Blue-Ray or HD-DVD - Page 6
Forum Storage : Optical Media - Blue-Ray or HD-DVD
Last message on previous page:
| Quote : but do most people want their consoles to turn into multimedia farms? |
to late it has been since the first console incorperated a cd rom then got more so with the dvd rom.
There are also other things i just picked that.
True, I guess things have gotten to the point that consoles will incorporate more and more with time, branching away from simply gaming. I may be weird, but here's how I see the electronics in my home: I like keeping different "boxes filled with wires" around the house that serve different purposes, that way if one box (i.e. game console) dies then I'll still have other boxes to keep me occupied (i.e. DVD player, computer) while I get some money to buy another box to replace the broken box.
@SuperFly: I looked around Amazon as well, but I must have been looking in the wrong section because it was somewhere way down the list. Still, if it's sold out I assume it is making some impact.
| Quote :
|
Is this not you?
If you look at it,
Consoles are actually fighting now to be your centralized media device.
They added Hard Drives, not to help you save your games but to sell you content. The XBOX-360 is Media Center PC compatible on purpose.
Consoles are not just for gaming anymore
In fact there are also rumors Microsoft is expanding their new ZUNE store interface to include downloadable less than DVD quality video for your XBOX
In fact the PS3 has a "we spent a lot of time" interface to display your pics as if they are being dropped onto your table.
All three have built in browsers.
The Wii has actually stated they are focusing on the game playing experience and therefore are not totally going to be your centralized device. Of course I would say the same thing if the output I had available is at best 480P.
| Quote : The above is strictly (conspiracy theory) type stuff but if you start to read it "could" happen.
|
And there is the killer. The second someone tells me i cant play my media on any compatable player because it isnt the same one i recorded on they lose all credibility to me for being a good product. If this is in fact true blue ray goes the way of mini disk no doubt whatso ever in my mind at all. Now assuming thats true HD-DVD has already won and hte argument is dead.
Activists
Enforcer,
It is not that you can NOT play it on another device it is that you might have to register that content on the new device...
It reads that this is a protection of BD content that Sony burns... But it does not seem to be restricted.
It would seem that there may be a loophole for copyright ownership..
literally they could end up selling you back your own content...
NOT LIKELY but possible...
Again (Conspiracy Theory) type stuff...
The next-gen format war is a hard one for me. I would honestly wait for everything to settle out. For right now, this is what I have, Sony used MPEG2 compression on their first generation of movies and since I know MPEG2, there is bound to be artifacts and compression issues. HD-DVD doesn't have a larger capacity on their discs. Bluray does have larger capacity. HD-DVD used H.264 compression on theirs. They're pretty much on the same level. I may have had issues with Sony before, but Bluray has some really nice features. On the downside, you have DRM. They both have DRM, but sometimes, Sony can go way too far. But I would expect the same attitude for the HD-DVD party. On price, HD-DVD seems to win, but the performance is lacking on players. The Samsung player is faster than the Toshiba player. I don't it's a fair benchmark, I would have to experience more players to see if it's a manufacture flaw. Most of the HD-DVD and Bluray players I've experienced resulted in the same thing. But, among my worthless mutters, I think I'll stand neutral.
Yeah i know you said register but i dont want to do that so to me its it wont let me.
I dont want to have to register all my content on every device i use for anyone.
For me its really that simple. My stuff i use it how i want. Sony or MS no one is going to tell me where i can play my stuff or is going to tell me to register stuff that is none of thier business to even know about.
I'm not trying to be a ass twords you im only giving my opinion on the matter just in case you were taking it that way.
I realise thats not a attitude alot of "i only watch my movies that i buy at my house" consumers when it comes to movies alone that i buy at the store i likely wouldnt care other then the BS fact i even would have to do it in the first place.
Seriously though theory or not if that ends up being true it will kill the format. You can only take things like this so far before the consumer gets fed up and that would defanitly be the last straw for me.
Call me old fashioned, but I'm thinking about getting a N64 simply because of GoldenEye007. Now that game was worth buying the console for. Games drive console sales, but the addition of Blu-Ray or HD-DVD is just another feature. However, developers might like these additions in order to develop games for said system. If more developers like a system better, then better games will come out for that system. But if the console doesn't do well, then no good games will be made, and the extra features won't help in the sale of said console. Aaaaah! Avoid circular thinking!
Anyway, I haven't been into consoles since the N64. Nowadays they keep adding features to the consoles to make them more appealing, and I guess I'm just slow for seeing consoles as purely gaming devices. I may spring for a Wii instead of a 64 if GoldenEye will be available on the Wii download service thingy. I'm not at all into this new hi-def war - I just want it to sort itself out in one way or another so there will be a nice easy standard for me to select. TELL ME WHAT TO BUY, DAMMIT!
Nah never take it that way...
By the way... Those who have never seen the two offerings the Samsung BD player is horrible. Given that it is supposed to be the superior player it is making a poor showing.
I would hope the Sony player is better.. The Samsung is actually on putting our a 1080i output...
The Toshiba as stated is DOG SLOW... But at present it actually puts out the better picture.
Go Figure... It is a shame that either of them supports the AACS DRM..
consoles are for gaming just these companys want to make it for more for as i can see it really no reason. Wii is the first console im going to buy since snes however (simply because i can play all the games i grew up on from intelevision,atari,nintendo,super nintendo) which for console are seriously the only ones im interested aside zelda
Anyways people dont buy consoles becuase of the drive it has however once they have the console they say hey my console can play movies which drives sales. Now a console will not determin which format wins it will have a impact so dont count out consoles in that department.
Only way I will own either right now is if someone were to purchase it for me
I can not see me spending my hard earned money on a DRM ridden device.
Bad thing is I have a 118" 720P screen just aching for HD playback other than Dish Network...
damn that big of a tv with that crappy of a resolution? i wouldnt be surprised if you could see each pixle up to 50 feet away
Course if i want to use any hd res it would be 1080p and any devices i get would have to fully support that. From the readin i have done ps3 might support it but yeah the graphics card will defanitly limit its use for gaming.
My Display is about as good as it gets in the $3,500 category.
I have an Optima H78 with a Dark Chip 3 DLP chip and an 8X color wheel.
Although it is only 720P I would put it up against any 1080i projector out there. In fact I would put it up against any other 720P single chip projector with the exception of the H79 from the same company.
You can only see pixels at roughly 3 - 4 feet from the screen.
Only problem I have with next gen players is that they will both have to down convert to 720P.
Running a PC at 1280x720P looks very good and is the reason I have 14-20 people at each one of my lan parties I throw.
Here is a new thought on the console war and Sony's blunder with the Blue ray.
Because Sony included a blueray player in its own console, its direct competitors, I.E. Xbox and Wii, now must deny the blueray as its direct competition to their own product. Microsoft could have released a blueray or hd-dvd addon which would have helped Sony reach its goal and let the market deside which format to chose. Microsoft did not have any real investment in either format. HOWEVER, now that the PS3 (not really Sony) is built with a Blueray player, Microsoft Xbox devision chose to compete by releasing only hd-dvd as an option.
--> sorry really tired. Idea is up, feel free to correct me.
| Quote : Anyways people dont buy consoles becuase of the drive it has however once they have the console they say hey my console can play movies which drives sales. Now a console will not determin which format wins it will have a impact so dont count out consoles in that department. |
Well said, my friend. And it's the long run that's gonna count in this battle.
Dang, Ches111, I'd be itching for more hi-def content too if I had a monster TV like that. I, on the other hand, still have my 32" tube TV that has survived quite well the past few years. This is part of my decision to get a cheaper console (probably Wii, but I'm not opposed to the 360), because why pay for extra quality if you can't even display it? At the rate my TV is going, it should last another year or two. So in the meantime I could split my money between my car and my computer while there is still so much going on. Ugh I need to get more money. I think that's one of my problems. I could complain about BR or HD-DVD all day, but it's not like I have the funds set aside for either of them for the time being.
| Quote : I think the biggest problem is cost for the consumer. I dont want to spend 35-40 bucks on a movie!
|
Well one thing to consider is that a $500 premium Xbox with a $200 HD-DVD player = $700. That's pretty comparable to a PS3 which has more powerful hardware and a better sales history. Still, the 1 year lead that Xbox 360 has, has really hurt the PS3. Oh, and aren't some Xbox 360 games more than $60? I seem to recall seeing Gears of War for $69.99 at Gamestop...I saved $10 and got the used version. :-P
True about the movies being too expensive though. Doesn't mean it'll stop us ungodly wealthy American's from being morons and buying them. Just look at how much we're willing to spend on the top of the line processor...
Who the fuk spends $1100 on a CPU when they can get a comparable one for 1/8th of that price? I'd understand it if that $1100 CPU wasn't junk (priced at about 1/16th of the cost) in 2 years.
Where did you get 500 for a premium 360? Its 400. So yes, with the HD DVD player, it is equal to a highend PS3. I never debated that.
I know GoW is 69.99 at gamestop. Check amazon. Its 52.99. I even got the collectors edition for 60 bucks from amazon!
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-54 [...] videogames
http://www.amazon.com/Gears-Of-War [...] videogames
Actually, Ryan's right. Who does buy the FX and extreme CPUs?
Anyways, back on topic. On thing blu ray could excell at is TV seasons. Just 1 or 2 disks and the whole seasons your's... But 50 gigs is not needed for a movie for sure.
this is how i see it:
Blu-Ray is better
HD-DVD is cheaper.
so i hope bluray turns out the popular one but i think HD-DVD will.
Bluray having 200GB on 8 layer discs, hd-dvd doesnt even come close to that much.
There can only be one
no but serious im tired of all that DRM crap and the price of a blu-ray player is pathetic so i vote HD-DVD
I just checked out the HD-DVD player attachement on XBox website. I noticed it said it is a double sided disc with one side being the HD-DVD and the other being regular DVD backwards compatible. This is awesome.
Now Blockbuster only needs to stock HD-DVD and not both a blueray and regular DVD disc. And if you ownan HD-DVD disc at home it will play in your mini van as well. Blueray won't.
As far as computers and storage space goes. WHo cares if the disc will hold 30gb or 50gb of MP3s. Those few people who actually have that much MP3s can just use 2 HD-DVD discs instead of one.
The backwards compatibility with DVD is a big selling factor for me.
yay i didnt know thanks :b ..
well i usually dont go 2 blockbuster :b
the blu-ray disks gonna cost so much so i dont think its worth it with storage.
I hope HD-DVD will cost the same as a regular DVD tho, but yea ur right about the storage thingy
well ppl are gonna store more than just MP3's on their discs.
of coarse u dont need 100GB or 200GB for songs.
| Quote : this is how i see it:
|
The problem with your logic is that you are basing the whole thing on 2 assumptions that may or may not be true, and you don't even try to prove/disprove these assumptions. Why is Blu-Ray better? How is it better? By what metric are you scoring these formats to figure out which is better? Does that apply to everybody else in the world?
My point is: I think you have over-simplified this. There are a lot of factors in play here and I don't think it's fair to over-simplify things.
| Quote : Blue Ray all the way. Better performance, the ray is smaller so can pack more and more data like 4 times HD-DVD, its completly new as HD-DVD makes use of older and well known technology (like intel and their loser FSB), better DRM technology for safer data, more movies compagnies backing it, its cool and i hate microsoft. |
Wow. You hate Microsoft so you rambled of a list of numbers you came up with?
- Both Blu-ray and HD-DVD use the same laser ("ray" ) wavelength.
- HD-DVD stores 15GB per layer, Blu-ray stores 25GB per layer.
- DRM is restrictive for end-users. "Better DRM" for end users is no DRM. Being able to stream movies anywhere in your house, being able to load your favorite movies on your NAS and watch them at a whim, being able to back up your kid's favorite movie, because you know they're going to destroy it...these are things that DRM prevents us from doing.
Anyway, you hate Microsoft, so HD-DVD is vastly inferior...I get it. A lot of people feel the same way about Sony. You keep hating MS, I'll be watching some of my HD-DVDs. (Should anyone care, I purchased HD-DVD based on the fact that existing players and existing movies have no region coding, and I'm hoping it stays that way.)
what is all this crap about DRM?
i know it is digital rights management but what does it have to do with these discs and what is bad about it?
no region encoding!?! If that stays, I'm HDDVD all the way.
| Quote : what is all this crap about DRM?
|
Over simplified:
Both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD have "more" DRM than DVD. But Blu-ray requires updates (via internet or added to Blu-ray disks, etc.) and won't let you play movies on your Blu-ray player if your Blu-ray player is blacklisted or not updated properly. HD-DVD isn't as restrictive.
Super over simplified, but I'm too lazy to look up the details right now.
| Quote : no region encoding!?! If that stays, I'm HDDVD all the way. |
Here are some links I looked up for a post in different forum:
http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/07 [...] or-hd-dvd/
"We've gotten a variety of opinions about region controls. Even in the Steering Committee, they are extremely unpopular; we decided to not put them in. HD DVD probably won't contain any region playback controls."
http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Ne [...] wsId=15223
"DVD Forum: HD DVD Movie Titles to be Region Free"
http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=60715
"...this is as strong a sign as any that HD-DVD will not be locked to regions."
http://www.emedialive.com/Articles [...] leID=11877
(Explains DVD region codes, Blu-ray region codes and the lack of HD-DVD region codes)
I can't find the quote I had from a Microsoft employee, but it goes along these lines: None of the HD-DVD players on the market today have region restrictions, and lack the hardware necessary to check for region restrictions. What that means is that there is a very good chance that you will never see region restrictions on HD-DVDs, and even if you do, the players already released won't know to check for them, so they will continue to play any HD-DVD disk they get.
As an American that lives overseas, and imports games and movies from other regions, that was the deciding factor for me.
Some other thoughts from CEDIA...
Toshiba just released an HD-DVD player with 1080P support (yeah thats right the same 1080P as BD).
The Toshiba also spent time on creating a very good upconverting DVD player so your 480P content is upscaled to 720 or 1080 (a nice feature when implemented properly)...
They also now have two different players available @500 or less. Hmmmmm
I think they are making a major play to compete in what used to be BDs space. HD-DVD was intially released as a 1080i only player and they quickly realized the error of their ways.
Tough call really...
Technically, from what i remember, Blu Ray is better than HD DVD, firstly they had greater capacity, which i believe the tech for 1TB HD DVD is out there now, but also if i rem correctly, Blu Ray could get the same speeds with lowwer RPM, blue laser vs red laser thingy.
Thats the tech BS, as for 'real life'...
I think HD DVD will win out. From a marketing perspective, the public is HIGHLY sceptical about most new tech stuff. HD DVD has a HUGE advantage as most ppl know and use DVD's. So moving to HD DVD is like... duh... easy. Where as Blu Ray... OMG its new and could kill my small children! We all know the cost/risk involved is the same for both formats... but ppl DO think like that.
Having said that, i just got a new LCD tv (46" sony kekekeke), and all the douche-bag salesppls were pushing Blu Ray like crack on the corner of Jefferson.
Thats my 2c, only time will tell.
But as usual i am right.
which model? I have the 40inch 1080i LCD from sony, and though it doesnt do P, the picture is outstanding. It was the largest LCD at the time, but I play on mounting it above my PC monitors when I upgrade to a 55in from Sony (when they arive).
I HATE though, the menu system lol. Worst I have used in a long while. Oh well.
Either Way, I would prefer HD-DVD to win out... and since sony has never won a format war, I dont think Blu-Ray will break their streak.
| Quote : no region encoding!?! If that stays, I'm HDDVD all the way. |
Here are some links I looked up for a post in different forum:
http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/07 [...] or-hd-dvd/
"We've gotten a variety of opinions about region controls. Even in the Steering Committee, they are extremely unpopular; we decided to not put them in. HD DVD probably won't contain any region playback controls."
http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Ne [...] wsId=15223
"DVD Forum: HD DVD Movie Titles to be Region Free"
http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=60715
"...this is as strong a sign as any that HD-DVD will not be locked to regions."
http://www.emedialive.com/Articles [...] leID=11877
(Explains DVD region codes, Blu-ray region codes and the lack of HD-DVD region codes)
I can't find the quote I had from a Microsoft employee, but it goes along these lines: None of the HD-DVD players on the market today have region restrictions, and lack the hardware necessary to check for region restrictions. What that means is that there is a very good chance that you will never see region restrictions on HD-DVDs, and even if you do, the players already released won't know to check for them, so they will continue to play any HD-DVD disk they get.
As an American that lives overseas, and imports games and movies from other regions, that was the deciding factor for me.
ha! It seems someone else has my plight. I've delt with region encoding as well, its quite annoying. I'm delighted that it seems there will be no region encoding.
I have a question. Why dont many studios that arent owned by sony only go with Blu?(like Disney)
You do know there are many DVD players out there that are region free?
And as for blueray / HD-DVD. Studios get incentives for going with BlueRay and producing movies in that format. Disney went with the incentives and thus, is doing BlueRay only.
I don't think it really matters. Scientists are already working on the next best thing. University of Central Florida is using standard DVD's and fitting 1 Terabyte on them just from using 2 recording lasers rather than one.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=429
| Quote : You do know there are many DVD players out there that are region free?
|
yes, I know that. I own a multi-region DVD player. However, Region Encoding is still a pain in the ass. I really like the 360 HD DVD player, but I wasnt sure about getting it due to region codes. Now that I know, I'll plan on getting it when I get my HDTV...(no point in a HD DVD with a CRT)
you kidding? CRTs look as good if not beter then LCD/Plasma. If you mean SD CRT, then ya i get your point.
Sony is a douchebag, microsoft actually looks like the good guy in comparison,
LOL
naw. Sony is the kindhearted juber that we all expect them to be. My only wish is that I could snuggle with the CEO and become best friends for ever and ever.
| Quote : Sony is a douchebag, microsoft actually looks like the good guy in comparison,
|
lol, you know I hate Microsoft more then Sony but I have to agree with ya.I started disliking Sony ever since I found out that Killzone and most the other games were pre-rendered.Even still though bad year for Sony DRM,battery recall and PS3.
I find it funny that the PS3 was supposed to win BlueRay the dvd wars but in actual fact the BlueRay may cost the PS3 the console war.
Sony has yet to win a format war.
Why would they expect to win the BR war?
BTW, check this out... guess who made #1 on THG "Top-10:Technology disappointments of 2006" list?
http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/12/11/ [...] age10.html
Thanks, THG. I couldn't have said it better.
| Quote : what is all this crap about DRM?
|
You have to be kidding! Well, if you want to know what the fuss is about, look up Sony's Rootkit issue (where they were trying to pretty much spy on people without them knowing), then start looking on the RIAA site:
http://www.riaa.com/default.asp
It pains me to link to those bastards. They sue single low-income mothers because their daughters download music, and they are evil. They even sue disabled people (dead serious). Start researching their lawsuits.
Then check this out:
http://www.eff.org/
http://www.boycott-riaa.com/mission
Anyway, that's why people are so freaked out by DRM. Because we don't want corporations to ruin the internet by spying on everybody all the time. The RIAA was probably formed after they watched V for Vendetta and mis-interpreted the message it was trying to convey.
HEH... I call those prices expencive.
I wouldnt buy either untill the cost dropped to $300.
A great DVD player costs around $200-$250... so an ok BR, HD player should be not much more.
| Quote : I don't think it really matters. Scientists are already working on the next best thing. University of Central Florida is using standard DVD's and fitting 1 Terabyte on them just from using 2 recording lasers rather than one.
|
Problem is when a new tech is emerging they already have the next on the drawing board so that is and always will be (has been) true. PS4 and the new xbox have been in design for a while now.
| Quote : I don't think it really matters. Scientists are already working on the next best thing. University of Central Florida is using standard DVD's and fitting 1 Terabyte on them just from using 2 recording lasers rather than one.
|
Problem is when a new tech is emerging they already have the next on the drawing board so that is and always will be (has been) true. PS4 and the new xbox have been in design for a while now.
Well, maybe not the PS4. Sony likes to wait until the last minute so they can delay launches, have major production issues and get people injured.
| Quote : I have a question. Why dont many studios that arent owned by sony only go with Blu?(like Disney) |
Along with incentives, Blu-ray has stricter DRM requirements, which causes more inconveniences for the consumer, but also more inconveniences for movie pirates. Given the choice between stricter DRM and relaxed DRM, consumers should naturally gravitate towards relaxed DRM and studios would naturally prefer stricter DRM.
| Quote : what is all this crap about DRM?
|
You have to be kidding! Well, if you want to know what the fuss is about, look up Sony's Rootkit issue (where they were trying to pretty much spy on people without them knowing), then start looking on the RIAA site:
http://www.riaa.com/default.asp
It pains me to link to those bastards. They sue single low-income mothers because their daughters download music, and they are evil. They even sue disabled people (dead serious). Start researching their lawsuits.
Then check this out:
http://www.eff.org/
http://www.boycott-riaa.com/mission
Anyway, that's why people are so freaked out by DRM. Because we don't want corporations to ruin the internet by spying on everybody all the time. The RIAA was probably formed after they watched V for Vendetta and mis-interpreted the message it was trying to convey.
Reading stuff like this makes me scared! seriously,how long before we are forced to have microchips implanted in our bodies so the government and big corporations know exactly where we are and what we are buying.
I feel like going to Washington and gunning down a few congressmen, maybe then the rest of them might start fighting for our rights like they should be doing.
ok maybe not gun people down but Sony should definitely be shut down and ordered to pay billions for the people's rights they violated.
| Quote : what is all this crap about DRM?
|
You have to be kidding! Well, if you want to know what the fuss is about, look up Sony's Rootkit issue (where they were trying to pretty much spy on people without them knowing), then start looking on the RIAA site:
http://www.riaa.com/default.asp
It pains me to link to those bastards. They sue single low-income mothers because their daughters download music, and they are evil. They even sue disabled people (dead serious). Start researching their lawsuits.
Then check this out:
http://www.eff.org/
http://www.boycott-riaa.com/mission
Anyway, that's why people are so freaked out by DRM. Because we don't want corporations to ruin the internet by spying on everybody all the time. The RIAA was probably formed after they watched V for Vendetta and mis-interpreted the message it was trying to convey.
Reading stuff like this makes me scared! seriously,how long before we are forced to have microchips implanted in our bodies so the government and big corporations know exactly where we are and what we are buying.
I feel like going to Washington and gunning down a few congressmen, maybe then the rest of them might start fighting for our rights like they should be doing.
ok maybe not gun people down but Sony should definitely be shut down and ordered to pay billions for the people's rights they violated.
Yeah, I agree that something needs to be done. But, I think it's only a matter of time before these corporations get smacked down for their lame practices. More and more people are starting to realize "hey, DRM sucks!", so it gives me hope.
So...not everybody stores only music on discs. I could store 35 gig TS files...
My point, one file can be bigger than the supposed limit, ie. one 20 gig TS file, that's around 4 gigs past your single layer HD-DVD limit. My FLAC and Wavpack files eat space like crazy too, imagine having to separate my lossless Zappa collection, that would be insane!
Seeing as I need more disc space, I can burn a rewritable, finish encoding one file, and bring that file back on to my drive for more encoding.
I'm quite neutral to this battle, but your argument isn't true in most situations. I can probably split a big file into an archive, but why waste the time? Encoding takes days, archiving might take just about the same amount of time.
There are 5 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
Please mind
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.
