Tom's Guide > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > The Short List: the Best Gaming Videocards for the money

The Short List: the Best Gaming Videocards for the money - Page 18

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - The Short List: the Best Gaming Videocards for the money

TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Last message on previous page:
All of those are fine for 1024x1280 but the HD 4850 is the best between those

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Trying to decide between the many choices here. I will be running 1680x1050, and I'd like to have a 2nd monitor running at 1280x1024 if possible.

A) 2x 4850
B) 2x 8800
C) 1x 4870
D) 1x 9800

Obviously I will need to change motherboards based on some of these. With (A) I'll go with an X38/X48, (B) I'll go with an nForce SLI 750i. The other 2 I'm undecided.

I'm trying to stay in the under-$425 range (preferably less) for whichever I go with.

Thanks,
CF


Message edited by controlfreak on 07-02-2008 at 04:50:48 PM
Reply to controlfreak

Two 4850's are the clear choice.

------------------------------ Cleeve
Hardware Editor, Tom's Hardware Guide
Reply to Cleeve

Yeah, at 1680x1050 or above, you're better with Crossfired 4850s than the other choices; they should also be by far the best at handling AA.

And the fact that you'd like a second monitor running pretty much says you should get two cards rather than one. While one card might be fine for driving two displays with just the basic GUI running, I think you'd start to notice a difference if you're running some media-heavy apps, such as playing high-definition video on one (or both!) screens.

Reply to nottheking

Quote :

Yeah, at 1680x1050 or above, you're better with Crossfired 4850s than the other choices; they should also be by far the best at handling AA.

All of those are fine for 1024x1280 but the HD 4850 is the best between those

As i said the diffrence isnt much but when its better why not buy it ? or as i said consider ATI HD 4850 too, its better than both and has a good price

8800GTS 640MB is agood card but its old, the new 8800GT 512 and 8800GTS 512 beat it and are better than it, go for them or go for
ATI HD 4850 which is better than all of these 3



maziar, you are a 4850 whore. :whistle:

Reply to ledzeprules

lol,i'm just talking about the facts :) not fanboys here :D

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

yeah, the 4850 is a good card actually. I prefer nvidia cards, but I'm tempted by that one because of the price/performance ratio ($200 + better performance than an nvidia 9800 gtx = pretty frickin sweet).

edit: although, nvidia may have some price cuts coming in response


Message edited by ledzeprules on 07-06-2008 at 11:56:38 PM
------------------------------ "The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men gang aft agley." -Robert Burns
Reply to ledzeprules

Yep,if NVIDIA drops the price of 9800GTX,then it will be a good buy because the difference between 9800GTX and HD 4850 isn't much.

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

lol, is there a way to delete a part of this thread (it is 860 posts long!)

 

Come to think of it, is this the longest thread on the forum?

 

*Edit* corrected my post to reflected actual number of posts

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by jonyb222 on 07-09-2008 at 06:43:57 AM
------------------------------ It is a very newb question, which is why I ask it.
Reply to jonyb222

jonyb222 wrote :

lol, is there a way to delete a part of this thread (it is 86 pages long!)

Come to think of it, is this the longest thread on the forum?


I think this may be the longest thread on the forum; I remember when it was first put up, heh. As for the page-count, you should perhaps change to have more posts per page.

Though in reality, all that really matter is the first post and the last page or two, so you can safely ignore the rest of the posts given how old they are; no need to delete them.

Reply to nottheking

^^ lol I just realized that, I corrected it now

Speaking of which the first page needs to be updated, no biggie though, the best value card are still up on tom's main page...

------------------------------ It is a very newb question, which is why I ask it.
Reply to jonyb222

this is a sticky so of course it will be long, now the pc vs ps3 thread that was still being resurrected after over a year, that was a long thread had to be closed otherwise it would still be on going.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

The short and sweet of it is I'm building an entirely new system and I've allowed myself 400ish dollars for video card(s). From what I've gathered most people think that the 8800gts(g92) is a better deal than the 9800gtx because of the price and fairly similar preformance. However, this is all gathered from older posts and since then I've seen people talking about price drops so I wanted to make sure I had my facts straight. As it stands I can get a 8800 gts(g92) off newegg for 159.99 after a $30 mail in rebate or a 9800 gtx for 209.99. Like I said I've got about 400 dollars I can spend on this but I'm a college student so if there's no big difference I'll gladly keep a little more money in my pocket. That said if anyone feels strongly about any other card(s) I'd appreciate your opinion, either a single card or sli works for me. As I'm sure it will make some difference, I'm making this as a gaming computer so I plan to play the newest games on the highest settings . Again any input is appreciated.

Reply to Toast

^^ get a 4870, end of story

------------------------------ It is a very newb question, which is why I ask it.
Reply to jonyb222

+1 More for HD 4870

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

I was looking to upgrade my graphic card and the first place i came to research was here. But I dont understand why you guys dont have much with the 9800 gtx. The price has substantially dropped and w/rebate you can get it for 180 right now. TigerDirect has the BFG 9800GTX for 179.99. Whenever I look at price comparison charts of it up against other cards the 9800 gtx always does best or second best . Like in cod4 the charts show the 9800 gtx is better in performance compared to the 8800 ultra by 5fps w/out AA.

Is the 9800 gtx the best graphic card for price right now?
Or is there a flaw with the 9800 gtx im not aware of making it not that valuable.

thanks,
Greg

Reply to gregtheorangeman

No,9800GTX cant beat 8800GTX/8800ULTRA in very high resolutions and when AA and AF is enabled because 8800GTX/ULTRA are 768MB and and 384bit.

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

Although I know Cleeve is busy, I'm still a little disappointed to see the list here neglected for so long, and even to find the "official" list article posted on the main page has not quite updated as much as it should; it covered the launch of the Radeon 4800 series, but neglected to cover any of the price re-arrangements that occured immediately thereafter. As such, out of boredom I took the liberty to go and see what's happened... To find that perhaps on the terms of the price-performance scale, nVidia's doing even worse than I thought, as three of their cards have been effectively "bumped off" the list by virtue of holding their price as the next-up tier dropped down to reach them.

BEST GAMING VIDEOCARDS FOR THE MONEY:
PCI-E video cards, Late July, 2008

Best PCI-e card for under $80US:

  • Radeon 2600 XT - Prices of this have fallen hard, hitting as low as the $60-65US range. While sold out, I also spotted that Newegg has the 256MB Sapphire version for only $40US. At this range, I feel that 256MB should be enough memory, making this an utter steal if it could be gotten.
  • Removed: GeForce 8600GT GDDR3 - Due to the price of this not falling as much as the 2600 XT, I really can't say it could be recommended when it tends to cost some 20-25% more ($75-80US) for comparable performance; at that level, it winds up about as close to the next higher tier than it does to the 2600XT.


Best PCI-e card for ~$100US:

  • Radeon 3850 512MB - Consistently, it appears a few of these are standing at around $100US in purchase price, though a number are running up as high as $140-150US, liable price stragglers to the price drops. (as well as price-dropped AGP versions)
  • GeForce 9600 GSO - Be warned, there is a version out there that has only a 128-bit memory interface, (link) making it weaker, so do not be fooled by a version with 512MB of VRAM. Aside from that, the normal 192-bit, 384MB versions follow roughly the same price scaling as the 3850.
  • Removed: GeForce 8600GTS - While previously the "best PCI-e card for under $100US," its price hasn't dropped much, leaving it very close in price to the considerably superior 3850 and 9600GSO.


Best PCI-e card for ~$120US:

  • GeForce 9600GT - On average, these cards actually cling a bit closer to the $120US mark than the 3870, though as noted, in non-AA situations (which at $120US, is a distinct possibility) it tends to trail the 3870.
  • Radeon 3870 - Generally, this seems to be a few dollars more, though in some situations it holds an edge over the 9600GT.


Best PCI-e card for ~$150US:

  • GeForce 8800GT 512MB - As with others, the price has dropped further here. For a while, there was a $100US sale on a 256MB version, though that has ended.


Best PCI-e card for ~$180US:

  • Radeon 4850 - Even though at the $200US MSRP, the card was killer, it seems that while AMD doesn't need to compete harder, the vendors and retailers themselves do, resulting in prices for the 4850 already being cut, as low as $175US. (link) This makes it hard to argue for any other card against this.
  • GeForce 9800GTX - These cards are pricing in, on average, some $10US above the 4850. Coupled with how the Radeon holds a slight-yet-consistent edge across the board, it would favor that instead of this, though perhaps not by a margin that this couldn't ever be recommended.
  • Removed: GeForce 8800GTS 512MB - As prices for the 9800GTX and 4850 have actually fallen a little, this has remained close to the same, making this card not really recommended anymore as you can buy either of the above two superior cards for the exact same price range.


Best PCI-e card for ~$290US:

  • Radeon 4870 - Yes, even though places could reasonably charge more, there is cutthroat competition to sell these cards, particularly between different brands; Diamond seems to offer the lowest prices, as low as $275, (link) with Sapphire a few dollars behind. Given that the GTX 260 is quite demonstrably weaker across the board, and doesn't regularly come less than $300US right now, it would not be recommended.


Best PCI-e card for ~$360US:

  • Two Radeon 4850s in Crossfire - The only cards that could claim to be more potent than a 4870 are the 9800GX2 and GTX 280... The former starting at some $380US, the latter at $450US, both offering only marginally more performance. For less than that amount, a pair of 4850s in CrossFire handily beat them.
  • Two GeForce 9800GTX in SLi - While price and performance-wise, the 4850 Crossfire solution may be superior, it relies upon you actually having a Crossfire motherboard. For those with an SLi motherboard, there's no sane reason to throw it out if they have their eye on a dual-card setup; a pair of 9800GTXs isn't anything to scoff at.


Best PCI-e card for ~$580US:

  • Two Radeon 4870s in Crossfire - Quite possibly rather gratuitous, with some speculation that AMD may bump the price of the 4870X2 as high as $550US, coupled with the fact that it's not out yet, provide possible reason to get a pair of 4870s. After all, word of the 4850X2 hasn't damped cheerful recommendations for 4850 Crossfire. Admitedly, the 4870X2 is coming in a month or two, while no one has officially announced their plans for a 4850X2 as of yet.



BEST GAMING VIDEOCARDS FOR THE MONEY:
AGP video cards, Late July, 2008

I only saw one real change, and that is that it appears the price on AGP 3850s have dropped to roughly $140-150US, from $160-170US. Much smaller price drops were seen on the 2600pro and XT cards, though overall their respective descriptions of "under $100" and "approximately $100" still fit.

Reply to nottheking

Cross fire for HD4800 series doesn't look like it's quite ready for the money yet. :D

Maby be a better idea to get 1 HD4800 card and enjoy it till drivers improve for CrossFire support and by then the price on the 4800 series cards will be less money.


Newegg has a great deal on Gigabyte HD3870

$99 after rebate+free shipping:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814125086

Reply to SonDa5

SonDa5 wrote :

Cross fire for HD4800 series doesn't look like it's quite ready for the money yet. :D


Perhaps not. To be honest, I wouldn't bother with anything in that price range or above m'self in this current situation; it's not like you could ever be truly satisfied with playing Crysis at 1920x1200 or above with those... But at any rate, I'll just defend myself as forward-thinking... :pt1cable:

SonDa5 wrote :

Newegg has a great deal on Gigabyte HD3870

$99 after rebate+free shipping:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814125086


As both Cleeve and I have consistently decided, we don't really like to consider after-rebate prices as valid for comparing the card's price overall, because they are never very consistent, and generally limited in time as to when they're offered.

Reply to nottheking

im using a asus m2n sli deluxe..
im tired of my aged 7600gt..would 8800gt would be a better upgrade option as it leaves the sli route a potential upgrade or is ati 4850 better??

Reply to red_star

ATI HD 4850 is better than 8800GT,but 2 8800GTs beat 1 HD 4850(Even the HD 4870)

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

4850 or 4870 for the win. For now Nvidia is obsolete.

Reply to pcspecialist

8800GT SLi costs approximately the same as a 4870 while being a tad more powerful, provided you're running at medium-high or above resolutions. (anything above 1280x1024, I'd say) I'd say it's perhaps a worthwhile option if you have a SLi-ready board... Otherwise, I'd not worry too much about having SLi, especially since these days, there tend to be superior chipsets (namely from Intel) than those that support SLi.

Reply to nottheking

First page needs updating.

 

Edit - Nevermind, I see nottheking has handled that.


Message edited by mathiasschnell on 08-01-2008 at 10:17:59 PM
Reply to mathiasschnell

Hi guys,

Is there a "Sticky" here that discusses Graphic Cards for the Laptops ... you know kinda the way you guys are doing here!?!?

Thanks,
G! :)

Reply to gonwk

Hello and welcome to the forums mate :)
Well unfortunately this topic doesn't talk about it,but which model do are u considering? i may help if i know :)

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

Someone above considered sli or cf for a dualmonitor setup - but doesn't sli and cf cancel the option for extended desktop? That's what I was told by some nerd in here anyway. Or is it only the connectors on the secondary card that are disabled?
(sli is pointless with the current cards being so powerful in my opinion, so never tried it)

Reply to neiroatopelcc

No, having an SLi or CrossFire setup will not make it impossible to have multiple monitors running at once. They just won't all be running when you're playing a game; it's been many years since video cards came to support hot-switching of video modes; it was kinda a necessity in order for SLi to work in the first place. So it'll simply be that when at your desktop, you'll have multiple monitors; with two video cards, you could actually have as many as FOUR monitors, quite possibly arranged arbitrarily, (well, either in a line or as a square) as well as two or three. It'd just switch off all but the first monitor when playing a game; in other words, it'd shift from simply a dual-video-card mode (something that'd been possible before SLi existed) to actually running in SLi mode.

Reply to nottheking

Good to see another update, Cleeve, though your lack of posting here is a little disconcerting. I just have a couple of warnings to point out about the latest revision...

  • As a serious potential problem, you note that you've found 9500GTs as low as $70US online, but neglect to mention that such cards appear to all be the DDR2 version; GDDR3 ones appear to start closer to $90US.
  • Additionally, I noted that there are actually lower prices on that card outside of NewEgg; Tiger Direct, for instance, has some modified versions, such as This one for $50US, though it has the memory clocked even slower, to 800MHz.
  • Strangely enough, there is also this overclocked version, which professes to have "DDR3" and is $50US as well, though I noted that the memory clock is 1200MHz, compared to 1600MHz for the actual GDDR3 version, and also packs only 256MB of RAM, though that likely may not be a problem for such a weaker card.
  • Though I understand that you list a "best card for under $100US," it's a bit of a stickier situation once you consider that it appears that such a card is only $10US cheaper than a 3850. Coupling that with the fact that you can Apparently now get a somewhat-weaker 2600XT for $30US*, (Or $60US once their supplies invariably are exhausted in a while) this makes it hard to argue for the 9500GT on a price-performance basis, which is supposed to be what the list is about.
  • Though it's a bit of nit-picking, I recall that the GeForce 9600 series uses the G94 GPU, not G92.
  • Lastly, though this was pointed out in one of the article comments, the AGP section could both use a comment on finding the right drivers (using the latest AGP drivers for 'em will make your PC toast) and also could use some fixing to the table.


*The cheaper Radeon card appears to be identical to the more expensive one save in that it has only one DVI port, and has a D-SUB port instead of a second DVI, and lacks the extra stuff; I'd judge it to be a "lite" edition of the card, which should probably be fine for most people looking for a dirt-cheap video card.

 

[edit]After checking again, I retract what I said about the 2600 mentioned; it appears to be another one of those DDR2 cards; so a DDR2 card for $30US, or a full 2600XT for $60US. Shame on me for paying all-too-careful attention for DDR2 GeForce cards, but missing it when looking at the Radeons on the other side... :p

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by nottheking on 08-05-2008 at 03:42:52 PM
Reply to nottheking

what card is highest performer?

ASUS ATI RADEON 3870 512MB GDDR4

MSI GEFORCE 8800GT 512MB OC GDDR3

MSI GEFORCE 9600GT 512MB OC GDDR3

ASUS GEFORCE 9600GT 512MB GDDR3

XFX GEFORCE 9600GT 'XXX ALPHADOG EDITION' 512MB GDDR3

SAPHIRE RADEON HD 3850 512MB GDDR3

ASUS ATI RADEON HD 3650 512MB GDDR3

the help would be much appreciated, pleeeeaaase....

Reply to ashman

8800GT

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

and the

ASUS ATI RADEON HD 4850 512MB GDDR3

GIGABYTE HD 4850 512MB GDDR3

SAPPHIRE HD 4850 512MB GDDR3

Reply to ashman

HD 4850>8800GT>HD 3870

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

SO 4850 OVER THE 8800GT? FROM WHAT I HEAR THE ATI CAR IS THE BETTER PERFORMER

Reply to ashman

ATI HD 4850 performs like a 9800GTX(It has a slight lead over its nvidia's rival in some games),so its more powerful than a 8800GT(however if someone has a 8800GT,it isnt worth it to upgrade to a HD 4850)

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

SPAM

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

Well that's some pretty random ****...

------------------------------ It is a very newb question, which is why I ask it.
Reply to jonyb222

nottheking wrote :

Good to see another update, Cleeve, though your lack of posting here is a little disconcerting.



Well, I just had my third son a couple weeks ago, so the whole lack of sleep thing is a factor. I'll be behind on things for a bit until I can catch up.

The 9500 GT GDDR3 is $80 on newegg now; GDDR3 2600 XTs are $60. It's a tough call, and I see your point about the 3850. I'll probably mention them both next month.

------------------------------ Cleeve
Hardware Editor, Tom's Hardware Guide
Reply to Cleeve

Cleeve wrote :

Well, I just had my third son a couple weeks ago, so the whole lack of sleep thing is a factor. I'll be behind on things for a bit until I can catch up.


Ah, I didn't know this. Then allow me to congratulate you for becoming a father yet again. I'm certain your son will grow up to be absolutely brilliant. :)

 
Cleeve wrote :

The 9500 GT GDDR3 is $80 on newegg now; GDDR3 2600 XTs are $60. It's a tough call, and I see your point about the 3850. I'll probably mention them both next month.


Of course, that's contingent on what the situation looks like a month from now. Clearly we're seeing things shook up quite a bit...

 

...And it appears that NewEgg has decided to "deactivate" the lite edition of the 2600 XT, though the DDR2 version remains there, and two GDDR3 cards (One & Two) have appeared to replace it at the same/lower price. (one even has a MIR to bring it down to $20US, heh)

 

Further shaking things up, we see the 8600GT has seen a price plummet, so now it is cheap enough to compare to the 2600XT's pricing as well, and possibly threatening the validity of the 9500GT even more, much like how the 3650 was never recommended. (One & Two, though there are also a mix of DDR2 cards in there as well)

 

Also, it appears that we're starting to see the 3850 dip below the $100 mark. (One, Two, Three, though it has only 256MB VRAM) Technically, there's also One 9600GSO under the $100US mark as well, (the other one is a 128-bit card) though it's close enough that I round it up to $100US.

 


The first card you mention is an open-box card; i.e, no warranty, potentially "dead on arrival." (DOA) Cards two and three include a rebate to get a price even close to $100US. The third is $120US, and considerably cheaper than any other brand; chances are it's a temporary price, as the rest (the other 26 cards currently listed) begin in the $140-150US range.

 

Really, remember that mail-in-rebates can't be counted, and likewise, unstable "fluke" pricing can't be counted either, since this is a guide meant to be usable for multiple days, rather than however long those freak prices last.


Message edited by nottheking on 08-08-2008 at 04:24:37 PM
Reply to nottheking

Yes but it's still should be in the 125 even without open box, fluke pricing and mir. 8800 gt's have gone way down on newegg and tigerdirect especially.

Reply to scippy4848

The video hierarchy link is broken

Reply to Shawnhath

MY son has a gaming computer basd on a Athlon 6000X2 processor and 2 8600GT is SLI mode. He got a new 26" monitor and would like to upgrade the performance of his system. We were looking at the Geforce 280 or the 9800 GX. Both in the $380-420 range.

Are these the best options? Should we consider somthing else?

Reply to ijourneaux

IMO your best bet is to get a 4870. I say that because it comes very close to the 9800gtx x2 in power even without new drivers. It's cheaper (250-270) and since it's not sli it won't suffer from sli problems. The only downside is that if you want to get another one like 2 years from now you can't do crossfire.

Reply to scippy4848

4850 in crossfire (but you need new mobo...)

Reply to Shawnhath

scippy4848 wrote :

Yes but it's still should be in the 125 even without open box, fluke pricing and mir. 8800 gt's have gone way down on newegg and tigerdirect especially.


It's still a fluke price if only a single card or two of that model strays down that far, with the bulk sitting at a price $15-20US above it. That is what the case is for the 8800GT.

 
ijourneaux wrote :

MY son has a gaming computer basd on a Athlon 6000X2 processor and 2 8600GT is SLI mode. He got a new 26" monitor and would like to upgrade the performance of his system. We were looking at the Geforce 280 or the 9800 GX. Both in the $380-420 range.

 

Are these the best options? Should we consider somthing else?


Well, if you had CrossFire capability, I would've recommended $340-360US for Radeon 4850 CrossFire, but with SLi... At such a high resolution as you would with a 26" monitor, another SLi setup *MIGHT* make sense, with 9800GTX cards, which should best either the 9800GX2 or GTX 280. Of course, that will depend a lot on what prices you can get the cards at; sadly, while they're a hair weaker than 4850s, they tend to be priced a bit more these days.

 

Alternatively, you could go for a single Radeon HD 4870; while weaker than either of those cards, it only falls short by a small (10-15%) margin, and would bring you notably under the $300US mark. There is also the 4870X2 which is to be released sometime this week or so, (as well as not requiring CrossFire support to use) but while vastly powerful than any other card out there, is expected to run $500-550US, making it considerably more expensive than your other options.


Message edited by nottheking on 08-11-2008 at 03:04:28 PM
Reply to nottheking

new kid on the block now deserves to go to the top for best gfx card and price for topend . 4870X2. (until nvidia respond next year that is)

Reply to samuraiblade

samuraiblade wrote :

new kid on the block now deserves to go to the top for best gfx card and price for topend . 4870X2. (until nvidia respond next year that is)


True, for $550-560US, the 4870X2 is remarkably good. The frightening part is that it provides a level of power-for-value that isn't all that much worse than the 4850 and 4870; normally after you pass the $300US mark, you'd only find cards a hair more powerful for considerably more money.

 

Of course, this list really doesn't need to go that high. Of COURSE people will all know what the best video card is, and know that if you've got the money to spend, the best card is the one to get. So its inclusion in a list here is kinda redundant, for something so self-evident.

 

Of course, currently it appears that AMD has a target of Q1 2009 for the release of RV870, which should be using either a 45 or 40nm process, which would bring the size down to 67% or 53% or so... So it's quite possible that with this much of a lead, nVidia's looking at a minimum of a year or two playing second fiddle in the graphics card market.

 

Simply put, I don't think that either GT 200b or GT 300 will be able to threaten AMD's dominance here; while they can bring themselves up to speed and compete against RV770/R700, AMD has made it clear that they do not wish to stand still long enough for nVidia to do so; once they manage to trump R700, they'll have to contend with R800 instead.


Message edited by nottheking on 08-13-2008 at 08:22:41 PM
Reply to nottheking

I would have chose the 9800gtx (not +, original) over the 4850.... they are around 175$ and beat the 4850 in gaming. (On my opinion.)

Reply to febtiger

Benchmarks seem to disagree with you; the 4850, in Crysis, (pretty much the only game there's a difference at with such potent cards) averages a 35-38% lead over the 9800GTX+ when anti-aliasing is enabled.

Reply to nottheking
Tom's Guide > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > The Short List: the Best Gaming Videocards for the money
Go to:

There are 10 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Google ads