Tom's Guide Forums
  Tom's Guide Forums » CPU & Components » Other Components » G.skill memory only 5.7 in windows experience?
 




Word :   Username :  
 
 Page : 1 2
Previous
Author
 Thread : G.skill memory only 5.7 in windows experience?
 
Ka - Boom
More Information

Ok, I know that wei doesn't really tell you anything about your system, but it bothers me that my g.skill 4 gb (2x2gb) memory is a 5.7, and all the other reviewers on newegg with the exact same ram have a 5.9? why is this?

 

here is the exact memory: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820231122

 

all my other components got a 5.9, so the memory score of 5.7 ruins my base score.

 

I have vista x 64

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by ispy on 06-02-2008 at 04:43:44 AM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

WR2
More Information

What is CPU-Z reporting for your memory frequency and timings?

Ka - Boom
More Information

uhh...well my cpu on the other computer is hitting 75c idle, so im waiting for zalman hsf before i start up the computer

More Information

Hmm, I have the G.Skill PC2-8000 (DDR2-500) 4GB kit and I'm at 5.9 on my index running at 1GHz effective. Anyhow, don't take their (M$) ratings to the heart. If others are getting the same index as I am with the PC2-6400 kit, then maybe they have theirs over-clocked.


---------------
E7200 @ 3.16Ghz (333x9.5)| Scythe Mine | Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L | G.Skill 4GB PC28000 | EVGA 9600GT | Audigy2 ZS | WinFast TV | 2xSeagate 80GB | WD 250GB | Lite-On DVD | Samsung 18x DVD-RW | Thermaltake TP 700W PSU | Antec P182GM | Klipsch PMU 5.1 | 28" HD
WR2
More Information

ispy wrote :

uhh...well my cpu on the other computer is hitting 75c idle, so im waiting for zalman hsf before i start up the computer

Lack of a Zalman cooler is NOT the reason you're hitting 75C at idle!

 

Republic of California
More Information

WR2 wrote :

Lack of a Zalman cooler is NOT the reason you're hitting 75C at idle!


And he would be better off and load/run things faster (and never any issues) with allot less RAM usage if he was using XP.

On the cooler issue....why get a Zelman if you can use a Thermalright which is better?


Message edited by ZOldDude on 06-02-2008 at 05:28:13 AM

---------------
*While we crash and burn, small, low tech, agrarian societies such as the Hmong in the mountains of Laos will continue on without so much as blinking an eye.*
More Information

ispy wrote :

Ok, I know that wei doesn't really tell you anything about your system, but it bothers me that my g.skill 4 gb (2x2gb) memory is a 5.7, and all the other reviewers on newegg with the exact same ram have a 5.9? why is this?

here is the exact memory: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820231122

all my other components got a 5.9, so the memory score of 5.7 ruins my base score.

I have vista x 64




what kind of hd do you have have? The slowest rating in my setup is hard drive.

Ka - Boom
More Information

umm its a seagate 7200.11 7200 rpm 500 gb. I partitioned it in two 250 gb partitions, one for documents, os, drivers, etc. and one for games music and movies.

with vista disc management you can only partition it in half, and you can use third party software like partition magic. blah

heres the link to the exact hd. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6822148288

ATI is back with a toilet flush on Nvidia
More Information

ispy wrote :

umm its a seagate 7200.11 7200 rpm 500 gb. I partitioned it in two 250 gb partitions, one for documents, os, drivers, etc. and one for games music and movies.

with vista disc management you can only partition it in half, and you can use third party software like partition magic. blah

heres the link to the exact hd. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6822148288



That's why you partition it before you install Vista on it. I have mine in 4 partition's with Vista on a 25g partition..Anyway Im using A-Data pc-6400 4g 2x2g and im getting 5.9 as well.


---------------
AMD X2 6000+@3.3
Vista 64 bit
Gigabyte..AMD 780G
A-DATA 4GIG's DDR2-800..
More Information

Have you adjusted your timings?

Remember... Look both ways.
More Information

Yeah Im using g skill pc2-8400(The same as you ) And I got a 5.9. But my base sorce is 5.6 for HDD its a WD 320gb 7200RPM. All the rest are 5.9s


---------------
Have No Fear...Master Chief Is here
Republic of California
More Information

Really...it is Vista.
It does not matter if it reports 5.7 vs 5.9 after all.

If you really care about how good/fast things run reformat the drive and install XP and see how much faster things run.

Most people with a high end system that "upgraded" to Vista or always had Vista can't tell...but a reformate and install of XP gives most people a -noticeable- boost.
Software after all is written to run on XP and -will- use alot less RAM doing so at the same time.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by ZOldDude on 06-02-2008 at 06:52:48 AM

---------------
*While we crash and burn, small, low tech, agrarian societies such as the Hmong in the mountains of Laos will continue on without so much as blinking an eye.*
ATI is back with a toilet flush on Nvidia
More Information

ZOldDude wrote :

Really...it is Vista.
It does not matter if it reports 5.7 vs 5.9 after all.

If you really care about how good/fast things run reformat the drive and install XP and see how much faster things run.

Most people with a high end system that "upgrade" to Vista or always had Vista can't tell...but a reformate and install of XP gives most people a -noticeabl- boost.
Software after all is written to run on XP and use alot less RAM doing so.



Please explain how having a "high end rig" makes RAM operate faster?

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by xX12amanXx on 06-02-2008 at 06:50:51 AM

---------------
AMD X2 6000+@3.3
Vista 64 bit
Gigabyte..AMD 780G
A-DATA 4GIG's DDR2-800..
More Information

i don't think he means it operates faster...i think what he meant is that vista is a resource hog compared to xp.


---------------
Intel Q9450 @ 3.4ghz

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/416459.png
ATI is back with a toilet flush on Nvidia
More Information
n°1824721
06-02-2008 at 07:02:05 AM