SAR ratings

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)

Lou@GoForIt.net wrote:
>Cnet just put out an article with SAR ratings for phones.
>http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6602-5020355-1.html?tag=nl.e404
>Note list on left side of page or at bottom.
>
>My V265 is right up there with a SAR of 1.55. I am not
>a heavy user, but I am not happy. Does anyone know if VZ
>will respond if I complain. Got phone last fall.

Why does the Treo 650 CDMA have a SAR rating of 1.5 W/kg
for analog (and 1.33 W/kg for digital) whereas the GSM
version only has a rating for digital ?

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)

Julie Ruin wrote:

Yes, I read the article in full.
My question was not about the effects, it was about what VZ will do?
Do you have personal experience or is your reply just an opinion??

Lou

> Yeah, I know what VZW will say.
>
> They will tell you to fxxx off. =0)
>
> And this is why: "there is not conclusive or demonstrated evidence that they
> (SARS) cause adverse health affects in humans."
>
> did you read the article you provided the URL to?
>
> -julie
>
> <Lou@GoForIt.net> wrote in message news:42F3BD10.E9088965@optonline.net...
> > Cnet just put out an article with SAR ratings for phones.
> > http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6602- [...] ag=nl.e404
> > Note list on left side of page or at bottom.
> >
> > My V265 is right up there with a SAR of 1.55. I am not a heavy user,
> > but I am not happy. Does anyone know if VZ will respond if I complain.
> > Got phone last fall.
> >
> > Lou
> >

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)

On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 15:25:04 -0400, Lou@GoForIt.net wrote:

>Cnet just put out an article with SAR ratings for phones.
>http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6602-5020355-1.html?tag=nl.e404
>Note list on left side of page or at bottom.
>
>My V265 is right up there with a SAR of 1.55. I am not a heavy user,
>but I am not happy. Does anyone know if VZ will respond if I complain.
>Got phone last fall.

Motorola's tend to have the highest SAR ratings. However, they tend to
have better reception than other phones. Maybe they're connected? :-)

Dave

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)

CDMA is not GSM.


"Treo Leo" <treoleo@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ig1Je.2123$WD.444@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> I didn't know my Treo 650 CDMA has analog mode :-)
>
> "Michael" <mpmorgan(no spam)@adelphia.net> wrote:
>>It's because GSM is digital only. There is no analog.
>>
>>"Treo Leo" <treoleo@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> Lou@GoForIt.net wrote:
>>>>Cnet just put out an article with SAR ratings for phones.
>>>>http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6602-5020355-1.html?tag=nl.e404
>>>>Note list on left side of page or at bottom.
>>>>
>>>>My V265 is right up there with a SAR of 1.55. I am not
>>>>a heavy user, but I am not happy. Does anyone know if VZ
>>>>will respond if I complain. Got phone last fall.
>>>
>>> Why does the Treo 650 CDMA have a SAR rating of 1.5 W/kg
>>> for analog (and 1.33 W/kg for digital) whereas the GSM
>>> version only has a rating for digital ?
>>>
>>
>>
>

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)

I didn't either
"Treo Leo" <treoleo@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ig1Je.2123$WD.444@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> I didn't know my Treo 650 CDMA has analog mode :-)
>
> "Michael" <mpmorgan(no spam)@adelphia.net> wrote:
> >It's because GSM is digital only. There is no analog.
> >
> >"Treo Leo" <treoleo@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>
> >> Lou@GoForIt.net wrote:
> >>>Cnet just put out an article with SAR ratings for phones.
> >>>http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6602-5020355-1.html?tag=nl.e404
> >>>Note list on left side of page or at bottom.
> >>>
> >>>My V265 is right up there with a SAR of 1.55. I am not
> >>>a heavy user, but I am not happy. Does anyone know if VZ
> >>>will respond if I complain. Got phone last fall.
> >>
> >> Why does the Treo 650 CDMA have a SAR rating of 1.5 W/kg
> >> for analog (and 1.33 W/kg for digital) whereas the GSM
> >> version only has a rating for digital ?
> >>
> >
> >
>