| Author |
Thread : A 4.1 GHz Dual Core at $130 - Can it be True?
|
|---|---|
|
More Information
|
Last message on previous page:
|
|
Related Product
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
The carrier scene was DX10 from what I've heard. While some of the jungle demos were running on X1900s. Which is not a DirectX 10 card. It still looks good, but the game is supposed to look even better and have better physics with DirectX 10.
|
|
More Information
|
okay i have a series of questions and i just hope someone can help me out here. im new at over clocking
|
|
More Information
|
some more good info read everything here
|
|
More Information
|
ya i'm just looking at the crysis pics right now. me i think Windows should have been 64 bit along time ago. 64 bit computing has been out for years. As far as Intel goes, it looks like may be they're finally starting to do something again. The new roadmap that came out a few months ago looks great. After the P4 3.2 came out a several yrs ago it seems like innovation at Intel just died. Prior to that they used to come out with faster and faster chips almost quarterly as well as regular and consistant price drops for the older ones.
|
|
More Information
|
icbiuscrn.... isn't it about 10 cents per kw/h? If so, wouldn't you multiply... say.... 400w..... so .4*30*24*.1 .4=400W-30=number of days per month-24=number of hours per day- .1=total per kw/h..... if that is the case wouldn't a Pentium D @ 300W cost roughly $21.6 per month? Maybe I am messing up in this calculation... but I thought it was on the money.... at the same time the X2 3800 @ 290 W would cost about $13.68 to run all month.... both at load of course... if my math is off please let me know.... but it seems correct to me. |
|
More Information
|
weskurtz81 - now that amd user have what intel sort of already had... with smoother multitasking... now that 2 to 3 percent doesn't even matter. thanks to dual core. thanks for pointing out the obvious... you can reuse the water system in a new system. i doubt most people would just dump the water cooling system after... and ummmm, most people don't run their computer 24/7 at full load. what are you doing, running full cpu loading tests 24/7? so right there, that's already kind of getting out of line and inaccurate in a real world situation. that brings the gap down a lot i would imagine. oh and you can reuse the ddr 2 ram in future systems. another plus. as for the support of conroe, i guess we'll have to wait and see on that one. (so that people don't get "misinformed" )
|
|
More Information
|
The 805 gets hot and loads the VRM allot when overclocked, but cheap.
|
|
More Information
|
okay i have a series of questions and i just hope someone can help me out here. im new at over clocking
|
|
More Information
|
here is the thing though.... it is still an expense for a water cooling setup... in my situation, I have never owned a system that needed one, even with the max oc in the equation. And you are correct, you can reuse a water cooling system... but, you cannot leave the initial cost out of the equation.... if you don't currently own a water cooling system... and want a dual core Intel system.... I would think the better purchase would be the 930 for only about 65-75$ more than the 805.... and hit that OC on air.... and when you feel like it.... buy a water cooling system.... otherwise... without it the 805 will have a hard time over 4ghz..... that is all I really meant about the $$ spent on a water cooling system. I am not sure if you know what folding is.... but I run my system at load 24/7..... 2 instances of folding.... that is my choice.... but since i choose to do that, the power consumption is also a factor for me.... I guess I like to justify spending money on a computer.... and at least have something for it to keep busy on.... also.... keep in mind most people leave computers running 24/7, maybe not at load.... but idle.... so, that in mind... an 805 idling @ 200+ watts is going to run you about $15 a month.... my system OC'ed with 2 7800gtx's only idles at 189W. But I also have 5 HDD's and 2 optical drives.... take out the gtx and it idles lower, set it up like the other system.... the 805 test system... with 1 HDD.... lower still.... closer to 130-150W..... roughly 25% less energy consumption at idle..... makes a difference to me..... obviously not everyone though. I am not really sure where the Ram comment came from, I don't think I mentioned anything about ram.....
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
I am curious of one thing.... how is the X2 4200 system so different that is cost more than $900 more to build.... and in all honesty.... if you were to build AMD you would be better going with an Opteron 165.... still.... that is only $200 more max than your current system.... the 4200 is only $350 ish.... which is still on about $225 more.... so.... really.... I guess where did the extra $675 come from? |
|
More Information
|
honestly I think you need to read the article more closely. i'm pretty nooby when it comes to overclocking but they DO explain it step by step in the article -_- |
|
|
