| Author |
Thread : Build a Cheap and Fast RAID 5 NAS
|
|---|---|
|
More Information
|
Last message on previous page: |
|
Related Pr oduct
|
Register or
log in to remove.
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
As several previous posters have mentioned, if you are going to do pure file sharing then you cannot beat a dedicated NAS box. NAS box does what it says on the tin, its a file server.
|
|
More Information
|
Here's my test results using the same parameters and 64k records in IOZone as your tests.
|
|
More Information
|
Hello all,
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
Hey, I just wanted to thank you all for this article again. I built up a nas from an old Dell Dimension 8100 P4. I put a SCSI card in and attached it to an old DVD ROM server, and added an extra 160GB HD I had lying around to it.
|
|
More Information
|
Hi zyberwoof. Yes, there is a raid product that lets you use different sized drives. It is call un-raid by Lime Technology http://www.lime-technology.com
|
|
More Information
|
Here is a very good explanation between the RAID 0+1 and RAID 10.
|
|
More Information
|
Raid 5 uses less overhead than raid 10. |
|
More Information
|
That link was already posted. |
|
More Information
|
Just finishing up an article (draft is off to Tom's) comparing the Sempron 2200+ with a Duron 1.5 GHz. On Ubuntu with no-RAID5, makes a pretty big difference. On ClarkConnect (Fedora) not as big a difference and slower than Ubuntu.
|
|
More Information
|
Is anyone here using RAID on direct attached storage?
|
|
More Information
|
We just installed an EMC Clarion X300 for our organization of 100 people and 5 servers. The Servers are attached with 2 fiber host bus adapters. We also opted for the LTO3 direct fiber attached tape vault. The Servers have 4GB/s throughput. The Tape vault backs up from the servers at 2GB/s.
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
I forget to say that this was a great article! |

