Tom's Guide Forums
  Tom's Guide Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Phenom 9850 v Q6600 For Fun System
 

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
 Page :   1  2
Previous 
Author
 Thread : Phenom 9850 v Q6600 For Fun System
 
And yes, it can run Crysis.
More Information

Ok, Im thinking about upgrading my Stupid ECS motherboard because of the lack of OCing options and general crappiness. So, I was thinking, If I'm going to get a new mobo, why not a new CPU? I really want to get into this whole quad-core arena and these are the options i have come up with...
AMD
X4 9850 BE @ the egg for $205 (prolly be cheaper by the time i actually buy this stuff)
Mobo---http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813138105
RAM--- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820231166

My cooler is fine and my psu should handle this stuff so im not worried about that. Size does matter, id like to keep a M-ATX size. total about $380.

INTEL
Q6600 (Duh)
MOBO---http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128078
Ram--- some cheap ddr2 800 4gb kit.
probably around $340

I'm not exactly looking for the fastest system but something that i can have fun tinkering with. I'm the kind of guy who opens the hood of his car every day to see if there is something to mess with. I might have a problem. :) Oddly enough, performance isn't the first priority as i know both will smoke my little e4400 and shouldn't bottleneck my 8800gs like my e4400 does.
I know this is a weird post but please leave some feedback. I am not too knowledgeable with AMD.
thanks!


---------------
e4400 (SLA5F???)2.66Ghz
ECS 945 GCT-M
2x1GB Kingston 667
EVGA 8800 GS SC 712/1728/1031
Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

More Information

id say get a better set of ram if going with AMD. After MIR, 4GB of XMS2 from Corsair is $66.50, with a lower voltage and same timings. As I am a slight AMD fan, I'd recommend the AMD. But to be honest, if you plan on OC'ing, as you said you like to tinker (I like to tinker too. Its how i fried the HD on my last system, which made me by the one I'm on now.) go with the Intel, as for now the Intel will OC to past 3 GHz. But if you want something that is rock solid for years to come (I'm not saying the Intel isn't) and don't plan on OC'ing, go with the AMD.

More Information

customisbetter wrote :

Ok, Im thinking about upgrading my Stupid ECS motherboard because of the lack of OCing options and general crappiness. So, I was thinking, If I'm going to get a new mobo, why not a new CPU? I really want to get into this whole quad-core arena and these are the options i have come up with...
AMD
X4 9850 BE @ the egg for $205 (prolly be cheaper by the time i actually buy this stuff)
Mobo---http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813138105
RAM--- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820231166

My cooler is fine and my psu should handle this stuff so im not worried about that. Size does matter, id like to keep a M-ATX size. total about $380.

INTEL
Q6600 (Duh)
MOBO---http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128078
Ram--- some cheap ddr2 800 4gb kit.
probably around $340

I'm not exactly looking for the fastest system but something that i can have fun tinkering with. I'm the kind of guy who opens the hood of his car every day to see if there is something to mess with. I might have a problem. :) Oddly enough, performance isn't the first priority as i know both will smoke my little e4400 and shouldn't bottleneck my 8800gs like my e4400 does.
I know this is a weird post but please leave some feedback. I am not too knowledgeable with AMD.
thanks!




With the 790GX motherboards coming for Phenom, either choice will give you 3.2GHz with basically unnoticeable differences in everyday use. Toss a coin.

What became of subtlety?
More Information

BaronMatrix wrote :

With the 790GX motherboards coming for Phenom, either choice will give you 3.2GHz with basically unnoticeable differences in everyday use. Toss a coin.



lol

More Information

I would definitely stick with the Q6600.No offense,but AMD has been really disappointing me.Plus,you would be saving money.

More Information

If you enjoy overclocking at all I would consider the Q6600. It has a lot more overclocking potential..especially with the G0 revision it isn't impossible to reach 3.4 to 3.6ghz on air cooling.

More Information

cory1234 wrote :

If you enjoy overclocking at all I would consider the Q6600. It has a lot more overclocking potential..especially with the G0 revision it isn't impossible to reach 3.4 to 3.6ghz on air cooling.



According to Anand's recent review this kind of overclock is also easily attainable with a 9850 and an SB750 motherboard. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipse [...] i=3360&p=4


More Information

yea go with the Q6600 definetly. Like u said, u like tinkering with your stuff, and the Q6600 is perfect for that. It is at 2.4 GHz, but it can be OCed to 3.2 easily. And its intel so u cant go wrong there.

More Information

falconzfan007 wrote :

yea go with the Q6600 definetly. Like u said, u like tinkering with your stuff, and the Q6600 is perfect for that. It is at 2.4 GHz, but it can be OCed to 3.2 easily. And its intel so u cant go wrong there.



I would strongly recommend reading the Anandtech article on the SB750 motherboards and Phenom overclocking. If you like tinkering with the settings then it definitely looks like the phenom rig with an SB750 motherboard will give you far more settings to play with. According to the review 3.0 Ghz is attainable on the 9850 with no voltage increase and the writers are still tinkering with the settings trying to get more out of it.

cjl
Rocket Scientist
More Information

That may be the case, or they may have gotten lucky. No guarantees. The Q6600 on the other hand is an old, proven overclocker, which can get to 3.2 GHz with almost zero effort. I'd stick with the Q6600, at least until there is a larger sample size with the Phenom + SB750.

More Information

Q6600 all the way. Everyone seems to have missed this:

customisbetter wrote :

My cooler is fine and my psu should handle this stuff so im not worried about that. Size does matter, id like to keep a M-ATX size.



That means no SB750 for him. And besides even with the SB750 the Q6600 is still cheaper since the SB750 motherboards will most likely be pretty costly.


---------------
Blasphemy is the spice of life.
And yes, it can run Crysis.
More Information

They aren't making a m-ATX size? That sure sucks...
O well, i guess my case is a little dumpy and could go. I just haven't found a case that i like yet that is also within my budget. $100+ for a box seems kind of unreasonable to me.

Message quoted 3 times
Message edited by customisbe tter on 07-24-2008 at 07:18:19 AM

---------------
e4400 (SLA5F???)2.66Ghz
ECS 945 GCT-M
2x1GB Kingston 667
EVGA 8800 GS SC 712/1728/1031
Yup, you got it buddy
More Information

If you want to have fun Tinkering, go with the 9850/9950 on a 790fx+sb750, or 790gx+sb750 board. If you get a board to has p-states settings in the bios, there is no end of tinkering with the Core clocks, and nb/IMC speeds on the phenom black editions. You can get a good mid tower for around $60, even at retail brick and mortar shops. And if you go that way, I can tell you how the p-states options work.

If you just want an easy OC, then go with the q6600, though from what I've seen there are no guarantee's there either, see too many people complaining of not being able to get past 3.0 even with g0.


---------------
AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition, ZeroTherm Nirvana 120 Premium CPU Cooler, MSI K9a2 Platinum bios 1.1b3 or P.0J, 4GB (2x2) Mushkin DDR2 1066 (pc8500) 5-5-5-15 2.05v RAM, Sapphire Toxic HD3870, Raidmax RX-700SS PSU, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320gb SATA2 X
More Information

customisbetter wrote :

They aren't making a m-ATX size? That sure sucks...
O well, i guess my case is a little dumpy and could go. I just haven't found a case that i like yet that is also within my budget. $100+ for a box seems kind of unreasonable to me.



There will be m-ATX versions. People suggesting otherwise don't know what they're talking about. There were some m-ATX versions of the 790GX motherboards with SB750 shown at Computex from the likes of DFI. http://www.tweaktown.com/news/9640 [...] index.html Check out the DFI LANPARTY JR discussed at the bottom of the page. IF DFI will be making an m-ATX version it is likely that other vendors will too.

More Information

I would definitely recommend Q6600. In the case that you DO overclock, Q6600 requires less voltage to achieve higher clockspeed, compared to Phenom. Not to mention that Q6600 is about on average 10% faster than Phenom at the same clock, and dissipates a lot less heat.


---------------
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/TXSuperFly03/478x88copy.png
There is ALWAYS a drone.
More Information

I have a GA-G33M-DS2R waiting for a new brain after putting the e6750 I had in a rig for my father. It has lots of OC options, but I did not use them much, because the NB got really hot. I have read that this can be a problem on the micro boards, but I otherwise really like this one.


---------------
There is ALWAYS a drone. Exactly where, or how many drones you will encounter may vary, but that there will be at least one will not.
More Information

cjl wrote :

That may be the case, or they may have gotten lucky. No guarantees. The Q6600 on the other hand is an old, proven overclocker, which can get to 3.2 GHz with almost zero effort. I'd stick with the Q6600, at least until there is a larger sample size with the Phenom + SB750.



I might also add that the Q6600 will beat the Phenom Clock for Clock.
S