Tom's Guide Forums
  Tom's Guide Forums » Homebuilt Systems » New System Build » high-end workstation
 

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : high-end workstation
 
Have drums, will travel!
More Information

I “manage” (i.e. herd cat-like objects :) ) the IT of a small business. We have three folks with desktops and three with laptops plus the boss has both. We have a rotation schedule to replace the computers, the boss gets a high-end desktop every five years and his old desktop is passed down with each box dropping down an office. The same happens with the laptops, but on a three-year schedule.

Because of the long time between builds (I build all desktops from the case/board up), I get a $5000 budget (unless I have had some disastrous expense in the five years) for the boss’s new computer. Here is what I have come up with for a January-February 2008 build:

CASE: Thermaltake VE2000BWS Armor Black ATX Full Tower Built-in Liquid Cooling $215
PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 1000w PSU W0132RU $259
MB: Asus P5E3 Deluxe $349 tigerdirect.com
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 at 3.0 GHz FSB1333 $277
RAM: OCZ DDR3 PC3-10666 Reaper X HPC 4GB Kit (2 x 2GB) $548
GPU: SAPPHIRE HD3870 $245 NowDirect.com $235
HDD: (2) Western Digital Raptor WD1500ADFD 150GB 10,000 RPM 16MB Cache Serial ATA150 ($165 x 2) $ 330
HDD (C: drive): Western Digital Raptor WD740ADFD 74GB $119
BU DRIVE: Iomega REV 70 GB SATA Kit w/5 disks $604
MONITOR: ViewSonic's 28" VX2835wm $700 (budget allows room for 2)
MS Vista Ultimate retail $258 64-bit
MS Office 2007 Ultimate retail $361
Total $ 4255

The boss’s computer does mainly heavy-duty spreadsheet financial analysis (60%), CAD and other graphics intense, non-game software(25%), music composition (10%--Finale & Sonar) with a bit of e-mail and programming; it runs Dragon NaturallySpeaking Pro 9 (onboard sound might not be good enough—might have to allocate $200 for a Creative sound card). Any thoughts or suggestions are welcome!


---------------
-ed
Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

More Information

#1) Get 8gb of RAM. You Don't need it Now, but in 2-3 years it could be very useful.

#2) Wait 10 days, and grab the E8500 CPU.


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
More Information

So, Does Guy #3 in your Desktop office has a 15year Old PC?
I really feel for him :>>>


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
More Information

Alright, there are some issues with this system.

PSU: Overkill, drop it for a PC Power and Cooling Silencer 750W
Mobo: Screw DDR3, huge price premium for next to no performance gain, get a P5E instead.
RAM: Get 4GB of quality DDR2 instead, hell, get 8GB of it for less then the 4GB of DDR3 you posted.
CPU: Q6600 is a better choice for multi-tasking.
GPU: There is no reason not to get a Quadro or FireGL card and enable hardware acceleration in AutoCAD. I use it everyday at school, and it runs as well on their old P4 systems, if not slightly better, then on my Core2Duo setup, because they have video card hardware acceleration.
HDD: Raptors aren't worth it, they are actually being beaten in many benchmarks by the new Seagate 7200.11 drives, and have terrible GB/$ ratio.

Most important thing to take from my post, is that a Quadro or FireGL card is basically needed if you are going to do intensive work in AutoCAD, the program runs so much smoother with hardware acceleration.

More Information

It's obviously a powerful PC, but it's not a workstation if it doesn't use an ECC capable motherboard and ECC memory.

More Information

ECC isn't always needed in a workstation, its more of a server thing also. You can have a fine AutoCAD machine without ECC ram.

More Information

CASE: Thermaltake VE2000BWS Armor Black ATX Full Tower Built-in Liquid Cooling $215

PSU: PCP&C 750w $160 NewEgg
MB: Asus P5E Deluxe $229 NewEgg
CPU: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 at 3.0 GHz FSB1333 $1075
RAM: (2) GSKILL -DDR2 1000 (2 x 2GB) $300 NewEgg
GPU: SAPPHIRE HD3870 $245 NowDirect.com $235 (Change to Quadro)
HDD: (2) 7200.11 500GB 7,200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0 ($120 x 2) $ 240
HDD (C: drive): 7200.11 500GB 7,200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0 $120
BU DRIVE: Iomega REV 70 GB SATA Kit w/5 disks $604
MONITOR: ViewSonic's 28" VX2835wm $700 (budget allows room for 2)
MS Vista Ultimate retail $258 64-bit
MS Office 2007 Ultimate retail $361
Total $ 4495


If you want to Cut from this you can..........
1) Get Vista 64-Bit OEM - Save $70
2) Get Gigabyte DS3R Motherboard - Save $100
3) PCP&C 610w Silencer (Still Plenty of Juice) - Save $40
4) You need a Backup Unit on a PC? Your Data is not on a Server?
Save $604.

Advantages of new System.

1) The Fastest CPU Available on the Market. (Q6600 Fine, but you have cash to burn)

2) 8GB of Memory. This will be very important very shortly. DDR2-1000 will still not come close to bottlenecking your system.

3) Far More DataStorage and just as fast or faster. You will also be able to backup your Data files from the presumed RAID-0 back to Drive C for fast/easy retrieval in the event of corruption of loss. You will still need tape backup, but this will make work as well.


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
More Information

Does BOSS really use all this computer power doing CAD or does he just want it for bragging rights? Is he the power user in the office or do some staff do more computer intensive work? Do any of the staff use multiple systems at once?

I expect the laptops don't have near the power of the workstations. What do the laptop users do that does not require a workstation but does require portability?

I guess I am being a little nosey but I can't help but wonder if this method really maximizes the effective allocation of resources or just indulges the boss. OK - it really is none of my business. I just can't help wondering.

I agree with Gravemind. I can't understand why, if CAD is the most intensive use, you spend so much on RAM, cooling, and HDs then seem to skimp on the graphics card. Also, don't CAD programs make good use of multiple cores? Would this be a good use for a quad core? What are the recommended systems requirements for his CAD and graphics software? Heavy duty financial analysis spreadsheets don't require much.

I pity the guy at the bottom with the old machine. Do the older machines get upgrades?


Message edited by rockyjohn on 01-11-2008 at 07:08:17 AM
More Information

Tbps wrote :

It's obviously a powerful PC, but it's not a workstation if it doesn't use an ECC capable motherboard and ECC memory.



That's new to me...

Have drums, will travel!
More Information

Thanks for all the helpful comments!

I will hit the environmental highlights first…the boss is paralyzed from the neck down (quadriplegic), some of his software needs are esoteric! He does like to brag (and sure he gets “indulged”), and I am expecting to drop a quad CPU in when the 45nm prices stabilize, unfortunately, we cannot wait for a new system because the 5-year-old is not able to keep up with the financial calculations. He manages a very large stock portfolio for a pension fund and currently the trend analysis takes over 20 minutes in Excel—we hope to get this below 10 minutes. The CAD program is not AutoCAD, but similar in hardware needs.

The pass-down desktops are indeed old and not upgraded much (they each have a big hard drive now and a single OS upgrade—98->ME). In reality, they are very well suited to the tasks they perform. Box 2 (10 years old) is a dual boot (XP Pro and BeOS), dual CPU machine which does custom programming, financial review, internet and some CAD. It too is getting a bit slow for the job! Box 3 is a BeBox, a proprietary, custom built motherboard and OS which is now little used except for text editing of software and internet connection. Box 4 is a Commodore Amiga 3000 with Video Toaster and is in heavy continuous use in a video production studio. None of these boxes are in the same location, we have no server.

The laptops are mainly used when parts of the team are on the road—mostly for communications via the internet.

The boss’s computer is shared by others, to some extent. We have three somewhat intermingled “jobs”. We manage a 23-person pension fund with individually tailored goals (the needs of an 18-year-old are far different from those of a 56-yerar-old), assets in $10,000,000 range. We design and build (handicap) accessible stuff (simple wooden ramps, 4x4 trucks, large and small boats, homes—anything imaginable, large or small). We also do specialized videos dealing with underwater environmental issues, some for public broadcast others for government studies.

Now to the good stuff (hardware)!

rockyjohn said, “I can't understand why, if CAD is the most intensive use, you spend so much on RAM, cooling, and HDs then seem to skimp on the graphics card.”

I posted in the graphics forum and learned that I did not need to buy a Crossfire card if I only wanted to run one card and two monitors. I would be more than willing to buy a better graphics card, but I could find no information out there to suggest a better card. I sure would like some help on that!

Then, “ What are the recommended systems requirements for his CAD and graphics software? Heavy duty financial analysis spreadsheets don't require much.”

The CAD recommends an nVidia card (I suppose I should consider the nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS), but Excel only needs a fast CPU and 2GB of RAM.

And, “Also, don't CAD programs make good use of multiple cores?”

Not really, and specifically, this one is not compiled to take advantage of multiple cores. The OS does not even do a great job of using more than 2 cores and MS Office is not compiled to use multi-cores. From the recent Tom’s tests, four cores did not significantly outperform two in any situation.

As for zenmaster’s offered system and Gravemind123’s suggestions, both tend toward—forget DDR3 and get a quad-core and skip the 10k SATA150 drive and get bigger 7.2k SATA300 drives. I have seen the test results reported on Tom’s which backup what both of you are saying. When I first priced out a system, I thought to go with DDR2 and 7.2k because of that data. I am still undecided! The tipping point is future compatibility on the DDR2 motherboards—I need to do some more research, I guess.

As for zenmaster’s suggestion to get 8GB RAM now, I may well, if I can stay under $5000 and will for sure if I go DDR2. Hmmm, can I put DDR2 memory in a DDR3 board?



---------------
-ed
More Information

No DD3 and DDR have different slots and different voltages.

I think the strategy of upgrading to one monster CPU with monster price every 5 years results in everyone having poor performing systems - including the boss towards the end of the cycle.

I would suggest upgrading every 2 years and buying a $2,000 system. Same cost on average yearly basis. And everyone would regularly end up with faster machines.

More Information

DDR2 does not work in a DDR3 board. Also, most boards will not handle more then 8GB, so future memory upgrades wouldn't be needed. If you look at test of DDR2 vs. DDR3, there isn't a great performance increase going up to DDR3.
As for CAD, you CANNOT get hardware acceleration with a GeForce card, my GeForce 7900GS cannot provide hardware acceleration, but the schools older Matrox cards can. You need a card geared to CAD and workstation jobs, like a Quadro if you are looking nVidia.

Look at this list: http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servl [...] ID=9240618
to see what cards are supported in which operating systems and find what fits best into your budget.

More Information

Need quad Core and 4 Gb or better of ram

CPU: Intel Xeon X3230 $568.50
Case: LIAN LI PC-V1200Bplus II $219.99
PSU: 750 watt PC Power and Cooling $169.99
Ram: Crucial 2GB 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 667 $199.96
HD: 8 x Fujitsu MAX3036RC 36.7GB 15,000 RPM 16MB Cache Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) Hard Drive $1,079.92
SAS Card: LSI LOGIC LSI00048-F PCI Express SATA / SAS MegaRAID 8408E 8 Port 256MB $630.00 Motherboard: ASUS P5K64 WS $219.99
Videocard: PNY VCQFX1500-PCIE-PB-V Quadro FX1500 $489.99
DVD Rom: PLEXTOR 18X DVD±R Super Multi DVD Burner $74.99

$3,653.33

Plus 1000 in screens

More Information

Need quad Core and 4 Gb or better of ram

CPU: Intel Xeon X3230 $568.50
Case: LIAN LI PC-V1200Bplus II $219.99
PSU: 750 watt PC Power and Cooling $169.99
Ram: Crucial 2GB 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 667 $199.96
HD: 8 x Fujitsu MAX3036RC 36.7GB 15,000 RPM 16MB Cache Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) Hard Drive $1,079.92
SAS Card: LSI LOGIC LSI00048-F PCI Express SATA / SAS MegaRAID 8408E 8 Port 256MB $630.00 Motherboard: ASUS P5K64 WS $219.99
Videocard: PNY VCQFX1500-PCIE-PB-V Quadro FX1500 $489.99
DVD Rom: PLEXTOR 18X DVD±R Super Multi DVD Burner $74.99

$3,653.33

Plus 1000 in screens

More Information

damn it sorry for double post


---------------
LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D |AMD Opteron 165 @ 2.7Ghz|Custom DD Watercooled

http://www.speedtest.net/result/211925289.png
More Information

You realize what is good today is not very good tommorrow?

BTW I am a Family (small) business owner. Slightly bigger than your business, but the situation is the same. The Family (aka owners, meaning me and the rest of the family) have computers that range from 3 months to 24 months old. Our older computers are passed down to least intensive departments. Even with passing down of equipment the oldest computer in the business is now 6 years old.

My newest computer will kick the butt of the 24 month old computers. Just running a simple task, such as opening a very large PDF file, can take less than half the time on the newest computer versus one of the 24 month old computers. Yep, really twice as fast, with similar cost (at the time) CPU's. Light years faster than that 6 year old computer.

I would seriously re-evaluate your purchases and plan for a quicker upgrade path. Build today with good quality parts, but not necessarily the absolute bleeding edge high end, with a clear upgrade path in 12-24 months when I would replace the MB and CPU with similar high end but not bleeding edge parts. The E6850 is a great CPU (today). You wait a few weeks the Penyrn's will be on the market. Either way would yield a really great CPU for the next 12-24 months. And the upgrade path would not require a huge rebuild so the computer could be offline just over a weekend.


In today's build, skip the DDR3 and the liquid cooling. OC'ing today will get you a faster unit ...today.... but in 12 or 24 months todays OC'd CPU will be just a mainstream CPU. Skipping the DDR3 should allow you to drop down to a less expensive MB.

I own a Raptor. Yep, it is fast. But the mainstream HD's are getting nearly as fast (or maybe as faster) and the mainstream HD's are waaay quieter. If you have multi- Raptors in a computer it is going to get noisy pretty fast.


---------------
I am old enough to be your grandfather.

It was born a Dell, it was made into a computer by StevieD
More Information

Just another thought - for that $5,000 today I could get a very decent system for owner for $2,000 (maybe not with huge monitors) and buy 3 pc's for others at $1,000 each that I am sure would make huge increases in productivity for them. For example, one site was selling a Dell Quad core with 3 mb of memory for $600 - throw in a $100 graphics card - maybe a 1950Pro - and wow would the productivity of the three users increase. Their job satisfaction, loyalty and performance might further improve as they were not treated as the bottom of the hand me down pile.

More Information