| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Sound Card over Onboard?
|
|
werd.
More Information
|
Hello, I am a budget gamer... and a music freak Thanks. --------------- "Steve Jobs is not making enough money" E8400 @ 3.6GHz (9x400FSB 1.32v)|4GB|HD4870 |
|
Related Product
|
|
More Information
|
There is no difference, save it and spend the money on speakers or headphone instead. --------------- Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply |
|
BAM!
More Information
|
^ id agree with dagger, if the ALC883 was enough for you in the past you wont notice the difference. --------------- "The MB is 31 C and the CPU is 109 C. I think it's the CPU overheating." |
|
More Information
|
I gave up along time ago on adding a sound card to my system. The on-board stuff has come on along way from the old AC97 sound (although that was good for the time).
|
|
The Order Odonata - We do what we must
More Information
|
As an audiophile I can promise you there's a difference between even an old Soundblaster Live! and even new onboard sound chips. For one, there's noise isolation you'll get with the soundcard. Its audio processor is not sitting on a motherboard sharing its PCB with all the other motherboard components, and is therefore, not subject to the same electrical interference that on board sound solutions face. Secondly, you can't find an on board solution (unless you have a board with a SoundBlaster built into it) that comes close to the S/N ratio of discreet audio cards. In fact, you may have a hard time even finding the technical specs of an on board sound chip (perhaps because they're so bad??). If you care about your computer's audio do one of two things. 1) Get a dedicated sound card. It doesn't have to be the very best but just about anything you get will likely sound better than onboard sound. 2) If you have a motherboard with S/PDIF output use the output to connect to a receiver so that the audio processing is not being done by the motherboard's, IMO, inadequate sound chip. Yes, if you using $50 speakers it may be hard to tell how bad the on board sound is, but if you step up to even the cheap-fi Logitech Z-5500 (fine for gaming and some personal music listening) that I use with their laser beam-like satellites (there's like no dispersion and bass that may kill the bacteria on your walls, but that is neither tight nor accurate) you'll hear a difference. Get a soundcard. Message edited by halcyon on 05-12-2008 at 12:56:16 PM --------------- Yes, I use an Intel Quad. Sometimes its a little overclocked, sometimes a bit underclocked. Yet, its always nice and the virtualiztion is sick. And? |
|
More Information
|
Although, I have a creative 5.1 card, or had anyway. Good luck getting it to work in Vista. Also, my new board has HD sound outputs. I doubt a 5 year old card will do better. I've got a cheap pair of headphones(10 bucks) that cover your ears, and the sound is great actually. Nice bass, good effects. I recommend try out your onboard sound with a good set of speakers/headphones, then if not satisfied go to a soundcard. |
|
The Order Odonata - We do what we must
More Information
|
I guess that's just makes all around sense, try what you have and see if you like it. My point is that I believe very few onboard solutions are going to compete with an Audigy, X-Fi, or Xonar. If you're really serious about HD sound would you be seriously considering using an onboard solution? Loosely like being serious about gaming but wanting to use a GeForce FX5200...woefully inadequate for the enthusiast. Message edited by halcyon on 05-12-2008 at 09:07:01 PM --------------- Yes, I use an Intel Quad. Sometimes its a little overclocked, sometimes a bit underclocked. Yet, its always nice and the virtualiztion is sick. And? |
|
Yes, actually, I did have nails for lunch.
More Information
|
You can find onboard solutions with S/N ratios that come close to that of discrete audio cards (and even exceed them in some cases). You just have to do a little research, which means going to review sites and downloading product spec sheets. Realtek spec sheets are detailed and readily available on Realtek's website.
|
|
The Order Odonata - We do what we must
More Information
|
That's a Creative driver issue likely. ...and we all know that Creative isn't the best with their drivers, especially where Vista is concerned. My point is not that onboard sound doesn't work, as your above post seems to suggest I wrote. My point is that today's discreet sound cards spec above today's onboard audio solutions. Yes, a SoundBlaster Live! isn't going to offer 7.1 audio and there aren't not drivers for Vista. That's Creative for ya. They don't want to support that 8-year-old sound card on Vista...damned them! ...but we're comparing today's onboard solutions to today's discreet solutions, eh? Are the Realtek onboard solutions besting 109db S/N ratio while being able to offload any audio processing from the CPU (not an issue, really, with today's dual and quad cores, but not irrelevant either). Are they offering any positional audio past EAX 3? I know onboard sound has come a long way but, again, I've not read or heard anything that makes me beleive an ALC883 is equal to an Xonar or X-Fi. Message edited by halcyon on 05-12-2008 at 09:50:48 PM --------------- Yes, I use an Intel Quad. Sometimes its a little overclocked, sometimes a bit underclocked. Yet, its always nice and the virtualiztion is sick. And? |
|
More Information
|
You say that the noise isolation is better with a discrete card but I actually get quite bad noise from my PCIE socket with my X-fi. Its a nasty scratching noise. |
|
The Order Odonata - We do what we must
More Information
|
--------------- Yes, I use an Intel Quad. Sometimes its a little overclocked, sometimes a bit underclocked. Yet, its always nice and the virtualiztion is sick. And? |
|
More Information
|
Creative is greedy and pathetic. Realtek offer full Vista driver support for their old onboard that's more than half a decade old. Even though few people still use. If even one of their comsumers still use an old model, they'll support it. And Creative drop support for their two week old expensive soundcard. At the moment, I am willing to believe anything from Realtek. They've been proven to be honorable through their deeds. Unless they pull a fast one, their words are good enough for me. If they say it beat a Diamond discreet card, than that's what it is. --------------- Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply |
|
More Information
|
i became very anti-creative-sound card when i lost a driver disk and called for some help, back when they didnt have driver downloads on their site. They told me that i could pay to have one shipped to me, i was like you have got to be kidding me, 12.00 bucks for a freaking driver. So now i am on-board till it dies. |
|
More Information
|
I actually prefer an add-on sound card over on-board. I can tell the difference. The on-board solution sounds a bit flat to me and less noise/distortion coming through the speakers.
--------------- Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | X1900XT 512MB | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi There is no such thing as a stupid question. But there are stupid people. |
|
More Information
|
