Tom's Guide Forums »
CPU & Components
»
CPUs »
umm...I thought the charts where supposed to be better?
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : umm...I thought the charts where supposed to be better?
|
|
More Information
|
what happend to this website...teh cpu and video charts are horrible!, they dont even have any new hardware...and there still using the same old games to benchmark...wtf, they dont even have any 9 series cards...i used to use this site all the time to compare cards and cpu's but tomshardware is horrible now...omg, what a downgrade.....is somebody having some issues..what is the problem....get new charts...bench the new cards..wtf........................ |
|
Related Product
|
|
Save the Hippies!!!
More Information
|
just STFU you little noob. --------------- don't listen to me I'm a troll Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's |
|
More Information
|
|
|
Save the Hippies!!!
More Information
|
my pc sucks because i do not think there is any new hardware that justifies me upgrading, the reason toms charts are out of date is that it is a sh!t load of work to do them and they have always only reviewed them periodically. --------------- don't listen to me I'm a troll Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's |
|
More Information
|
my 3 year old pc is better then yours.....like i said... ATARI |
|
More Information
|
y ou dont tell your fans your coming out with an all new toms hardware..and downgrade the **** website....there old charts where better then this new ****, they should have just let **** be, till everything was upgraded, this site sucks. |
|
Save the Hippies!!!
More Information
|
hehe, i'll take your bait, my comp is not 3 years old and there was pretty much nill that could beat it at that time. pray tell, what are your 3 year old specs?
--------------- don't listen to me I'm a troll Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's |
|
More Information
|
This site is here to help people. It's free. If you want to see things when you want them, then you better buy the cards yourself and benchmark them. You don't pay for this site, you have no right to demand anything from it.
|
|
More Information
|
im jsut so mad cuzz i used to love this site...the charts used to be excellent..so i th ought with new toms ...new charts...but the charts are worse then before....old pc 7600gt p4 640 3.2 533mhzram
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
And, lastly, just because you have a lot of money to spend on hardware doesn't give you the right to say you're better than anyone else.
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
They'll get it up soon, I'm not too upset about it. They'll probably be there before the week's out.
|
|
Save the Hippies!!!
More Information
|
so let me get this straight, you like toms and use their charts but you bought a pentium 4? how does that one work? --------------- don't listen to me I'm a troll Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's |
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
Rule of thumb for any website, though, is never "upgrade" to a new design without including new content (and never, ever, EVER sacrifice content or features for a new design, always build on the old and improve). The designers think it's awesome, but regular visitors probably couldn't care less. Message edited by Oh Snap on 05-05-2008 at 11:09:33 PM --------------- Intel Core 2 Quad q6600 @ 3.0ghz // 8GB PC8500 RAM @ 1066 2x WD Velociraptors 10k rpm RAID 0 3x (Tri-SLI) BFG NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX OC 768MB 2x Gateway FPD2485W 24" Monitors and 2x 30" Dell 3007WFP Monitors |
