ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
Forum Windows XP : Windows XP General Discussion - ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
and how they perform in games under XP?
Both have 128 megs of ram.
Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
You can also get additional info at www.ati.com
r.
"Phil" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:-uidnRgXw9YUAHDcRVn-ow@rogers.com...
> Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
> and how they perform in games under XP?
>
> Both have 128 megs of ram.
>
> Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
I did, but you cannot compare the two cards.
The option isn't there.
Can someone provide me with some info?
"namniar" <this@that> wrote in message
news:%23t4Bgub$EHA.3988@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> You can also get additional info at www.ati.com
>
> r.
>
> "Phil" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
> news:-uidnRgXw9YUAHDcRVn-ow@rogers.com...
>> Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI
>> X300se and how they perform in games under XP?
>>
>> Both have 128 megs of ram.
>>
>> Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
>>
>>
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
I did, but you cannot compare the two cards.
The option isn't there.
Can someone provide me with some info?
"namniar" <this@that> wrote in message
news:%23t4Bgub$EHA.3988@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> You can also get additional info at www.ati.com
>
> r.
>
> "Phil" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
> news:-uidnRgXw9YUAHDcRVn-ow@rogers.com...
>> Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI
>> X300se and how they perform in games under XP?
>>
>> Both have 128 megs of ram.
>>
>> Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
>>
>>
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
Phil wrote:
> I did, but you cannot compare the two cards.
> The option isn't there.
>
> Can someone provide me with some info?
I don't know ATi cards. I haven't seen any reviews of the X300 either,
but you may have some luck yourself, the usual tech review sites I
browse are:
www.techreport.com
www.aceshardware.com
www.tomshardware.com
www.anandtech.com
www.xbitlabs.com
You'll find benchmarks and comparisons of various cards.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
I have those same ATI cards in my two Dell Dimension desktops. I'm not a
gamer, but this might help you.
The 9600 seems likely to be the strongest. It's scores are about 15%
higher than the X300 in 2D scans at PC Pitstop.
Phil wrote:
> Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
> and how they perform in games under XP?
>
> Both have 128 megs of ram.
>
> Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
"Phil" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
>and how they perform in games under XP?
>
>Both have 128 megs of ram.
>
>Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
>
The Radeon 9600 series are medium to high end graphics adapter for a
computer that uses AGP graphics cards. They have 8x AGP speed, which
is the fastest that is generally available. They are not as high
performance as the ATI 9800 series. The 9600 series consists of 3
models insofar as I can discover - the 9600, the 9600 Pro, and the
9600 XT. I do not see a 9600SE model listed.
The X300 series is an entry level graphics adapter for a computer that
uses the new PCI Express 16 cards. PCI Express is, by design, at
least twice as fast as AGP. ATI lists 4 other series of PCI Express
cards that are higher perfomance than the X300.
Note that there is no computer that I am aware that incorporates the
ability to use both the AGP and the PCI Express 16 cards. It is an
"either or" situation. So if your computer supports PCI Express 16
then your considerations should be directed towards the X300 and other
PCI Express type video cards. AGP cards will not work in these
computers. Note that computers that use PCI Express 16 video cards
have only been generally available for less than a year, and many new
computers being sold today still have not moved to the new standard.
And if your computer supports AGP video cards then your considerations
should be directed towards the Radeon 9600 series and other 8X rated
AGP cards (provided your computer can operate AGP cards at 8X speed.
Computers more than a year or so old are likely to only support 4X AGP
and therefore a lot of the performance capabilites of an 8X AGP card
would be wasted in such a computer.
Good luck
Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
Hi,
I would suggest you to buy Nvidia 6600GT, PCI Express or AGP8x model which
depends on you motherboard.
Peter
"Phil" wrote:
> Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
> and how they perform in games under XP?
>
> Both have 128 megs of ram.
>
> Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
>
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
"harold" wrote:
> I have those same ATI cards in my two Dell Dimension desktops. I'm not a
> gamer, but this might help you.
>
> The 9600 seems likely to be the strongest. It's scores are about 15%
> higher than the X300 in 2D scans at PC Pitstop.
>
> Phil wrote:
> > Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
> > and how they perform in games under XP?
> >
> > Both have 128 megs of ram.
> >
> > Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
> >
> >
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)
You pretty well summed it up Ron.
However, if Phil's motherboard only has PCI Express slot he should be aware
of a major limitation- the wattage of his power supply. I opted for the ATI
300SE because I only have a 300 watt power supply in my system. Also the
higher end PCIex cards burn much hotter- think about system cooling. In my
case my MSI MB already has an ATI 200 PCIexpress chip integrated in it, the
separate video card freed up my RAM and CPU more and I maxed up my RAM to 2
GB dual channel memory. The video streaming is awesome!
"Ron Martell" wrote:
> "Phil" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
> >Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
> >and how they perform in games under XP?
> >
> >Both have 128 megs of ram.
> >
> >Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
> >
>
> The Radeon 9600 series are medium to high end graphics adapter for a
> computer that uses AGP graphics cards. They have 8x AGP speed, which
> is the fastest that is generally available. They are not as high
> performance as the ATI 9800 series. The 9600 series consists of 3
> models insofar as I can discover - the 9600, the 9600 Pro, and the
> 9600 XT. I do not see a 9600SE model listed.
>
> The X300 series is an entry level graphics adapter for a computer that
> uses the new PCI Express 16 cards. PCI Express is, by design, at
> least twice as fast as AGP. ATI lists 4 other series of PCI Express
> cards that are higher perfomance than the X300.
>
>
> Note that there is no computer that I am aware that incorporates the
> ability to use both the AGP and the PCI Express 16 cards. It is an
> "either or" situation. So if your computer supports PCI Express 16
> then your considerations should be directed towards the X300 and other
> PCI Express type video cards. AGP cards will not work in these
> computers. Note that computers that use PCI Express 16 video cards
> have only been generally available for less than a year, and many new
> computers being sold today still have not moved to the new standard.
>
> And if your computer supports AGP video cards then your considerations
> should be directed towards the Radeon 9600 series and other 8X rated
> AGP cards (provided your computer can operate AGP cards at 8X speed.
> Computers more than a year or so old are likely to only support 4X AGP
> and therefore a lot of the performance capabilites of an 8X AGP card
> would be wasted in such a computer.
>
> Good luck
>
>
> Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
> --
> Microsoft MVP
> On-Line Help Computer Service
> http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
>
> "The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
>
There are 9 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
Please mind
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.
