OK before everyone jumps to the conclusion that the HD 4870 is the better value card... I want to make it clear.

I am looking for a single GPU card option to run my games on a 24 inch monitor.

I am prepared to pay a bit more for a reasonable premium performance. (Performance used to mean something before Ati's 4XXX series)

With this in mind which card should I go for.

I want to this to be subjective because I am about to buy one of these cards... but unsure and dont just want the perspective of Price in mind.

Which one would you buy if you had the money.

Questions to ask

1. Is direct x 10.1 important given it takes roughly 2 years for a game to be developed from the ground up to utilize this. Given that direct x 9 games are almost the same as their counterpart direct x 10 at this stage.

2. GDR 3 or 5.... is this going to be utilised anytime soon

3. Will the more beefy GTX280 memory be crucial for games in the upcoming 6-12months.

4. Which one would OC better

5. Which one is less bug prone

6. Which one is likely to get even better performance with some driver updates...

any suggestions will be appreciated

I just want filter out the price perspective and get an idea on what is the best in my situation....

Please dont mention SLi or Xfire... I hate the idea of both

1. dx10 looks better and probably work faster, but i am not fan of Vista (and never be)
2. diference betwen GDR 3 and 5 is in data throughput and yes it could be ustilised easily with high resolution games.
3. i dont know what you mean
4. 4870 will OC better as its created on smaller technology and 280 is much more hot
5. Hard to say, both cards are on market short time, nvidia having crash/performance problems with some graphic functions used together, ati having worse drivers, but catching up with nvidia.
6. I think ati have more room for increasing performance with better drivers.

I was for loong tim (since ati rage) fan of nvidia, but now i am seriously thinking change mine 8800GTX for 4870x2

Buy a 4870 now, then you can sell it later and upgrade to a 4870x2.




You'll get much better re-sale residuals out of a 4870 than a GX280.

4870 is almost as fast as the gx280, at half the price (or less).

not a hard choice at all

Go with the 4870 or wait for the 4870x2 would be my advice. As iam sure you know the 4870 isnt far behind the gtx280, and the soon to be released 4870x2 will destroy it.

The way i see it is that the 4870 can max out any game at that res other than crysis. However a single gtx280 still wont be able to max it out...it will only give you maybe 5fps more at most. Is that 5fps in one game worth the money...your call.

Or like i said wait for the 4870x2 and get a single pcb card that really might be able to play crysis well at those resolutions (tho still not max it out) .

+1 for Amiga500

4870 of course. Why pay nearly double for very, very little performance gain?
All the rest it purely conjecture at this point. Neither have been out long enough to base any reasonably good opinions on.

Hard to say at this point. Usually youll see great improvements with ATI, but nVidia has been known to have them at times as well. I guess it matters alot about how the cards are set for future games (strengths vs weaknesses), but I find driver improvement overall in ATI's favor. As far as ocing goes, some threads Ive read, the ATI product does a lil better, but thats using hacked bio etc on the ATI cards, so it could/maybe do even better, too early to know for certain. The makeup of the 4870 shows it to handle your res very very well, so memory isnt an issue, as ATI tends to make better use of their memory than does nVidia because of its arch. I believe the 4870 will inch closer to the 280, but probably wont ever "own" it. That being said, the 280 is a slightly better card, but to me, it should also only show a slightly higher cost

GTX 280 is outta wack on price don't touch it with a 10 foot cattle prod.

^The simple and correct answer.

GTX280 is the best option for you right now.

You seem to already know the answer to the value question is the 4870. You should realize that you are paying $200 more for maybe a 10-20% increase in performance.

It will yield you the following:
- faster card
- more memory (though less efficient)
- stable drivers with many games tailored to nvidia cards.

You pay the price with:
- higher energy consumption and greater heat output
- no DX10.1 (truly shameful)
- the stigma of ignorant people telling you "you should have got a 4870" and then in a month or two "you should have got a 4870x2", to which you will need to repeatedly explain "they weren't available when I got my card" or "I had the money, so I wanted the faster card".

If you want to buy the GTX280 and have the money, then just buy it - it is an AWESOME card.

I have a 24" monitor, but it would appear less cash. I am thinking of getting the 4850 or waiting to save some more and get the 4870. The reason being, the 4870 is that little bit more future proof. It has the buffer to allow performance at 1920x1200 in upcoming releases.

If price wasn't an issue, I would be waiting another month and buying the 4870x2 (which will dominate everything else available).

+1 hamster wheel

2. the difference between gddr3 and gddr5 is more architectual at this point, its more or less irrelevant to a buying decision

3. gtx200 series use more memory because of architecture, it is similar performance to the AMD solution for all intensive purposes

4. the 4870 does not OC any better, the OC of the gtx280 is very good and it has an excellent stock cooler - this is not to say the 4870 is a bad OC-er as long as you are willing to do softmods to drivers or buy an aftermarket cooler, but the 4870 has buggy software out of the box.

5. Nvidia's nv.dll errors are typically caused by users overclocking their video cards far past /reasonable/ limits, this is not an Nvidia problem this is end-user tomfoolery. I've actually never owned a single Nvidia card that was crash prone, and I overclocked every one of them quite a bit, but never higher than a top factory OC. On the AMD side of things, their drivers are getting much better than before, its certainly become a priority for them.

I had to pull these out and respond to them because they were more opinion than fact.



Oh, and my opinion of which card to get if you want to spend money?

GTX280 or wait for the 4870x2 to see if it has higher performance than the gtx280. There is no point in buying a 4870 if you are willing to go higher on the performance scale - so my recommendation is to wait until the 4870x2 is out.

I disagree that its similar for memory usage, as has been shown, you get more out of the ATI arch with less memory. Being as theres only one oc tool for the 4870s, and I havnt seen the results from using it yet, its too early to say, but like I said, at this point, Ive seen higher %'s on ATI using software mods. And thats the facts as Ive seen them

I would definitly suggest waiting for the 4870X2, as two 4870 are already beating the 280 in some benchmarks, wait and see, worse that can happen is a price drop on the gtx 280