Tom's Guide > Forum > Overclocking > AMD > Intel New 65nm CPu still suck AMD x2 & FX still beat It.

Intel New 65nm CPu still suck AMD x2 & FX still beat It.

Forum Overclocking : AMD - Intel New 65nm CPu still suck AMD x2 & FX still beat It.

TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

ppl i think most of u hav check out the new article abt the New intel 65nm CPu.. WEll 1st b4 i check out the article i throught is sould b a Time for intel 2 bring back.. but nono Intel still Suck.. esp in Power n Performance.. well 1 think i hav 2 say that intel is realy good at is Video benchmark intel is realy faster.. but still i think over all Intel still not so Cool in TEmp or in Performance esp with all this new step ahead AMD with the DDR2 n VT support n hight L2 cash n stuff. Dont we all think INTel Reallly suck "?]
4 me i think ya what u think AMD Rule :)

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

This is the most poorly written thread I've ever read.

Thanks for wasting 5 seconds of my time.

-mpjesse

Reply to mpjesse
- 0 +

"Poorly written" doesnt come close to describing the illiteracy in that.

Reply to hazmat

Like it or not, that new Pentium is made on a .065-micron manufacturing process and AMDs are not (for now) ... and that is laying the groundwork for some excellent Intel processors in the very near future (Conroe comes to mind) For now I'm still on the AMD side of the fence (X2-4400), but I won't hesitate to run to the other side if Intel offers the better value (and I think they will with their next generation) ... in your case, I guess ignorance is bliss so go on and drink your Kool-Aid.

Reply to rodney_ws
- 0 +

I think he has been snorting the koolaid...
Looks like intel has a real chance to once again overtake the speed crown later this year.

Reply to RichPLS

English as a second language?

Reply to black_dought

English as a THIRD language.

Reply to Gravijah

First of all, learn English. Second, your naive way of speaking is very fanboyish. The new Intels aren't even out yet, and you're already saying AMD is better. I love AMD (in fact I'm using one right now), but if Intel comes out with some great chips this year, I say they're worth a look.

Reply to Bender1012
- 0 +

Pentium M processor pretty much owns everything when it comes to overclocking in a desktop (there was an article on here about it awhile back), including AMD processors. I think all the new intel processors are based on the pentium M.... I think AMD is going to have it's work cut out for them to be honest. This is coming from an AMD fan.

Reply to KennyG

Quote :

"Poorly written" doesnt come close to describing the illiteracy in that.



And he's from South Africa. We're not all illiterate in South Africa!

Reply to Claidheamhmor
- 0 +

Quote :

ppl i think most of u hav check out the new article abt the New intel 65nm CPu.. WEll 1st b4 i check out the article i throught is sould b a Time for intel 2 bring back.. but nono Intel still Suck.. esp in Power n Performance.. well 1 think i hav 2 say that intel is realy good at is Video benchmark intel is realy faster.. but still i think over all Intel still not so Cool in TEmp or in Performance esp with all this new step ahead AMD with the DDR2 n VT support n hight L2 cash n stuff. Dont we all think INTel Reallly suck "?]
4 me i think ya what u think AMD Rule :)



http://secure.hop.com

Reply to kumana1
Tom's Guide > Forum > Overclocking > AMD > Intel New 65nm CPu still suck AMD x2 & FX still beat It.
Go to:

There are 11 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Google ads