I just set my computer up with a 40" 1080p TV as a monitor and am saving up again to build a new PC. My crrent yard stick is going to be the ability to play Crysis on High at 1920x1080. There don't seem to be any GPU solutions out currently that can do this at a comfortable price. So what are the chances that something will be released this year that will be down to manageable prices by the end of the year?
 
 
Nvidia's 9000 series doesn't seem like it'll be able to do it. What about the proposed specs for ATI's HD4000 series? Anything know to be in the pipeline behind these?  

The lack of response doesn't really fill me with confidence that my dreams of big screen Crysis will be fulfilled this year...

yeah  
u can just taking all those choppy frames and imagine them running fluidly works for me lol

Q9550 @ 4.0ghz
9800gx2 in sli will give it a good go...
 
 
 

High is pretty easy with current cards, if you are referring to maxed out or "very high" (vista only) then we have a little ways to go. According to extremetechs podcast, they got up to a 100% performance boost at high resolutions on very high with patch 1.2. Mix that with the HD4000 series or nvidias gt200 gpu and things are looking somewhat promising.

I look forward to the summer when the new cards arrive.
 
Until then, there's mastercard.

Yeah i dont see it happenin, not this year anyhow, ati need to get back on the horse b4 we see some real innovation in our graphics cards until then, I dont think we would have even seen the 9xxx series yet except ati brought out there x2 chip, and nvidia felt the need to retaliate....

The 8800GTS  /  GT models were still selling rather well though...  

My 8800GTS 512 will play Crysis @:
 
1680x1050 on High (shaders on very high, shadows and post processing on med) and get ~30fps
 
1280x720 on Very High 2xAA (shadows and post processing on med) and get ~30fps
 
I'm afraid the words "Crysis" "Very High" "1920x1200" won't go together until the next generation of cards comes out.

I think it is a bug they put in on purpose to make everyone think that their graphics cards are inferior    
 
Seriously though, I think new patches + new cards by ATI and nVidia due out this year should give it a run for its money.  It is only March after all.

I really hope the GT200 and the RV700 will be able to play Crysis on full settings.
 
I wish NVIDIA and ATI would release their monster cards instead of their revamped G92's and whatever.

I would just put the game away. Then this time next year, act like its a brand new game, and by that time cards will be able to do it.  

Well the 9800x2 IS the fastest card out there, but only by a hair, and not at superhigh resolutions everyone is fascinated with right now. But its not a appreciable diffrence for the price your going to pay, 700 dollars for a 30% increase over the gtx8800 is not worth it. You turn on the aa and that drops to only 13%? Definetly not worth it, if this is the best there top end setup is going to give us right now, i dont see the gtx being any better, but well see, right now thats only speculation, but nvidia does seem to fall into these type of patterns...

Crysis isn't a good game... dunno why you wanna play it so bad =P

 
Are you a wind up merchant?
 
... or did you pirate the game and that's your weak attempt at justification for not paying for it?

Don't you know? The "cool" new "fad" is to act like a hardass against things that lots of people think are awesome, even if you secretly agree with them.  
 
This guy is obviously "cool"

 
Thats ok, I dont think world of warcraft is a very good game but apparantly 10,000,000 people disagree with me. Its possible Im wrong and its just that I dont like the game.

No no, you're right.
 
@Ragnorok64: Crysis is very playable if you spend the time to tweak it properly. There are settings that use up graphics horsepower without adding to much to the visual side of things.

Its possibile
 

 
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/ [...] index.html