So do the new Catalyst 3.10 drivers have optimizations in them for 3Dmk03? What about the 53.03 Forceware drivers?

What's the real deal?

Take a look at Digit-Life's review to find out;

<A HREF="http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/gffx/gffx-34.html" target="_new">http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/gffx/gffx-34.html</A>


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK

<b>-NEW PIC IN THGC ALBUM-</b>

Does that mean I need to buy a 5950 too for different games/benchmarks?

Screw ATi and nVidia, they can suck my dick!

<font color=red><b>TO HELL WITH ALL THE 128-bit 9800SEs!!!</b></font color=red>

Pretty soon, Vid cards will be like outfits...we'll have to mix and match them to the proper games in order for them to make any sense at all. And you know that every step of the way they'll be chargin us out the yin yang.

Oh and ya gotta love it...ATI doesn't optimize and yet Nvidia does AGAIN! Fuggin Cheaters.

----------
<b>It is always brave to say what everyone thinks. </b> <i>Georges Duhamel</i>

TKS

Grrrr...you made me read through an nVidia review to end up at that conclusion!...heh. Good thing I like Digit-lifes shiznit



<b><font color=red>3DMark03</font color=red></b>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1790928" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1790928</A>
<b><font color=red>3DMark 2001SE</b></font color=red>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7381806" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7381806</A>

Took my 56K ages to load! Don't do that to my 56K again guys plz!

<font color=red><b>TO HELL WITH ALL THE 128-bit 9800SEs!!!</b></font color=red>

Hehe, sorry I couldn't give away the ending now could I?

I hadn't even heard of the 3.10 rumour (likely during my time in T.O.) so I didn't feel I should mention much more. But I still think they should've checked to see if the monitors blew up!

Sorry about that, and yes, I love D-L stuff too, especially the ability to quickly scroll to the end to get the desert and ruin the meat and potatoes of the review.

As usually nice pictures of the gear.


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK

<b>-NEW PIC IN THGC ALBUM-</b>

LOL!

Yeah, sometimes it helps if someone will send it to you in the mail, especially something as freakin' big as that. But you'd have to look hard for someone willing to do that for you.



- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK

<b>-NEW PIC IN THGC ALBUM-</b>

hehe, the monitor blew up thing was so damn funny!

Good one nVidia fanboys!

<font color=red><b>TO HELL WITH ALL THE 128-bit 9800SEs!!!</b></font color=red>

It's too slow to load on dialup. Is Nvidia still cheating?!?!?!

_________________________________________
<font color=red>12 bit... The way games are meant to be played!</font color=red>

Nope nVidia are now using 32-but precision.
AnandTech said the image quality arenow better than Catalyst.

<font color=red><b>TO HELL WITH ALL THE 128-bit 9800SEs!!!</b></font color=red>

Not really. It would appear to be so to some, but really nV is using their run-time compiler to work things again.

But like I said before the recent patch proves that the run-time compiller can't handle the code natively without help, it needs to be told how to handle each situation it encounters (meaning optimizing the forceware for each new game you want out). Now what nV is doing IS in violation of FutureMArks guidelines, but in this case it is something that would be benificial in games without image quality differences (WUSY, Aanad is far from an objective source, he didn't even do serious image quality comparisons like Digit Life did [there ARE some differences on both cards, especially Halo issues with nV {like missing panel lights in hallways}]).

However for the sake of a benchmark that will show you how well you card handles un optimized/floptimized code, FM is correct, nV shouldn't do that, because this is how their cards will react to new games that haven't been 'adapted' for in the forceware drivers for the run-time compiler. So in a way it is cheating, but definitely not the kind we had earlier in the year.

This kind of cheating is simply more akin to what nV <i>NEEDS</i> to do in the real world to get their hardware eunning at equal speed and performance to the ATIs. In the 'real world' this isn't cheating this is (as we have seen of late) valid opitimzation. The question is whether 3Dmk can still in any way be representative of gaming and be a valid benchmark for the 'know-nothing' masses that don't understand how it can be manipulated. If it was only a test for driver differences for the same rig, no one would care, it's the dollars that are behind it all that make it such a tough issue. What nV does with it's run time compiller gives the end user a similar experience to that of ATI users. It may not be elegant, but it does seem to work well enough for most of the IQ and Performance issue/debates to have calmed down somewhat.

I have to side with FM because it is their Benchmark and they should be able to decide how it's used/applied, but really what nV is currently doing bears no resemblance to their previous exploits. This is very much like ATI's 'cheating' earlier this year (at the same time as nV), the switching of the order the code was handled in giving better performance and equal IQ seemed rather mild to me at the time (and still does), and to me the focus should be on whether all the work is still being done with the exact same IQ result (the most important thing IMO). However I think FM and nV will lock horns for a while. FM could patch 3Dmk03 again, and then the next driver release we'd be back to the same thing. If 3Dmk03 held no place, no one would care, and we all benifit when it works well in the games we play.

If think this issue has a little further to go before it is truely decided one way or another. I'm no where near as angry about this than the previous issues. The just don't seem similar at all, other than the main players in the continuing drama.


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK

<b>-NEW PIC IN THGC ALBUM-</b>

Your just checkin' to see if I'm awake


<b><font color=red>3DMark03</font color=red></b>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1790928" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1790928</A>
<b><font color=red>3DMark 2001SE</b></font color=red>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7381806" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7381806</A>