My New E6400 Posting at 3519 on stock v core.

Damn is this normal! 8O

Add a reply

Register or log in to remove.

8O

holy god, crank that baby to 4ghz and fry an egg.

edit; god your desktop is fugly.

Reply to georgelawton

damn dude

I got an E6400 too...let's trade

Reply to UA_Iron

Quote :

damn dude

I got an E6400 too...let's trade

LOl, can yours not do that?

Reply to RobsX2

What? Have you tried running a VCore program to check if that reading is correct?

Reply to dasickninja

I've gotten mine up to 3.6ghz no problem, I just have to bump the vcore and worry about temps.

Reply to UA_Iron

First off that vcore reading is not correct. Im guessing your vcore is set to auto or you think your pulling a fast one. Once your vcore reaches 1.5 it registers as 1.2xx on CPUZ.

Point and case:

Reply to ocnewb

I have to agree... CPU-Z lies about V-core... your bios will probably tell you what your ture V-core is.

Reply to Doughbuy

He probably has it set to auto. I assume this because he thought it was amazing to be running at 1.2xx when the stock is 1.3x. I doubt that system is prime stable either.
Download PC Wizard, that will give u an accurate vcore.
Download CoreTemp to see what your temps are, i bet that thing is nearly on fire.

Reply to ocnewb

Quote :

He probably has it set to auto. I assume this because he thought it was amazing to be running at 1.2xx when the stock is 1.3x. I doubt that system is prime stable either.
Download PC Wizard, that will give u an accurate vcore.
Download CoreTemp to see what your temps are, i bet that thing is nearly on fire.

I realize CPU Z shows incorrect Vcore readings and I never claimed those were correct anyway. However do not have my V core set to auto in the bios either. I have it manually set at 1.29 vcore or whatever the setting just under 1.3vcore is.

The motherboard was reporting stock vcore to be at 1.29v and thats what I set it at manually.

Reply to RobsX2

I though something was fishy about that reading. I had my X6800 clocked up to 3.9GHz and even then I had to raise the VCore.

Reply to dasickninja

Quote :

I though something was fishy about that reading. I had my X6800 clocked up to 3.9GHz and even then I had to raise the VCore.

Look at the post above guy, there is nothing fishy going on and I am running stock v core.

Reply to RobsX2

Use a actual VCore reader. That kind of clock speed at that voltage isn't plausible.

Reply to dasickninja

Regardless of what the vcore is saying, have you checked for stablitly yet?

Running Prime95 for at least 6 hours or overnight (on both cores of course)?

Reply to Grimmy

I have manually set my Vcore to what the motherboard stated was stock V core before I did any overclocking at all. The result is 3519.5mhz without touching v core at all.

Reply to RobsX2

Quote :

Use a actual VCore reader. That kind of clock speed at that voltage isn't plausible.

Oh god whatever people. I doubt my v core settings in my motherboard are wrong. I just thought I would share my findings jeeze.

And no its not prime stable, never claimed it to be. Just thought it was cool it would boot into windows that high on stock v core.

Reply to RobsX2

I'm not knocking you, and I think thats damn cool, but I call it like I see it.

Reply to dasickninja

Quote :

I'm not knocking you, and I think thats damn cool, but I call it like I see it.

You call it like you see it? so you think im lying about my vcore settings according to my board? :roll: Ok.

Reply to RobsX2

Right now im priming at 3304ghz and have been rock stable for the past 6 hours at the default v core setting so im doing pretty damn good.

Reply to RobsX2

I wouldn't totally trust the readings.

For example my P4 3.0 northy, default vcore is 1.5 volts.

MBM 5 does record its readings. My bios is set to 1.5 volts, not auto.

MBM 5 records readings of:

High: 1.60
Low: 1.46
Average: 1.57

Can't really say if newer technology products would be more accurate.

Reply to Grimmy

Well regardless all I did was manually set the v core to what the mb reported to be stock v core which was 1.29. I then got all the way to here before it would no longer boot to windows so whatever.

I got a great overclocker on my hands and like I said earlier so far for the past 6 hours rock prime stable at 3304ghz without touching v core.

Reply to RobsX2

Quote :

Right now im priming at 3304ghz and have been rock stable for the past 6 hours at the default v core setting so im doing pretty damn good.

Thats fine bro but the fact of the matter is you have no proof. You say you set your vcore to 1.29. yet the only program u used to proove it is known to be very inaccurate at high vcore. If I had to guess, id say your pushing 1.5. What mobo/mem are you using? Heres a hint, open cpuz and post screen shots of the mainboard and memory tabs. Results without proof are just BS to many of us.

Reply to ocnewb

Quote :

Right now im priming at 3304ghz and have been rock stable for the past 6 hours at the default v core setting so im doing pretty damn good.

Thats fine bro but the fact of the matter is you have no proof. You say you set your vcore to 1.29. yet the only program u used to proove it is known to be very inaccurate at high vcore. If I had to guess, id say your pushing 1.5. What mobo/mem are you using? Heres a hint, open cpuz and post screen shots of the mainboard and memory tabs. Results without proof are just BS to many of us.

For the last damn time I never once claimed that I was using CPU Z to prove V core Voltage! I realize it is inaccurate. I am only using it to show you the clock speed which btw is accurate. I have an Asus P5B delux board and yes my v core is set manually at 1.29v.

I have better things to do with my time than to make up a lie about a fawking chip!

Its my board so I think I am fully aware of what the V core is set at people. Damn.

Reply to RobsX2

Quote :

I'm not knocking you, and I think thats damn cool, but I call it like I see it.

You call it like you see it? so you think im lying about my vcore settings according to my board? :roll: Ok.
Did I call you a liar? I just said that something was fishy about the readings. Don't be so quick to take offense at everything.

Reply to dasickninja

Quote :

I'm not knocking you, and I think thats damn cool, but I call it like I see it.

You call it like you see it? so you think im lying about my vcore settings according to my board? :roll: Ok.
Did I call you a liar? I just said that something was fishy about the readings. Don't be so quick to take offense at everything.

Well you have pretty much been implying the whole time that something must be wrong here or there when the fact is I am telling you straight up what my vcore is set at in my MB.

Damn I am not a noob to overclocking at all and I am competent enough to know how to manually set vcore in my bios.

Reply to RobsX2

Quote :

Right now im priming at 3304ghz and have been rock stable for the past 6 hours at the default v core setting so im doing pretty damn good.

Thats fine bro but the fact of the matter is you have no proof. You say you set your vcore to 1.29. yet the only program u used to proove it is known to be very inaccurate at high vcore. If I had to guess, id say your pushing 1.5. What mobo/mem are you using? Heres a hint, open cpuz and post screen shots of the mainboard and memory tabs. Results without proof are just BS to many of us.

For the last damn time I never once claimed that I was using CPU Z to prove V core Voltage! I realize it is inaccurate. I am only using it to show you the clock speed which btw is accurate. I have an Asus P5B delux board and yes my v core is set manually at 1.29v.

I have better things to do with my time than to make up a lie about a fawking chip!

Its my board so I think I am fully aware of what the V core is set at people. Damn.

Umm.. Please read the title to your own post "My New E6400 Posting at 3519 on stock v core."

So u post a screenie of cpuz, one would assume this is your proof of vcore and fsb. Am I wrong?

Then prove me wrong. Post a screen shot of you system specs.
Including:
Vcore
Mem
Mobo
and maybe the type of cooling setup you have?

If you cant then dont respond. Cause what you are saying without proof sounds like total BS. And the fact that you "dont want" to proove us wrong isnt helping your case much.

Dont get me wrong, Id love for you to proove me wrong.

Reply to ocnewb

You don't know me that well to say that I'm implying anything. I don't imply. I say what I mean.

Reply to dasickninja

Quote :

Right now im priming at 3304ghz and have been rock stable for the past 6 hours at the default v core setting so im doing pretty damn good.

Thats fine bro but the fact of the matter is you have no proof. You say you set your vcore to 1.29. yet the only program u used to proove it is known to be very inaccurate at high vcore. If I had to guess, id say your pushing 1.5. What mobo/mem are you using? Heres a hint, open cpuz and post screen shots of the mainboard and memory tabs. Results without proof are just BS to many of us.

For the last damn time I never once claimed that I was using CPU Z to prove V core Voltage! I realize it is inaccurate. I am only using it to show you the clock speed which btw is accurate. I have an Asus P5B delux board and yes my v core is set manually at 1.29v.

I have better things to do with my time than to make up a lie about a fawking chip!

Its my board so I think I am fully aware of what the V core is set at people. Damn.

Then prove me wrong. Post a screen shot of you system specs.
Including:
Vcore
Mem
Mobo
and maybe the type of cooling setup you have?

If you cant then dont respond. Cause what you are saying without proof sounds like total BS. And the fact that you "dont want" to proove us wrong isnt helping your case much.

Dont get me wrong, Id love for you to proove me wrong.

The memory is crucial memory rated at ddr 667 with 3 3 3 12 timings. As you can see it has overclocked nicely too and the timings are still tight. Keep in mind I am now at 3304 and priming for stability so thats the reason the fsb is showing 413.

Reply to RobsX2

Quote :

You don't know me that well to say that I'm implying anything. I don't imply. I say what I mean.

And you dont know me well enough to tell me I dont know what im doing either.

Reply to RobsX2

Nice overclocking dude How far are you planning to go?

Why is your PCIe link @ 1x instead of 16x??

And could you post some screenshots of another program with those readings? Mayby install PC probe II and take a screenshot of that?

Reply to Grated

Quote :

And you dont know me well enough to tell me I dont know what im doing either.

I'm ending this battle of words right here. Telling you that the VCore looks inaccurate ain't saying you don't know what they are doing. Telling you that a different test might yield more accurate results ain't telling you, you don't know what you are doing. You aren't Wusy, you aren't Crashman, and you sure as hell ain't Oscar Wu. So therefore, you've got some minerals to imply that you can't be taught anything either.
I'm done. Nice OC anyways.
Juan

Reply to dasickninja

I just built this system last night. Here are some more pics for the naysayers.

[img]

[img:8c5355d131]http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/3760/picture036qv7.jpg[/img]

Reply to RobsX2

Quote :

And you dont know me well enough to tell me I dont know what im doing either.

I'm ending this battle of words right here. Telling you that the VCore looks inaccurate ain't saying you don't know what they are doing. Telling you that a different test might yield more accurate results ain't telling you, you don't know what you are doing. You aren't Wusy, you aren't Crashman, and you sure as hell ain't Oscar Wu. So therefore, you've got some minerals to imply that you can't be taught anything either.
I'm done. Nice OC anyways.
Juan

Whatever guy. Please leave, your a complete pain in the ass anyway who wouldnt believe it if it slapped you right in the face.

And comparing me to your forum heroes? pathetic. :lol:

Reply to RobsX2

Wow, the half hour I take away from the forum to get back to work and this thread goes downhill real fast...

I think everybody is being real harsh on this guy, even though I think his results are just a tad bit... sketchy (okay... more than a tad bit, but whatever)

I'd like to see temps and some more things, but I doubt he's really lieing...

Reply to Doughbuy

Quote :

Wow, the half hour I take away from the forum to get back to work and this thread goes downhill real fast...

I think everybody is being real harsh on this guy, even though I think his results are just a tad bit... sketchy (okay... more than a tad bit, but whatever)

I'd like to see temps and some more things, but I doubt he's really lieing...

Let me find out what is up with my pci e link and I will get back with more pics.

Reply to RobsX2

Dude, he's not insulting you. You're the one with the freaking complex. If you post something on the internet, and people think that there is something fishy about the information that you post, you can be damn sure that they'll call your bluff on it or atleast say that something is amiss.
And by the way, Oscar Wu is the head of DFI's LanParty division. You know, the guy that can recode BIOS for an individuals RAM? The one who practically built ABIT? He's not on the forum moron. Crashman and Wusy are practically industry gods. So STFU.
Posting a picture of your built computer is proof anyways.
Who's pathetic now?

Reply to forpalmsonly

Quote :

Dude, he's not insulting you. You're the one with the freaking complex. If you post something on the internet, and people think that there is something fishy about the information that you post, you can be damn sure that they'll call your bluff on it or atleast say that something is amiss.
And by the way, Oscar Wu is the head of DFI's LanParty division. You know, the guy that can recode BIOS for an individuals RAM? The one who practically built ABIT? He's not on the forum moron. Crashman and Wusy are practically industry gods. So STFU.
Posting a picture of your built computer is proof anyways.
Who's pathetic now?

I never once said those guys were not smart. So you pleas stfu.

Reply to RobsX2

You must of had trouble with reading comprehension in school. Did I ever say that you said these guys were not smart? Read what you see, not waht you think.
So you stfu.
Stop being insulted by everything someone says to you. grow some skin.

Reply to forpalmsonly

Both of you chill. Palm, lay off him. RobsX2, chill yourself. Understand that people are inclined to point out flaws. You've thrown chum into a sea with sharks that live by precision. You reap what you sow.

Reply to dasickninja

I like mini tacos.

Reply to georgelawton

........... :?:

Reply to dasickninja

Quote :

You must of had trouble with reading comprehension in school. Did I ever say that you said these guys were not smart? Read what you see, not waht you think.
So you stfu.
Stop being insulted by everything someone says to you. grow some skin.

LMAO ok nub. Sure.

Reply to RobsX2

Quote :

Both of you chill. Palm, lay off him. RobsX2, chill yourself. Understand that people are inclined to point out flaws. You've thrown chum into a sea with sharks that live by precision. You reap what you sow.

When you can get a E6400 at stock v core to oc like I did then you can talk sh1t. Till then STFU.

Reply to RobsX2

Let me give you a bit of an education. Overclocking is raising the clock, or frequency of a CPU. To raise the frequency to a CPU, you must increase the voltage (to make the vibrations occur with increasing scale more power must be added to the Core). To be able to get a 1.4GHz jump in speeds on a processor without an unlocked multiplier is implausible, if not impossible. Until you post, not a CPUz image, but a Core Temp, TAT, or BIOS image, I revise my position on your post as bullshit. Prove me wrong. Really. I want you too. But until you do, don't bother posting again.

Reply to dasickninja

Quote :

Dude, your desktop is extremly ugly...

Here are a few tips:
1) Raise the resolution to 1280x1024 or higher.
2) NEVER use the stock Windows desktop wallpaper or any of Windows preloaded wallpapers for that matter.
3) Try to find an abstract or visually appealing wallpaper that is 100% universal. (something that everyone could look at and you won't get asingle complaint)
4) Pictures of people, real animals/creatures(fantasy ones can be ok, just choose wisely), ms paint drawings and nature are not acceptable.
5) Change the way your taskbar looks (silver looks more slick)
6) Organize the icons on your desktop into seperate folders (games,movies,porn,programs,random stuff, etc...etc...etc)
7) For a nice clean look, put subfolders in each folder to keep things even more organized.

Here is an example using my desktop:

It's an abstract dragon flying in the blaze of a fire.

Now....I expect a screenshot of your "NEW" desktop sometime within your next couple posts.

Here is a link to help get you started
www.wincustomize.com

Reply to 3lfk1ng

Quote :

Both of you chill. Palm, lay off him. RobsX2, chill yourself. Understand that people are inclined to point out flaws. You've thrown chum into a sea with sharks that live by precision. You reap what you sow.

When you can get a E6400 at stock v core to oc like I did then you can talk sh1t. Till then STFU.

I have yet to see proof of this being stock vcore. As I asked b4, any program other than cpuz please? Try the one that came on the cd with your mobo. Also temps would be nice as well. A good example is one like this.

This is one i have of when i was hitting 3.9.. Wasnt stable tho.

Reply to ocnewb

geez people. relax.....back away from the pc and go have some fun ffs.

Reply to minim3

[quote="3lfk1ng"]

Quote :

Dude, your desktop is extremly ugly...

Here are a few tips:
1) Raise the resolution to 1280x1024 or higher.
2) NEVER use the stock Windows desktop wallpaper or any of Windows preloaded wallpapers for that matter.
3) Try to find an abstract or visually appealing wallpaper that is 100% universal. (something that everyone could look at and you won't get asingle complaint)
4) Pictures of people, real animals/creatures(fantasy ones can be ok, just choose wisely), ms paint drawings and nature are not acceptable.
5) Change the way your taskbar looks (silver looks more slick)
6) Organize the icons on your desktop into seperate folders (games,movies,porn,programs,random stuff, etc...etc...etc)
7) For a nice clean look, put subfolders in each folder to keep things even more organized.

Ummm....could we get his clock frequency in order before we tell him to fix other flaws? I'd rather have a fully working CPU than a pretty desktop, if I had to choose.

Could you include some screenshots of your machine running Prime95 after many hours? And please run a CPU-Z validation, that would be nice.

Reply to yourmothersanastronaut

Dood why post in a public forum if you can't take any comments. If you want a cookie then just ask, Action Man will probably give you one!

Now either accept other people critisim/opinions/inquiries or do us a favor and go show this OC to your mother, she probably wont argue tat the VCore aint stock.

And DaSickNinja EDIT: is probably IS a much better Ocer....

Reply to Anonymous

Um... WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON...

Sounds like people here are all getting into one huge pissing match... It doesn't matter... I'll settle it...

MY E-PEEN > ALL OF YOURS... RAWR!

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1075792

Go to that webbie for a nice collection of benchmarks... see if any of them come close to you... and then you'll sorta get an idea why everyone doesn't believe you...

Reply to Doughbuy

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - My New E6400 Posting at 3519 on stock v core.

Please mind