Tom's Guide Forums »
Homebuilt Systems
»
New System Build »
Want to build a semi-future-proof rig for <1500
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Want to build a semi-future-proof rig for <1500
|
|
More Information
|
Hey all, I'm new to the THG forums although I've been on THG for years.
Message edited by remix on 02-19-2008 at 11:59:20 PM |
|
Related Product
|
|
More Information
|
Some suggestions: Mobo: MSN P6N SLi sports a 650i chipset, which is pretty much.... a 2 year old product. You should go for a more recent chipset, such as 780i. Personally, I opt for Intel chipset to couple with Intel processor, since Nvidia chipsets are not the best chipset out there, and they run quite hot. I would recommend either ASUS Maximus Formula, or Gigabyte X38 Graphics: You can get 2 8800GT in SLi at the cost of a single 8800GTX, and with the performance exceeds that of 8800Ultra. So if you have a nvidia chipset (780i), 2x 8800GT are highly recommended. However, if you decide to have an Intel motherboard, which does not offer SLi capability, you can go with 2x HD3870s. They offer better image quality, and better driver support for multi-GPUs (this means you see more performance gain with 2x HD3870s than 2x 8800GT) Hard drive: If you still have about 200 USD left in your budget, highly recommend a Raptor X / Raptor 150Gb along with your WD Caviar RE2. Then you can put OS and execution game files on the Raptors, while using WD hard drive as a storage. You'll see some performance gain (faster boot time, faster load time) Power Supply: If you're thinking of a 2-year rig, I recommend Seasonic PSU over any other PSU brand. They offer superior quality, and much more stable power feed. Seasonic 700W should be sufficient (unless you decided to go water, and add another 1~2 graphic cards to your dual GPU setup. Now, some of your questions, 1. As I said above, MSI P6N is based on nvidia 650i chipset, which is a 2 year old product (I used 650i since winter of 05). It is incapable of running newer Intel processors (45nm variants), and its a terrible chipset for Q6600. If you're also looking into overclocking (even slightest), you should look away from Nvidia chipsets. Intel chipsets not only are more efficient than Nvidia's chipset (lower power consumption, lower heat dissipation), they are also compatible with Intel's newer offerings. In terms of overclockings, they are enthusiasts' choice. You can either do X38 chipset (said above), or X48 chipset to have quad GPU capabilities (4x 3870). 2. As for 9-series Nvidia cards, so far there are only 1 high end (9800GX2) and 1 mid range (9600GT) announced. 9800GX2 is just a dual-GPU solution on a single PCI-E card, which house two 8800GT GPUs. 9600GT on the other hand, has lower performance than 8800GT. 3. I'm not exactly sure what you mean by mid-range PC. The next mid range components (CPU / GPU) from Intel / Nvidia due should be somewhere in March~May timeframe, with ATi's in June. They do not offer any superior performance gain than any current generation products. ATi's, on the other hand, promise significant performance gain over their current HD3870 solutions. Hope these help. Message edited by yomamafor1 on 02-19-2008 at 03:45:08 AM --------------- ![]() |
|
More Information
|
Intel is changing sockets at the end of this year or the first of next. Everything will be new as far as CPU's and boards. If I do the build I'm planning on, it will last me longer than other's because I don't game or need the absolute 'latest thing'. I think you could do a build when the video cards come out and be fine, but others are going to suggest you wait. I'm using a pIII right now, can't do everything but it works fine for browsing and general purpose use. --------------- Opinions are like asses,everybody has one. |
|
More Information
|
Wow, thanks for the great response, yomamafor1.
|
|
More Information
|
If you opt for Nvidia chipset, I would recommend EVGA 780i board 8800GTX has always been a good card, but its just getting old. Compared to 8800GT, 8800GTX has only slightly more performance, while spouting out tons of heat, and costing around 450 USD. 8800GT on the other hand, only cost about 200 bucks, and pairing two of them together will yield you 8800ultra performance, or above. IMO, its a lot better than a single card 8800GTX solution. I also highly recommend a non-reference 8800GT. The reference cooler not only is noisy, but also very insufficient at cooling the chip. You can get non-reference 8800GT at the same price as the reference cooler ones. Like this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814127329 So, let's see Intel C2Q Q6600 = 280 USD Total: 1505 USD. A Raptor X costs about 180 USD, so you'll be over-budgeted
Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by yomamafor1 on 02-19-2008 at 05:10:18 AM --------------- ![]() |
|
More Information
|
Hmm looks awesome, that is more than likely what I'll end up getting |
|
More Information
|
What kind of monitor are you using? If its 22 or below one card is fine. you wont see a big difference with two cards. I would go for the evga gts512. runs much cooler and quieter than an 8800 gt.
|
|
More Information
|
I have a 32inch lcd as my tv but vga compatible (most likely not gonna be used for gaming, youd need a freakin huge desk) and I will probably buy a 19 or 22 inch since they seem to be pretty close. I never actually thought of that though, good point I might as well (for the beginning) keep it with 1 8800GT dropping my price by 200 - how much will that affect maxd settings gaming? FEAR/COD4/Obliv (alan wake in the future!) I wonder what gfx requirements alan wake will have...
|
|
More Information
|
You can get Scythe S Flex SFF21F about 10 USD cheaper here: EDIT: As for the games you just named, you'll be able to get very decent framerate with just 1 8800GT at 1680 x 1050 (22" size). So you can just get a Raptor X first, then upgrade to a second 8800GT in the future. Good suggestion. Message edited by yomamafor1 on 02-19-2008 at 07:34:47 AM --------------- ![]() |
|
moments of brilliance
More Information
|
--------------- Why is it that the more somebody talks about what Certs they have the stupider they sound? |
|
More Information
|
go with the 22". it would be a sin to build this and run it on a 19 inch monitor.
|
|
More Information
|
Message edited by Ignatious on 02-19-2008 at 10:53:14 AM |
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
Actually the Seagate 7200.11 beats the raptor in all but one test. so the raptor is a waste of money now, even in raid 0.
|

