Tom's Guide > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > The Short List: the Best Gaming Videocards for the money

The Short List: the Best Gaming Videocards for the money - Page 3

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - The Short List: the Best Gaming Videocards for the money

TomsGuide.com: Over 800,000 questions and answers to address all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 
- 0 +

Last message on previous page:
Hi all,


First, please accept my apology, Cleeve, it was not right of me to go personally at you. I was just in a very bad mood when I came home last night, and then saw these posts.

And to you all, please read my entire post before commenting on PCI cards not being for gamers. As my post stated:

Quote :

Reason being that I have an AGP Card, which I am satisfied with, but I have been hunting the web like a crazy for the best performing PCI cards, as I want to add two PCI cards to get the fastest possible 3-monitor setup.



I have an ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128MB (that I will change to a GeForce 6800 GT I hope - to benefit from nView) which I am very satisfied with, and I have two 17" monitors connected to that one, and then I have a horrible old 1MB ATI card in a PCI socket to run outlook on a 3rd 17" monitor.

I do play games, but for me the game quality does not measure in FPS. At this moment I am playing EQ2, a very graphics intensive game, and I normally only play it on one monitor.
I tried a few nights ago to stretch the game, in windowed mode, across the two screens I have on the 9800 Pro card, and it worked out ok actually.

What I simply thought then was that now I want to play it across all three monitors, and I would need a new PCI card for the 3rd screen to do so.

And I started speculating if the performance would be best with one triple-head (Parhelia) AGP card, or with one AGP, and two PCI cards. Or even if I use the 9800 Pro for two, and add a PCI card for the 3rd.

That was all my question was about in the first place, I never intended to say that playing on a PCI card was useful, which I agree with you guys, it probably wouldn't be today.

And thank you, Cleeve, for the last post, where you include a test on PCI Cards, that was VERY helpful. I had been searching everywhere for a PCI Cards test, but with no luck.

Please understand that 2 screens will not do, as it is very annoying to have the center of your view split across two screens. With 3 screens I would still have my character on the center screen, and expand the area for inventory, stats, maps, etc.

And finally... I am talking about PCI cards, to all those of you who tell me to go for a SLI setup... I am not talking about a PCI-E card :)

I have a Dell 8300 computer, with a P4 3000 MHz HT CPU, 1024 MB Dual Channel RAM, 800 MHz FSB, WD 200 GB 8MB Cache HD, SB Audigy 2, etc. It has one AGP slot and a number of PCI slots.

Thanks again, all, and please accept my apology for being a jerk.


//Xesc

Reply to Xesc
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Meh, no harm done. Apology accepted.

For my part. sorry if I responded a bit curtly to your original post.

Best regards,

Reply to Cleeve
- 0 +

Update:

Changed best PCI-express card over $500 to Radeon X1900 XT, due to cheaper price and equal performance to Geforce 7800 GTX 512.

Reply to Cleeve
- 0 +

Jan 26 updates to PCI-express category:

Moved the 6800GS and X800 XL to the $250 - $300 category as newegg offers them in this price category. Removed the regular X800 GTO from the pci-express list as the 6800 GS is notably better now that it's in the same category.

Added the X850 XT in the $200-$250 category as they are going for as little as $209 on Newegg!

Reply to Cleeve

Just wanted to say...nice board, Cleeve. Do you think the 7300 GS will be added to the list soon?

Reply to bourgeoisdude
- 0 +

Thanks man.

The 7300 GS has a crippled 64-bit memory bus from what I've seen... I think it'll probably perform only slightly better than the 6200.

I doubt it'll come close to challenging the 6600/X1300 for best budget card, but we'll see when the benches arrive.

If you've seen some benches though, shoot 'em my way...

Reply to Cleeve

Not yet...the 7800 GS looks decent. Will that one possibly be on your list?

Reply to bourgeoisdude
- 0 +

The 7800 GS might be the best AGP card available, but it's nowhere near a best card for the money at $350...

Reply to Cleeve
- 0 +

Feb 7, 2006 update:

Removed the X800 XT/X850 XT from best AGP buy above $200 because they are becoming very scarce below $250, and are in the $300 range for the most part now.

Recommend upgrading to PCI-express mobo and 7800 GT to people who have more than $200 to spend on an AGP card, until the 7800 GS can be found for <$250

Reply to Cleeve

You need to add a zero to the lithography process measures and make them nanometers rather than microns as 1 micron = 1000 nanometers.

Reply to sdemerch
- 0 +

Sorry, the lingo is a bit misleading.

What is commonly referred to as the "13 micron process" is actually 0.13 microns. The first CPU's were much larger and the micron name has stuck, although people simply omit the decimal point much of the time. But this has been the slang for some time in the processor world I'm afraid.

You'll probably be happy that as time goes on and the process is reduced, it's more commonly shifting to nanometers which is more correct.

Reply to Cleeve

Scrap the X800XL, the GTO's are replacing them since Ati is putting the R430 (XL) core in the GTO's

Reply to godlyatheist

X800XL shoudl stay, not all (not even the majority) of X800GTOs are R430s, in fact most are R480s and R423s.

But the number of different chips (R420,423,430,480,481) in the GTO is ridiculous, GTO2 = R480 though, but still doesn't mean the X850XT should go either.

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

Quote :

The 7800 GS might be the best AGP card available, but it's nowhere near a best card for the money at $350...



Feb 15, 2006: 7800GS available under $300 USD: http://www.monarchcomputer.com/Mer [...] watch&NR=1

Update perhaps for $250-$300 AGP? Also the 7300 GS is only like $80. Is it really as bad as people say it is? It does have DDR2 or GDDR3 memory in it...

Reply to bourgeoisdude
- 0 +

I'll hold off on the 7800 recommendation until it's $250ish. Still expensive considering it's a 16-pipe part.

The 7300 GS really IS as bad as everyone says. not even as good as a 6600 from what I've seen, but honestly I should check more benches.

Reply to Cleeve

Id says pce-i, 7800Gt is more bang for the buck. :D

Reply to chuckshissle

Quote :

I refuse to dilute's the purpose of the list because of brand preference, Zanko.

The best card for x dollars is the best card for x dollars, plain and simple.



Everything is not that plain or simple.

The best card for me is an ATI card because I know what the developers of the game I like to play develop with, even though the 7800gt provides a better value and works great.

The best card for a HTPC might be the card with the most power available in a fanless form, or it might be a more powerful card with a water cooler attachment.

I don't favor making this sticky, because it changes way to often, but also because choosing a graphics card is one of the few real upgrades that a user can do to an existing computer (even a mass produced factory stamped out DELL). So I think each user should give some individual attention to their selection and not select the mass approved "BEST" model according to this list.

Reply to ivoryjohn
- 0 +

You are missing the spirit of this sticky.

It is a guideline as to the best GPU buys for the money, nothing more. Of course some people require peronal attention, but hey, that's why this is a forum where anyone can post.

It HAS to change often, as videocard prices change often. That's just the way the industry works. If it was static, it would be completely useless as far as pointing out the "Best card for the money".

If you're an Ati fanboy, or Nvidia fanboy, you're not looking for value... you're looking for a brand. You should notice that if there isn't a clear winner in a price segment, either brand of card is mentioned. But in the case of the 7800 GT, it's a better value than any Ati offering of the same price, plain and simple. There's no convincing argument otherwise... until the prices change (which they will - and then the list will get updated again)

Reply to Cleeve

Out of curiosity, how is this card as far as AGP goes? Oddley I thing it is the only gaming AGP video card with 512MB in existance. How does it score?

Reply to bourgeoisdude

Quote :

X800XL shoudl stay, not all (not even the majority) of X800GTOs are R430s, in fact most are R480s and R423s.

But the number of different chips (R420,423,430,480,481) in the GTO is ridiculous, GTO2 = R480 though, but still doesn't mean the X850XT should go either.


I never DID find out what the R481 was; as far as I knew, the R420 was the X800 (AGP), the R423 the X800 (PCI-e), the R430 the X800XL, (PCI-e) and the R480 the X850. (PCI-e) Or were there separate AGP and PCI-e chips for the X850, and a bridge wasn't used?

Regardless, you are correct that the sheer number of chisp to be found in "X800" cards is rediculous by any measure, particularly when any one could turn up in an X800GTO.

Quote :

Feb 15, 2006: 7800GS available under $300 USD: http://www.monarchcomputer.com/Mer [...] watch&NR=1

Update perhaps for $250-$300 AGP? Also the 7300 GS is only like $80. Is it really as bad as people say it is? It does have DDR2 or GDDR3 memory in it...


Personally, I recommend the 7800GS Superclock from eVGA, as although it's still $319US from NewEgg, it's much worth the extra premium.

As for the 7300GS, you didn't pay close enough attention to note the REAL killer: The 64-bit memory interface. It also has 4 PSUs and TMUs, as well as, I think, ROPs. So even though it claims to the GeForce 7 line, and also boasts high clock rates, it's still a shabby card I wouldn't touch. Nothing to be compared to, say, the Radeon X1300 line.

Quote :

Out of curiosity, how is this card as far as AGP goes? Oddley I thing it is the only gaming AGP video card with 512MB in existance. How does it score?


Just as good as any other X1600pro, when it comes to performance. 512MB might become useful if you're playing next-gen games like F.E.A.R. or the like, and can't live without x16 anisotropic filtering, but in most cases, when it comes to actual quality, your money is generally better spent on a more powerful 256MB card. In this case, that's nearly enough for a GeForce 6800GS, which is significantly more powerful.

Reply to nottheking

What about a GeForce 7800GT? I'm building a gaming rig and looking for a lot of information and help in forums about which card to get. FEAR, Far Cry, Half-Life 2, and Quake 4 are on my gaming list.

Reply to gainedchrist

Quote :

What about a GeForce 7800GT? I'm building a gaming rig and looking for a lot of information and help in forums about which card to get. FEAR, Far Cry, Half-Life 2, and Quake 4 are on my gaming list.



We were talking AGP cards, which 7800GT is PCI-e. Read the first post for 7800gt info

Reply to bourgeoisdude

Quote :


I never DID find out what the R481 was; as far as I knew, the R420 was the X800 (AGP), the R423 the X800 (PCI-e), the R430 the X800XL, (PCI-e) and the R480 the X850. (PCI-e) Or were there separate AGP and PCI-e chips for the X850, and a bridge wasn't used?



Yep, R481 = AGP X850.

Quote :

Regardless, you are correct that the sheer number of chisp to be found in "X800" cards is rediculous by any measure, particularly when any one could turn up in an X800GTO.



Nah, ridiculous would be the number of partner boards that run the 'known chips' on unknkown spec boards. I'll take 5-7 different chips over 15+ variations of the boards using those chips. Some of this is due to things like ATi's GTO or nV's GS, but there's also the BFGs, eVGAs, ASUS, Sapphires, Powercolors and GeXcubes.

Quote :

Also the 7300 GS is only like $80. Is it really as bad as people say it is? It does have DDR2 or GDDR3 memory in it...



Yep it sucks. But that's all relative I guess. However I'd say an old GF6600/x700 would be competitive/better for less money.

Quote :

As for the 7300GS, you didn't pay close enough attention to note the REAL killer: The 64-bit memory interface. It also has 4 PSUs and TMUs, as well as, I think, ROPs. So even though it claims to the GeForce 7 line, and also boasts high clock rates, it's still a shabby card I wouldn't touch. Nothing to be compared to, say, the Radeon X1300 line.



Well you can compare it to the LE I guess, like HK did when it launched;
http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/gf7300gs-3.htm

Quote :

Just as good as any other X1600pro, when it comes to performance. 512MB might become useful if you're playing next-gen games like F.E.A.R. or the like, and can't live without x16 anisotropic filtering, but in most cases, when it comes to actual quality, your money is generally better spent on a more powerful 256MB card. In this case, that's nearly enough for a GeForce 6800GS, which is significantly more powerful.



Depends on the use, I personally think that extra memory is for Vista, which if you look at M$ description will require alot of memory for the vector implementation.

I'd still suggest the GF6800GS because the X1600 is a big dissapointment, but that IMO is more about the memory bandwidth that the X1600 needs to move beyond it's 'killer' 128bit memory (for a chip with much more processing power than an R9800 pro that deserved and got that extra memory bandwidth). 128bit memory just doesn't cut it anymore, which is why the GF6800GS and X800GTO still have noticeable advantages over the current 'mid range', heck they're already GTO'ing the X1800 when a 256bit mid range card would be best (if there weren't such a market for top end 'castoffs').

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

Cleeve,

I fully support a new gfx card buyer's guide sticky!!! As long as you are willing to update it on a regular basis, at least 6 times a year. You have my vote.

Cheers

Reply to sweatlaserxp
- 0 +

Cleeve: 6800GS AGP prices have been dropping quite a bit. I bought my BFG 6800GS from ZipZoomFly for $198 shipped. Last time I checked, the PNY 6800GS AGP is $189 at Newegg after MIR. However, prices seem to be jumping every day or so and it never seems to stay still, and more and more 6800GS AGPs are disappearing off e-tailers. They're cheap now, but I'll bet in 2-4 weeks you won't be able to find one anymore.

Prices according to Pricegrabber BTW.

Reply to MTLink

thats for a pci express card man

Reply to Elminster

Add the X1800XL in there somewhere, good OC capability, decent performance with a fair cooler.

Reply to ak47is1337
- 0 +

X1800 XL is decent, but overpriced compared to the 7800 GT.

When the price goes down I'm sure it'll make the list tho.

Reply to Cleeve

Fair enough. Make an uber cheap ass budget category, and an avid-overclocking category -.-

Reply to ak47is1337
- 0 +

Well, if the 7800 GT was a poor overclocker I'd add the X1800 XL in there because of the extra value being able to overclock makes.

But 7800 GTs are good overclockers too, so it's hard to discern based on that.

Frankly, I wish X1800 XL's were priced at $275 where they belong... which shouldn't take too long to happen, as Ati has lowered the MSRP of the X1800 XL to $299

Reply to Cleeve

Quote :

thats for a pci express card man



Oops...there I go assuming pricewatch.com actually gives accurate info again...

Reply to bourgeoisdude

Quote :

thats for a pci express card man



Oops...there I go assuming pricewatch.com actually gives accurate info again...

Pricegrabber.com is where it's at.

Reply to ak47is1337

excellent list, good work.

Reply to cefoskey
- 0 +

Update:

With multiple X850 XTs on newegg under $200, the card easily bests the 6800 GS and X800 XL to take top spot in the $150 to $200 category

$200 to $250 segment is barren because the X850 XT is the best card for the $$ until you get to the $250-$300 7800 GT.

Reply to Cleeve

thought id say i just bought a Sapphire x1900xt for 450$ no rebates or anything at newegg on the 4th. o yeah and for some reason they were around 50$ cheaper than the x1800xt's.

Reply to ZackInTheBox

yeah, that card is an incredible deal believe it or not..

Reply to ak47is1337

Thats a long short list. For just me I think my 7800GT is the best for the money and it's price range. It's able to play FEAR and BF2 at high settings with decent performance. :D

Reply to chuckshissle

Quote :

Thats a long short list. For just me I think my 7800GT is the best for the money and it's price range. It's able to play FEAR and BF2 at high settings with decent performance. :D


Overall, certainly. However, if you move up a few steps, the X1900XT will blow anything for a decent $450.

Reply to ak47is1337
- 0 +

Specifications
ATI RADEON™ X1300 Visual processing Unit
512MB DDR2 memory
AGP 8X
90 nanometer GPU
Ultra threaded core 3D architecture
Avivo™ display enhancement technology
Shader model 3.0
Single Slot solution

for an agp this isnt bad

Reply to pharoah

It doesn't really say anything about the performance other than it can tackle SM3.0.

Reply to astrallite
- 0 +

Quote :

Thats a long short list. For just me I think my 7800GT is the best for the money and it's price range. It's able to play FEAR and BF2 at high settings with decent performance. :D



Yes, the list is long because there are many price points, and two different interfaces (AGP and PCI-express).

But if you look, you'll notice that the 7800 GT is listed as the best PCI-express buy from $250 to $300.

Reply to Cleeve
- 0 +

The AGP X1300's I've seen run at PRO specifications, and their price has come down to that of the 6600's in some cases. So I've added them as honorable mention to the AGP list, they were already on the PCI-express list.

Reply to Cleeve
- 0 +

***UPDATE***

Removed X800 GT from AGP because of limited availability

Added X1600 PRO to AGP because availability is common and price is below $150, as Good alternative to 6600 GT.

Reply to Cleeve
- 0 +

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814130281

Wouldn't this naturally overtake the 7800gt in that range of price? At the 300 dollar mark and is more of a performer than the 7800gt.

Reply to spookz

Only reason that isn't on there is because it just came out.

Reply to ak47is1337
- 0 +

March 13, 2006 Update:

Completely updated the buyers guide with the new & available cards like the 7600 and 7900 series.

Reply to Cleeve

man i wish i could get video cards at those prices. x850xt costs like 350 in Canada. and the 7900gt costs 450..sigh.. xfx7800gt is at 350. Tiger direct has too much influence north of the border.. Fcuk tiger

so is it worth getting a x1800xl or 7800gt anymore?

Reply to illicitsc
- 0 +

I feel your pain, man. I'm in Canada.

All I can say to you is, ebay is your friend. I got my X1800 XL in Canada for $340 USD brand new from a trusted etailer. I've also ordered cards from the US... just keep your eye out for deals.

Sure, it's worth getting an X1800 XL or 7800 GT. Just get them used, at a deal. Should be able to find 7800 GTs on ebay in the low $200s.

Reply to Cleeve
Tom's Guide > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > The Short List: the Best Gaming Videocards for the money
Go to:

There are 11 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Google ads