Tom's Guide Forums
  Tom's Guide Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » 45nm INTEL QX9650 VS 65nm INTEL QX6850
 




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : 45nm INTEL QX9650 VS 65nm INTEL QX6850
 
More Information

Taiwan's website, chinese language. You could use google translator, but most of the contents are just pictures.
http://forum.coolaler.com/showthre [...] ost1891209


Message edited by JimyKing on 10-26-2007 at 07:45:30 AM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

look how they make the graphs to make it look like a huge difference

More Information

Translation of the chinese page (first link):

http://translate.google.com/transl [...] uage_tools


Message edited by evongugg on 10-25-2007 at 01:25:52 PM
U win some, the rest u smoke
More Information

Yeah, saw that too
Still noice tho.
Solid gains esp in mem b/w :D
Oc quite well too :D


---------------
Q6600 B3 2.7Ghz @ 1.085v load
4850 + 8800GTS 320
P5B-D
3Gb 800
More Information

graphs wont display

want to fill me in what the graphs say?

More Information

About 5-8% increase clock for clock agaisnt the qx6850. I didnt go too far into the pages but Im assuming it definitely runs cooler too b/c its 45nm and it has intels new high-k metal gate silicon technology to decrease heat loss and lower watts.

He has it running at 4.5ghz@1.62vcore on air cooling.


---------------
Q6600 @ 9x333, 500gb barracuda 7200.10
Gigabye DS3R P35, Evga 8800 gt
4x1gb Super Talent 800 3-3-4-8, OCZ 850w, vista 64
More Information

I like the graphs^^

More Information

Well, I love the 4.5 on Air Cooling part :>
Very high Voltage, but I bet 4.0-4.2 would run quite cool then.

What became of subtlety?
More Information

cory1234 wrote :

He has it running at 4.5ghz@1.62vcore on air cooling.




I think I just wet myself.

More Information

Looks like I've got something specific to look forward to upgrading to when this is released. Assuming the Q9450 OCs anywhere near as well I'd probably go for something like that.

-mcg


---------------
Athlon X2 3800+ (230x10) @1.40v w/Tuniq Tower | Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe
2x1GB Corsair XMS PC3200 2.5-3-3-8 1T @409MHz | 2x6600GT SLI
WD 640GB AAKS, Seagate 7200.8 250GB, Hitachi 80GB
Antec EA-500D | Samsung 206BW | Vista Ultimate x64
More Information

He ultra overclocked QX9650 to 5.066GHz@1.64v with liquid nitrogen.


Message edited by JimyKing on 10-26-2007 at 04:18:25 AM
Master-de-bater
More Information

Wow the QX9650 can be clocked that high? Damn, and I just got a Q6600 and 3.6 is hard enough already....


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
More Information

http://www.coolaler.com.tw/coolalercbb/QX6850/AIR4G_5.JPG

More Information

Cool,

4 GHz and still first of the batch model. I'm already dreaming of what they'll do by next march when I'll be ready to upgrade my E6600.

One thing left to do right now. That's waiting for Phenom in sufficient number and high enough frequency to see if AMD will get back to where it was in the K6 days. That would be low-end market. I surely hope not!


---------------
My new PC:
E6600 OC to 3.0+GHZ
6GB OCZ DDR2@833 (4-4-4-15)
Asus P5B Deluxe
More Information

My QX9650 Overclock

http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l71/kmtyb/SP32-20071025-160524.gif

The sweet spot for everyday use looks like 4.2GHz @ 1.44v.

From my observation, QX9650 runs cooler (15-20%) and overclocks better (at least 10%) than QX6850.


Message edited by young on 10-26-2007 at 07:29:08 PM
More Information
n°1755907
10-27-2007 at 07:35:59 AM