Tom's Guide Forums
  Tom's Guide Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » CONFIDENTIAL R300 SPECIFICATIONS, ROADMAP, etc..
 




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : CONFIDENTIAL R300 SPECIFICATIONS, ROADMAP, etc..
 
More Information

Quote :

<b>ATi R300 Specifications (HARDWARE)</b>
By Brian Neal
Wednesday, June 19, 2002 10:00 AM EDT
Thanks to xbitlabs for posting about this site, which has published several slides from a presentation by ATi regarding the upcoming R300 and RV250 3D accelerators. The slides apparently confirm a number of previously rumored specifications, including the R300's 8 pixel pipelines and 350 MHz core clockrate. It is also said that the R300 will feature comprehensive support for DirectX 9 and it is listed as a DX9 part in the roadmap on the first page. A full list of specifications from the R300 slides follows:

Peak T&L performance - 150 Million Triangles/Second
350 MHz Core Clockrate
400+ MHz memory clockrate (DDR SDRAM)
8 rendering pipelines with 2 TMUs each (16 TMUs is a DirectX9 requirement)
Improved Pixel and Vertex Shaders (4 Shader Pipelines?)
Hydravision
0.15µ Production
Vertex Shaders 2.06, Pixel Shaders 2.0. Some sources claim there will be 4-pipeline vertex shader
Full DirectX9 compatibility
High quality anti-aliasing and new more complex higher order surface support
HyperZ III
Hardware MPEG-1/2/4 and DVD decoding (hardware motion compensation and DCT/IDCT).

The roadmap seems to indicate a production timeframe of Q2 2002, though this is obviously not the shipping timeframe. According to xbitlabs, the R300 is scheduled to ship in August.


from <A HREF="http://www.aceshardware.com/#60000378" target="_new">R300</A> <A HREF="http://www.myhard.com/20020617/1616258.shtml" target="_new">roadmap,RV250,R300,KT400&DDR400 preview,R8500 HDTV,ATI AGP8X</A> <A HREF="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/story.html?id=1024462399" target="_new">and more</A>


Intel for free. AMD for fee.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

don't tell me everyone already know that.


Intel for free. AMD for fee.

More Information

i found out two days ago :smile:

----------------
stop reading this!

More Information

dude. :tongue:

Intel for free. AMD for fee.

More Information

just out of curiousity...are you planning on getting an R300?

:eek: <b>Who fixed <font color=red>ATI</font color=red>'s leaky faucet??</b> :eek:

More Information

....cause you may want to look into a NV30. Looks like a really great product, although it'll probably cost a load of money.

What's the deal with lampshades, I mean it's a lamp, why would you want a shade? :smile:

FiL
More Information

well i'm looking to replace my Geforce2 Ultra

i think we just have to wait for the benchmarks

NV30 v R300 v Matrox Par??

i'm not really loyal to Nvidia, i'm going to buy the fastest card, although that could well be the NV30

<font color=red>FUDweiser......True</font color=red>

More Information

Yeah that's what I'm waiting for too. Once I see some benchies, I'll decide. Also, I'm not loyal to nVidia either, it's just that their "rumoured" specs seem much better than ATi's.

What's the deal with lampshades, I mean it's a lamp, why would you want a shade? :smile:

More Information

If i will have the cash in time, yes, this would be a possibility.

Note: I am not a nvidia fan, i don't play doom-like games, CS, Quak and whatsoever. I prefer RPG and Adventure games. Moreover i use video capturing, video editing, DVD and DivX plus TV tuner.

Finally i think for those kind of utilization, ATI used to have better quality images, better TV tuner, better hardware mpeg2 compression/decompression (hardware mpeg4 integrated with the R300) and more up to date GPU features associated to good 3D performances however.


Intel for free. AMD for fee.

More Information

why did you say that?!?


Intel for free. AMD for fee.

More Information

Quote :

why did you say that?!?


Is there something wrong with what I said?

What's the deal with lampshades, I mean it's a lamp, why would you want a shade? :smile:

More Information

.15 micron at 350mhz, wonder how they are pulling that off?

More Information

Not too hard, GF4 Ti4600 is running at 300 and can usually go to 325MHz. Then a couple extra core enhancements and a better fan, and POW! 350MHz it is.

What's the deal with lampshades, I mean it's a lamp, why would you want a shade? :smile:

More Information

you are funny, man. :lol:
you stole the R300 specs for your GF4. LoL.

More Information

haha. have you a link to provide to your nvidia "rumoured" specs?

More Information

Wha?? No Galvin or whoever was asking how ATi was gonna get a .15um core to 350MHz and I said that nvVidia already has the GF4 cores to 300MHz plus a bit of overclocking will get them to 325MHz usually, so why can't ATi. Then if ATi adds some core enhancements, it'll probably reach 350MHz. I feel like I'm repeating myself here!

What's the deal with lampshades, I mean it's a lamp, why would you want a shade? :smile: