Tom's Guide Forums »
Wireless Networking
»
Wireless General Discussions »
Sharing wifi between buildings
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Sharing wifi between buildings
|
|
More Information
|
I got a friend who lives 2 blocks from my house, he is in a only-student building and they got 10Mbps ADSL. He has no prob to share it with me, but obviously this is impossible, becos no Wifi antenna could reach such a distance.
|
|
Related Product
|
|
More Information
|
Its possible to do with the proper antenna. However, you would need significant power to drive the extra gain (at least 20db). Those are difficult to find and expensive to build. The DTV dish may server in this capacity if you found the proper power and the specialized Equipment to 'extend the 802.11g signal ( 11.g would be recomended). Oh and you would probably need clear line of sight with no obstructions of any kind.
|
|
More Information
|
You need line of site but you certainly don't need 20 dB of gain. For two blocks you don't need a very powerful antenna you just need it to be directed. A 5 dBi yagi would be fine as long as you have a short pigtail from device to antenna. Two blocks is nothing, with the understanding you need good line of site. |
|
More Information
|
Not in my experience. Perhaps 20 is overkill but 5 in most cases won't maintain a connection at any significant distance, I suppose it somewhat depends what he means by "block". A rural blocks vary a lot. City blocks he is talking a greater distance. |
|
More Information
|
Yeah, in fact i got the idea after that convention, but i couldnt find details or a howto guide.
|
|
More Information
|
20 db is more than a bit overkill. Well can't speak to your experience but I've put up several hundred links of what would amount to a city block. Hell a couple of city blocks with 4 dBi patch antennas. Not even a very tight beamdwidth. Get a yagi with a 30 degree beamwidth and and at least 5 dB, you could go 7 if you want some confidence. Not a problem. |
|
More Information
|
Looks like my experience isn't the norm and Kwebb is more correct. Some proof of this can be found <A HREF="http://www.wirelessnetworkproducts.com/index.asp?PageAction=Custom&ID=20" target="_new">Here</A>
|
|
More Information
|
This is a (small) city and the blocks (at least in this neighborhood) are 50 meters long per side and the streets are 10 meters (and up) wide.
|
|
More Information
|
Got low budget and the spirit of adventure? Build a Cantenna.
|
|
More Information
|
Haha i cant believe it! a pringles can?
|
|
More Information
|
don't know about the steel bowl. The wave guide formula sort of depends or is based on the confined shape in this case a cylinder. The 1/4 waveguide calculation would not help you accurately place the connector in the bowl. You are welcome to experiment away. |
|
More Information
|
Good point, there's cylinder-like bowls too, but seeing the classing dish layout of the normal bowl makes me thing it could work.
|
|
More Information
|
"Looks like my experience isn't the norm and Kwebb is more correct. "
|
|
More Information
|
ok, I have no problem conceeding to your expertise on this. My experience, which is basically doing war driving experiments sponsored by a gvt lab to see if folks were complying with WEP/WPC policy, is certainly not as credible for this thread. The antenna used in my situation was built by some antenna geeks who may have had a secret pact to max out db. I made an erroneous assumption that because that antenna was ~22db and that we were monitoring from various distances between 100 and 500 meters that what I quoted was credible.
|
|
More Information
|
You can do it without a yagi yes. Panel, patch omni. Several options there but frankly I'd probably go with a yagi. Just not a home made variant. |
|
More Information
|
I just think that for the cost versus the performance some of these Cantennas we're seeing (granted they weren't competing against commercially manufactured units) were very nice and would certainly be more economical, not to mention fun - it seems the original poster is up to the challenge too.
|
