| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : A couple AMD CPU questions
|
|
More Information
|
Display/Hide instant messengers
I'm building a soft-core build for work and I know that for not extreme work, AMD is the better candidate. However, I have a couple questions
|
|
Related Product
|
|
Ironhide: Why are we fighting to save the humans?
More Information
|
First some general advice:
Message edited by Andrius on 05-07-2008 at 05:17:46 PM |
|
Sailing in my Dreams
More Information
|
Among dual core AMD chips, the 5000+ BE is the overall winner; low power consumption at stock speed, very good overclocking ability, great price. Also, an AMD machine will be a bit cheaper to put together than an Intel. However, when it comes to performance, an Intel C2D will win top honors.
--------------- Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil. Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it. |
|
More Information
|
Hide
Display/Hide instant messengers
Well mine isn't the typical office-I'll be doing design editing and photoshopping. So I don't need an awesome PC, but the best for the price. I was hoping to get an AMD, around maybe 2.4 GHz dual-core, and overclock maybe to 2.7 or 2.8. Possible for one of the $60 CPUs?
|
|
More Information
|
Hide
Display/Hide instant messengers
Anyone know what I'm talking about here? |
|
Master-de-bater
More Information
|
Not exactly, but a $60 E2140 will be much better than any of AMD's offering for around the same price. Besides, you can OC to 3GHz on them, and that will pretty much destroy the competition. --------------- "Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be *Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman |
|
More Information
|
Hide
Display/Hide instant messengers
Okay-I guess maybe that's the route I should go, then! I have an e2180 and easily get 2.8 Ghz on stock voltage.
|
MyDiscussions.Net Forum, Version 2007.1
© 2000-2006 No1Dev

maxtherabbit
tkline_maxrabbit@hotmail.com