Tom's Guide Forums »
Homebuilt Systems
»
New System Build »
Solidworks CAD Workstation PC Build - June 20 2008
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Solidworks CAD Workstation PC Build - June 20 2008
|
|
More Information
|
Please note this is not a gaming PC build, it is built for a serious professional occupation using CAD software so please keep the flames to a minimum. But please feel free to critique, advise, or comment. There are some usefull tidbits in here about particular hurdles along the way.
Message edited by Pokey_Joe on 06-21-2008 at 06:56:13 AM |
|
Related Product
|
|
More Information
|
Newer cad software, unlike most games, is quad optimized. Dual is not good. It'll run a lot faster with slower clocked quad. 2gb is not good. Cad is memory hog. Workstation graphics card is not good. They're overpriced and underpowered. Maya, and nothing else, requires it. Cad does not require high graphics, not in the sense games do. A cheap mid-high range desktop graphics card will do fine. It does not support sli or crossfire, so that sli motherboard is useless. P45, which overclocks much better, runs cooler, and far more stable, is better for the workstation. That expensive case is not necessary. A mid tower atx case with good cooling does just as well for cad workstation. Hdd is slow and quite small. Hdd speed does make a difference for cad, unlike for games, in which faster hdd only decrease load time and doesn't increase in-game fps. For os, Vista 64bit is a better choice. It's ram hog, but not cpu hog. You should get a lot of ram for cad anyway. XP 64bit still have some stability and driver problems. If they haven't worked out the kinks by this point, it won't happen. For workstation, stability and reliability is more important than a tiny, unnoticable performance increase. No offense, but you don't really seem to understand cad, or how it's different from gaming. --------------- Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu |
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
I also think 64-bit XP isn't such a great choice, it was always the odd one out considering it was released years after 32-bit XP and hasn't had the same level of support. Vista 64 has much better support since it was more mainstream being delivered with the 32 bit (some PC manufacturers are installing Vista 64 on new computers, which they never would have done with XP 64). Vista only seems like a RAM hog until you get past 2GB of RAM, then you'll have loads left over. Plus the sidebar, Aero, and other services like parental controls could be disabled on your workstation to save a lot of memory.
|
|
More Information
|
I placed a "(2)" in front of the OCZ memory to indicate it was a 4Gb build using a set of 2Gb DIMM's, as the mfg part # would show, keeping room to expand to with another 4Gb's. Also, the motherboard mfg does not certify a memory mfg that will supply a 2gb dimm (Per slot) that runs at the boards maximum advertised speed, so OCZ was the the obvious choice. (You always want to use a pair of matched dimms to get the best ulitization of speed from the memery buss. or so I've read).
Message edited by Pokey_Joe on 06-23-2008 at 06:49:38 AM |
|
More Information
|
Pokey your mom is a smart gal. And her advice come in handy especially in some of these formums.
|
Tom's Guide Forums »
Homebuilt Systems
»
New System Build »
Solidworks CAD Workstation PC Build - June 20 2008
MyDiscussions.Net Forum, Version 2007.1
© 2000-2006 No1Dev
