As for ram go for Mhz or MBs ??
Forum Motherboard & Memory : General Motherboard - As for ram go for Mhz or MBs ??
While upgrading i can't figure out if i have to use
2 x DDR333 256 MB
or
1 x DDR400 256 MB
Is it appropriate to use more than 256 MB, as i've never seen ram under stress while using it, so plz guide me out of it.
What's your chipset / mobo / processor ?
That will determine what ram is best...
To err is human... to really screw things up you need a computer!
i got the same q. i'm about to buy the asus A7N8X, amd xp 2400+ and wd 80 gig 8 mb cache or the maxtor with the same specs i'm not sure yet. so what kind of memory do u guys reccomend ddr333 or ddr400? and how much? its mostly for gaming.
THANKS!
I'd go with 512 of 333. If you have a newer AMP CPU the FSB will be @ 333 and it will run in sync with the RAM which is what you want. To answer the other question: 512@266mhz would be quite a bit faster than 256@333mhz. The higher RAM speed is nice, but the difference isn't dramatic like people make it out to be. The jump from 256 to 512 will be help you out quite a bit, but from 512 to a gig will only get you about a 3 to 8 percent increase, and that's only with certain apps.
Yo A,
Are you over-clocking? Do you know that there is no standard set for "DDR 400" yet? What are you upgrading........just the ram.........what mobo & cpu are you using? What are you using this system for?
Peace Out.............tg
I'm a man in a Box
Thats
MSI K7N2-L
with 2000+ T-Bred
surely i'll overclock (slightly though)
will 2000+'s FSB sync with the DDR333 ram , i'm not very clear of the idea "sync", so...
It just means that your cpu will be able to get data through the FSB just as fast as the memory can provide it that's all. It's always better to be in synch or have your ram running a bit faster so there are no processing bottlenecks.
To err is human... to really screw things up you need a computer!
Yo A,
Get the 2 sticks. You are using a "Dual Channel DDR" mobo.....even though most people are saying that they are not seeing much improvement running 2 sticks of Ram over 1 big stick. Also with the nForce2 mobos, most benchmarks show the best performance at running the DDR in-sync with the cpu bus........ all the Athlon XP's 2400+ & slower are 133 mhz(this will "sync" with DDR 266/PC2100) cpu bus processors, most XP 2500+ are 166 mhz(this will sync with DDR 333/PC2700) cpu bus processors. There is not that much performance gained by running your DDR faster than you cpu bus, in anything other than memory benchmarks.
My advice: get 2 sticks of good quality PC2700/DDR 333, & run it at the most aggressive 133/266 mhz memory settings that your mobo bios will allow, do not adjust the DDR voltage higher than stock(when OC'ing do not go higher than 2.7 volts). When you OC, work on your FSB, keeping your CPU & DDR in-sync..........until your sanity tells you your cpu is running too hot.
Peace Out...................tg
I'm a man in a Box
Hmmm..
Now tell me if i've got 2*256DDR333 and processor with 266, how can i run them in synch, for example i use 2200+ T-Bred,
so..
Yo A,
Your cpu will be at 133 mhz & your DDR 333 will be "under-clocked" to run at 133 mhz(because it is "DDR" it will run at 2X 133mhz).............your FSB will be only 133/266 mhz not 166/333 mhz. I advised you to get PC2700/DDR333, because it would be easier to get a pair of quality DDR333 sticks that could run CAS 2.0 @133 mhz over getting a pair of quality DDR266 sticks that could run CAS 2.0 @133 mhz. Also there is not much in price difference between PC2100 over PC2700. About DDR400........ with no set standard, who knows for sure if paying the extra cash is worth it. Hope that helps, again, if you want both the Ram & CPU to run at 166/333 mhz, think about very good cooling solutions like water cooling. My suggestion, is to go the other route, & under clock your DDR to 133/266, until you can get a 166/333 mhz CPU.
Peace Out................tg
I'm a man in a Box
There are 12 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
Please mind
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.
