Tom's Guide Forums
  Tom's Guide Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Graphics Cards ATI FINALLY BEATING NVIDIA ??
 

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
 Page :   1  2  3  4
Previous 
Author
 Thread : Graphics Cards ATI FINALLY BEATING NVIDIA ??
 
More Information


My .... My ... Why don't I see any posts about the new ATI 2950 ?? Fully Directx 10.1 capable .... low priced ... blowing nvidia 8800's away .... need I go on ? Release date november ! Advanced SLI capable ! My bank card is now burning a hole in my wallet ----- :bounce: I knew if we waited a bit the video wars would pay off . Come on TH ..... put some specs and reviews on their possibilities here !

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Maybe because they're not beating the 8800 GTX so it's not really news...

More Information

Don't believe the hype !!

ATI is not even in the game anymore, and their drivers aren't much better.

IF, there is any truth behind this one very small victory for ATi, then it will be short lived.

Message quoted 4 times
Message edited by bfg72 on 10-12-2007 at 06:18:42 PM
Warp Field Stabilized.
More Information

What? The 2950 has been released and there are benchmarks? Someone show me the way!

More Information

No it hasnt been released, theres just alot of speculultion going around.

Both the 8800GTs and 2950s are looking good if the rumours are to belived, with low power consumption (or better overclockability in my book), competitive pricing and perfromce in between the 8800GTS and GTX. Perfect!

But they are rumours...

Hopefully they will be around £120 so I can afford one.


---------------
E4300@2.925ghz
AW9D-MAX
EVGA 8800GTS 640mb
2GB OCZ
More Information

BFG..... I know it's hard but try not to be a fanboy. ATI not in the game, are you kidding me? And their drivers aren't much better than what?

More Information

the HD2950s will beat the 8800gtx by alot i am getting 1 ill never buy any nvidia crap i removed all nvidia stuff from my pc

More Information

bfg72 wrote :

Don't believe the hype !!


I agree.

Just look at the hype with the 2900xt before it cam out!

Don't get me wrong; I like the 2900xt, especially placed against 8800gts; but it was initially hyped to be the 8800gtx killer!

I really hope the 2950xt is awesome (I admit I am a ATi fanboy), but till we see some benchmarks, I would not judge to much.

OddJob's side-kick!!
More Information

bfg72 wrote :

Don't believe the hype !!

 

ATI is not even in the game anymore, and their drivers aren't much better.

 

IF, there is any truth behind this one very small victory for ATi, then it will be short lived.

 

Don't spout utter crap. We now know how the architecture performs, the specs of this card and its rough price. It WILL be a very good card for the price and if it isn't for 8800gt then it would cause serious blows to nvidia.

 

And it IS confirmed for the RV670...

 

Same core specs as r600
55nm
256bit interface
512mb gddr4 memory
clocks I cant remember off top of my head but i think its 825 for core and 1250 for memory.

 


But please feel free to give me a few points behind your absolute knowledge.

 


Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Hatman on 10-12-2007 at 10:40:49 PM

---------------
Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
More Information

Hatman wrote :

Don't spout utter crap. We now know how the architecture performs, the specs of this card and its rough price. It WILL be a very good card for the price and if it isn't for 8800gt then it would cause serious blows to nvidia.

But please feel free to give me a few points behind your absolute knowledge.



If only if it wasn't for a better nVidia card, or a better company beating us, or ATi had better drivers, or a law was passed saying we all had to run ATi's, it would be a much better card... honestly !!

Come on give it up, and not that I should knock your over-whelming fountain of knowledge, after only being out of school longer than it took me to drink my last cup of coffee.

Hey, do you even remember Pac-Man ??


Message edited by bfg72 on 10-12-2007 at 10:55:50 PM
OddJob's side-kick!!
More Information

If you want I can mention how you may be a disturbed individual arguing with a young person on an online forum, but I wont go into taht because im better then you obviously.

But if you go into things like age or insults again just because you cant think of anything intelligent to say ill probably report you.

Wana post? Then dont post rubbish.

ATI card = Good

And im getting an 8800gt, just for record.


---------------
Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
More Information

daye159 wrote :

the HD2950s will beat the 8800gtx by alot i am getting 1 ill never buy any nvidia crap i removed all nvidia stuff from my pc

do us all a favor and get one now..., good riddance


---------------
Evga 780i SLI : Q6600 @ 3.5Ghz :8800GTX x 2 SLI 649/2052 :4GB XMS2 Dominator 4-4-4-12 900 :XFi Fatal1ty :150GB WD Raptor :500GB Seagate 16MB x2 :Eheim + Danger Den :Lian Li PC V1000 (black) :BFG 1Kw PS :37" Westinghouse 1080p 8ms :XP32bit :Vista64bit
OddJob's side-kick!!
More Information

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inqu [...] nce-driver

If that indeed is true, ATI just stepped up their game a lot on the one thing nvidia suck at, drivers.

Those improvments are immense.


---------------
Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
More Information

You seemed confused. 2950 isn't a high-end video card, it's more of the replacement for the x1950 pro.
http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/HD [...] ml#Scene_1

You're dumb because smiley face
More Information

@bfg72

Lighten up or go away. We don't like your kind here. This is a place for discussion, not insults and stupidity.


---------------
The ability to speak does not make you intelligent.
e6320 @ 3.15GHz (450x7, 1.400v) ** GA-965P-DS3 1.3 (F11 BIOS)
2x1GB G.Skill 900MHz 4-4-3-5-2T 2.2v ** XFX 8800GTS 632Mhz/962MHz(1924MHz DDR)
320GB WD3200AAKS ** Lite-On
OddJob's side-kick!!
More Information

computertech82 wrote :

You seemed confused. 2950 isn't a high-end video card, it's more of the replacement for the x1950 pro.
http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/HD [...] ml#Scene_1

 

It supposed to be but I cant see anyway its going to under-perform the 2900xt, its got half the memory bus rate but it has 70mhz+ core clock.

 

What its supposed to do and what it will do will be totally different. Higher resolutions id say the 512bit will help it lots, but the card generally does bad at high resolutions anyway. If the AA problems are solved in the new model aswell which they should be, then we have a new winner.

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by Hatman on 10-12-2007 at 11:46:29 PM

---------------
Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
More Information

Hatman wrote :

It supposed to be but I cant see anyway its going to under-perform the 2900xt, its got half the memory bus rate but it has 70mhz+ core clock.

What its supposed to do and what it will do will be totally different. Higher resolutions id say the 512bit will help it lots, but the card generally does bad at high resolutions anyway. If the AA problems are solved in the new model aswell which they should be, then we have a new winner.



It is NOT the R670 but a RENAMED R600 (aka RV670). So you really can't compare the slower outdated gpu with the newer R670 gpu.
http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/ [...] PD&seq=211

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by computerte ch82 on 10-13-2007 at 12:05:16 AM
More Information

DX10 is what matters in this part of the market, and the 2900XT is extremely inferior to the 8800GTX in DX10. Therefore it is unlikely that the 2950 will beat it - but we will see and until then, who knows?

This is just a pointless flame war.

More Information
n°1751847
10-13-2007 at 12:19:55 AM