AMD is the new Big Oil
Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - AMD is the new Big Oil
Since they're having problems convincing the average consumer of their strengths, it looks like AMD is getting the US government to do their dirty work for them.
Energy Probe
I'm not saying this is a bad idea, but AMD picks a particularly bad time for them to support looking at energy efficiency. What would be funny is if the government looked at current products today and did a performance/energy comparison. Unfortunately it looks like it would be just servers and not an Intel Conroe or Quad core vs the 4x4.
Maybe Al Gore should try out the 4x4 and link it to at least 50% of future global warming (you know, from just Baron's rig).
| Quote : Since they're having problems convincing the average consumer of their strengths, it looks like AMD is getting the US government to do their dirty work for them.
|
Child, please. I will post my power numbers. I will even measure how much time I spend at 100% load and measure how much power it is with the configuration I choose. it should be one proc more than a single socket with the same amount of peripherals.
AMD sucks so badly...
| Quote : AMD sucks so badly... |
Link?
BTW, your statement means they are bad at sucking.
| Quote : Since they're having problems convincing the average consumer of their strengths, it looks like AMD is getting the US government to do their dirty work for them.
|
Yup.... lets jsut ignore the not so recent past, in fact the Netburst CPU's are still being sold in droves (both in desktops and servers).
Seeing as they are very close to 65nm and the power consumption reduction it should bring I doubt they are too worried about singular things like 4x4 which are energy hogs. Look at the auto industry, they just need to meet an AVERAGE energy consumption, which means offsetting SUV's with things like a Prius. Unless youe xpect 4x4 to be a monster hit (which it won't be) its barely a blip in the overall sales.
| Quote : AMD sucks so badly... |
That's not exactly fair, man. Besides, it's pointless to get into "the brand wars". If anything, you should limit it to something like "The current 4x4 sucks", which I would agree with. Of course, 4x4 could rock in a year or 2 (if you don't care about punching a hole in the ozone layer), but right now it doesn't have enough virtues to outweigh the bad (IMO). Of course, right now this is strictly opinion because I don't feel like providing linkage and getting into the same old battle over and over again.
I don't like a lot of government interference. However, if the bill can save taxpayer dollars in terms of energy costs it should be a good thing. If AMD's processors are more energy efficient then that's a good thing for AMD.
Keep in mind, although 4x4 does suck big time, it's not relevant in this topic because nobody would ever put it in their data center.
If the concern is about the data-centres, AMD still can claim that they have more energy-efficient CPU family.
But for desktops and laptops, surely Intel is great now.
| Quote : AMD sucks so badly... |
Link?
BTW, your statement means they are bad at sucking.
Very lame. Go to school.
| Quote : AMD sucks so badly... |
That's not exactly fair, man. Besides, it's pointless to get into "the brand wars". If anything, you should limit it to something like "The current 4x4 sucks", which I would agree with. Of course, 4x4 could rock in a year or 2 (if you don't care about punching a hole in the ozone layer), but right now it doesn't have enough virtues to outweigh the bad (IMO). Of course, right now this is strictly opinion because I don't feel like providing linkage and getting into the same old battle over and over again.
Dual Opteron 2218 uses 119W but someone said I should go with that. Is 6W for two chips really that much more? QFX is 125W. Hell, two or three NetBursts in one home could do all of that. Again, what's the difference?
| Quote : Keep in mind, although 4x4 does suck big time, it's not relevant in this topic because nobody would ever put it in their data center. |
Sucks big time means it's measured against E6600 and gets slaughtered. Statements like that are why I say you are all biased. No one would put it in a DataCenter because it doesn't have ECC. Hwo much power do you think a 16 socket cluster uses? I guess it's worth it for the extra productivity.
Do you knwo how much power RISC ships use? Alpha was the definition of the space heater yet it was the fastest, most sought after chip for HPC all through the 90s.
Sometimes you have to sacrifice. What would you say if AMD released a new rev that got power down to 89W?
http://www.extremetech.com/article [...] 252,00.asp
"We always have to look at all the options, but that [the Quad FX] roadmap is 125-watts, extended through next year," he said.
So you're going to take the statement of one to judge all Forumzers?.. I concur though, Quad FX does suck big time
| Quote : AMD sucks so badly... |
Link?
BTW, your statement means they are bad at sucking.
Ah, insulting grammar, a cunning strategy
To be fair, AMD does have a good line of small form factor ready Athlon64's and energy efficiency X2's. Everyones going to make a Netburst one time or another.
Now the only problem is finding these SFF and EE A64's....
dean, just saw your sig, that's pretty hilarious. Must have missed that thread.
| Quote : dean, just saw your sig, that's pretty hilarious. Must have missed that thread. |
It was pretty priceless. Especially for somebody like me that absolutely loves irony
.
This is the 3rd thread I've read today that smells like flame bait and just perpetuates the bias and ignorance so prevelant in these forums lately. Out of all the things you could have said about AMD supporting an environmental and datacenter energy usage study, you had to throw out 4x4...such a near sighted view...to my knowledge, there has never been a study on a specific topic like this (if there has been, show the linkage!) and will only server to benefit the industry asa a whole, that means Intel will also gain valuable information from the findings...open your eyes and see the big picture.
| Quote : AMD sucks so badly... |
Link?
BTW, your statement means they are bad at sucking.
Very lame. Go to school.
Albeit it is lame, BM is right. Why should he go to school for that? Methinks BM schooled Ycon on that statement.
| Quote : Of course, 4x4 could rock in a year or 2 (if you don't care about punching a hole in the ozone layer), but right now it doesn't have enough virtues to outweigh the bad (IMO). |
Using a 4x4 is not going to punch a hole in the ozone layer. CPUs don't emit aerosols, nor free radicals, nor do they use much more power than the monster 8800 series video cards - no one's even mentioned anything about power troubles since they came out.
The C2D is not a server class chip. It doesn't support EEC, nor is it certified for 24/7 operation at a constant 100% load. The 4x4 is.
C2D is faster. Big freaking whoop. Everyone knows it. But, 4x4 has the advantage that it is a server-class chip, and therefore can do certain things the C2D may be capable of, but quite possibly isn't. And that's why it's a better server chip - because there's a guarantee that comes with it. The C2D doesn't.
Me thinks arguing about spelling is pedantic.
Just a thought, a minor correction if you will. Compare the QuadFX to Core 2 Quad, not to the Duo chips. 4x4 is a competitor to the Quadro chips, not the Duo.
Uh, unless I am mistaken, 4x4 uses regular desktop chips. AMDs server chips are Opterons, which do use ECC memory and the like (unlike the 4x4 chips).
Yes, gm0n3y! And that's what... err... makes it... a better chip...
... $hit!
| Quote : Of course, 4x4 could rock in a year or 2 (if you don't care about punching a hole in the ozone layer), but right now it doesn't have enough virtues to outweigh the bad (IMO). |
Using a 4x4 is not going to punch a hole in the ozone layer. CPUs don't emit aerosols, nor free radicals, nor do they use much more power than the monster 8800 series video cards - no one's even mentioned anything about power troubles since they came out.
The C2D is not a server class chip. It doesn't support EEC, nor is it certified for 24/7 operation at a constant 100% load. The 4x4 is.
C2D is faster. Big freaking whoop. Everyone knows it. But, 4x4 has the advantage that it is a server-class chip, and therefore can do certain things the C2D may be capable of, but quite possibly isn't. And that's why it's a better server chip - because there's a guarantee that comes with it. The C2D doesn't.
Ummmmm NETHER ARE "SERVER CHIPS" CERTIFIED FOR 24/7 OPERATION
4x4 is an opty without ECC requirements
C2Q is faster, cheaper, colder overall - now thats the big deal - why pay more for less?
Now your comparing a video card to a CPU? the 8800 didnt go far heat/power wise from the last series, it still doesnt cover the fact that 4x4 is hotter and crappier.
Kinda sad, a whole new socket, chipset, mobo design etc all to make such a crud product, and all the AMD fanboys "amd scales better cause of HTT"
To be honnest i was thinking AMD could have pulled the stunt off and showd an expensive but quick alternative to Intel, AMD let me down.
On a more serious note...
| Quote : With AMD64 technology and Dual Socket Direct Connect Architecture, the new AMD Quad FX Platform offers scaleable performance enhancements on a personal workstation |
Source:
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate [...] dir=dtfx04
And if you can provide linkage to the "guarantee" you mentioned that goes along with the AMD 4x4, that would be just fantastic!
so this certified for 24/7
so all the cpu's that are not and do run all the time should get vacation time?
BTW, mad, I like how you have an "Evil Inside" as your avatar, but right now you're running an Intel CPU.
Intel inside my computer...
Evil inside my soul...
Workers comp for CPU's? Next they'll be forming unions and demanding the right to vote.
| Quote : AMD sucks so badly... |
Link?
BTW, your statement means they are bad at sucking.
Very lame. Go to school.
Hes right, that is not a double negitive.
AMD [subject] sucks [verb] so badly [negitive adverb].
Do some people actually turn off their PCs? The only time mine even gets rebooted is when OCing, installing new components, window's updates, etc.
Wouldn't 'badly' be an adverb in this instance (quantifying the level of suck)?
*EDIT* Of course you edit your message while I'm typing my response. So wouldn't the negative adverb (badly) be stating they the verb (sucking) is not being done well?
No real computer user turns off his/her machine.
(her... lol.. .we all know there are no girl PC enthusiasts ).
| Quote : No real computer user turns off his/her machine.
|
Dare to dream man, dare to dream...
| Quote : Wouldn't 'badly' be an adverb in this instance (quantifying the level of suck)?
|
Ya, I caught it quick... thank god nobody pointed it out... oh wait...
The adverb is quantifying the verb in this case. Since the verb, suck, is modifying the pronoun AMD, your suggestion is not the case here.
We need to get the AMD and Intel guys on the global warming issue, trying to create a device that neutralizes Cow Methane - Cows farting and doing their buisness accounts for 50% of the C02 emissions, not a Pentium 4
And the other 50% of methane and C02 release is your mom.
As some who has studied this in lenght, I can tell you COWS, do not make up %50 of the total C02 emissions.
I have to disagree with you here, the adverb is stating how much the subject is doing the verb. So the subject is doing a bad job of sucking, i.e. they don't really suck very much at all.
| Quote : And the other 50% of methane and C02 release is your mom. |
Wow are you on meandrugs today.
Installing vista RTM. I hope its good. I havent seen VISTA since RC1.
I know, it is actually out of character for me to be mean, but I was actually joking since I don't think that anybody would say that cows produce 50% of the world's C02 and actually not be joking.
what if AMD has a bullet proof foot?
| Quote : what if AMD has a bullet proof foot? |
So AMD is superman now?
They make hockey skates with Kevlar, so if AMD was wearing skates...
On a side note, many hockey sticks are also coated in Kevlar.
*EDIT SPELLING*
| Quote : I know, it is actually out of character for me to be mean, but I was actually joking since I don't think that anybody would say that cows produce 50% of the world's C02 and actually not be joking. |
True enough, being as how cows don't produce CO2. They do produce greenhouse gases, but not CO2. Check these articles out if you even care to:
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/env99/env220.htm
http://www.cgfi.org/materials/arti [...] _01_05.htm
http://www.tierramerica.net/2000/1126/acent.html
Actually, they do. They have a respiratory system just like we do, where we breathe in O2 and breathe out CO2.
| Quote : AMD sucks so badly... |
Link?
BTW, your statement means they are bad at sucking.
Very lame. Go to school.
Hes right, that is not a double negitive.
AMD [subject] sucks [verb] so badly [negitive adverb].
To do something badly is to not do it well. It has nothing to do with a double negative but the use of an adverb in place of an adjective.
| Quote : methane |
<gameshow host voice>
We have a winner!!!! Congratulations, Vern!
</voice>
| Quote : I have to disagree with you here, the adverb is stating how much the subject is doing the verb. So the subject is doing a bad job of sucking, i.e. they don't really suck very much at all. |
They live in warped reality land where because people hate my preferences they will always be right.
Excuse them.
| Quote : AMD sucks so badly... |
Link?
BTW, your statement means they are bad at sucking.
Very lame. Go to school.
Hes right, that is not a double negitive.
AMD [subject] sucks [verb] so badly [negitive adverb].
To do something badly is to not do it well. It has nothing to do with a double negative but the use of an adverb in place of an adjective.
That's all fine and well, but you're not taking into account acceptable slang. Example: when women say "I want you so badly" or something, what do you think they are saying?
A: They do want you.
B: They do not want you.
Even though the English doesn't really make sense, it's slang. Know what I mean?
So, I will go with you on the fact that my statement "go to school" was a bit unwarranted. Sorry about that.
There are 10 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
Please mind
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.
