Computer Is Running Very Slow Resources At 99% - Windows XP
  Tom's Guide Forums » Windows XP » Windows XP General Discussion » Computer Is Running Very Slow Resources At 99%
 




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Computer Is Running Very Slow Resources At 99%
 
More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

Hi I am having a problem on my xp pro machine my computer is very laggy and
when I go into task mamagment with crtl-alt-delete it should cpu resource
usage 99% it's not suppose to be this can anyone help me thanks.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

I have another problem how do I get this in the first place. What can I do to
protect my self.

"Matthew Senecal" wrote:

> Hi it seems that you might have a virus and/or spyware on your computer. I
> would like for you to going in windows and right click on my computer on the
> desktop and go to properties and go to the system restore tab and check the
> box to turn off the system restore and click apply and ok. Then get a
> anti-virus program and do a full scan on your computer if you don't have a
> anti-virs program you can download avg's for free at http://www.grisoft.com
> and anti-spyware program at http://www.lavasoftusa.com to download Ad-Aware
> SE. After that go and download hijackthis for free on the internet and then
> run a scan and save the log and paste the log at this site
>
> http://www.hijackthis.de and it will tell you want to check and to remove
> and then restart the computer and see how it goes there is a virus and/or
> spyware on you computer that is corrupting your system by locking up when
> going through folders and opening them even though you might fix the virus
> and/or spyware with system restore on it's still saved in there that's why I
> had you turn it off. and that should fix it.
>
> --
> Reply back and let me know how it goes. Don''t forget to select yes if this
> was helpful on my post. I always like helping out people with there problems.
> Thanks
>
> Matthew Senecal
>
>
> "Stef" wrote:
>
> > Hi I am having a problem on my xp pro machine my computer is very laggy and
> > when I go into task mamagment with crtl-alt-delete it should cpu resource
> > usage 99% it's not suppose to be this can anyone help me thanks.

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

Hi jsut always run scans and updates and also keep that program for
anti-virus installed it does a automatic scan and removal every night at 2am
or you cange change the time but it's great and will work out for you thanks.
--
Reply back and let me know how it goes. Don''t forget to select yes if this
was helpful on my post. I always like helping out people with there problems.
Thanks

Matthew Senecal


"Stef" wrote:

> I have another problem how do I get this in the first place. What can I do to
> protect my self.
>
> "Matthew Senecal" wrote:
>
> > Hi it seems that you might have a virus and/or spyware on your computer. I
> > would like for you to going in windows and right click on my computer on the
> > desktop and go to properties and go to the system restore tab and check the
> > box to turn off the system restore and click apply and ok. Then get a
> > anti-virus program and do a full scan on your computer if you don't have a
> > anti-virs program you can download avg's for free at http://www.grisoft.com
> > and anti-spyware program at http://www.lavasoftusa.com to download Ad-Aware
> > SE. After that go and download hijackthis for free on the internet and then
> > run a scan and save the log and paste the log at this site
> >
> > http://www.hijackthis.de and it will tell you want to check and to remove
> > and then restart the computer and see how it goes there is a virus and/or
> > spyware on you computer that is corrupting your system by locking up when
> > going through folders and opening them even though you might fix the virus
> > and/or spyware with system restore on it's still saved in there that's why I
> > had you turn it off. and that should fix it.
> >
> > --
> > Reply back and let me know how it goes. Don''t forget to select yes if this
> > was helpful on my post. I always like helping out people with there problems.
> > Thanks
> >
> > Matthew Senecal
> >
> >
> > "Stef" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi I am having a problem on my xp pro machine my computer is very laggy and
> > > when I go into task mamagment with crtl-alt-delete it should cpu resource
> > > usage 99% it's not suppose to be this can anyone help me thanks.

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

Stef,

Follow these steps.

click to download Ad-aware
http://www.download.com/3000-2144- [...] tag=button

1) install Ad-aware



click to run a virus scan
http://security.symantec.com/ssc/h [...] DIJBJQVYEW

2) select 'Scan for Viruses' (accept the ActiveX app that will need to
install)



Run both scans daily or weekly (no longer)



There are many free apps that do both of these functions. If you don't like
these two, choose two others. Also, use multiple spyware removal apps to
catch all spyware (others similar to Ad-aware, not the on-line virus scan. I
suggest investing in an anti-virus tool such as Norton's Anti-Virus)

Drew

"Stef" <Stef@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:5127A07E-CAAA-4F66-9547-6470EE8ECC3E@microsoft.com...
> Hi I am having a problem on my xp pro machine my computer is very laggy
> and
> when I go into task mamagment with crtl-alt-delete it should cpu resource
> usage 99% it's not suppose to be this can anyone help me thanks.

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

In article <CC672FE8-D815-4CAB-BAAA-1CF3EE3520B1@microsoft.com>,
Stef@discussions.microsoft.com says...
>
> I have another problem how do I get this in the first place. What can I do to
> protect my self.

First, you need to understand what happened, and it's very good that you
ask how it happened - we need to know what happened, and knowing what
malware you actually got would tell us a lot about how it happened.

In most cases there are just a few paths:

1) Direct connect to your computer from the Inetnet or another infected
machine in your network.

2) You browsed to a malicious site and something ran or you click on
something to run it - you may not have know about it at the time.

3) You were using another program and clicked on a malicious link or on
an attachment in an email which ran something....

If you have cable/dsl you need at least a NAT Router installed between
your internet connection device and your computer

If #2 - then you need a different browser, use FireFox for any site that
you can, some banking sites need IE, but most everything works with
FireFox.

If #3 - then you need to use a different product, update that product,
or you need AV software that scans email and removes things before you
get them. Many cheap AV software doesn't scan email as it comes in to
your PC, get one that does. You also need one that stays resident, gets
frequent updates (nightly), and to learn about using non-Microsoft email
and browser clients.

--

spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote
>
Many cheap AV software doesn't scan email as it comes in to
> your PC, get one that does.

Bad advice for anyone that uses Outlook Express. Email scanning offers NO
additional protection and can and will corrupt Outlook Express. It would
seem to me that you would know that, Leythos.

Alias

z
More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

Stef wrote:
> Hi I am having a problem on my xp pro machine my computer is very laggy and
> when I go into task mamagment with crtl-alt-delete it should cpu resource
> usage 99% it's not suppose to be this can anyone help me thanks.

In Task Manager, click on the Processes tab then on the CPU column heading.

Which processes are consuming the most CPU?

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

In article <eFQb#73uFHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>, aka@[notme]
maskedandanonymous.org says...
>
> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote
> >
> Many cheap AV software doesn't scan email as it comes in to
> > your PC, get one that does.
>
> Bad advice for anyone that uses Outlook Express. Email scanning offers NO
> additional protection and can and will corrupt Outlook Express. It would
> seem to me that you would know that, Leythos.

It seems to work for all of the people we know using OE with NAV and
Symantec and AVG products - not one corruption on any of them.

--

spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d967454fd941c9b98a0ac@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> In article <eFQb#73uFHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>, aka@[notme]
> maskedandanonymous.org says...
>>
>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote
>> >
>> Many cheap AV software doesn't scan email as it comes in to
>> > your PC, get one that does.
>>
>> Bad advice for anyone that uses Outlook Express. Email scanning offers NO
>> additional protection and can and will corrupt Outlook Express. It would
>> seem to me that you would know that, Leythos.
>
> It seems to work for all of the people we know using OE with NAV and
> Symantec and AVG products - not one corruption on any of them.

State that on an OE newsgroup and see what happens.

Alias

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

In article <eY8d9X#uFHA.1516@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>, aka@[notme]
maskedandanonymous.org says...
>
> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1d967454fd941c9b98a0ac@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> > In article <eFQb#73uFHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>, aka@[notme]
> > maskedandanonymous.org says...
> >>
> >> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote
> >> >
> >> Many cheap AV software doesn't scan email as it comes in to
> >> > your PC, get one that does.
> >>
> >> Bad advice for anyone that uses Outlook Express. Email scanning offers NO
> >> additional protection and can and will corrupt Outlook Express. It would
> >> seem to me that you would know that, Leythos.
> >
> > It seems to work for all of the people we know using OE with NAV and
> > Symantec and AVG products - not one corruption on any of them.
>
> State that on an OE newsgroup and see what happens.

I can state it anywhere I want, as I have actual experience that none of
the users we know have any issues with it, none at all. While most of
our clients, their friends, and family we know, do not experience any
issues, it could be due to the fact that their systems are not already
compromised.

I have more than 80 residents between two sororities that are using OE
with Norton AV and AVG (and one with Panda) that are not having any
issues with it, not last year and not this year.

If you know people that are having problems, maybe they have other
stability issues with their system.

--

spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d967c56612698c298a0ae@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> In article <eY8d9X#uFHA.1516@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>, aka@[notme]
> maskedandanonymous.org says...
>>
>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.1d967454fd941c9b98a0ac@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
>> > In article <eFQb#73uFHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>, aka@[notme]
>> > maskedandanonymous.org says...
>> >>
>> >> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote
>> >> >
>> >> Many cheap AV software doesn't scan email as it comes in to
>> >> > your PC, get one that does.
>> >>
>> >> Bad advice for anyone that uses Outlook Express. Email scanning offers
>> >> NO
>> >> additional protection and can and will corrupt Outlook Express. It
>> >> would
>> >> seem to me that you would know that, Leythos.
>> >
>> > It seems to work for all of the people we know using OE with NAV and
>> > Symantec and AVG products - not one corruption on any of them.
>>
>> State that on an OE newsgroup and see what happens.
>
> I can state it anywhere I want, as I have actual experience that none of
> the users we know have any issues with it, none at all. While most of
> our clients, their friends, and family we know, do not experience any
> issues, it could be due to the fact that their systems are not already
> compromised.
>
> I have more than 80 residents between two sororities that are using OE
> with Norton AV and AVG (and one with Panda) that are not having any
> issues with it, not last year and not this year.
>
> If you know people that are having problems, maybe they have other
> stability issues with their system.
>
> --
>
> spam999free@rrohio.com
> remove 999 in order to email me

Per Norton....

Norton AntiVirus email scanning is not compatible with Internet service
providers using Secured Socket Layer protocol
Situation:
You have an Internet service provider (ISP) that uses the Secured Socket
Layer (SSL) protocol to download email to its incoming POP3 server. When you
configure Norton AntiVirus email scanning to scan email attachments, the
program does not appear to scan email attachments. You may also see the
error message "An encrypted email connection has been detected. Please see
help for more information on how to transmit encrypted email."

Solution:
Norton AntiVirus email scanning does not work with an ISP that is using the
SSL protocol. Also, Norton AntiVirus email scanning will only scan email
that arrives on default ports 110 or 25.

If your ISP uses the SSL protocol, then you must disable email scanning in
order to send and receive email. Read the document Turning on or turning off
email scanning in Norton AntiVirus for information on how to disable email
scanning.

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

In article <OBv4Fd#uFHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl>, fake@nowhere.org
says...
>
> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1d967c56612698c298a0ae@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> > In article <eY8d9X#uFHA.1516@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>, aka@[notme]
> > maskedandanonymous.org says...
> >>
> >> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
> >> news:MPG.1d967454fd941c9b98a0ac@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> >> > In article <eFQb#73uFHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>, aka@[notme]
> >> > maskedandanonymous.org says...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote
> >> >> >
> >> >> Many cheap AV software doesn't scan email as it comes in to
> >> >> > your PC, get one that does.
> >> >>
> >> >> Bad advice for anyone that uses Outlook Express. Email scanning offers
> >> >> NO
> >> >> additional protection and can and will corrupt Outlook Express. It
> >> >> would
> >> >> seem to me that you would know that, Leythos.
> >> >
> >> > It seems to work for all of the people we know using OE with NAV and
> >> > Symantec and AVG products - not one corruption on any of them.
> >>
> >> State that on an OE newsgroup and see what happens.
> >
> > I can state it anywhere I want, as I have actual experience that none of
> > the users we know have any issues with it, none at all. While most of
> > our clients, their friends, and family we know, do not experience any
> > issues, it could be due to the fact that their systems are not already
> > compromised.
> >
> > I have more than 80 residents between two sororities that are using OE
> > with Norton AV and AVG (and one with Panda) that are not having any
> > issues with it, not last year and not this year.
> >
> > If you know people that are having problems, maybe they have other
> > stability issues with their system.
> >
> > --
> >
> > spam999free@rrohio.com
> > remove 999 in order to email me
>
> Per Norton....
>
> Norton AntiVirus email scanning is not compatible with Internet service
> providers using Secured Socket Layer protocol
> Situation:
> You have an Internet service provider (ISP) that uses the Secured Socket
> Layer (SSL) protocol to download email to its incoming POP3 server. When you
> configure Norton AntiVirus email scanning to scan email attachments, the
> program does not appear to scan email attachments. You may also see the
> error message "An encrypted email connection has been detected. Please see
> help for more information on how to transmit encrypted email."
>
> Solution:
> Norton AntiVirus email scanning does not work with an ISP that is using the
> SSL protocol. Also, Norton AntiVirus email scanning will only scan email
> that arrives on default ports 110 or 25.
>
> If your ISP uses the SSL protocol, then you must disable email scanning in
> order to send and receive email. Read the document Turning on or turning off
> email scanning in Norton AntiVirus for information on how to disable email
> scanning.

Thanks for the info - I have never run into anyone using a SSL
connection to pull POP email.

--

spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

z
More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

Leythos wrote:
> Thanks for the info - I have never run into anyone using a SSL
> connection to pull POP email.

Get a real ISP, then!

Mine's been using SSL for 2 yrs+.

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

In article <RI2Xe.43220$1g2.17599@fe05.lga>, Z@no.spam says...
> Leythos wrote:
> > Thanks for the info - I have never run into anyone using a SSL
> > connection to pull POP email.
>
> Get a real ISP, then!
>
> Mine's been using SSL for 2 yrs+.

I don't need a mail server from an ISP, I have my own email server. I've
not seen many of the big ones providing SSL instructions on their
support sites.

Maybe you would want to post who your provider is so that we could look
at how they have it setup?

--

spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me