| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Best 3-drive EIDE RAID-0: Seagate, WD or Maxtor?
|
|
More Information
|
Building a DV capture/render EIDE RAID. I have a budget for 3 80GB drives, and was wondering which brand to go with. I'm not up to snuff enough on my tech to know what would be most beneficial for a video RAID: Seagate's superior sustained read/write transfers, or the Western Digital Caviar Special Edition's 8MB buffers. Does being in a RAID affect the drive logic's use of its cache? ATA/133 may be a marketing gimmick, but maybe Maxtor is somehow best suited for RAID?
|
|
Related Product
|
|
More Information
|
WD all the way.
|
|
More Information
|
Hmm, I have a RAID 0 w/ 2 D740X's, and I get some sick results- over 80MB/S sustained transfer rate. The D740x's are really nice on a raid. I know they are also very reliable.
|
|
More Information
|
Best by far would be the special edition drives from Western Digital, but they cost a bit more. Second choice would be the Maxtors. But whatever you do stay away from the Seagate Barracuda IVs in a RAID array, they have known problems when used in RAID!!
|
|
More Information
|
They do? What sorts of problems? I built a computer for my parents with a Seagate RAID, and it seems to function. I was thinking that perhaps the Special Edition's fat cache might outweigh the Barracuda’s higher sustained transfer rate in a RAID. Any opinions on that?
|
|
More Information
|
I would say WD special Edition. |
|
More Information
|
The Barracuda IVs have notorious slow speeds when in RAID setups, not much faster then a single drive. Other Seagates seem ok, and they may have fixed this bug but I have not heard about it if they did. Either way the Western Digitals would be the best choice IMHO....
|
MyDiscussions.Net Forum, Version 2007.1
© 2000-2006 No1Dev
