Tom's Guide Forums »
Graphic & Displays
»
Graphics Cards »
Graphics Cards ATI FINALLY BEATING NVIDIA ??
|
Previous
|
|
| Author |
Thread : Graphics Cards ATI FINALLY BEATING NVIDIA ??
|
|
More Information
|
|
|
Related Pr oduct
|
Register or
log in to remove.
|
|
More Information
|
Maybe because they're not beating the 8800 GTX so it's not really news... |
|
More Information
|
Don't believe the hype !!
Message quoted 4 times
Message edited by bfg72 on 10-12-2007 at 06:18:42 PM |
|
Warp Field Stabilized.
More Information
|
What? The 2950 has been released and there are benchmarks? Someone show me the way! |
|
More Information
|
No it hasnt been released, theres just alot of speculultion going around.
--------------- E4300@2.925ghz AW9D-MAX EVGA 8800GTS 640mb 2GB OCZ |
|
More Information
|
BFG..... I know it's hard but try not to be a fanboy. ATI not in the game, are you kidding me? And their drivers aren't much better than what? |
|
More Information
|
the HD2950s will beat the 8800gtx by alot i am getting 1 ill never buy any nvidia crap i removed all nvidia stuff from my pc |
|
More Information
|
|
|
OddJob's side-kick!!
More Information
|
Don't spout utter crap. We now know how the architecture performs, the specs of this card and its rough price. It WILL be a very good card for the price and if it isn't for 8800gt then it would cause serious blows to nvidia. And it IS confirmed for the RV670... Same core specs as r600
Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Hatman on 10-12-2007 at 10:40:49 PM --------------- Na na na na na na na na HATMAN! |
|
More Information
|
Message edited by bfg72 on 10-12-2007 at 10:55:50 PM |
|
OddJob's side-kick!!
More Information
|
If you want I can mention how you may be a disturbed individual arguing with a young person on an online forum, but I wont go into taht because im better then you obviously.
--------------- Na na na na na na na na HATMAN! |
|
More Information
|
do us all a favor and get one now..., good riddance
--------------- Evga 780i SLI : Q6600 @ 3.5Ghz :8800GTX x 2 SLI 649/2052 :4GB XMS2 Dominator 4-4-4-12 900 :XFi Fatal1ty :150GB WD Raptor :500GB Seagate 16MB x2 :Eheim + Danger Den :Lian Li PC V1000 (black) :BFG 1Kw PS :37" Westinghouse 1080p 8ms :XP32bit :Vista64bit |
|
OddJob's side-kick!!
More Information
|
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inqu [...] nce-driver
--------------- Na na na na na na na na HATMAN! |
|
More Information
|
You seemed confused. 2950 isn't a high-end video card, it's more of the replacement for the x1950 pro.
|
|
You're dumb because smiley face
More Information
|
@bfg72
--------------- The ability to speak does not make you intelligent. e6320 @ 3.15GHz (450x7, 1.400v) ** GA-965P-DS3 1.3 (F11 BIOS) 2x1GB G.Skill 900MHz 4-4-3-5-2T 2.2v ** XFX 8800GTS 632Mhz/962MHz(1924MHz DDR) 320GB WD3200AAKS ** Lite-On |
|
OddJob's side-kick!!
More Information
|
It supposed to be but I cant see anyway its going to under-perform the 2900xt, its got half the memory bus rate but it has 70mhz+ core clock. What its supposed to do and what it will do will be totally different. Higher resolutions id say the 512bit will help it lots, but the card generally does bad at high resolutions anyway. If the AA problems are solved in the new model aswell which they should be, then we have a new winner.
Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by Hatman on 10-12-2007 at 11:46:29 PM --------------- Na na na na na na na na HATMAN! |
|
More Information
|
|
|
More Information
|
DX10 is what matters in this part of the market, and the 2900XT is extremely inferior to the 8800GTX in DX10. Therefore it is unlikely that the 2950 will beat it - but we will see and until then, who knows?
|
|
More Information
|
|

