
$45
Generic Floopy Drive
$5

$2,853.00 SUB TOTAL


$7,436.00 TOTAL


the raptors will be in raid0 the rest will not be raided




Why would you be using 4 xeons? I take it you mean 2 5310s? Other than that it looks great. Really nice if I do say so myself. Now, any idea of an OS?
For one thing you do not want to use a pci sata card pci-e or pci-x is better.
and you can get dual cpu amd board with HARDWARE SAS raid and SLI with 2 full x16 slots for $300 less and it uses cheaper ddr2 ecc ram.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

but can I get the same performace for rendering with the AMDs?

More Information

No. But that Tyan Tempest board you have has two PCIe slots with x4 signals as well as a 133 MHz PCI-X slot. So I'd look at PCIe x4 or PCI-X SATA controller cards over a PCI card. The Promise TX4 is simply a 4-port SATA interface with no hardware RAID controlling abilities. I'd suggest something like HighPoint's RocketRAID 2310 if you want an inexpensive 4-port SATA PCIe controller. Like the Promise, it has no hardware RAID functions, but the HighPoint unit has 1 GB/sec bus bandwidth versus the Promise's 133 MB/sec. As such, the 2310 makes a good controller if you do not want to use the card's onboard RAID functions and instead use OS-based software RAID of use the disks independently. I use Linux md RAID to run my 3-disk RAID 5 that's connected to the HighPoint controller and it works great. Supposedly using the card's RAID functionality uses a bit more CPU than Linux md does but performance is still pretty good.

More Information

I don't really want to spend much on the SATA card nor do I need or want anything apart from my two raptors on RAID (system drive). The drives I will be attaching to the extra card will just be storage drives, I don't even really need them to be high speed. I was only looking to spend less than $150AUD on the card. I have seen the 2310 for about $230 which is a bit more than I wanted to spend.

More Information

I suppose computer parts in Australia are a bit more expensive than they are in the U.S. At today's exchange rates, a HPT 2310 here costs AU$180, not AU$230. You can't get a non-PCI 4-port SATA controller for less than about AU$160, so I suppose that you could perhaps get that PCI card as long as you don't think that you'll be accessing more than 2 drives at once. Or you could get a pair of PCIe x1 2-port cards for about AU$70-80.

More Information

Is that $70-80 ea. or for 2? eaither way is that the same brand again just a different model?

More Information

That would be for two. The price for a PCIe x1 2-port SATA card built on the ubiquitous Sil3132 chip is about US$30. Here is an example. two of those would be US$60, which would be AU$78.

More Information

getting those two cards looks like a better option for me, thanks for the help

More Information

that board has 6 sata and 8 sas ports so you do not need a sata card.

SAS can use sata disk so run you raid off of that.

More Information

Quote :

Thanks for the replies, but maybe I didn’t explain too well, the xeon I am looking at is a quad core xeon, but it comes in at a lower clock speed (1.6ghz) but with two of them that takes it to 3.2ghz which is higher than the QX6700 which is 2.66 (but from what i have seen that can be overclocked to around 3.2ish) which is why I am having difficulty choosing, the lower latency ram would be nice but if the xeons are going to give me a significant increase in speed, like would having 8 cores be faster than 4 at the speed? If the xeons can be over clocked then they would have a higher combined speed. Id be fine going with that, I just cant find any clear compassions between the two.



You realise you can OC those Clovers to 2.4 GHZ right??? http://forums.2cpu.com/showthread.php?t=77937

Why not get 5320s?

More Information

I am not too clear on the SAS thing, I thought that was some kind of SCSI connector

The 5320s are about $200+ ea. than the 5310s and with only 200mhz (yeah?) difference it didn't seem worth it. I am already pushing my budget, and with little difference in performance I don't think its worth the ~$400

I have seen the overclocking thread and I do intened to try overclocking

 Page : 1 2
Next
Top 

  Tom's Guide Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » QX6700 or x2 Xeon 5310s for rendering?

Go to:
 

Google ads