RAM - FSB problems

Forum Motherboard & Memory : General Motherboard - RAM - FSB problems

TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Motherboard - ASROCK VSTA 775
CPU - Conroe E6300
RAM - Simple Tech DDR3200 256MB x2 (DUAL CHAN)

Here's the prob:

Since my ram (DDR 400mhz) is in dual channel, I thought my FSB would double up to run at 800mhz to the cpu, however, it's stuck at 533mhz.

I believe my bios date is the latest (sept 9 06), everything is set to auto in the bios (im not trying to OC), yet the bios info is saying my ram is ddr running @ 266mhz. Why?

Please help.

Thanks!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Because your processor the E6300 has a FSB of 266mhz the ram runs at a 1 to 1 ratio which is double that of the FSB which is 533mhz. THe ram being 800mhz means it CAN raech 800mhz when you increase the FSB to 400. The cpu has a multiplier of 7 which means 266x7=1860mhz.

So what im saying is theres nothing wrong with your ram! :D

Reply to yas
- 0 +

Try take your FSB to 400Mhz (therefore your RAM = 800Mhz, the 1:1 ratio), and change you CPU multiplier to get your max Ghz on CPU. FOr eg., 400FSB X 6 = 2.4Ghz CPU.

Reply to fishboi

omgosh, i thought no one would post =/

Thanks so much =D

So if I got dd2 533mhz (which is the next upgrade on my list) will the FSB remain the same? Or like is there a way to increase the ratio?

Reply to shambf00

FSB 266 x 2 (DDR - Double Data Rate) = DDR 533. Changing the memory modules will not affect the FSB. Since you said you're not trying to overclock, then understand that the only proper way to change the FSB and memory muiltiplier ratio is to adjust them in BIOS, as FishBoi suggested. Hence, you won't be able do so, unless you're willing to take the settings out of "Auto" and work with them, so it's up to you to decide what you want to do. If you want to crank it up, then we'll be glad to help you.

Reply to CompuTronix

Hrmm...ok if I have to overclock so my memory can run at what it's supposed to then I think i may take that option.

I have a gigabyte 3d rocket cooler gt (all copper), which, i believe, can deal with the heat (i got it in prep of hot summer days).

So my thought was, at least in longterm, buying ddr2 533mhz - installed in dual channel - would allow my system to perform at the e6300's max fsb which reads as 1066MHZ (533 x 2) on the box.

However, according to the point about the multiplier, does this mean that I have to set my fsb to 533 to get my ddr 533 to run at it's full speed? cos that means my cpu with tag along to run at 3.7 ghz (533 x 7). That sounds kinda dangerous =(

Reply to shambf00

The E6300 and E6400 are 2Mb shared cache Allendale Cores. The E6600's and up are 4Mb shared cache Conroe Cores. Your Asrock motherboard supports two DDR slots, and two DDR2 slots. Your present memory modules are PC 3200 (DDR 400) 256Mb x 2 = 512Mb. To clarify, DDR refers to 184 pin memory, and DDR2 refers to 240 pin memory. DDR always means Double Data Rate. DDR2 is simply newer arcitecture.

Since there are two 256Mb modules installed on your motherboard, rather than one 512Mb module, BIOS (Basic Input Output System) configures them to operate separatly, or in Dual Channel mode. This configuaration refers to the method by which the memory is simultaneously accessed, and is unrelated to the speed at which they operate.

The memory controller for your Intel CPU has a default setting of 266 x 2, or 533Mhz (266 DDR = 533). Since the chipset operates the FSB (Front Side Bus) "quad pumped" the resulting FSB is 266 x 4 or 1066Mhz. The CPU frequency is then 266 x 7, or 1866 Mhz. 266:266 = 1:1 ratio. As you can see, all clock settings are based upon the FSB. I hope this helps you to understand the relationships between the system's basic components.

Since BIOS reports your present 184 pin DDR 400 memory at DDR 266, then BIOS has defaulted the memory to boot at a safe 133 x 2, or DDR 266 (1:2 ratio), rather than forcing your DDR 400 memory to attempt to boot at DDR 533. In order to bring your DDR 400 up to it's native speed, you must change the memory ratio in BIOS from from an "Auto" setting of 1:2, to a "Manual" setting of 3:4, assuming that BIOS provides for changing this setting. I can't tell you exactly where to find the proper settings, as I don't have your board, but I'm sure you can now grasp the concept, and put it into action.

If you're not yet comfortable with adjusting BIOS settings and need further guidance, then perhaps someone who is also running your motherboard will be kind enough to offer their assistance. You can also read wusy's excellent overclocking (sticky) guide, to familiarize yourself with general BIOS functions.

Good luck, and enjoy!

Reply to CompuTronix

Thanks!

I'm gonna mess around with that for a bit.

Reply to shambf00

I was just reading the reviews on Newegg regarding your board, and some additional thoughts come to mind. If your BIOS won't allow you to access the appropriate memory settings to allow you to tweak your DDR 400 (200 x 2) memory, then you can replace your memory with DDR2 533, as you had mentioned. It also appears that your motherboard is capable of being mildly overclocked. You can update the BIOS, purchase DDR2 667, and tweak up the FSB. Some reviews report 315Mhz FSB on the E6300 which is 2.2Ghz. Interestingly enough, some extreme overclockers were able to exceed 400Mhz FSB by hardware volt modding, which would be 2.8Ghz on an E6300. Amazing results for this board! You may want to read the reviews and search the forums for more information to learn what can be accomplished. Sorry I can't provide you with all the links. You'll have to ferret it out for yourself.

Reply to CompuTronix
- 0 +

Quote :

I was just reading the reviews on Newegg regarding your board, and some additional thoughts come to mind. If your BIOS won't allow you to access the appropriate memory settings to allow you to tweak your DDR 400 (200 x 2) memory, then you can replace your memory with DDR2 533, as you had mentioned. It also appears that your motherboard is capable of being mildly overclocked. You can update the BIOS, purchase DDR2 667, and tweak up the FSB. Some reviews report 315Mhz FSB on the E6300 which is 2.2Ghz. Interestingly enough, some extreme overclockers were able to exceed 400Mhz FSB by hardware volt modding, which would be 2.8Ghz on an E6300. Amazing results for this board! You may want to read the reviews and search the forums for more information to learn what can be accomplished. Sorry I can't provide you with all the links. You'll have to ferret it out for yourself.



I dunno if he should change the ratio from his 1:1 ratio though. Do you really think he would see an increase in performance. Usually its best to leave it unless its a massive gap.

shamb,
if your gonna fiddle around in the bios you may as well try increasing the FSB a little since you have some headroom in your ram :wink:

Reply to yas

Understand that he doesn't have any headroom. His memory is DDR, not DDR2, so his DDR 400 can't run at DDR2 533, and he can't run at 1:1.

Reply to CompuTronix
- 0 +

No I mean to increase the FSB keeping the ratio the same.

Reply to yas

I see your point. Since shambf00's DDR 400 is only running at 133 x 2 (DDR 266), which unfortunately, is just 1:2, then he might be able to simply bump up the FSB clock with his memory as is, which is what I believe you're pointing out.

I understand there are no voltage adjustments in that BIOS, so they say flashing to the latest version is critical. Regardless, if he can reach FSB 300, that would bring his memory a little closer to it's rated frequency, 150 x 2 (DDR 300) and 2.1Ghz (300 x 7) on the CPU. That would give him an overall performance increase of 12.5% for just a simple FSB bump. It's certainly worth a try. Speed for $0.00 is always a beautiful thing.

Reply to CompuTronix

Yeah, I think I've about exhausted all options without overclocking FSB.

Even when I try to over clock fsb to 285mhz so i can get effective clock of 2.0ghz windows will lock up when I run everest, or anything else that "mildly" taxes the system.

I also can't find the option to change the ratio.

I've always had the plan to get faster ram, so I guess I'll be looking forward to it.

So I looked at my bois and confirmed from my bios manual that the multiplier for the E6300 is locked @ 7; fsb = 266mhz, resulting in cpu clock @ 1862mhz.

Here's what everest shows me though:

http://img377.imageshack.us/my.php [...] e63gq1.jpg

Thanks guys.

Any last thoughts? =D

Reply to shambf00

Yeah, I think I've about exhausted all options without overclocking FSB.

Even when I try to over clock fsb to 285mhz so i can get effective clock of 2.0ghz windows will lock up when I run everest, or anything else that "mildly" taxes the system.

I also can't find the option to change the ratio.

I've always had the plan to get faster ram, so I guess I'll be looking forward to it.

So I looked at my bois and confirmed from my bios manual that the multiplier for the E6300 is locked @ 7; fsb = 266mhz, resulting in cpu clock @ 1862mhz.

Here's what everest shows me though:

http://img377.imageshack.us/my.php [...] e63gq1.jpg

Thanks guys.

Any last thoughts? =D

Reply to shambf00

Yeah, I think I've about exhausted all options without overclocking FSB.

Even when I try to over clock fsb to 285mhz so i can get effective clock of 2.0ghz windows will lock up when I run everest, or anything else that "mildly" taxes the system.

I also can't find the option to change the ratio.

I've always had the plan to get faster ram, so I guess I'll be looking forward to it.

So I looked at my bois and confirmed from my bios manual that the multiplier for the E6300 is locked @ 7; fsb = 266mhz, resulting in cpu clock @ 1862mhz.

Here's what everest shows me though:

http://img377.imageshack.us/my.php [...] e63gq1.jpg

Thanks guys.

Any last thoughts? =D

Reply to shambf00

Yeah, I think I've about exhausted all options without overclocking FSB.

Even when I try to over clock fsb to 285mhz so i can get effective clock of 2.0ghz windows will lock up when I run everest, or anything else that "mildly" taxes the system.

I also can't find the option to change the ratio.

I've always had the plan to get faster ram, so I guess I'll be looking forward to it.

So I looked at my bois and confirmed from my bios manual that the multiplier for the E6300 is locked @ 7; fsb = 266mhz, resulting in cpu clock @ 1862mhz.

Here's what everest shows me though:

http://img377.imageshack.us/my.php [...] e63gq1.jpg

Thanks guys.

Any last thoughts? =D

Reply to shambf00

sorry about the multiple posts...it told me "an error occured" everytime

Reply to shambf00

Install SiSoft SANDRA

www.sisoftware.co.uk

Run the CPU benchmark and Memory Throughput Test with window maximized.

Screenshot the results.

Usually a 266 base FSB on the current Intel platforms is QDR, which is a 1066 FSB effectively.

I don't know where you are getting this 533 FSB figure from, unless your base FSB is 133 MHz, and your are underclocking the CPU by -50%.

Sounds like RAM ratio is the least of your concerns


PS: 285/266.667 = +7% which means your SATA and PCI bus will get out of sync and fail as the divider for PCI bus hasn't raised.

Tip: Try 300 FSB or 333 FSB, they'll each keep the PCI/SATA bus at 33/100 - so it might be stable. (Well double check the mainboard manual, may they won't raise the divider at all, and give way out of spec PCI/SATA clocks :P )

You want FSB:RAM ratio at 4:3 (1066:400 Dual-Channel) - if not overclocking.

At 300 base FSB (1200 FSB) you'll want FSB:RAM ratio at 3:2 (1200:400 Dual-Channel) instead.

Reply to TabrisDarkPeace

anytime i try to download sisoft sandra i get a "no files to extract" error. I tried 4 sites, same error.

and, my bios see the ram as something like this:

Dual Channel

DDR2 - NONE
DDR1 - 256mb/166mhz - DDR 333

DDR2 - NONE
DDR1 - 256mb/166mhz - DDR 333

Total RAM 512mb

I think the ratio option is locked for this particular cpu (e6300)

Reply to shambf00

The ability to change memory ratios, as well as other BIOS settings, are dependent upon the flexibility of clocking features on the motherboard, and except the CPU multiplier, are unrelated to the CPU. Therefore, the memory ratio is not "locked" but is just typically not available on a $57.00 motherboard. Please read through the following reviews:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Cust [...] 6813157092

http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2810

Many of the posts are a wealth of information regarding the abilities and limitations of your ASRock 775Dual-VSTA, and describe how other users are getting the most out of this motherboard.

Hope this helps.

Reply to CompuTronix

Quote :

anytime i try to download sisoft sandra i get a "no files to extract" error. I tried 4 sites, same error.



Try downloading Prime95 and run the torture test in blend mode.

If you're pushing your RAM / MCH / FSB too far you'll get corrupted downloads, it could just be pushing PCI / NIC interface too far though (much less data will be corrupt).

Either way data is going corrupt, so avoid defrags until you know the cause.

Reply to TabrisDarkPeace

Great thread - thanks!

How about this then:

My Intel XBX2 MB has 2 frequency references in the performance/memory config section of the bios.

Reference Frequency (Default/333/266/200/133) currently at 266

Memory Frequency (800/667/533/400) currently at 533

My memory is Corsair DDR2-6400C4 and my FSB is at 334, running at 3.00 GHz.

CPU-Z currently reports the FSB:RAM as 1:1, which I thought was the ideal.

What is the difference between Reference freq and Memory freq?

And what should they be for best performance?

Thanks!

The Gunny

Reply to GunnySpook

If your FSB is 333 (1333 QDR) then you want memory clocked at 333 or higher (667 DDR).

DIMM1 = 333 MHz, DDR2, 64 bits wide
DIMM2 = 333 MHz, DDR2, 64 bits wide
MCH (NorthBridge / Memory Controller Hub) links them in Dual-Channel (128 bits wide, for 10.67 GB/sec peak throughput).

MCH talks to FSB on a 333 MHz, QDR FSB, 64 bits wide, which is also 10.67 GB/sec peak throughput just the bus to the CPU from MCH is half as wide (vs MCH to RAM).

However a setting of 266 MHz in your "Intel mainboard" BIOS may actually mean 1:1 ratio with 266 FSB, and as you've changed FSB to 333 to overclock, your RAM may actually be running at 333 (667 DDR).

If this is the case setting it to 333 will lead to your memory trying to run at 833.333 MHz DDR (416.667 MHz base clock, which is likely out of spec and may cause problems).

However (2), if this is not the case then you want to use 333/333. But I strongly suspect in the Intel BIOS that every value you see is assuming there is not overclock in place (a pre-overclock value) - I could be wrong though.

:? - Confusing, eh ?

Try the memory throughput benchmark in SiSoft SANDRA 2007.

http://www.sisoftware.co.uk

At least then we can compare scores.

RAM: INT: 5247 / FLOAT: 5270 - both in MB/sec

Use Large Memory Pages was off (this reduces the score, so to compare we both need to confirm it is not flagged)

This is while running browsers, iTunes with music, etc with 2 x G.Skill DDR2-800 (4-4-4-12, 2.05 Volts) running at DDR2-667 with 5-5-5-14 (or 15) timings though.

FSB is: 333 MHz base (1333 QDR).

The large prefetching of Core 2 Duo hurts its results in this test btw, but it does score high on efficiency. 8)

Least using SANDRA Mainboard Info and Memory Throughput test you'll be able to see what is going on under the hood.

eg: (Copy the below into Notepad or WordPad, OpenOffice, etc, or just bump the fonts up heaps to read on) - 8)

SiSoftware Sandra

Mainboard
Manufacturer : Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
MP Support : 1 Processor(s)
MPS Version : 1.40
Model : 965P-DQ6
System BIOS : 09/20/2006-P965-ICH8-6A79LG0GC-00

System Memory Controller
Location : Mainboard
Error Correction Capability : None
Number of Memory Slots : 4
Maximum Installable Memory : 4GB
Bank0/1 - A0 : DIMM 1GB/64 @ 66Mt/s
Bank2/3 - A1 : Empty
Bank4/5 - A2 : DIMM 1GB/64 @ 66Mt/s
Bank6/7 - A3 : Empty

Chipset 1
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (29A0)
Bus(es) : PCI PCIe IMB USB FireWire/1394 i2c/SMBus
Front Side Bus Speed : 4x 334MHz (1336MHz data rate)
Maximum FSB Speed / Max Memory Speed : 4x 400MHz / 4x 233MHz
Width : 64-bit
IO Queue Depth : 12 request(s)

Chipset 1 Hub Interface
Type : DMI (Direct Media Interface)
Version : 1.00
Number of Ports : 4
In/Out Width : 4-bit / 4-bit
Multiplier : 3/1x
Speed : 8x 2500MHz (20000MHz data rate)

Logical/Chipset 1 Memory Banks
Speed : 4x 167MHz (668MHz data rate)
Multiplier : 4/8x
Width : 64-bit
Memory Controller in Processor : No
Performance Acceleration Technology : Yes
Refresh Rate : 7.80µs
Power Save Mode : No
Fixed Hole Present : No

APIC 1
Version : 2.00
Multiplier : 1/2x
Maximum Interrupts : 24
IRQ Handler Engaged : Yes
Enhanced Support : Yes

Memory Module 1
Model : F2-6400PHU1-1GBHZ
Type : 1GB DIMM DDR2-SDRAM
Technology : 16x(64Mx8)
Speed : PC2-6400U
Standard Timings : 5.0-5-5-14 (tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS)
Version : 1.2
Date of Manufacture : Saturday, 25 December 1999
Set Timing @ 400MHz : 5.0-5-5-14 (tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS)
Set Timing @ 267MHz : 4.0-3-3-10 (tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS)

Memory Module 2
Model : F2-6400PHU1-1GBHZ
Type : 1GB DIMM DDR2-SDRAM
Technology : 16x(64Mx8)
Speed : PC2-6400U
Standard Timings : 5.0-5-5-14 (tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS)
Version : 1.2
Date of Manufacture : Saturday, 25 December 1999
Set Timing @ 400MHz : 5.0-5-5-14 (tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS)
Set Timing @ 267MHz : 4.0-3-3-10 (tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS)

PCI Bus(es) on Hub 1
Version : 2.30
Number of Bridges : 5
PCI Bus 0 : PCI (1/1x PCIClk)
PCI Bus 1 : PCIe (3/1x PCIClk)
PCI Bus 2 : PCIe (3/1x PCIClk)
PCI Bus 3 : PCIe (3/1x PCIClk)
PCI Bus 4 : PCIe (3/1x PCIClk)
PCI Bus 5 : PCI (1/1x PCIClk)
Number of PCIe Lanes : 19

LPC Hub Controller 1
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (2810)
ACPI Power Management Enabled : Yes
Advanced TCO Mode Support : Yes
Advanced TCO Mode Enabled : No
High Precision Timer Support : Yes
High Precision Timer Enabled : No
Delayed Transaction Enabled : Yes

LPC Hub Controller 2
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (283E)

USB Controller 1
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (2834)
Version : 1.10
Interface : UHCI
Channels : 2
Speed : 48MHz
Supported Speed(s) : Low (1.5Mbps) Full (12Mbps)
Legacy Emulation Enabled : No

USB Controller 2
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (2835)
Version : 1.10
Interface : UHCI
Channels : 2
Speed : 48MHz
Supported Speed(s) : Low (1.5Mbps) Full (12Mbps)
Legacy Emulation Enabled : No

USB Controller 3
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (283A)
Version : 2.00
Specification : 1.00
Interface : EHCI
Channels : 4
Companion Controllers : 2
Supported Speed(s) : Low (1.5Mbps) Full (12Mbps) High (480Mbps)
Addressing Support : 64-bit
Legacy Emulation Enabled : No

USB Controller 4
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (2830)
Version : 1.10
Interface : UHCI
Channels : 2
Speed : 48MHz
Supported Speed(s) : Low (1.5Mbps) Full (12Mbps)
Legacy Emulation Enabled : No

USB Controller 5
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (2831)
Version : 1.10
Interface : UHCI
Channels : 2
Speed : 48MHz
Supported Speed(s) : Low (1.5Mbps) Full (12Mbps)
Legacy Emulation Enabled : No

USB Controller 6
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (2832)
Version : 1.10
Interface : UHCI
Channels : 2
Speed : 48MHz
Supported Speed(s) : Low (1.5Mbps) Full (12Mbps)
Legacy Emulation Enabled : No

USB Controller 7
Model : Giga-Byte Technology ??? (2836)
Version : 2.00
Specification : 1.00
Interface : EHCI
Channels : 6
Companion Controllers : 3
Supported Speed(s) : Low (1.5Mbps) Full (12Mbps) High (480Mbps)
Addressing Support : 64-bit
Legacy Emulation Enabled : No

FireWire/1394 Controller 1
Model : Giga-Byte Technology TSB43AB23 1394a-2000 OHCI PHY/link-layer Controller
Version : 1.10
Interface : OHCI
Enhanced Support : Yes
Channels : 64
Speed : 400MHz

System SMBus Controller 1
Model : Intel 801xx/63xx SMBus
Version : 0.02
Specification : 2.00
Advanced TCO Mode Enabled : No
Slave Device Enabled : Yes
PEC Support : Yes
Speed : 100kHz

Expansion Slot(s)
PCI : PCI 32-bit +5V +3.3V PME i2c/SMBus Full-Length Used
PCI (1h) : PCI 32-bit +5V +3.3V PME i2c/SMBus Full-Length Available (Intel Corporation ??? (29A1))
PCI (6h) : PCI 32-bit +5V +3.3V PME i2c/SMBus Full-Length Used
PCI : PCI 32-bit +5V +3.3V PME i2c/SMBus Full-Length Used

Port Connector(s)
PRIMARY IDE : None - ATA / None
SECONDARY IDE : None - ATA / None
FDD : 8251 FIFO - Floppy Disk / None
COM1 : Serial Port 16450 - 9 Pin Dual Inline / DB-9 pin male
COM2 : Serial Port 16450 - 9 Pin Dual Inline / DB-9 pin male
LPT1 : Parallel Port ECP/EPP - DB-25 pin female / DB-25 pin female
Keyboard : Keyboard - None / PS/2
PS/2 Mouse - Detected : Mouse - PS/2 / PS/2
USB : USB - None / USB
USB : USB - None / USB

Performance Tips
Notice 224 : SMBIOS/DMI information may be inaccurate.
Tip 2511 : Some memory slots are free so the memory can be easily upgraded.
Tip 2 : Double-click tip or press Enter while a tip is selected for more information about the tip.

Reply to TabrisDarkPeace
- 0 +

Quote :

Yeah, I think I've about exhausted all options without overclocking FSB. .... Here's what everest shows me though:
http://img377.imageshack.us/my.php [...] e63gq1.jpg


OK, I'm totally confused by this. According to your post, you are not overclocking and your system clock/FSB is set to 266MHz and your CPU multiplier is 7. But the everest screen shot you referenced shows your FSB running at twice that speed or 533MHz and your multiplier set to 7/2 or 3.5. Something wrong with the everest program?? :?

Have you tried the old stand-by of CPU-Z? Here's a link to the CPU-Z web site. To use it you just download the .zip file, unzip it to a directory, then run the cpuz.exe file in that directory. After anywhere from a few to a couple seconds delay, the CPU-Z window pops up. (The reason for the delay when starting is supposedly because it takes some time to gather the memory SPD information).

I'd be curious what it says your CPU, FSB, and SDRAM speeds are.

-john, the redundant legacy dinosaur

Reply to zjohnr

The Via PT880 Pro isn't an Intel chipset.
Still I'd find it extremely odd if it really was 533 MHz DDR, instead of 266 MHz QDR to/from the CPU / MCH.

Still SiSoft SANDRA and CPU-Z are far more industry accepted.

VIA Chipset link: http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/ [...] 880_ultra/

Reply to TabrisDarkPeace

Sorry this is late...I'm preparing for final exams.

Yeah, my memory is in dual channel so I think that's why everest says fsb is 533 (266 x 2) mhz.

Cpu-z gives me some silly error about an problem loading driver, so it doesn't give me all the info:


http://img185.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cpuzzt7.jpg

I just ordered dual-kit ddrII 667 ram by ocz.

I'll post the results when i put them in.

Yeah, so does anyone know why I would get that cpu-z error.

And like could someone give me a link to sisosft sandra that works; all the ones I use end up corrupted =(

Thanks!

Reply to shambf00

Ok, so I found an update for cpu-z and here's what I get:

http://img209.imageshack.us/my.php [...] allei8.jpg

Please lemme me know your thoughts on this.

Reply to shambf00
- 0 +

Well, FWIW to me everything looks correct.

CPU-Z says you have an E6300 running at the stock FSB of 266 MHz. Your DRAM is DDR-400 running at its correct clock speed of 200 MHz. You can't run with a FSB:DRAM ratio of 1:1 using DDR-400 unless you overclock the DRAM ... which is something I'm not sure you want to do, especially with an ASROCK VSTA 775 motherboard. (Actually, I don't even know if it is possible to run 1:1 with DDR-400 with an ASROCK VSTA 775 motherboard. Not sure the BIOS provides that much flexibility).

-john

Reply to zjohnr

Ooookay...so my RAM is now OCZ S.O.E 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 667 (PC2 5400) Dual Channel Kit.

The ratings are 4-4-4-12.

Now, I dunno wassup, but I thought dual channel was created so that RAM speed could run at the FSB speed for CPU and RAM to talk without one having to wait for the other, or something to that effect.

When I saw the E6300 CPU with 1066 MHz FSB, I said "sweet, so I'll just get RAM that can run at 533 MHz, but in dual channel, so the RAM runs effectively at 1066 MHz (533 x 2) and everything will be merry".

However, cpu-z says memory frequency is 266 MHz, BUS speed is 266 MHz, while FSB is 1066 MHz...what’s the difference between BUS and FSB (beside the obvious speed discrepancy)?

cpu-z info link:

http://img258.imageshack.us/my.php [...] dr2qw2.jpg

You guys are being great help!

Thanks a lot.

Reply to shambf00
- 0 +

Quote :

cpu-z says memory frequency is 266 MHz, BUS speed is 266 MHz, while FSB is 1066 MHz...what’s the difference between BUS and FSB (beside the obvious speed discrepancy)?


It sure is hard to tell sometimes, I'll give you that. Whoever came up with the current naming scheme used to describe the parts connected to the processor bus seems to have wanted to maximize total confusion. (Ah, marketing!)

The one important speed to keep in mind, the one which determines what all the other clock speeds turn out to be, is what I'll refer to as the system clock speed. In the case of a Core 2 CPU running at stock, this is 266MHz. This is the speed that is multiplied by the "multiplier" of the processor to get the actual speed the processor runs at. In the case of an E6300, the multiplier is 7 so the CPU runs at 7*266 = 1,862 MHz or 1.86GHz.

Now I frequently also refer to this "system clock speed" as the "FSB". I probably shouldn't but I do simply because the two are so tightly coupled. The actual or effective speed of the FSB is simply 4 times the "system clock". In this example that is 4*266 or 1,366MHz effective speed. Why four times the system clock? The FSB is "quad-pumped" which appears to mean that 4 units of data are actually transfered on the FSB for each tick of the system clock.

How is this "quad-pumping" done? I have no idea. Is it related/coupled to dual channel memory? Seems likely, but again I really do not know how it works. All I know is that the effective FSB speed is 4 times the system clock speed. However this does seem to dove-tail really nicely with both dual channel memory and DDR DRAM supplying 2 units of data per clock tick. 2 (DDR) * 2 (dual channel) = 4 (quad-pumped).

And then there is your DRAM. The timings there work out as you outlined them. CPU-Z shows the base clock speed, not the effective speed for your DDR memory. You have to multiply this value by 2 to get the DDR2 rating. For example, 2*266 implies DDR2-533.

Depending on the motherboard and BIOS, it is possible to run your memory at a different clock speed than the FSB/system clock is run at. Usually you'll be advised to not do this because running the FSB and DRAM at the same speed (a FSB:DRAM ratio of 1:1) usually gives you the best throughput.

But as an example, in your case your RAM is DDR2-667 so it can run at a base clock speed of 333MHz. If your BIOS allows it, you could leave the system clock at 266 but run the memory at 333. If you did this the FSB:DRAM ratio would be 4:5 (I think ... :? Understanding the concept and getting the arithmetic right are two separate issues for me).

Now why not run your RAM at it's fastest speed? Because this will only increase the performance of your system if the RAM speed is your only bottleneck. Usually it isn't, the FSB is. So often instead of running their system clock at "stock" and running their RAM at a higher speed people will instead overclock. If you up your system clock to 333 and maintain a FSB to DRAM ratio of 1:1 your memory will run at it's full rated speed. But you will also get a much larger performance increase from running your CPU at 7*333 = 2,331MHz or 2.3 GHz.

I seem to have run off at the mouth on this reply. Hope what I've said helps some. If it doesn't, just ignore it. :wink: Someone else will probably explain it better. This stuff is constantly being rehashed on these boards. Like I said, it is almost as though it was designed to confuse people.

-john

Reply to zjohnr

Omgosh! Thanks for clearing that up.

I've tried to run the fsb to 333mhz as you explained, to the see performance boost, however, the system wouldn't post...and I'm not about to mess around with voltages and stuff.

So, I've accepted the 1:1 ratio as ideal.

Thanks again =D

Reply to shambf00
- 0 +

Your ASROCK VSTA 775 motherboard is known to not overclock much, if at all. So the fact you couldn't boot at 333 is not surprising. But at least it sounds like you're working well at 266 now.

-john

Reply to zjohnr

if i was to get that MB and use my 2 gigs of ddr1(2x1gig ram)how much can i overclock the E6300 or even the e6400??

Reply to javimars
- 0 +

Quote :

if i was to get that MB and use my 2 gigs of ddr1(2x1gig ram)how much can i overclock the E6300 or even the e6400??


I actually do not know, of course, but I think I recall people posting that they were able to get the FSB to 300MHz, but not higher. For an E6300 this would be 7*300 or 2.1GHz and for an E6400 this would be 8*300 or 2.4GHz.

The ASRock VSTA 775 motherboard is sort of a "dancing elephant". The wondrous thing about a dancing elephant is that it can dance it all. Trying to get it to tap dance is just cruel and unreasonable. :wink:

Likewise the fact that the ASRock VSTA 775 works at all should be enough for you. It's not an overclocker. A quick look at the BIOS would convince you of this. Where other motherboards might allow you to specify a voltage as a decimal value, the ASRock VSTA 775 offers selections of "Low", "Normal", and "High". :?

-john, the redundant, legacy dinosaur

Reply to zjohnr

Quote :

if i was to get that MB and use my 2 gigs of ddr1(2x1gig ram)how much can i overclock the E6300 or even the e6400??


I actually do not know, of course, but I think I recall people posting that they were able to get the FSB to 300MHz, but not higher. For an E6300 this would be 7*300 or 2.1GHz and for an E6400 this would be 8*300 or 2.4GHz.

The ASRock VSTA 775 motherboard is sort of a "dancing elephant". The wondrous thing about a dancing elephant is that it can dance it all. Trying to get it to tap dance is just cruel and unreasonable. :wink:

Likewise the fact that the ASRock VSTA 775 works at all should be enough for you. It's not an overclocker. A quick look at the BIOS would convince you of this. Where other motherboards might allow you to specify a voltage as a decimal value, the ASRock VSTA 775 offers selections of "Low", "Normal", and "High". :?

-john, the redundant, legacy dinosaur
thank you for your response. wich motherbord is a better overclocker and allows me to use my ddr1??

Reply to javimars
- 0 +

Quote :

thank you for your response. which motherboard is a better overclocker and allows me to use my ddr1??


Once again, I honestly don't know the answer to this question. My guess is that there are not a lot of motherboards out there that will support DDR and a Core 2 processor. I think Intel really intended to pair the Core 2 with DDR2 DRAM. So if you want a motherboard you can overclock I think you should look at the newer, DDR2 motherboards. If you want to continue to use your DDR DRAM and move to a Core 2 processor you should probably expect to run no faster than a tad above the stock FSB speed of 266MHz.

Just an opinion/speculation, not claiming it's fact. But it's all I've got. :(
-john, the redundant, legacy dinosaur

Reply to zjohnr
Tom's Guide > Forum > Motherboard & Memory > General Motherboard > RAM - FSB problems
Go to:

There are 12 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Google ads