| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Samung 2253BW OR 2253LW HELP
|
|
More Information
|
Hey guys whats up? I'm pretty new here so excuse if i post wrong or anything. I'm having a bit of a problem to decide on a monitor.
Message edited by flare on 07-28-2008 at 03:33:15 AM |
|
Related Product
|
|
More Information
|
I saw these two monitors in shop this week... the LW is way too glossy for me. --------------- Gigabyte x48-ds4, E8400 @ 3.6ghz (1.225v), Xigmatek s1283, 4GB Corsair XMS2 DHX, Radeon 4870, WD6400AAKS, Corsair tx750w, Samsung 2493HM, Vista64 |
|
More Information
|
The only difference between the monitors is that the 2253LW has a glossy finish and the 2253BW has the traditional matte black finish that most monitors have.
--------------- Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | X1900XT 512MB | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi | WinXP There is no such thing as a stupid question. But there are stupid people. |
|
Too much blood in the caffiene system
More Information
|
I'd personally go with the BW (the matte finished one) as I hate reflections while gaming, watching movies/anime, and online. (large window to my left, lets in lots of light/glare, but I like the view). |
|
Do not eat the styrofoam
More Information
|
I'd pick the 2253BW. I don't even understand why they make glossy monitors. If I wanted to look at myself I'd just use a mirror.
|
|
More Information
|
I have a 2253LW, it DOES NOT have a glossy screen. The ONLY difference is that the LW is 21.6", and the BW is 22". The LW is considerably less expensive, so I'd go with that unless you you need that extra .4". The BW came out first, and is being replaced by the LW from what I can gather. Both are quite nice, and you won't find better in the price range. I have heard of minimal backlight bleeding around the edges, but mine shows zero. As for buzzing, I haven't experienced anything like that. The monitor has some funky auto contrast features that are terrible; just turn them off. The default setting are also too bright, and blue, but that's fixed easily enough. They claim 2ms g to g response, and it is a very snappy monitor. Games and movies play very well. I highly recommend either of these monitors. They are the best TN panels I've seen, and every bit as good as the 226BW's that everyone likes. I've heard some complaints about the stand, but I have no issue. I think the way the base swivels is uncomfortable to some, and there is the potential to scratch a very fine desk surface. The monitor tilt works well enough, but is not super smooth, and there is no up/down adjustment. My only qualm is the control button setup on the monitor. Unless you're in a super lit room, you cannot read the labels. It's overall clumbsy.
|
|
More Information
|
hmm ok..but i've been reading about users complaining about the backlight bleeding to the top n bottom but this applies to the 2253BW (I haven't heard any bout the 2253LW)..and that concerns me so what do you guys think? You all have any suggestions?? remember i want to use it for gaming and movies Message edited by flare on 07-28-2008 at 06:39:44 AM |
|
More Information
|
I have the 2253BW ,and i dont have the 'backlight bleeding' thing.
|
|
More Information
|
hmm interesting..all that i read i heard ppl talking of the bleeding...clownbaby has me leaning toward getting the LW...
|
|
More Information
|
Thanks for your comments Clownbaby.
|
|
More Information
|
Hey rrpalma..i came across the Samsung T220 it looks really good to so i'm sorta leaning toward getting one of that...would love to hear if anyone heard of has used one of those |
|
More Information
|
Just purchased the 2253lw, havent had a chance to play with color settings as i had to run into work pretty much right after it came in.
|
MyDiscussions.Net Forum, Version 2007.1
© 2000-2006 No1Dev
